Instead of all this botnet shit why doesn't somebody come up with something useful. Like a way for me search for local images based on description, not just title, type, dimensions, etc. For example, I type in spiders and it shows me all the pictures I have saved with spiders in it.
>>54764786
Image recognition isn't that simple, anon.
OP, you dumbass, go to bed
You mean like OneDrive does?
And yes, you can search locally in this manner as well.
>>54764786
better start solving captchas
>>54764844
fug
botnet wins again
>>54764844
>nignog
They are working on it OP.
>>54764786
lol it's ezpz, just fucking name your files based on content instead of 1459191111563.jpg
>>54764845
>solving captchas
hasn't seem to have improved goggle's image search tho tbqh famalam
And speaking of captchas, fuck you, I don't feel like playing your flip-card game. Too lazy to switch it to street signs though.
>>54764895
assuming you replied to wrong post
>hasn't seem to have improved goggle's image search tho tbqh famalam
that's because i do it wrong every time cuz fuck google
>>54764844
Does google not do this?
>>54764951
Sure, it does.
>>54764974
>>54764844
How can free software compete?
>>54764786
I would like a simple tagging tool for winduws myself.
>>54764984
It won't because its users are afraid of letting anyone have copies of their files.
>>54764844
>>54764951
>>54764974
Yeah, but will OneDrive or Google let me search through TBs worth of meams?
>>54764904
>ezpz
>>54764997
Well lucky for you it is literally built in.
If you don't like this, you can just make folders and pretend they're tags by symlinking files that belong to your 'tag' into the folder
>>54765011
both of those are anything but "simple" to do on the fly and the windows one is just plain bad, I've tested using it quite a bit but its shit.
Adding tags fast would be required instead of hopping through all those hoops
>>54765029
Well just wait, winfs is coming soon
>>54764786
LOL, you don't meta you data?
>>54764974
>>54764844
I have been using DropBox for ages, I save most of my shit on my dropbox, as in pictures I save from 4chan etc, theres shota, loli, beastiality, rape, weird porn, murder, gore etc is it safe to use OneDrive or GoogleDrive with them?
>>54764786
What do you think reCAPTCHA is collecting all that data for?
>>54765097
safe from your grandma:
yes
safe from NSA:
nope
not that they give a shit
>>54765011
>woman holding ribbon cable against butt.jpg
sauce
>>54765097
all that shit is for children. Grow up already.
>>54765126
the botnet cloud storage or the bad porn?
>Saving images
>You effectively owning any data
>Data you can preserve against censorship and removal
>Data you can share with others for free
>Data you don't pay a regular fee on
>Data that can't be combined with usage stats
That's not what the corps want
>>54764845
>>54765099
>>54746212
>>54765134
The botnet storage. Weird porn is a direct result of adulthood.
See, normies are eternal children. That's why they still like playground games (sports) and think shiny things make them cooler.
>>54765115
What would you trust more? Or witch one of them is less shitty? OneDrive or Google Drive?
>>54765169
I'm saying it doesn't matter. neither are guaranteed government proof and both will get the job done. Pick the one with prettier colors.
>>54765182
Just one more question, the metadata search only works online on both? It wont add metadata to files in explorer?
>>54765122
>>54765203
saved
(for no reason since I'll never find it again)
>>54764786
What do you think is on that USB drive, /g/?
>>54764974
Holy shit, awesome! It actually tags text inside pictures! AWESOME, searching for a thread screenshot with seconds for example
>>54764786
Also, image recognition would be useful for cameras. Say you take a picture of a sunset, it tags it sunset, sun, sky, dusk, etc. You take a picture at a birthday party, it tags it birthday, cake, balloons, etc.
>when will this technology be available for everyday use by anyone and how hard is it to implement
>mfw someone tells me instagram does this already
>>54765275
Instagram does this already anon
>>54765250
220V ~50Hz mains or it's one of pic related
>>54764786
Ah well, I'm not sure but I guess the way g00gl and M$ do it is to tag pictures (based on some A.I.).
So when you search for something it really just does a look up in their database.
So if you want to have something yourself, you either add tags yourself or build some AI that does it for you (might be a little bit difficult).
>https://jcornuz.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/tagging-your-images-for-easier-retrieval/
>http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/tag-pictures-easier-find#1TC=windows-7
>>54765293
>this kills the USB
>>54765275
Pretty good idea anon.
Also if you take a picture of that person it should include the name. And a small medical and criminal record, just the most important parts.
Maybe google glasses is for you?
>>54764808
>>54764984
>>54764997
>>54764998
How about a program that scans and compares your images to a database of known images and tags them accordingly.
Open source, of course.
>>54765316
It's a shame you must equate innovative technology with invasive and orwellian.
>>54764974
FUCK OFF JORDAN
REEEEE
>>54765356
I wouldn't want my porn to be compared to any database.
>>54765385
YOU'RE PORN COMES FROM A DATABASE, LOSER
>>54765387
>YOU'RE PORN
I wish anon I really do
Hydrus. Basically a booru engine for local files.
>>54765484
sounds interesting
>>54764901
>>54765637
Most of the shit I try it says
>I think it's two giraffes in a fenced in area.
>>54765142
>>54765142
>>54765142
>no one should own data
And they call open sores communist.
>>54765356
>a program that scans and compares your images to a database of known images and tags them accordingly
botnet. the idea
>>54765293
How do you charge it?
One exists.
For anime images.
http://demo.illustration2vec.net/
I'd rather save all my lolis on onedrive, at least they didn't overtly scan everything for ad potential like jewgle does
>>54766463
that's why i'm getting all these dog dildos and adult diaper ad's, fuck
>>54766499
You're one severely sick fuck
>>54766213
you don't, it uses the 5V from the USB, probably uses a boost converter to step up the voltage which in turn charges those big capacitors.
>>54766527
Thanks love
>>54765203
>reverse image search on this
>>54766213
>>54766542
Yup, it's true
http://kukuruku.co/hub/diy/usb-killer
>charges the capacitors 110V then applies it to the signal lines of the USB port
>>54766064
Yes, a botnet. Used to your advantage for a change, not the other way around.
