speccy thread?
speccy thread
Dat 2500k.
Old but still good.
Hoping my 5820k is similar. (though at least my motherboard supports 10 core CPUs if I ever really needed more)
>>54719552
mirin' that storage man, i couldnt even imagine using up what i currently have
>>54719506
I can't fucking wait to get rid of my 780 when Polaris arrives.
>>54719575
I've got about 6-7TB free, I should be set for the year, maybe a bit longer.
70% is anime, rest is movies, TV, music, games, books, and programs.
>>54719592
i got a 2nd one today for just $180 AUD, will keep me going until polaris aswell
Guess what im upgrading next.
>>54721320
That empty spot in your soul
Waiting for Polaris :3
>>54722295 here
>chkdsk the samsung drive
> BLOCKING ISSUE : your hard disk has 91 pending sectors. Those are sectors that couldn't be properly read and that the hard disk logic is waiting for a write operation to try to remap to a spare sector (if available).
WELP
Just ordered a 6TB WD Blue off of Amazon...
pleb here, I've been meaning to ask you guys, is it right for my ram to be clocked at 799MHz?
I'm pretty sure these were advertised as higher when I built this pc long ago, 1600 maybe, why are some clocked higher like these >>54719552
>>54719592
and others lower like these >>54722295
>>54722358
is it a configuration issue, or is it intended?
I'm waiting for Zen. However, I will most likely not upgrade, unless I can get a real 8 core.
>>54719506
>4.5 GHz
You lucky son of a bitch
>>54719552
How much have you spent on your drives?
>>54721320
Gonna get a 1070/1080, or are just going to wait for Polaris?
Budget build, non-pc gamer although I am seriously considering wanting to create a Steam account just for Dark Souls 3.
>>54723692
>How much have you spent on your drives?
Current ones?
$750? maybe a bit more.
>>54723707
I had two 2TB drives die on me this year :(
>>54723681
DDR stands for double data rate. You double the number shown in Speccy to get the actual speed of your memory. So your sticks are running at the rated 1600MHz, whereas >>54719592 for instance is DDR4 3333MHz.
>>54723845
That sucks, i haven't had a drive die on me in years. My old drives I copy the data from them and then put them in my closet (so it's sorta like a backup I don't update). That way if a drive dies in just bring back the drive (or drives) the data originally came from.
Of course new data i would lose out on, but the majority of my media that is new is being put on my newest drives, so not a huge concern. And I also have an online backup using crashplan, it's slow for the initial upload, but it's cheap and it works.
>>54723925
thanks anon
>>54723692
Probably going to go 1080 this time. I realize the Ti card will be better in every measureable way, but if I can get a 1080 to run at 60fps on max settings at 1080p ill be happy. The 760 4gb is a great card for what I paid, but in some situations it does show its age, specifically with heavy light effects. Doubling the memory is probably the biggest thing im looking at.
People will say im shilling but I haven't had a Radeon card since the 4000 series and even then, id buy an XFX if I were to. EVGA has been good to me.
I think some upgrades are in order
>4 more GB of RAM
>R9 2/390X
>New CPU cooler
>better case fans
>a lot more storage
Can anyone recommend a good air cooler that will handle an OC'd 2600K? Maybe a Dark Rock Pro 3?
>>54726576
can recommend thermalright macho a bw
overclocked my i5-2500k runs 65°C under load at 4,5ghz
bls no bully
>>54721258
hail Xeon
>TFW fell for skylake meme
"Upgraded" from Xeon x5650 to i5 6600k.
Fuck me in the ass, what a huge mistake. At least I sold my old motherboard for $300.
>>54727194
No. You're not serious.
Waiting on Zen. Fuck me AMD HURRY UP. I want my 10 core chip.
>>54727317
Why would you want Zen when you already have a good enough computer? Wait another 5 years.
750ti reporting
>>54727317
4690k won't bottleneck anything for a while guy
>>54727345
encoding times. My i5 is great for gaming but really lags when trying to encode videos. I have many Blu-ray rips that get up to around 50gb and even with my i5 overclocked, encodes take up to 1 hour and 15 minutes. This is for a single video and I do up to 5 videos at a shot. That's almost 7 hours of leaving my my main PC locked at 100% usage unable to do anything else. With moar coars I would be able to open my encoding software in a VM, set 4-6 cores for encoding, and use the rest for other stuff.
Not to mention newer standards. USB 3.1 ports/USB C. More pcie lanes so I can run nvme SSDs at fully capability.
haven't decided on a 1070 or 1080 yet.
seems like I'd rather get two 1070s and OC the piss out of them at the "founders" crap prices.
