>RIP NVIDIA 1993-2016
>RX 480 199$
>Nvidia moneyfire
>150W
>Much slower than GTX 1070
>Consumes just as much power
RIP AYYMD HOUSEFIRES
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility/
>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.
>THEY FELL FOR THE POOLARIS MEME
>>54855347
>Consumes just as much power
costs 100 shekels less
>>54855365
Give it up, Kyle. Nobody gives a shit that the bad AMD man touched your special place.
>>54855347
>>54855365
>>54855428
B-but consumes 150w
Better than 980 and 199$
>490/Fury2 like 3x1080
Fanboys crying.
>>54855499
You look like a fanboi too, desubh fampai.
So I need new graphics card for 1080p 60FPS gameplay, nothing more than that, why would I pay 700$ for Nvidia when AMD can run all games at 1080 60 without any issues for a third of a price?
>>54855347
It's also like half the price
>>54855499
I dont care, I'm gonna buy the 8GB version no matter what. Just sucks I have to wait so long, and if I need more performance, I'll just buy another one
>>54855347
>480 is 150$+ cheaper
okay buddy
>>54855532
Nvidia cards are $379 and $599, stop with your $700 lies, AMDPOORFAG
>>54855539
the only ting preventing me from buying it would be worse performance than a 970..
>>54855548
maybe in america m8, here nvidia cards are a lot more expensive than amd cards
>>54855557
yep, same in my country too.. the founders edition is 800 euros
>>54855571
>20-25% VAT
>Blame companies for high prices
Good for you, YUROPOOR
>>54855571
I mean here TitanX costs about 1350$, 1080 will be atleast 1000$
>>54855571
>>54855325
this is their low profile card? That things the size of a bus.
>>54855347
>>54855548
>>54855579
relax autismo junior
>>54855586
I coughed up a lung.
>>54855607
yep, in croatia it will be even more than that. Its cheaper for me to buy from germany and avoid the 25% vat...
but I cant just bring myself to pay the 19% german vat either, since it would go to refugee financing
>>54855631
>tfw in sweden
I'm in an even worse seat.
>480 costs 200€ in europe
>1080 costs 800€
>2 480 beat the 1080 for half the price
Nvidia is done
>>54855365
>http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/27/from_ati_to_amd_back_journey_in_futility/
>>In the simplest terms AMD has created a product that runs hotter and slower than its competition's new architecture by a potentially significant margin.
>>THEY FELL FOR THE POOLARIS MEME
>Have obvious bias towards shill companies
>Quits getting invited to launch events
>Rants on site about how bad AMD is
>Doesn't know basic facts, such as TDP vs power consumption
HardOCP is basically tumblr. Fucking feminist special snowflake syndrome.
Founders 1080 is going for $800 in America as we speak. Even worse than we imagined
>>54855325
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
SHIT MAN
I WANTED TO BUY A GTX 1070 BUT THIS
SHIT I HATE AMD BUT IT'S ONLY 200 BUCKS
>tfw you fell for the fury x meme
oh well, not like I need to upgrade
>>54855687
>I hate amd
You should go someplace else, Teddy. The Razer store perhaps.
>>54855656
I'll just buy the 480 in croatia. It will probably cost me 350 euros for the 8gb, but whatever, at least I dont finance cuck countries.
>>54855700
There is nothing wrong with Razer you meme shouting nigger
Just because you can't afford it faggot get a job
>still no good ShadowPlay counterpart
smiling_penn_jillette.jpg
RX 480 has a clock somewhere slightly north of 1200mhz, this is the only reason why its a 150w card, other wise it'd be in its sweet spot sitting at 100w~ 14nm LPP operates with low target voltages, and thought it does improve fmax, you're still having higher dynamic power come with that. GCN CU are just way too big and beefy to hit high clocks. Like the Polaris 11 demo showed, the arch excels in perf/watt around 850mhz.
AMD made the choice to clock a small die a bit higher at the cost of power consumption so they could mass produce a cheap mainstream card. Raw cost per die, if GloFo is to be believed, is cheaper than 28nm HPP. Even AMD themselves has stated cost per transistor is now lower.
