http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/GeForce-GTX-1070-8GB-Founders-Edition-Review
http://www.legitreviews.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-video-card-review_181760
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-review,1.html
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/7722/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-titan-performance-under-400/index.html
IT'S HAPPENING
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/05/29/nvidia_geforce_gtx_1070_founders_edition_preview
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-8gb-pascal-performance,4585.html
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/reviews/video_cards/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-review/
http://www.techspot.com/review/1182-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070/
wew lad is this the 'list of shill sites to avoid' thread?
>>54807519
Cool, it's not even released yet
I'm not believing shit until it is, it's like you idiots didn't learn from what just happened with the 1080
>>54807753
>BUTTMAD AMDPOORFAGS WITH POOLARIS HOUSEFIRES DETECTED
I hated the 3.5 GB stuff with the 970 but I laught every time when somebody brings up that the 1070 only has 7.5 GB of VRAM.
Nigga, having 1/8 VRAM memory disabled is much worse than having 1/16 VRAM disabled, Besides. Name one game what uses mure than 6 GB of VRAM. Even in 4k,
>no tpu
God every review site is so fucking shit
People only care about the performance summary
>>54807753
It's just like all the first 1080 reviews praising it before the truth came out
Why the fuck would anyone buy the Founder's Edition cards?
>>54807762
That it's the best card ever, at least until the 1180 or 1080Ti?
its ogre
>>54807837
Because it's the Founders Edition, m8. Dat means its gud.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
>>54807854
Even the founders 1070 is cheaper than a Fury X lol
>>54807854
>980 ti
What a fucking piece of shit.
AMDPOORFAGS ON SUICIDE WATH
Real talk, who's going to buy the Fury X now let alone the $420 390x?
Can AMD survive 6 months without sales?
>>54807935
Those fucked embargoed the 480 and 490 till end of June
AMD is literally retarded
>>54807869
And then look at the 390x, and polaris 10 will be like the 390x but cost like the 380x
>>54807947
IIRC no new hardware featuring polaris is allowed to be shown at computex.
I have no idea why any OEM would consider working with AMD in the future with decisions like that.
>>54807762
What happened with the 1080?
>>54807964
Nothing happened, just butthurt AMDPOORFAGs trying all their memes
>>54807519
>Not linking only Gamersnexus review.
Retard shill confirmed
>>54807964
Thermal throttling out the ass because the reference cooler sucks more dick than OP's mother.
At the moment i'm waiting for polaris and will compare when they are both actually out.
Luckily i'm not in a situation where i need to jump out and get the latest card.
>>54808024
>reference cooler
"Founders" cooler, anon.
>>54808024
So wait a few weeks and buy one of the custom cooled models. You have to be retarded to buy NVIDIA's $700 overpriced reference model, unless you're getting it for very specific circumstances, like tiny cases where a blower performs best.
>>54807964
throttles for heat often, shitty bios can't control the fans well as they rev up randomly, garbage power delivery
that's just founders though, the others might be good
>>54808048
Yeah I Cannot think off any reason.
Wasn't the reference coolers cheaper before? I mean cheaper than the aftermarket ones. My brother bought a reference 780 and added a custom water cooler for it
>>54807978
>Being this deep in denial
Nvidiot, pls
So excited to finally replace my 280x. I immediately regretted going AMD after I got it. It's aged pretty well though but so ready to get a real graphics card again
>>54808087
The reference model used to be sold at MSRP, so in the case of the 1080 it should be $600. There were custom cooled cards sold at MSRP too, but generally speaking the reference was as cheap as you could go.
NVIDIA decided to be extra shitty this time around and to greed it up by selling their bog-standard reference card at a $100 premium. There will very, very likely be clearly superior cards for less money than NVIDIA's shit.
>>54808132
You should not be. The 280x even beats some Dx12 titles against the 970 and the 780 (ti?)
>>54808132
When did you buy it? It was a good buy when it released, and like you said it aged well.
GTX 1070 has full 2MB L2 cache enabled like GTX 1080, full 64 ROPS and full 256bit memory bus
Guess the AMDPOORFAGS have to find a new meme now since they got NOTHING now
>>54808167
Not a single 1080 is available at MSRP.
Not a single 1070 will be available for MSRP.
They only put the MSRP so low to get favourable reviews. Not a single tech site is going to change their reviews when they find out the actual store prices are significantly higher.
>>54808167
Or the custom cooler cards will be as much if not more than the Founders shit.
This is the type of card that will be available for around the $600 msrp.
