>3840x2400
>Released in 2001
IBM was so ahead of its time.
That's a sexy monitor
>60 msec response time
>>54762882
2016 and still no gpu to run games @4k
>>54762882
They pushed the limits. IBM was part of the space exploration epoch, and had the mindset of build it the best you can imagine.
>>54762882
I wish it was still viable but
>15Hz
>goes for $600+ used
Would've been pretty neat if I mustered the money a few years ago
>>54762936
>4K 144+FPS on Alien Isolation.
>DaS3 4K 50-60FPS
GTX970 isn't the best card out there but 4K have been possible since a while back now.
>>54762882
That thing must be ghosting as fuck, whats the refresh and response time?
>>54763003
wtf is DaS3? You mean DS3, Dark Souls?
Didn't it cost like $15,000 when it was released?
>>54763288
Like 15Hz and 60ms, although I've heard that you can actually overclock the monitor to get to like 75Hz
>>54762882
>shut down computer
>picture of desktop stays on screen for another 2 minutes
>>54763300
>Doesn't know what DeS and DaS is.
>>54763312
No clue, not a /v/tard
>>54763318
Claims he's not a /v/-tard, brings up DaS3, but shits up the DaS abbrevation.
So you're a retard then.
It was shilled to hell on /g/ a few years back by some bald fag. Glad now that 4k monitors are like $250 he stopped making them.
>>54762936
You can easily run games at 4k if you turn down some settings.
>>54763329
Ohh, I'm a retard yeah, got it now.
DeS = Demons Souls
DaS = Dark Souls
As I sayd, not a gaymer
>>54763370
No problem.
There's too many abbreviations with just DS3 in it and DS means both Demon's Soul and Dark souls so the souls community started calling them that once DaS was released.
>>54762882
What machine in 2001 could possibly have supported that resolution?
>>54763441
Every monitor that had DVI.
>>54763385
i see DS as dungeon siege
>>54763464
I see Disco Stu
>>54763470
I see dual shock
>>54763348
>Running anything less than max
>>54762882
>tfw have wanted to buy one but have no idea where to get it
>>54762882
DT880 and T70?
>>54762882
SGI was already putting out 16:10 widescreen flat panel monitors for years by the time the T221 was in vogue (at least as much as you could call it that), and a high-end CRT would wreck that thing in everything but pixel density.
It's a nice piece of technology that I would love to own, but it's not really innovative. IBM was never ahead of the curve in desktops and workstations.
>>54763441
They typically shipped with quad-GPU Matrox abominations, mostly due to the kludgy way IBM designed it. While it has one panel, it acts as four, and requires four separate DVI connectors.
Single-chip Matrox boards were more than capable of 2K resolution and beyond, though. High resolutions weren't some alien concept.