Its a pretty good marketing decision.
Why do you niggers care so much about video cards holy shit
I'm honestly wondering about the 32 CU GPU, which will probably perform on par with a 970/390, which is all the performance I want really. Otherwise I want the card to be cheap, run quiet with low power consumption.
>>54855723
keke
nvidia btfo once again
>>54855744
Autism is a very broad spectrum
Have they said anyting concerning the temps of the cards idle & on load ? What can we expect ?
The real loser here is /g/
>just buy a 480
>>54855745
>weedman attacks again
>>54855730
>1200mhz
For max turbo.
36CU at 1150mhz nominal gets you 5.2TFLOPS. 5.299 more specifically.
1150mhz is a 35% increase in frequency over 850mhz, power consumption of the Polaris 10 cards is going to drop through the floor when clocks are lowered. Thats good news for a prospective 64CU Vega card. They could have a card that out performs the GTX 1080 at 175-200w~
It's amazing how poor people are on this board.
>Slower than the 1080
>Slower than the 1070
>Slower than the unreleased 1060
If this was a airline
1080 = Private jet
1070 = First class
1060 = Economy class
Rx 480 = Strapping yourself to the wing and holding on for dear life.
>>54855325
Will vulcan ever actually make multi gpus more effective? Will it reach the point that AMD can actually compete with this because its cheaper to buy and use multiple of their gpus?
Also will I know be able to make my hobby neural network out of cheap amd gpus?
>>54855871
Thank you for kindly do the needful sir pajeet!
>>54855871
But strapping yourself on is cheaper!
>>54855871
The 1080 and 1070 are Nvidia's high end.
The RX 480 is AMD's mid range, and works out to be something like 10% away from Nvidia's 1070.
This nonsensical shitposting doesn't show you in a good light, anon.
>>54855891
No because cudnn will NEVER EVER work on AMD hardware.
>>54855536
thats the 4gb one. they forgot to mention the 8gb prices
>>54855891
Vulkan and DX12 should have better multi-GPU support than DX11 but until AMD and Nvidia solve the PCIe issue, SLI / Crossfire will never have perfect scaling, as the cards interact with a bus that is much slower than the video RAM of each individual card.
>>54855586
Lucky you.
>>54855347
>costs $180 less, practically half the price
>about 90% of the performance
Ayyyy
>>54855924
its not like you need more than 3.5gb anyway
>>54855671
we just have 1 benchmark so far
>>54855871
Desperate clutching at straws nvidiot shill
>>54855941
I dont have that problem, my 1080 has lots of gb
>>54855926
Well that is good news I think. The server room right now is screaming for faster interfaces. Hopefully PCI will be getting another upgrade soon.
Dont like that cooler, anyways though, what is the performamce really gonna be comparable too?
where does the fury x place in all of this
is it getting btfo?
>>54855941
I do need to load muh mods. Also I play 4k 60 fps.
>>54855745
>>54855930
Get on my level.
>>54855951
We need something with at least 200GB/s of bandwidth so each GPU can read and write to the other GPUs dedicated memory without a significant performance penalty.
just curious,
why would you buy a"founders edition" nvidia card anyway?
are they supposed to be more reliable? (would that even be a thing since gaymers buy a new card every year anyway)
>>54855977
It's just for cucks.
>>54855973
Translate that to white people's money please
>>54855973
Sah affordable. Anybody who doesn't fall for the meme is a poorfag
>>54855499
Whoa. You mean...it's better than last Gen????
>>54855924
they did, 250 USD
>>54855982
I forgot its half term and kiddies are off.
I bought my 1080 because.......I wanted one.
>>54855961
Fury x beats the 980ti in all games that have been released in 2016
>>54855996
link? I didnt think itd been verified. Only the 4gb one was, well thats from an article i read
>>54855365
Why the fuck is a BMX rider talking about graphics cards?
>>54855961
Fury X gets replaced by the Vega line. Non X Fury and Fury Nano might be very close to the RX 480.