>FASTHER THAT TITAN!!!
topkek
>>54808212
>Using the word "Full" as if it means anything in this context
kek
>>54808246
>Cherry picking benchmarks
TOPPEST LELKEK, SO PATHETIC & DESPERATE TO DEFEND YOUR POO IN THE LOO
>>54808278
>>Cherry picking benchmarks
Yeah nah.
amd is literally ruined
stock will CRASH completely
I mean they try and sell the 480x for like $350 while performing exactly like a 290x they made 7 years ago LOL
>>54808246
>>54808305
>both meme cards lose to 980Ti
You cant make this shit up.
>>54808305
>970 replacement gets the same pref as 980 ti
What's the problem?
>>54808318
>Selling 480X for $250
Nvidiots actually believe this.
Remember, kids. Never go full retard
>>54808219
>>54808234
I don't know if there were any announced at exactly $600, but I'm pretty sure there are custom cards at around $620, like the one from Asus. If Asus is doing it, others will probably be doing it as well and I don't think it's unlikely for some cards with shit-tier blowers to sell for $600.
It's not great price anyway, but it's still around the 980 Ti price point for a card that's 20-30% faster on average and uses less power. Better than nothing.
![AsusEAH4850_mpspc[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qpzi1dD.jpg "AsusEAH4850_mpspc[1].jpg")
>>54808234
What happened to the cards with cute grills on them? Who even likes clowns?
>>54808370
Is the $620 card actually available to buy anywhere?
All the cards I can see actually for sale are selling for way more than MSRP
>>54808424
I wanna say that's because the 1080s out right now are the founder's editions ones, which had a big markup on them.
>>54807785
>with poolaris
>implying anyone has those
it seems nvidiots failed to use their thinker on this one.
>>54808370
>a card that's 20-30% faster on average
Maybe if you're tech illiterate and cant overclock your 980Ti. Look >>54808246 and >>54808305
>>54808424
>Is the $620 card actually available to buy anywhere?
NEVER EVER.
>>54808370
>but I'm pretty sure there are custom cards at around $620, like the one from Asus
You mean this one?
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-geforce-gtx-1080-directcu-iii-strix-gaming-aura-rgb-8192mb-gddr5x-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-401-as.html
It costs £619 which is $905.
>>54808246
>20% faster than a FuryX
MADSHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>BUT MUH POOLARIS
If you think Shitlaris can top this in any way, wheter it's price or performance you're beyond retarded. You're a fucking imbecile.
Tomorrow is the day AMD loses their miniature share of the PC market lmao.
>>54808542
But Nvidia didn't set the bar very high
>>54808565
They don't need to. They have no competition.
>>54808424
>Is the $620 card actually available to buy anywhere?
I assume not, since it's launching on June 4th. Which is why I initially said in the first post in the chain to wait a few weeks.
>>54808480
>>54808483
Are you pretending to be retarded or is this the first time you're shopping for computer components in Europe? Surely you must have noticed that everything is always more expensive in Europe, right? Surely, you cannot be so stupid as to not know that MSRP is different for different countries and regions, right?
Call the Suicide Prevention Lifeline.
AMD faggots might off themselves in the next 48 hours.
>>54808628
It was 144 FPS.
>>54808669
Man, I fucking wish AMD releases a card that runs DOOM maxed at 2560x1440 at 144FPS for $300. But any modicum of common sense will tell you that it won't happen.
>>54808696
It will once the Vulkan version of Doom is available.
Tears.
TEARS.
They are flowing.
>120 Watts at load less than a ShitX
>overclocks much better than a ShitX
>costs less than a ShitX
>AMD won't even release a card capable of competing with this until next year
Oy vey. Oy gevalt.
It's another shoah.
>>54808696
Then why is Raja partying so hard?
>>54807790
there is no cuck vram on the 1070, if there was it'd be in all the reviews days 1 and would turn nvidia into a laughingstock.
people claiming 7.5 are delusional amd fanboys or shills.
>>54808739
It's like on the fucking titanic. Everyone is enjoying their last moments on the amd ship.
>>54808739
Look at those sad faces.
>>54808167
The extra $100 is because they use Prermium(TM) materials to make it.
>>54808583
>Surely, you cannot be so stupid as to not know that MSRP is different for different countries and regions, right?
>>54808762
>it'd be in all the reviews days 1
Throttle happened on 1080 and none of the reviews reported it day 1. It was reported days later after some random nonshill russian reviews pointed it out, then everyone started coming out the woodworks
>>54808880
More like the Russians were the only retards who ran the card at 40% fan for an hour.
The other reviewers actually knew how to run an Nvidia card.