>>54727191
Its a fun chip, but I itch for something more powerful.
was running a Q6600 with everything untill i upgraded to an i5. next purchase, a new psu and gpu :3
>>54727900
What PSU Are you using? Might not be necessary to get a new one. Any idea what GPU? The jump forward in CPU performance from 6600 to the i5 was nice yea?
H I
I
Kind of related question. Do you think getting a refurbished Asus Z68 mATX motherboard for $90 and a used i7 2600k for $150 is a good deal?
>>54727900
I'm running a corsair CX500m. gpu, i'm not sure yet. might wait until amd has brought their new cards out before i make a decision. but those new nvidia ones do look tasty. if i was to buy a new psu it would have to be able to handle any future sli/crossfire setups i might have, but thats a while away yet lol
>>54727971
>>54728064
quoted the wrong post lol
>>54725533
>1080 to run at 60fps on max settings at 1080p ill be happy
>1080p
Nigga just get Polaris or pay a little extra for the 1070.
>>54727994
no.You'd be buying into an old chip, older standard, and on the chance the motherboard just dies, you're fucked.
A 4790k could be had for $250 and Z97 board for $120. More money? Yes.
Or save and get a brand new 6700k and Z170. I say this because you plan to keep the CPU/mobo for a long time, don't buy into old standards.
Mines a sad prebuilt from 2011, I don't dare to post specs they are sad.
>>54727194
>Xeon x5650
Nigga why not get a 5820k?
>>54728105
Cool. Thanks.
>>54728108
Post em anyways so we can laugh at you.
>>54728064
just stay away from the CX series in the future. They'd mediocre quality. Look at something like the EVGA G series. Or V series from Cooler Master.
Ok. On the lookout for an upgrade to Zen/*-E and Vega/1080Ti.
>>54728128
Na, I will build a pc one day, but have other prioritizes right now.
I honestly have no idea what i should with my computer. Maybe grab an SSD or something.
>>54728202
>not falling for the SSD meme
Do it faggot. I bought a TB when it was $400, now you can find them for less than $250. Maybe a 250GB for less than $100 will do.
>>54728119
X5650 was LGA1366
5820k is LGA2011, which is another based socket.
>>54728139
ive been eyeing up the EVGA ones, all the reviews ive read/watched have all been pretty much positive. just not sure what wattage to go with.
Rate it.
This is a desktop.
>>54728236
Damn son I didn't realize they had gotten that cheap. I always saw them as a luxury not a necessity.
>>54719506
any mITX bros in here?
>>54719506
Getting a 970 in a few days
>>54728336
Why not grab a used 980ti or wait for the 1080/1070?
>>54728290
Patrician build senpai
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta
>>54728336
As a 970 owner myself, you are waiting a few days, might as well wait a few more for the 1070. Who knows, maybe Polaris will come out in June as well.
>>54727994
Sandy bridge are still good , i own a 2500k and dont plan on upgrading my cpu for the next 2/3 years , it all depend on what you are aiming for! Its good for 1080p gaming and shitposting , maybe a lil enconding since you are talking about a 2600k. I also own a refurbished Z68 gen 3 board for a years now and i Oc the shit out of my cpu and everything is running smooth as fuck.
The other anon also right! Its old tech , adding just a little would give you better and new.
>>54719506
Ooh yeah, you jelly right? Yeah.
Meh?
>tfw no money to build a new pc
Pic related is a prebuilt form 2011. I really need to upgrade the ram, not sure what kind?
Adding more RAM, but I just finished installing openSUSE on this thing.
>tfw installing openSUSE with a serial console.
Anything I should upgrade or improve on?
>>54729040
get another [spoiler]8gb of ram[/spoiler]
>>54728530
Thanks for your response, too, Anon.
>>54731094
>>54731094
>>54731094
Not bad for something I got for.
Thoughts?
Spooky thread?
>>54719506
>>54731884
>Opera
Into le bin you go.
need dat dere polaris 480x
another 8gm ram would be nice
why is my ram running at 799mhz? it's supposed to be 1600
>>54732001
>tfw haven't bothered to rice anything beyond muh colorz
>>54732799
What's wrong with Opera? It's actually a really nice browser. Only issue I have with it is the high ram usage.
>>54732934
>Only issue I have with it is the high ram usage.
>he didn't fall for the 16gb ram meme
what the fuck do i upgrade besides storage, /g/?