>1080 founders muuuh 700€
>Wait custom for 599$
>custom 900€
>Nvidia moneyfire
>>54855910
>1080 and 1070 are high end
What is 1080ti?
I hope amd thrives but holy shit this site is so biased to the point of making me only want nvidia.
>>54855992
>>54855993
$1.306 buying with installment
$1.111 buying in cash
>>54855871
It's weird really. Having high end hardware doesn't excite me in any way. I'm more into having something that has barely enough performance and tweaking it relentlessly.
Oh man what a nice little rig am I buying this summer.
Zen + one X2 card of those and I am set for few years
>>54855871
Seriously.
>970 pref
>when 970 has been selling for sub $220 since last year
>290x were selling for $240 new before 390x release in fucking 2015
>both 970 and 290x gets 980 pref once overclocked
What's there to be excited about? It doesn't offer any better pref/dollar than cards released 3 years ago and the pref/watt isn't any impressive compared to Pascal.
>>54856053
The ti cards are a halo product. Lrn2 market positioning before you make a post.
>>54855548
Except there is no msrp versions you nigger.
Only the reference card "founders edition" which is 699$
oh man i love shitposting before real benchmarks
>>54856102
Hi pajeet
>>54856077
970 for $220 and 290X/390 for $240? You gonna link those? Because they're close to $300 or higher pretty much everywhere, even with discounts. You're looking at 2nd hand prices, when this $199 price tag is for a brand new card.
>>54855347
>>54855365
You nvidia gay cocksucking drones have serious comprehension problems. 150W refers to the maximum amount of power that the card could draw from its connectors. If you think that the 150W refers to real power draw we could also logically assume that the gtx 1070 is a 225W housefire because is powered by an 8 pin connector
>>54856077
it's closer to 980 performance if the anandtech 'leak' is to be believed
http://wccftech.com/amd-polaris-10-gpu-specs-leaked/
>>54855671
>lol crossfirex
Dual GPU solution will be awesome for VR and DX12 BUT for gamers trying to play the newest demanding titles like Fallout 4 (AMD SUCKS FOR THIS GAME) the microstutter will make it unusable for stuff that still runs older DX. I had this issue when I used dual 6950 cards. For some games it was great and for others it was worthless from all the microstutter. Going forward it will be great that DX12 will solve the issue of shit multi gpu performance.
>>54856120
Dumbasses always do this. Cue some spastic ranting about his $100 3 year old ebay Xeon.
NVIDIA WON
RIP BANKRUPT AYYMD
>>54856090
last i checked, the Strix 1080 comes out in 3 days. Thats a month before we'll see any amd card.
>nigger
https://www.asus.com/Graphics-Cards/ROG-STRIX-GTX1080-O8G-GAMING/
>>54855745
>Out of stock
>>54856120
It's unbelievable people still buy stuff at retail prices when deal sites are so readily accessible.
>>54855871
>Just because something is faster means that it's ok to spend an infinite amount of extra money in it
Fucking lmao
>>54856224
>open box
lmao, might as well throw your money away
>>54855778
sad but true
>>54856224
>Console killer series
>>54855726
>what is amd vce
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Coding_Engine
>>54856224
>2nd hand shit
Yea, because that always works 100% of the time, right?
When I'm putting hundreds of dollars towards a product, I'd rather have it brand new out of the box and knowing that I have warranty guaranteed in case shit goes south. Especially with electronics.
>>54855744
Fairly interesting consumer tech which gives you a lot of benefits in practice, depending on what you use your computer for. These products evolve really quickly, too. GPUs couldn't be less interesting to talk about on /g/ since these threads are nothing but shitposting and baiting. Millenias taking sides by brand and /pol/ overflow.
>>54856224
>buying used shit
>>54856207
and it will still cost 300%+ of a 480
>Nvidia moneyfires
>for a card that throttles itself after 5 minutes
>>54856263
>ignoring the 4 lower price sub $220 new cards
>going for the 2 open box cards
Why make it so obvious anon?