HardwareCanucks quote:
>How I did the benchmarks? I set the fan to 70%.
There was that one guy with the thermal paste in a jar that put a fucking waterblock on it the second day he got his card and made a 5 video series about it.
Fact of the matter is at this point you're just grasping at straws and it's fucking pathetic and hilarious.
>>54808961
FIRST FOR ASYNC COMPUTE!
>>54808339
AMD Drones grasping at straws because they have nothing.
They're literally considering it a 'win' that cheaper nvidia cards aren't beating expensive nvidia cards in every benchmark. Think about that for a minute.
>>54808981
WE FERMI 2.0 NOW
>>54808999
>an oy vey can be heard in the distance
Even Async can't help you now. Ayyyyyyyyyyyyy.
Truly the Blast processing of the 2010s.
>>54808981
Shit, is Pascal Fermi lite?
Why the fuck won't AMD release their GPUs early?
Do they want to lose 3 months of sales? Everyone, even the AMD bros, will get horny over the 1070 and 1080, and buy as soon as they come out.
>>54809138
I don't think so. I mean, the 1070 would be a fantastic buy if I was a new user, but not only am I running a 970, I have a 60Hz 1080p monitor as well. You could argue to buy a new monitor, but I'd rather wait for Greenland and a high refresh 1440p freesync monitor that isn't shit.
>>54809188
I have a 760. Struggles on modern titles even with a good OC. Need to upgrade soon
>>54809280
I had a 670 before that and it's basically the same card, it ran 1080 decently, but it has aged like shit. If anything, I would wait for Polaris then since there's definitely going to be a less than $300 option due to it targeting the mainstream.
making a new build next month anyway so it's time to get the 1070 for it then
>>54809188
>>54809280
Ive been using a 7790 2g for like years now, i'm still not feeling the lag if i play at the playable settings.
How many generations did i missed ? Last game ive played was Serious sam 3.
>>54808880
except the throttling issue is nonexistant (because the card doesn't throttle to below base clock), it took one russian AMD shill to point it out, while all the credible reviewers saw no issue with it.
>>54808573
>They don't need to. They have no competition.
I hope you knoe why this is a BAD thing, right?
>>54810237
>*know
Stupid phone typing.
I'm waiting on dat 1060. I'm not buying a 4k monitor for at least another year or two.
>>54809138
AMD is a company that produces high end computer processors for the discerning consumer. Nvidia is a meme team that shits out garbage with excellent marketing that appeals to mindless gaymers.
>the AMD bros, will get horny over the 1070 and 1080, and buy as soon as they come out
People stupid enough to make a purchase so impulsively aren't buying AMD in the first place, they're under the impression they need to buy the 1080 for TEW ECKS VEE ARR.
http://youtu.be/-FWtJXmtITs
card can't even hold its clocks for the Fermi Edition, thus slower than 980ti anf titan x over time
All these reviews seems really really rushed.
Most of it doesn't even have temps or power bench, not to mention that the numbers of game reviewed is suspiciously low and more Nvidia favoured.
Nvidia is clearly forcing these reviewers to shat out these reviews before Computex.
>>54810450
>Most of it doesn't even have temps or power bench
Yeah they do
These sites have had the cards for like a week
>>54810453
DELETE THIS
>>54807854
RX 480 is rumored to perform between 390x and Fury.
If the rumored pricing is true, at $300, 480 is a better purchase than GTX1070, even at a base MSRP price.
>>54810419
>changing the fan profile is hard!
What's with all the fucking memes?
/g/ is practically reddit right now.
I hope you're proud.
>>54810549
The frames per dollar will be better, but for $80 more, you get a hell of a lot of frames. Hopefully the 490 or rx 490 or whatever the fuck will be on par with the 1070.
>>54810596
if im not mistaken, fan profile is fucked for now and issues reported by users of 1080s
>>54809138
The 1070 will be have a $450 founders edition and $380 aftermarket cards coming some time later, this leaves a large part of the market out of it's price range. Polaris is known to be targeting a "mainstream" price bracket, so expect it to cap out at ~$300-350 for the higher end model.
What AMD and Nvidia are effectively doing is locking certain price ranges into their brands until they release the missing segment with their top end cards later.
>>54810453
>this image triggers me
I AM SALTY
>>54808762
There is no cuck VRAM, but they might have found a new way to gimp it. First plebs buy a 1070, find out that it's not as good as advertised, upgrade to 1080, and a few months later to 1080 Ti. Just like last time. Planned obsolescense
>>54810453
>>54810513
>>54810859
390 beats 970 resoundingly
Wonder if 490 demolishes 1070
>>54810453
>>54810859
>390 btfo'ing the 970
Like I said here, >>54810789, I don't think the AMD comparisons (besides fury X) will mean a lot until Poolaris is out.
