less verbose

>>54756548
>but it sounds really unreliable

Only if you don't know what you're doing.

if I would want to use a language that is not dynamically typed, I would not be using C.

>>54756626
best static typed language?

whats the point of this shitposting? maybe its "easier", but it sounds really retarded. maybe its just because i don't have down syndrome?

>>54756638
Probably a language from the ML family.

>>54756638
Absolutely not. C# is way better. More functionality built in, less verbose, way more flexible. Why on earth would you use C if you don't need to absolutely maximise performance

Duck typing, eval functions, mock objects, more easily facilitated generic programming, metaprogramming, etc.

It's like the difference between Doppler radar and looking out the window; both have merits.

>>54756673
C#
You mean most convoluted language.
It's like PHP on steroid.

>Have event, delegate and lambda expression.
>All doing the same thing but technically different.
>Having query in LINQ but later retrofit to put lambda, to reduce readability of our code.

>>54756757
C# is java with c syntax, practically shit tier. c++ is the one true programming language

Hello fellow anons, can you help with a python program, it's supposed to do some things like facebook :)

>>54756548
Marklar with dynamic marklar is just as readable as marklar with static marklar. Marklar who disagree are obviously marklar.

Writing marklar when the marklar is obvious from marklar just increases marklar without adding any marklar.

>>54756883
bantz?

>>54756548
>whats the point of dynamic typing? maybe its "easier"
/thread