>>54856224
>above 200
>massively inferior to 480
>3.5gb
>>54855942
even if those dual 480s can get anywhere close to 1080s performance and still cost almost half the price then there is literally no reason to buy a 1080
>>54856284
None of them are sub-220, nice try pajeet. Maybe one day you'll learn to not poo yourself in public.
>>54856284
>AMD's new card is still significantly cheaper than 2nd hand cards, while boasting better performance, a smaller process and lower TDP than both options
>lol, but they're so cheap!! look at it, 2nd hand and so cheap, people buying new stuff so dumb xD
kys
>>54856309
>muh few dollar difference
>>54856367
>i care about saving money so much that I'll be a poor nigger and buy second hand shit without a warranty
>what? you wanna save $20 on a RX 480? Lol are you poor?
how fucking dumb are you?
>>54856159
Moron
>>54855871
Get in the cargo bay, poorfags.
>>54855871
1080 = strapping yourself right next to the jet engine
>>54856019
it was actually $229
>>54855365
How do I filter this faggot?
>>54855325
AMD has been killing it this past year
290/390
Freesync
Crimson Drivers
Nvidia is actually doing worse in comparison
>>54855539
I gonna buy 2 of these 8gb babies if they are as good as I expect them to be (if it matches or is better than 390x)
>>54855671
AMD is big in Yurop
AMD is best in Yurop
>>54855871
>it's slower see my marketing graphs prove it
>>54856379
>can't deal with the fact people bought amd/Nvidia cards a whole year ago that offered the same pref/dollar
waitfags btfo
>>54855745
Are you complaining about a $30 difference?
>>54855871
the wing experiences the least turbulence
>>54856049
$900 is a great deal for such amazing performance goy you should be glad for the privilege of buying this card at such a price
>>54856279
does a ferarri not cost 10x more than an economy car?
>>54856102
1 shitpost, 1 rupee
>>54855871
Are you literally fucking retarded? Here's your (you), now fuck off
>>54855726
>ShadowPlay
>good
I can see you're talking out your ass
>>54856449
>no vulkan
>worse performance
>higher power consumption
>3.5 GB
>second-hand if you want a comparable price, otherwise it's $100 extra
Not even remotely the same perf/$.
Nvidia not very good at being a company.
>>54856049
many EU countries have such prices , hell even higher.
It's called bureaucracy
>>54856449
I'm not a waitfag, I absolutely zero interest in the RX 480 or PC gaming in general. I simply recognize that the 480 is a good value for people who don't want to gamble on a used card.
>Nvidia profitable
>AYYMD not profitable at all
>Nvidia not good at being a company
AYYMDPOORFAGS logic
>>54855871
Hi Poojeet
90% of games still use 1080p 1440p is a meme 480 at $200 its more sense then buying a 1080 or 1070
wake me up when a single card can do 4k 60fps none of this sli/CF shit
>>54856508
Are you pretending? The yellow ones are new cards. The blues ones are used.
>>54855726
Shadowplay can't even capture 144 fps
>>54856509
Poojeet on pooicide watch
>>54856382
yeah but it doesnt show my card on there.
>>54856509
You're retarded, cuck
>>54855723
Hahahhahhagaagag
Did you ype that worthless comment on your shitty 200 dollar razor chroma fuckboi keytoyboard.
>>54856524
I didn't even read all of the links on your stupid reddit image, I saw open box and alt f4'd because I knew then that you were retarded and wasting my time
Gonna wait for more benchmarks but it looks like I'm selling my Fury and buying two of these. Unless the Fury gets a price cut below $400
>>54856410
In what sense? please explain. Then I will let you know whether what you think about them is true.
>>54856516
>90% of games still use 1080p
>wake me up when a single card can do 4k 60fps none of this sli/CF shit
>I don't know how to change my graphics settings
>>54855325
you hear that?
it's AMD regaining market share
and it's Nvidia's $1000+ cards collecting dust on reseller's shelves
>NVidia defense force can only complain about the power usage
>>54856474
yeah I remember when I saw a ferrari throttle itself down to 60mph after going fast for 5 minutes
>>54855723
Please be bait and dont really be that person that admits to buying razer products. Bet you cant wait for the balls to drop.
