Is P2P a meme technology?
>>54765508
Yes
>>54765508
No, it should be the way the internet works
>>54765508
Everytime you describe something as a meme, without additional explanation, someone somewhere, with explosive diarrhea forgets to wash their hands before handling your food.
>>54765540
>I want malware to be unavoidable
>>54765564
How do you figure?
>>54765585
Did you look at the picture?
>>54765652
Yes, you haven't explained how peer-to-peer networking makes malware unavoidable.
>>54765691
Are you aware of the idea that one bad apple ruins the entire bunch?
Think of this and look how each computer is connected
>>54765652
Are you fucking retarded?
>>54765724
Yes, if you don't take any precautions. Do people's bittorrents get ruined with garbage data?
>>54765724
Ah, yes. Yes, you are.
>>54765724
p2p doesn't make it more or less likely to get malware. It's a way to get data.
Think about this:
If instead of accessing a google server to get your data, you accessed a P2P network to get the same data.
How does one make the other more malware prone?
>>54765738
>bittorrent is p2p
I thought this was a technology board
>>54765742
Googlel is a botnet therefore its contents is malicious
>>54765749
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent
>BitTorrent is a communications protocol of peer-to-peer file sharing
>>54765774
It's not p2p in the classic meaning. You don't retrieve an entire file from a single source, you receive pieces of it from multiple sources.
>>54765785
>i dont know what im talking about
>>54765785
Yes from multiple peers.
P2P is jewish technology
>>54765785
> Huurrr durr
> I don't know what a p2p network is
>>54765785
bittorrentfags btfo
>>54765724
lol ok mate.
>a p2p network with file transfers verified with sha sums or something
>cannot modify the official sha sum without a majority of botnet computers sharing it
>a server based network
>hack it and modify/swap the file and sha sum hosted on it
>thousands of pcs infected because the admin was lazy/unaware
looking at you mint (but not thousands here lmao)
>>54765795
So then it's p2ps (peer to peers) not p2p you fucking autistic retard. Go back to college kid.
>>54765774
The argument being made is that BitTorrent is not a full communications protocol. It depends on how you are defining network. Ask a CCNP about a P2P network and then ask a software engineer. You're going to get two really different answers. The diagram is vague enough that both models apply
>>54765823
>>54765801
Topkek
>>54765839
All transmission protocols rely on layers above and below them. We're just nit picking now.