>>54808132
I bought a used 280x and loved it. It was a hot card though.. sold, waiting on 1050/470 for a 1080p machine
>>54808880
>Throttle happened on 1080
Only if it falls below its stated BASE CLOCK
How many time do i have to correct you people on this?
>>54810933
you mean beats a reference 970, a properly clocked 970 will destroy the 390.
>>54807837
Nividia fanboys who want Nvidia branded hardware
>>54807837
people who want to water cool. there's a surprising lack of decent water blocks for non-reference cards.
>>54811418
Except now you might as well buy a non-ref card that uses the reference PCB instead of paying the stupid tax on the nvidia shill ed
>>54807519
stop shilling and go back to /v/
>>>/v/
>>54810933
dont post my wife nowaru-san
>>54811475
Ok, I'll return her to you along with her sister in perfect condition
980 ti is still a far better card.
The pascal cards don't scale as well when overclocked, and if you are not overclocking, you're dumb.
Here is the full article
http://www.hardwareunboxed.com/geforce-gtx-1070-overclocking/
>>54811973
it even beats the stock 1080 in some games.
>>54811993
>>54811973
Sadly some people cant afford to overclock especially those living near the equator due to heat.
>>54812188
lol 3rd world cucks
>>54812188
watercool your rig
Apparently all benchmarks show only the boost score, but leaving out what happens once thermal throttling hits (like with the 1080).
Did any reviewer test the card in a closed case? It'd be nice to know if the card can maintain the boost clock.
Other than the one anon who dug up a single weird german (russian?) site that says otherwise, the consensus is basically that the 1070 is the new shit right?
>>54813254
computerbase.de i think does that to their test.
this one >>54810419 was pre heated for 20min before extracting the results. Hardware canucks also did some 10min heat tests
>>54809138
What's the release date for the 1070?
Fuck, I can't stand it anymore, do I really need to switch to Nvidia. I've been a staunch supporter but FUCK AMD's lack of vision, FUCK
>>54813254
1080 throttles at what temp? I've been playing just fine at 85c without drops in FPS?
>>54807854
ogre for amd, right?
And I thought AMD was supposed to be good at DX12.
>>54814025
the fuck is with those huge spikes?
>>54811973
>9-980 ti is still a far better card! I s-swear guys!
>>54811973
>overclocking with reference cards
What exactly did you expect?
>>54814030
Don't ask me. It happens in every DX12 game guru3d tested for Fury.
>>54814062
Last one.
>>54814025
>>54814062
>>54814073
so it may have higher framerate but the frame pacing sucks in general?
>>54807854
>390x beating a titan.
>DELETE THIS
Gimping in action.
>>54811973
We told you fags to not buy the 980Ti this year, we fucking told you and you didn't listen.
>>54811993
Not for long.
>Reference card being beaten by some EVGA FTW OC TURBO KEK edition 980Ti overclocked to balls.
huehehueh
1080 is a great card, cheaper than 980Ti here (that thing costs like 1000euros here, got 1080 for 650euros)
>>54807854
>390x beat titan
>290 beat 980
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>54807854
>TITAN-fucking-X getting trashed by R9 390X
What the ever loving fuck am I watching
>>54807854
Holy shit, I'm glad I got AMD 4 years ago.
>>54814243
>>54814220
>>54814211
>tfw bought EVGA 980Ti instead of Fury X
kill me lads
kfucking kill me
>>54814118
The frame times for DX11 games that guru3d tested were clean for all cards. While the guru3d data shows that Fury has frame pacing problems in DX12 games in general (though our sample is pretty small in this case), I wouldn't make hasty conclusions like 99% of the posters on this board tend to do. These are things you should use multiple sources for, not cling to a single benchmark that stands in line with your opinions.
Toms' results also show some issues for Fury X in Tomb Raider, though it was tested with DX11, pointing out to a problem with the game rather than DX12. Hitman shows clean graphs, but that one was also tested with DX11. Ashes was DX12, and fairly messy for all cards involved, making drawing conclusions from that relatively difficult.
cba to look for more sites with FCAT frame time measurements.
>Cheapest 980 Ti in my shit country costs $758
1070 sounds like an option for the price
Do wish AMD will show something impressive that will make me consider otherwise
>>54814285
980Ti is like 50euros cheaper NOW than 1080 MSI here.
