>Guy Nvidia
>Get cucked every time a new arch is released
>buy AMD
>Get cucked by nvidia
What can we do?
I'm buying AMD because if I'm going to get cucked, I might as well support the company not cuckolding my pc.
>Project Cars
You could grow the fuck up you pathetic manchild.
>buy AMD
>see your GPU become increasingly powerful due to DX12 implementation + non botched design, see your 290x that was made to compete against a 780 go neck and neck with a 980
I wonder how long it'll take for the 290x to trade blows with the 1080 desu
>>54880928
A single year, from this day in 2017.
>>54880779
>it only happened once
>>54881050
literally patched the next day
>>54881068
Lol nope.
>>54880763
What you can do is be rich and give zero fucks
>value
>>54880763
>the next generation of cards performs (sometimes significantly) better than the last
>this is somehow bad
>>54881173
It is when an inferior card is in the lead.
960 vs 780?
780 ti vs 970?
>>54881336
Guys the 480 beats the 390, AMD is gimping cards now!
>>>/out/
>>54881336
Clearly it's not inferior.
>>54881467
How is that bad? They advertised it as such.
>2 times performance per watt
Just like how 1080 beating titan x is fine because it's a more powerful card and costs more, plus it was advertised as having that performance.
A 960 should never beat a 780, and a 970 shouldn't beat a 780 ti. They're not "powerful" enough. It's clearly with software.
>>54881152
You don't become rich by ignoring the value of your own money, and if you by any chance are rich while ignoring the value of money, you won't be rich for very long.
>>54880763
>>Guy Nvidia
Who?
>>54881083
Lol yup.
>>54881575
>GTX 1070 performance
>>54881575
Where's keppler?
Performing so badly they excluded it completely? Niiice.
>spending 700 dollaridoos on a garden blower
It just werks
>>54881600
No. There was not enough space so i deleted it. Here you go.
>>54881644
>970 above 780 ti even after "patch"
>960 still above 780 even after "patch"
And that proves me wrong how?
>>54881665
I just meant that i removed them. Thats it. Im not arguing with you m8.
>>54881575
If RX 480 will have 980 performance 1070 is fucked.
>>54881693
Fair enough. Sorry if I came off as aggressive, I thought you were arguing.
>>54881773
My wording also could be better :)
>>54881530
>powere eg tflops = card potential
no. the 970 beats the 780 ti with lower floating point and computational performance just like the 980 ti beats the fury x or the 980 beats the 390x with lower floating point and computational performance. cards that are much less "powerful" are winning all the time. you're just deluded.
>>54882422
It's funny how you neglect to mention shit like a gtx 650 barely outperforming a gtx 260 because it doesn't fit your argument.
never buying nvidia again after getting fucked by kepler's shitty longevity
>>54880763
>not getting cucked
>>>/v/
/g/ is for high IQ posters
>>54882452
First of all you're the one who mentioned the 970 and 780 ti so I expanded upon the point so stop moving the goal posts
Second of all I currently own both amd and nvidia and in no way has anything I've said been a fanboy related comment so I don't know why you've suddenly got over defensive when I'm just stating a factual point.
You seem a bit daft and I think you should go back to r/amd.
>>54880763
>What can we do?
Stop using the word cuck
>>54880763
Keep telling yourself that cuck
lol these benchmarks confirm why i should buy nvidia this gen
im buying a 1070 and this post will trigger some neckbeard amdrone
>>54880928
>>54880946
This is what AMD users actually believe.
>>54882422
Fuck off
>>54882626
>resorted to using synthetics to defend a losing argument
Welp, you people can not be helped. Too thick in the head.
>>54882654
Synthetics don't get gimped.
>>54882675
You do realise that each gpu company has to optimize for each update of 3dmark, right? So yes in actual fact they do get gimped if the gpu company doesn't bother optimize for their older cards as well as their newer cards. Hence why the amd 5000 series is considerably worse on 3d mark today than it was 3 years ago.
>>54882724
Source?
>>54882675
>Synthetics don't get gimped.
kekkk
what are you like 12? synthetics get gimped all the fucking time. theyre literally the worst proof anyone can show when talking about real world performance.
>>54882724
Do your own research. I don't spoon feed people who get their sources from adored tv or WCCFtech.
>>54882790
At least one person knows his shit
>>54882790
>no source
K.
>>54882828
Meant for >>54882732
>>54880763
>>54882617
>>>>>>>>>>>>>PROJECT CARS
>>54882675
>synthetics don't get gimped
http://techreport.com/review/17732/intel-graphics-drivers-employ-questionable-3dmark-vantage-optimizations/2
there's a massive history of synthetics being gimped and manipulated by all companies. this is just one example.
>>54882829
>1280x1024
Why nigga?
>>54881622
holy shit. This form is funny as fuck.
>>54883015
>>54880763
>buy a card
>if you need to upgrade, do it
>if not stop bitching
>>54881773
>>54881832
Get a room already.
>>54881665
Amd patched their cards, nvidia got no driver's for anything older than a year.
>>54883143
I remember when they didn't gimp cards.
Went from a gtx 260 to a 670, my next card will definitely be red team though. 670 was great but now it's not even competition for the 7950.
rip Kepler ;_;7
>>54883370
W10 drivers are so fucking bad.