>>54733459
polaris
>>54733915
but muh pascal
Buying a HDD soon
>>54719506
>4.5ghz
>32 nm
My cpu is 3.2 ghz and 45nm. Brother.
>>54719506
Here's your speccy
>>54728097
I don't upgrade cards very often and I have yet to own a "flagship" near launch. Hell, my 8800 Ultra was almost a year old when I bought it. The 1080 should carry me for 5-7 years for what I do and SLI is always an option.
>>54728274
For a single card, a 650 is a good choice. SLI 750 or 850 depending on CPU and GPU choice.
>>54728274
For a single card, a 650 is a good choice. SLI 750 or 850 depending on CPU and GPU choice.
>>54719506
With a Noctua NH-D14
>>54728236
You can get 500gb for 100$ now. I just bought a 120gb for 35$ and a 500gb Samsung 850 for 120$
>>54737361
>500gb Samsung 850 for 120$
Where?
figured this thread would be good for this.
So this is my first build. I have always been that guy spending over $1k on laptops/ultrabooks and never owned a desktop. Figured today was the day.
I am trying to keep it under $1200 with the 970. I know I can just remove the astros, but I am in need of good headphones and I also game on ps4 and having the ability to listen to pc and ps4 at the same time is a plus.
Thoughts? advice?
>>54737998
Buy real headphones for 1/2 the cost and enjoy much better headphones.
Also, dont buy Windows 10, especially if you're building in the next few weeks. Just buy W7 or W8 off reddit (should cost $20-30) then use the free upgrade to W10.
I did it 3 days ago with my gfs new desktop, saved me $70 from buying W10.
>>54719506
Kek
>>54738016
>Also, dont buy Windows 10, especially if you're building in the next few weeks. Just buy W7 or W8 off reddit (should cost $20-30) then use the free upgrade to W10.
I was thinking about this, but then I remember reading somewhere that may is the last month one can upgrade to windows 10.
Any recommendations for headphones that can do what the astros can do?
>>54738043
>may is the last month one can upgrade to windows 10.
July
like i fucking said, if you're building in the next month, you're fine.
Any headphones can do what the astros do if you're not retarded, they just have a built in DAC.
Buy a USB DAC if you want.
Honestly i'd recommend doing a LOT more research on audio before spending $200 on shitty gaymer headphones, they're legit ~$50 headphones, if that.
>>54737998
I would suggest looking into Xeons, some of them are just rebranded i7's without a gpu and the ability to overclock so they sell for less. Neweggs servers are all fucked right now so I can't point you to a Xeon that performs better than the i5 4460 for less than $180 right now but I would definitely look into it.
>>54738176
just changed that to the i5-6600k
>>54738253
It looks like you are getting about 100mhz more with the 6600k than all the Xeons I am seeing around that price, some of the Xeons offer HT but if you are gaming you will probably not even notice it.
>Here are a few Xeons I saw in a quick search
E3-1231V3
E3-1225
E3-1230
>>54737998
What are you using now?
Rate?
>>54738470
right now? I never owned a desktop. but I am using a surface pro 3 and ave owned a few other laptops and ultrabooks.
>>54738436
>>54737998
made some changes.
Any Suggestions?
>>54738518
Looks like a good build
>>54719506
Under $1000 build?
>>54738518
if you have microcenter nearby you could probably save a bit more.
Also if you're getting a B150 board you can't overclock so its kinda wasted money getting the "K" cpu, since the "K" CPUs are meant for overclocking.
R8
>>54738509
I can replace the i5 with the i7-6700k if you guys think it would be worth it.
rate.
Im actually worried as to why my i5 is running so hot. It has turbo boost off and it is undervolted, with only 25% usage atm.
Also, no fucking clue how to overclock RAM on my motherboard.
>>54738606
>5930k
>two GPUs
wew
Should've got the 5960x or the 5820k getting the 5930k with dual GPUs just tells us you're an idiot who either doesn't understand how PCI lanes are used, or simply likes to waste money for no performance gains.
>>54738509
I really like the Noctua because it is so quiet, but it is about $70, also the MSI 970 takes a slight hit in performance but I read that it is also very quiet, just don't expect them to honor a rebate. If you can wait till Zen you might be able to get some of this for less although DDR4 may go up due to demand.
>>54738509
get a z170 board for cheaper. Why get a b150 with a K series part?
>>54738620
Intel may have used bad TIM on your CPU, some of the 3rd gen would overheat @stock speeds/volts
>>54738713
I thought devils canyon was to fix that ffs.