Fucking Slavshitstan.
>>54808246
dont worry, it will be when nvidia releases new drivers for the 9xx series
if you catch my gimp
>>54811973
Lol buttmad amdrone trying his best to make people spend $650 on a 980 ti instead of the much cheaper 1070.
>>54807935
Would I buy one brand new? No, not unless the prices dropped like a rock with Vega.
Would I buy one second hand? With a steep enough discount, maybe.
I've already got one Fury X though, so a second wouldn't be the worst possible decision.
I also have a custom loop being shipped to me, so there's no issue regarding the size of it.
>>54807519
Nvidia changed everything. Again.
>>54814615
Stupid question here, but related to these frames.
I've been playing on getting a GTX 1080 Hybrid when one is released, along with a 1440p 144Hz monitor, since most of what I play will easily hit 144FPS with that card.
However, I also intend to use this computer for video editing 30FPS and 60FPS footage, and playing games like The Witcher 3 that won't hit 144FPS.
Will sub-144FPS content look shitty on a 144Hz monitor, or is that just the maximum refresh rate it can handle? This isn't like native resolution, where a 1080p signal will look like shit on the 1440p panel, yeah?
>>54814897
>Hybrid
Please don't.
They're just as loud as fans.
They're LOUDER than fans on idle.
They don't work that much better under gaming stress (maybe 10 celsius off the top)
and no, sub-144fps content wont look shitty on 144hz monitor lmao
>>54811418
sad for them everything is mostly locked out
>>54814949
I really didn't think it would, but I had never thought to investigate until I saw that framerate chart, for some reason. Figured it was worth asking, lol.
The 980Ti Hybrid seemed to run at really solid temps. I understand that the 1080 has some temp throttling, so I'd definitely want to water cool. I want to build in a Define Nano S though, so I'd rather not have to figure out how to custom loop. That leaves me with the option of an aftermarket AIO bracket that requires me to do some work on the card and may or may not have decent VRAM cooling, or an EVGA Hybrid.
I honestly wouldn't be so interested in water cooling the GPU if it weren't for that low-temp throttling.
>>54814949
>They don't work that much better under gaming stress (maybe 10 celsius off the top)
That's not quite right. You can get way better OC on the core but your temps for everything else are pretty mediocre. The problem with hybrids is usually the blower part.
Better to get something like the NZXT H10 and use your own fan and heatsinks or just go custom loop like you should.
I've only ever had Nvidia cards but I found out so many disgusting things about that company that I will switch teams over to AMD.
Their shady business practices are beyond despicable and the only excuse for still going for Nvidia cards is ignorance of that fact.
They collude with developers to sabotage AMD cards so that a 300 dollar AMD card performs worse than a 250 dollar Nvidia card with unseen and unnecessary tesselation all over the place just to slow down AMD cards.
Or the lying about specs and features of coming cards. Or the deliberate gimping of their older cards with new drivers so people buy their newer ones.
Fuck Nvidia. I never bought an AMD card but Polaris will be my first. Fuck Nvidia. Never again. I hope AMD conquers back a sizable portion of the market. 80/20 for Nvidia is a borderline monopoly position and stronger competition is always good for the end consumer.
Threadly reminder to never trust anything negative said about nvidia.
:^)
>>54808234
Y so srs?
>>54814949
the fuck are you talking about
i'm running it on hybrid and its quiet
does your casing not have a cover or something
>>54815159
Why do you think its samefag? Those apostrophes proves nothing really.
I'm just here to say this
>NDA ON AMD CARDS UNTIL RELEASE DAY
AMD is the good guy.
AMD is the good guy.
AMD is the good guy.
Repeat it 3 times and it might become true.
>>54815246
If AMD were good, they would be doing good stuff.
>>54815159
You cut out some replies where you were BTFO and all in pic is out of context desu. At least you spend few hours to make it.
Threadly reminder amd is utter trash confirmed by their own fanbase.
Anyone refuting this solid piece of evidence is full on damage controlling and needs to end themselves.
:^)
I have a R9 280 - would the 1070 be a nice upgrade for the money? (Obv the performance is there)
>>54815246
So you're telling me there will be no reviews before release day? Who the fuck does this. What a shitty company.
>>54815287
>buying a dx11 card in 2016
No.
>>54815287
If you can find it at reasonable price which is not going to happen in the next half year at best.
>>54815287
Yeah its commonly accepted to be the current price/performance king. It's a damn good care.
>>54815297
>Who the fuck does this
Generally, video games editors.