>>54856579
It's like a penny a day, dude.
Didn't your dad teach you that a penny saved is a penny earned?
I bet you ignore leaky faucets in your house, too.
AYYMD is not gaining any marketshare at all
GP106 will cream this HOUSEFIRE garbage at much lower power consumption
>AYYMDPOORFAGS think Nvidia isn't releasing anything
>>54856593
if I was fully retarded and had lots of money to waste I'd almost consider the Razer blade because it's got a really nice form factor for a gayman laptop
I wouldn't do that though because lol gaming laptops and lol @ spending >$2000 on them
call me when it has linux drivers that let it run anything else than 2D indieshit
>>54856558
And then you continued to participate in the discussion for another 35 minutes?
My fucking sides
>>54856579
But they shouldn't complain even about that because polaris is more power efficient. Polaris has a 6 pin connector so it can draw a maximum of 150w while the gtx 1070 has a 8 pin one so it can draw 225w.
>>54856627
Poolaris is not more power efficient and it has no overclocking headroom with 1 6pin
>>54856574
will it? a lot of people happy with 960, and going for analog
only real hope is that 1060 will come out in october/september
>>54856636
1080 can't overclock for shit even with 8+6pin,
didn't you see reviews?
AMDrones have a bit of room to breath after colossal anal rape 1080 release. 1070 and 1060 Ti incoming.
Shit tier second hand GPU down the block for 199$ releases on fucking 29th june shilled with premade game ashes stats and unconfirmed benchmarks, settings, resolution, details, temperature, ocability, no dvi and AMDfags praise it as the next Titan.
top vegeta kek
>>54856615
>>54856589
Still, the 1080 is better than any amd card if you have the money. AMD showed what they can do with 2 of their gpus in sli. i'd like to see them do it again with 2 1080s
>>54856656
GP104 overclocks just with to 2.0GHz/2.1GHz with 1 8 pin
>>54856636
>overclock 1080 50mhz
>94 C after 2 minutes
>>54856636
>polaris is not power efficient
Explain that please
>no overclocking headroom
The gtx960 has a single 6 pin connector and overclocks pretty well, the same can't be said for 1070/1080 which hit very easily their power limit
>Decide it is best to wait to find out how much the 8gb card costs thinking it will be $250.
>It's $230.
AMD is on a roll.
>>54856659
June 29 is the fucking paper launch. It won't be available until a several month after.
AMD is non-memingly finished. They have nothing. NOTHING.
>>54856711
>>54856659
Trolling is a bannable offense
>>54856725
Recommending amd should be a bannable offense.
>>54856224
>buying second-hand consumer electronics
senpai....
>>54855347
>Consumes just as much power
Except it doesn't, you Nvidiot.
The 150W are the max possible power consumption of the 480. The 1070 only starts at 150W and will probably be closer to 200W under load. Just like all the other recent Nvidia cards, Nvidia is lying about their TDP and power consumption.
>>54856699
GTX 960 is 120W
Polaris is 150W, it's at its power limit already
>>54856693
if you value getting jewed by spending 300% more for 20-30% better performance
>>54856572
i meant gamers still use smart ass
Can't make this shit up
they won't let you see the ingame settings
I've seen /g/ devolve into shit flinging fests before but this is just ludicrous. I know for a fact you faggots don't play that many video games nor encode video so I don't know what the fuck you need these cards for other then boosting your epeen in speccy threads.
I'm still using a 5770 and will only be replacing it because it's failing but you can be sure as shit that I dont actually need more power for anything im doing.
>falling for meme resolutions like 1440p and 4k
>probably playing on some 27 inch monitor at best
Could nvidia faggots BE any more tech illiterate? Hope you bought a 5.1 gaming headset with that 1080 too...fucking retards
>>54855365
I thought the 1080 was the one that ran hot, thats why its seeing performance hits due to reaching the thermal limit.
