[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Hold me /g/, Broadwell-E is junk and housefire, I was looking
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 52
Thread images: 16
File: 1454884458436.jpg (69 KB, 540x540) Image search: [Google]
1454884458436.jpg
69 KB, 540x540
Hold me /g/, Broadwell-E is junk and housefire, I was looking to upgrade asap
>>
>extremely shitty overclock
>temps going through the roof
>power consumption high as a man's eye can see
>>
wait for zen
>>
>1.5V for 4.5Ghz and 9000 degrees Celsius
>>
>>54832255
Checked
>>
>whole series is a bust
>>
Either get a good loop going or don't overclock as high?
What's the problem? Nobody complains about fx-9xxx CPUs being even bigger housefires, and they are just quad core CPUs.
>>
File: 81845.png (39 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
81845.png
39 KB, 650x450
>a total shit for gaming
>>
File: 1456867873042.jpg (100 KB, 633x758) Image search: [Google]
1456867873042.jpg
100 KB, 633x758
>>54832327
>>
File: 81863.png (40 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
81863.png
40 KB, 650x450
>>
>>54832316
everyone knows they were shit, this is 2016 and Intel is cucking us all
>>
File: 81823.png (44 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
81823.png
44 KB, 650x450
>i7-6700k better than 1600$ processor
>>
File: 81817.png (45 KB, 650x450) Image search: [Google]
81817.png
45 KB, 650x450
>>54832382
good goyim!
>>
File: 1448925465262.jpg (20 KB, 439x290) Image search: [Google]
1448925465262.jpg
20 KB, 439x290
>mfw forced to wait for the Zen meme because of the fucking jews and we don't even know how it's gonna turn out
>>
honestly the 6700k looks like the better deal, or wait for Zen.
>>
File: 1462768355364.jpg (47 KB, 493x342) Image search: [Google]
1462768355364.jpg
47 KB, 493x342
>>54832244
>intelcucks
lelkek
>>
>>54832455
this tbqh familia, I think I'll pick up a 6700k, 4 cores is a bit of a bummer though
>>
File: 1463525426541.jpg (46 KB, 340x565) Image search: [Google]
1463525426541.jpg
46 KB, 340x565
>>
File: 1438837924665.png (13 KB, 429x375) Image search: [Google]
1438837924665.png
13 KB, 429x375
>tfw have 4790k
>>
>>54832791
Its a hot proccessor
>>
>>54832834
FOR
YOU

Xd
>>
>>54832327
Uh, wtf? Did Anandtech remove this charts from their review?!

http://www.anandtech.com/show/10337/the-intel-broadwell-e-review-core-i7-6950x-6900k-6850k-and-6800k-tested-up-to-10-cores/8

I don't see it.
>>
>>54832244
>>54832285
Link for the review?
>>
>>54833137
I'll give it to you if you promise to praise Intel's hard work in the comment section.
>>
>>54832213
>not having a 8 core xeon
poor fag
>>
>>54833172
Enjoy your sub 3GHz clocks
>>
>>54833137
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-broadwell-e-6950x-6900k-6850k-6800k,4587.html
>>
I seriously forgot how jewish Intel are.

Their HEDT line is practically made to give some purpose to low-end Xeons that failed integrity, power or circuitry checks.
And they want mad money for it too.
>>
File: Pricing.png (515 KB, 2196x1233) Image search: [Google]
Pricing.png
515 KB, 2196x1233
Jesus Christ. They neutered the bottom chip's PCIE lanes again and expect you to pay almost $200 just to re-enable them.
>>
>>54833307
Higher clocks retard
>>
>>54833349
>>
>>54833349
You can just OC the 6800k to match the 6850k clocks, numbnuts. You'll still end up with a neutered part though.
>>
Just get a 6700k and be okay for gaming for a decade god damn.
>>
>>54833510
that would be true if it had 6 cores
>>
>>54833349
>overclock a 6800k by 0.2 ghz and it matches the 6850k

Good goy
>>
>>54833307
There is no sane rason for more than 20 PCIe 3.0 lanes. This is already enough for two GPUs in SLI at 8x/8x and the fastest PCIe SSD on the market.
>>
>>54832213
Why would anyone save this pic?
>>
They seriously cannot distance themselves from the mainstream market anymore than this. First they lay off more than two thousand employees for the internet of things, then they make processors which barely bring anything new and now this. Honestly intel should just focus on the server market and the internet of things, xeon chips are still really sought after in servers.
>>
>>54833677
kek
>>
Those benchmarks are fake.
Jesus Christ you people gobble up anything by anti Intel media.
>>
>>54833752
Haha, this damage control shill posted this here as well >>54833740

No they're not fake you idiot.
tomshardware is a credible website and anandtech wouldn't publish fake benchmarks
>>
>>54833752
>anti intel media

These benchmarks are from third party tech review sites who aren't affiliated in any way with intel or AMD.
>>
>>54833795
Anandtech are payed by AMD to slander Intel/Nvidia
>>
>>54833824
Literally the most blatant Nvidiashills after Tom's hardware. If they're paid by someone, it sure as hell isn't AMD.
>>
>>54833824
>companies pay review sites to make good reviews

Nice meme, but this is false. Even if AMD does do that (which they don't), people will eventually give negative criticism about it as they'll eventually buy it, and that will slander the product's reputation and make it unbuyable.
>>
>>54833824
As is Tom's Hardware
>>
>>54833824
This is true, I only visit trusty sites like HardOCP with fair reviews.
>>
>>54833874
Nope. Why are you fags so butthurt? Trying to defend a company that fucks you in the ass, god you're so sad.
>>
>>54833172
>8 core xeons can be found on ebay for less than $100
??
>>
>>54833908
He's talking about the E5-2670 Xeons, which are Sandy Bridge-E. They can be had for really fucking cheap, $70-80 USD, which gets you 8c/16t. It doesnt clock that high though.
>>
>>54832962
on the first page they mention the r9 285, but then the benchmarks are gone.

probably got a call from Intel. ;^)
>>
File: 2f7.jpg (31 KB, 601x508) Image search: [Google]
2f7.jpg
31 KB, 601x508
Thread replies: 52
Thread images: 16

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.