>>54815308
Card*
>>54815246
>NDA ON AMD CARDS UNTIL RELEASE DAY
Do you know when release day? Nice. Care to tell? Ill made a post on videocardz!
>>54815246
Nvidia didnt do the same?
>>54815332
June 10.
And you don't need to make a post, every reviewer who went to Computex already made an angry twitter post shitting on AMDs retarded marketing moves.
>>54815344
So they announce Polaris on June 10th (source needed) then reviews come out at 29th with cards launch somewhere in early July. Whats the problem with it again?
>every reviewer who went to Computex already made an angry twitter post shitting on AMDs retarded marketing moves.
Tbh i didn't see even one, but if you say that EVERY reviewer did then i just missed all of it :^)
>>54815344
>tfw type amd on twitter
>see this
https://twitter.com/CPCHardware/status/736725716885241856
Fucking disgusting. Amd are so poor they could only afford bottom of the barrel asian girls for their party lmao. Asian chicks = ugly, no wonder Raja is trying to smoke himself to death.
>>54815299
The 1070 is DX11?
>>54815423
Ayy lmao
>>54815471
No, but NVidia doesn't care about DX12.
Why do you people fight so hard to defend either Nvidia's or AMD's new cards?
They're not even released yet, so you can't have buyer's remorse or feel the need to defend your purchase at this point.
Literally why?
>>54815471
>no async
>1080/1070 slower than polaris/fury x in AOTS
They dont care about dx12.
>>54815501
Ah ok, does it mean that much when the performance is so high though? I don't care about AMD and Nvidia and all that, just the best cards.
>>54815507
Some people enjoy shitposting, some retarded fanboys, some shills.
>there are people on this very board right now who bought a 980ti
>some of them even got 2
>>54815516
What's AOTS?
And will DX12 make a difference?
>>54815517
What for the prices of non-reference 1070 and for Polaris release.
>>54815501
They actually support a feature level higher than amd.
Dx12 won't be the norm for at least another 2-3 years just because of how long it takes to rebuild game engines which fully support dx12 and it's features.
>>54815529
>What's AOTS?
Ashes of the Singularity.
>And will DX12 make a difference?
Not if Vulkan happens to be something.
I'm waiting on 3rd party and double/tri fans that are quite, no way would i ever buy the leaf blower.
Also since i'm waiting on that gonna see if polaris can match a 1070, if so i might consider it instead cause of async.
>>54815526
>tfw got myself used 980Ti for 390$.
>tfw i overclocked it and its faster than 900$ GTX1080
Feelsgoodman.
>>54815537
Yeah yeah I'm going to wait of course.
>>54815544
>Ashes of the singularity
Never heard of it.
But yeah I was planning on upgrading soon, had enough of this 280.
>>54815562
>if polaris can match a 1070
>Polaris matching 980Ti performance
Yeah, wake me up when it does. Polaris 10 is supposed to be at a lower pricepoint
>>54815579
>Never heard of it.
It's the benchmark for Dx12 performance.
>>54815587
Oh ok.
But yeah the 1070 non-founders is rumoured to be £320, so for that kind of performance it looks like a nice upgrade.
>>54815600
Look at 1080 prices right now. Example >>54808480 Nowhere near of MSRP. Same is going to happen to 1070. Those new cards will be heavily overpriced for a while.
>>54815544
AOTS is AMD sponsored DX12 game which only leverages AMD exclusive DX12 features and uses no features which AMD lacks.
>>54815617
>Prices in Europe are higher
Colour me surprised.
>>54815617
Aren't those Founders though?
>http://www.computerbase.de/2016-05/asus-geforce-gtx-1080-strix-oc-test/5/
>Ohne diese Möglichkeit bleiben die erzielten Ergebnisse im Test hinter der von vielen erwarteten 2,1-GHz-Barriere für die GPU entfernt.
>custom PCB
>Extra 6-pin connector
>8+2 power phases
>still can't get over 2.1GHz barrier
Looks like Maxwell architecture were tuned up to the limit with Pascall.
The voltage limit is stuck at 1.25v before the card shat itself.
>>54815626
>devs worked more with nvidia than amd
fuck off shill
>>54815626
Which is funny because the 370$ at launch 1070 slays their boosted ShitX card in that bench.
And the big jump in fps Fury gets in those benches that's because the cards were doing 20fps in DX11.
I don't know why MADshits think those 120% more fps is something to be proud of. That just means AMDs drivers for DX11 are still to this very day garbage.
>>54815644
No.
>>54815587
>It's the benchmark for Dx12 performance.