>>54856627
The GTX 1080 is a fucking hilarious beast. It has a power target of about 175w, and it'll stick to it no matter what you try to set the actual clocks to. Even overclocked cards with 2000mhz+ core clocks are sticking right around 180w. Why? Because they're running excessively hot. Its just jumping around constantly under load because it can't surpass its set power target without dissipating an ungodly amount of heat per mm2. I think line variability is actually worse than their 28nm Pascal cards.
Tomshardware did their typical oscilloscope measurements with the card and it was really telling.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-pascal,4572-10.html
Maxwell for comparison. Power target vs variability is not looking good for 16nm Pascal
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-970-maxwell,3941-12.html
Undeniably, Nvidia has moved significantly backwards with Pascal in regards to handling power consumption and clocking.
>>54855924
the 8gb version won't cost that much more, since gddr5 prices at this point are almost nothing
Now I am glad I waited. Thank you based AMD.
fury x owner here, thinkgen of getting a highest-end Vega once it comes out, who else /vega/ here?
>>54856760
No polaris will be around 100-120w. The 150w number popped out only because it has a 6 pin connector
Waitfagging paid off.
8 gb version is $229 according to http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-clock-speeds/
>$199 US (4 GB)
>$229 US (8 GB)
Who would buy the 4 gb version if 8 gb is just 30 bucks more?
>>54856760
Isn't there a 960 with no power connector?
Nvidia put a full 980 inside a laptop too.
>yfw Maxwell ends up being more efficient than poo in looaris
>>54856813
What for a reworked 390x ?
>new poo in loo guy in charge
>he's actually trying to improve the company
AMD is doing a reverse Microsoft
Let's face some facts here. 150w is the max it will use. That will be during intensive gaming. I highly doubt you will be playing games 24/7. So lets just say you play games for 4 hours a day. Most of the time the card will be idling away using hardly any power at all. Over the course of a year the difference in power usage is so fucking negligible a McDonalds burger would probably cost more than the difference Amerifats.
>>54856799
But AMD cards generally perform better at the meme resolutions and whenever a benchmark supporting that comes out you go BTFO HAHAHA LMAO 1080PKEKS so what changed here?
>>54856808
>Fermi 2.0
>>54856840
People who game at 1080p, which is most everyone.
Can someone please update this?
>>54855586
>Delivery: In 3 to 5 weeks
Top KEK
>>54856840
That makes no sense. $30 for double the bg. Seriously that cant be right they must be guessing at the 8gb price
>>54856840
why would i need 8gb?
Waiting for the same performance level shit AYYMD has been selling since 2013
AYYMDPOORFAGS logic
>>54855726
Shadowplay is fucking trash. Artifacts, Glitching games, and lowering FPS.
>>54856884
1440p and ultra super duper hpyer hq big ass textures
Is it possible to be any more upset than Nvidia astroturfers are right now?
>>54856858
when the power usage argument is used to come up with shit like "hurr you'll spend more money on electricity!" - then that shit's retarded, because boo fucking hoo you'll be paying $10 more per year for electricity
the only argument that is somewhat regarding power usage is that a high-wattage GPU requires a better PSU, but even then, this card is only 150W so who gives a shit
btw, nvidia always under reports their TDP (to shill and fool people) and AMD always over-reports (read: worst case scenario power usage) theirs
>>54856903
Only AYYMDPOORFAGS are upset
Nvidia will outsell AYYMD and be very profitable and there's nothing AYYMD astroturfers can do about it
>>54856870
do it yourself you lazy cunt.
>>54856049
ahahaha that's almost two of my monthly salaries
I guess it's time to remind all you people that FreeSync monitors are cheaper than G-Sync monitors.
>>54856924
I own a fury x which was more expensive than a 980 ti at launch
explain to me - how am I a poorfag?
Who's going to buy the $420 390x now?
AMD just killed their own sales. They shouldn't have announced the price.
>>54856931
Fuck me what do you do? pick potatos in a field in Linconshire or something.
>>54856937
>using memesync
>>54856764
So what if they do?
>>54856813
Word.
Time to get rid of my trusty 8800GT.
Bring on the pain AMD!