Lol no. It just happens to be the only game that "fully supports dx12" as the claim which is why it's used. Aots will be thrown in the bin once an actual dx12 benchmark comes out. Also the fact it's been so heavily optimized for GCN means I'd never trust the results it puts out just like I wouldn't trust a benchmark that is heavily optimized for nvidia hardware like tessellation based shit.
>>54815664
>370$ at launch 1070
>he actually thinks he will be able to buy 1070 for anything less than 500$ in the best case scenario
>nvidia cheating in aots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2b6Nncu6zY
Defend this dx11vidia cucks
>>54815709
Holy shit. NVIDIA shady business practises at work.
>>54808271
>full 4gb of vram
In this case of a new 70 card it does mean something
So what we've concluded in this thread is nvidia have produced yet another brilliant product for its price and amd fanboys are mad because they know their beloved company cannot compete.
Ok.
Good day.
>>54815912
>t. butthurt nvidia shill
>>54815904
Are you saying the 970 does not have 4gb vram?
>>54815937
>t. Mad amdrone
>>54814190
>1080 for 650€
Which one and where?
>>54815912
They're actually expensive. They should be $300/$500.
But nvidia is competing with its previous generation of cards, not with AMD.
>>54815995
It is the price without VAT, I have my own small company so I can get rid of VAT.
645euros to be exact, bought two so it cost me fucking nothing at 1290e (original Titan X I think I bought for 1000e a piece)
>>54815912
1080 is my favorite card in a long, long time. I need to go back to Radeon HD times to find another favorite.
>>54815995
>>54816034
Oh and it was the Memers Edition.
>>54807854
The 970 is such a marketing ploy
>>54816034
>1080 is my favorite card in a long, long time. I need to go back to Radeon HD times to find another favorite.
Same. I had a 7970 which was the last card I was so pumped about and now I'm stocked for the 1080.
Can't wait for the "Actually Cooled" Edition to come out. FE is for punks.
Hmm... Seems like the goat 1440p card, but with 4k ready cards on the horizon it seems like a waste of time. Just waiting a year will bring another exponential leap.
>>54816471
I have Founders Edition(s) running at 85 during 4k games at everything maxed out but I have yet to witness throttling.
At about 92-95 when I was tinkering with clocks and whatnot I did notice heavy throttling.
Love these cards, I hope you get one soon too. I heard MSI already has a custom one out?
>>54816474
1080 is great for 4K so far
>>54816497
Mind you thing I noticed that memory clocks out of the fucking ass (750mh) but GPU clock not so much (on either of the cards), that is probably because of whatever turbo boost schaisse tech these cards use, but I have mine at 175+ gpu clocks and 715mhz mems and usually at 2000 clocks~, 2115 or 2075 is the highest I've been at with these FE cards.
>>54811973
>if you are not overclocking, you're dumb
Yeah no thanks I like my stability and my low heat
>>54815912
Pretty much. AyyyMD fags are just grasping at straws at this point.
So if I'm expecting to just one one 1440p monitor is the 1080 overkill? Should I just get the 1070 instead?
>>54816497
I've seen the MSI and EVGA ones. I think I'll wait for the Gigabyte ones to come out as well.
I typically go for Gigabyte because they have the best cooling and lowest noise with their 3 fan setups. We'll see.
Would it be reasonable to expect a 1080Ti in about half a year?
>>54816574
No. Just in time to crush Vega as well.
Nvidia is timing their shit right for once.
>>54816565
Probably, but the 1080 is more future proof
>>54816565
1080 fucking goes at 45-50 at 4K when everything is maxed, TW3 with hairworks and everything maxed was like at 59fps constant.
Yes it's overkill but it is damn good quality overkill
>>54816593
I mean it's not reasonable to expect it in 6 months. It reasonable to expect it sooner.
>>54816599
That's what I assumed. My build initially had a 980Ti, so the 1080 shouldn't be too much more - when/what are the iterations of it coming, and which ones should I be on the look out for? I'm going to be off the grid for two months but I wanted to purchase it once I return.
>>54816615
Do like the other anon and wait for three-fan setup from Gigabyte.
1070 will only be faster than a 980ti OCed when nvidia releases a couple new driver revisions, it will happen
>>54816615
You're probably better off just getting whatever is out when you get back. The 1080 Ti could come out in about 9 months if they are going with the same release schedule as the 900 series.
>>54816632
W-what? Sorry I don't keep up on the brands too much. I haven't had a nice set up in ages.
>>54816678
I suppose so. Is the Ti going to be leagues better, anyway?