$199 Fury performance level card, kek, Nvidiots must be so butthurt right. Like you need anything more than that for 1080p. Just know that if Nvidia cuts prices or released the 1060 at a low price, it'll be because of this. You faggots should be happy. If AMD weren't competitive this round the 1060 would've been $300.
>>54856944
It's called not living in Western Europe or the USA. I'm a teacher, go fucking figure.
>>54856903
I doubt it.
I'm willing to bet that Nvidia actually hired a bunch of these chucklefucks to shill on tech sites and social media to do damage control.
Polaris 10 is extremely telling for the big Vega GPU. 36CU at 850mhz would be 100w, possibly even lower. We know thats about the peak perf/watt point for the arch, and it actually has been since first gen GCN. The RX 480 is only coming with a 150w rating because clocks are pushed to 1150mhz to get more out of the smaller die. 64CU Vega with an 850mhz~ core clock is only going to be 200w.
>>54856782
>mfw it's running at 50% render scale
>>54856958
You're dumb
GTX 960 was $199 and GTX 1060 will be $199
>>54856958
>1060 $300
>when 1070 is $379
>>54856962
ayy me too, where u at family? Budapest here
guess I'll never have that sweet gtx 1080 for a video game that I won't play because I'm not a fucking child anymore...pretty sad, but in exchange at least I don't have to teach / live with niggers or arabs.
>>54856920
>>54856858
The card will not draw 150w, it will have a good amount of headroom like all cards that have been released in these years by AMD. If the chip is good there will be even space for some overclock
>>54856697
yes, and doesn't give performance scaling best you get from 40% overclock is 10% perf
>>54857008
I was at the presentation and felt the heat radiating off the stage.
>>54855977
It's for people who are too immature to wait a few months for the proper cards to hit the market.
>nvidia coems with worse card - it's a new king
>amd comes with amazing cards everyone is backpedaling how everything is bad
>>54857033
I was at the gtx 480 presentation and the card caught fire while Jen-Hsun Huang was holding it
So is AMD releasing the midrange before the high end cards gonna payoff? Is the market share something like 50-60% midrange cards or is it less?
>>54857006
I'm 300 km to the south. You said it right, I also pretty much stopped playing games, my amd 7670M in my 3 year old laptop is quite enough for shitposting and watching youtube. My country was always AMD land because Nvidia is way too expensive.
For example, when I was buying my laptop 3 years ago, the gtx 610M cost two times more than my current card, even though my card is two times stronger.
>>54857066
yes, that's the idea - release an awesomely performing product for only $199 and get the majority of sales in the mid-range
this is a good thing
>>54857033
Jokes aside if I recall correctly they even said that two rx 480 drew as much as a single gtx 1080
>>54857006
>mfw I own a 1080 and dont see arab/niggafags where I live.
>>54855347
>Comparing this card to 1070.
Are you people retarded..
>>54855325
Sooooooo, the 380 is now useless?
>>54855977
two types of people
1. those that take loans for a flagship phone
2. those that can afford it effortlessly and will replace it in 6 months
One of these categories is 0.3% of overall(partner cards included) sales, guess which.
>>54857083
I dont believe them. Also my 1080 only runs to late 70s playing games. (temperaturewise)
>>54855347
GTX 1070 consumes 200W+ under load (about 215W). The 480 is less than 150TDP so probably won't reach 200, probably around 180W.
>>54855365
>>54855055
>>54853853
>>54854872
>>54851342
>>54852682
How much are they paying you? Are you doing it for free?
>>54855428
Costs about $150-250 less if Nvidias values are to be believed (e.g. 1080 is going for about $950 in the UK, $800+ in europe, ~$1000 AUS, $1000+ in Japan, etc.)
>>54856958
They visibly are as you can see by their massive shitposting on /g/.
>>54856996
>implying things
>>54857033
Ok kid.
>>54857008
It's most likely <80C. Either that or much less (i.e. 60C) due to lower clocks and 14nm finfet. Pretty sure there is room for OC, unlike the 1080, and say, unlike the 380 that OCs to 380X levels.
>>54857105
>Also my 1080 only runs to late 70s playing games
hmh? My 1080s run at 85 constant when I play.