/sqt/ perhaps
http://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Founders-Graphics-08G-P4-6180-KR/dp/B01FWI6F08?ie=UTF8&ref_=cm_sw_r_other_apa_mZosxb939TJK1
>1.5 stars
>>54816713
Well 980Ti is ton cheaper than Titan X yet can match it (and my 980Ti overclocks better than either of my Titan X cards)
>>54816764
So if it is anything like that, I would wait for 1080Ti
>>54816724
>its all people complaining about the seller price gouging
>>54816724
Amazon allows you to write a review even if you didn't buy the product.
Is it possible some of these angry reviews are AMDrones? Quite likely.
>>54807785
>POOLARIS HOUSEFIRES
They are reportedly 130W cards while the 1080 hits 250W and 85C and then throttles down.
>>54816615
if you have and oc´d 980ti you are completly fine and upgrading give you like 4-5fps in most games
>>54816615
Don't upgrade now.
Wait an year. Get a 1080Ti when it's not pricegouged.
>>54816807
in reality it's a bunch of nvidiots crying because they can't buy their card. can't wait to BTFO of 1080 users once high end vega is out.
>>54816825
I must say to you, that no - the 1080 does not fucking throttle at 85C. I do not know these review sites but I have two cards that only throttle above 90C.
>>54816846
Not even an upgrade - I don't have anything aside from a laptop, so it's a from scratch state of affairs.
>>54816878
I don't think you will fuck up by getting a 1080 when aftermarket ones are out there, but you will sorta be disappointed you didn't wait for 1080Ti.
I say - if you have money -
get a CPU with good integrated GPU like what 6700k has (fine enough for immediate use, not for gaymen though) and wait for 1080Ti to come.
>>54816864
The fact that it even hits 90C is even worse.
>>54816889
>and wait for 1080Ti to come.
you do know the 1080TI wont be out till late, or mid 2017 at the earliest, right?
>>54816857
Vega is getting smashed by the 1080Ti.
No dreams now. Just tears.
>>54816878
Buy depending on the resolution you want to play at. The 1070 when it's being sold at msrp will be quite the steal. But it should be more than sufficient for VR. Heck most VR games have been demoed so far with lesser gpus.
>>54808480
top kek I bought 6700k with 32GB ram and huge SSD cheaper than that GPU.
>>54816897
Well I have mini ITX/ATX case whatever the fucks the proper name
>>54816897
What do you expect a GPU to hit when it's running on one fan, next to another GPU running with one fan, inside a mini-ATX case when they're both performing a 4K game at max settings?
Curious.
>>54816902
with how things are going i wouldn't be surprised to see the 1080TI launch with a $800 price tag, lets be real here. the vega 490 and fury variants will be priced way lower. not to mention the wait time, the titan cards always come out first.
>>54816889
Or just wait until the 1180 comes out, because it will be better than all of those.
See how this goes? Better to just buy now what you need.
>>54816889
>>54816899
I don't know who to believe, son.
>>54816965
Just get the fucking 1080 that's good (two fan/three fan) and sell it when 1080Ti has a release date and buy 1080Ti.
DONE.
>>54816965
he's right you will be disappointed you didn't wait but i'm also right that its release date is a long ways away. we'll likely see the titan come out in Q1 2017 then the 1080TI during Q3/4.
>>54812188
what is air con?
>>54816889
>waiting for the 1080ti
>so that in a year later the 1170 will come out, be 10% more powerful, for a quarter of the price
It's only really worth getting the **70/80 cards to be honest.
>>54816965
Just wait a few years until the 1280 Ti is out, it will blow away everything else.
No actually the 1580 is going to be better, wait a decade for that one, it will be worth it.
>>54817010
Even the 80s are overpriced, I'd say only the 50/60/70s are worth it.
>>54816965
Here's the reality.
1070 is out now.
1080 is out now.
They're good cards.
Vega wont' be out until 2017 and that's AMD speeding up their schedule meaning Nvidia fucked them up majorly with the 1070/1080, they won't have an answer in the high end segment for 6 months and even then since it's a rushed launch expect limited quantities. Heck HBM2 was already shaping up to be a horror show when it comes to availability. So sad times for AMD next year.
Meanwhile OC 1080s will be coming out for months.
And then the next supposed Titan will be out around the time Vega is ready. It will be better than Vega with significantly superior GPGPU - as can be expected from a prosumer card.
And then the 1080 Ti. And that will slay Vega in price and performance like the 9xx generation.
No reason to expect anything else.
>>54817088
>>54817012
>>54816983
Well, thanks for the tips, guys.
Looks like yet another case of just get what you can or face the "just wait until X...." game.