>>54857088
why? it's fine for 1080p, 480 is for VR/1440p and if you have dead card on your hands that needs replacement
everyone else waiting for 490/490x
>>54857066
Its a wise move from a marketing perspective, and much of the presentation was spelling out exactly why. AMD could have showcased Vega first with a paper launch in typical Nvidia fashion, but they made a smarter move. The whole "entry level VR for everyone" angle is a winning play. Thats the type of thing that gets news headlines, and its the type of thing retailers cling on to because the average consumer is clueless.
Joe Schmo walks into a brick and mortar shop looking for a GPU to upgrade his prebuilt Dell mid tower. Bob the salesman in his name plaque laden polo walks over and shows him the card labled as VR ready for $200, and Joe buys it without second thought.
That is the overwhelming majority of the market right there.
>>54857043
>few months
god I've been waiting for 2 years for video release cause 970 and 390 series didnt impress me due to 3.5gb and rebrand.
This is the first time I'm intrigued by both 1070 and rx 480 due to performance on nvidia and ridiculous value card for amd.
I can easily choose to get the cheap rx480, use it for a year or two and buy the hbm and throw money on a high end card
I've been using Nvidia since Geforce 4, Im not breaking the streak.
>>54857122
also better video decoding if they don't lie, gotta push those ms for frames
I was going to get one but, there's no DVI port; I'd have to buy a new monitor too. Defeats the purpose of going for the cheap card if I have to buy a new monitor. Might as well get a 1070.
>>54857140
but, rx480 is a huge temptation unless benchmarks or has temperature issues.
>>54857140
>1070 and rx 480
you realize that 480 costs $200 and 1070 is at least $450
>>54857160
The actual card is going to be around $370, no one is buying into that founder's edition trash (I hope anyway; please tell me you aren't this dumb, /g/)
>>54857154
>what are custom pcb
who the heck buys reference cards?
Really shows how much in the shitter nVidia is when their fans are defending 1070 against these midrange cheap cards.
fucking bodied
>>54857172
do you see custom 1080 prices? it goes up to $850
the cheapest goes for almost msrp but has blower cooler from msi, if i remember right
>>54857088
Not really. Is it satisfying your GPU needs? If so, no. The 480 is essentially a VR-capable 1440p card for $200. I mean it's so inexpensive it's not even worth not buying. But really, unless you have a VR headset or have a 1440 monitor, the 380 is fine.
>>54857206
>>54857122
Thanks for the reply, guys, I was seriously considering selling my 380 and getting a 480 just because "ITS NEWER !!!"
>>54857206
I'm considering to buy one just to save $3 on power bill, it's faster than my 390 anyway
AMD release shit card
>I-I-I'll just buy two and crossfire them!
>I-It's cheaper than one good card
Good luck with those drivers AYYMADs
>>54857196
iirc those are just FE with custom logos and partner warranties. Think it's just lip-service for the MSRP. All custom PCB/cooling versions are $700+
>>54857172
custom versions are revealed already because nvidia backpedaled from the founder's edition exclusivity meme, they cost the same or more
>>54855325
DELETE THIS
>>54857160
Nobody is buying the $200 when theres the $249 8GB here on /g/
So its pretty much $250 vs $370, just a $120 difference
It isnt that huge.
>>54857219
Nvidia keep giving me bsod and black screens since december updates, Im pissed as fuck.
Wouldnt mind testing the competition.
>>54857219
A CF 480 setup just beat the 1080 at a 4K game benchmark, for about half the price, against something it's not even MEANT to compete with.
Do you feel retarded yet?
>>54857220
> those are just FE with custom logos and partner warranties
because shekelvidia prohibited 3rd parties from making major changes to the card. that's why it costs the same everywhere.
>>54855325
No matter how cheap is it, I still find it looking very ugly. The nvidia one looks like some low poly model but it actually looks awesome and like a premium card.
>>54857232
they revealed them, but i'm not sure you can buy one yet
either way end of june for both
>>54857245
>A CF 480 setup just beat the 1080 at a 4K game benchmark
What if I have two?
>price.
Not an issue.