I even have a watercooler...
>>54737269
Anybody want to rate my PC?
I have a Samsung 500gb 850 evo on the way
>>54738747
Still not as good as soldered IHS like on xeons or 5820k/5930k/5960x
>>54738747
I don't know if they did, I quit paying attention after I bought a 3rd gen.
>>54738747
It's still shit, I'm probably going to delid my 4790k since it loves voltage but runs way too hot to OC past 4.6
>>54738795
I heard the 4th gen had some issue with maybe the graphics or some other new device in the CPUs that prevented high overclocks compared to the 3rd gen.
>>54738689
I did see the Asus Z170-A, but it was like $50 more. Then I saw this, will this work?
>>54738903
You might be thinking of AVX2 instructions, which raped haswell thanks to adaptive voltage.
Apparently anything higher than 1.29v is just too much for the shitty thermal paste to handle, and that's what I need to break 4.7.
>>54738936
Do you have a Microcenter near you? I think they offer the $30 off on all their mobos, when I built my 3770k pc for some reason there was an extra $100 discount on my receipt, I assume it was another combo discount but I didn't ask for fear they would remove it.
Their combo deals are cheaper but you have to pay tax
>>54739072
If you have microcenter look at the 5xxx or the 4xxx series as they will be significantly cheaper than online prices.
Skylake however because it's newer is only gonna be like $20-30 cheaper than online (meaning the tax you pay will probably be more than your savings)
I got my 5820K + motherboard for $460 from microcenter compared to $550 from newegg.
>>54739130
Do you save $30 if you buy any cpu and mobo or does the cpu have to be listed on the sale page
>>54739182
Not sure as I have only ever done it with their promotional CPUs. It's not worth it to save $30-40, it IS worth it if you're saving $80+
>>54738936
For about $60 more you can step into socket 2011 and a 5820k. Also you can get a Xeon down the road for that future upgradeability. Skip the Xion case as well, I built my first PC in one and it was cool to look at but that was before I knew about cable management. Look at the Corsair 200r or 300r.
>>54738606
And that folks is why I didn't buy a 5930k. My 5820k holds a higher stable OC and is in essence the same chip minus 3way+ SLI which I will never use anyway. Glad I saved $130.
>>54739253
will the 5820k really be an upgrade, because like I said, if it is worth it, I can upgrade from the one I have there to the i7-6700k.
>>54739334
the 5820k is a 6700k with 2 more cores, double the L3 cache and slightly more power hungry.
6700k has 1.75B transistors
5820k has ~2.6B transistors
As long as what you're doing can utilize the extra cores and cache, the 5820k is far superior to the 6700k.
>>54719506
Build yesterday
RAM is actually Kingston HyperX 2133Mhz
>>54739433
>RAM is actually Kingston HyperX 2133Mhz
>16GB single channel DDR4 1066Mhz
That's the same thing anon, DDR is double data rate, so double the 1066mhz figure to get 2133Mhz.
Also, single channel?
>>54719506
gpu is an 860m
>>54739697
Yeah single channel. It was cheap.
Had to save a few bucks
>>54732836
Multiply the speed of your ram by 2. It is running at 1600mhz.
>>54732836
Basically what >>54739697 said.
>>54739334
For today's programs? No. For the future that will utilize more cores and L3 as well as having a longer lasting socket (should be anyway) Very very much so.
>>54719575
You can, when you start collecting HD movies. And I didn't even start with 4K.
>>54741233
>And I didn't even start with 4K.
Mine is all 1080p and 720p (and some SD stuff when not available in a higher res)
>>54719552
>>54741262
Same for me, except some rare Youtube 4K videos (And from my phone). But Bluray movies take 20 GB easily per file.
>>54741294
>Bluray movies take 20 GB easily per file
i've got some large animes
>pic related
Looking to upgrade to a Xeon E5-2687W v2 when the finances allow. Perhaps a 1070 too.
planning to build new PC in few months, thinking about i5 6600K and gtx1070 with 16gb ram, maybe new 1440p monitor, anons think it will be worth to put old gramps to retirement?
>>54741962
I upgraded from a Q6600 and a GTX 9800 with 8GB DDR2 and a 240GB SSD for boot to a 5820k and GTX 960 (soon to be 1070).
It was beautiful
>>54719506
Dell Latitiude XT2, good enough to watch animated chinese porn at 720p
Holding up pretty well.
I'm planning on buying a GTX 960, will this make any sense to do without upgrading my processor and getting an SDD as well?
I'm just now looking at what I need to to do get my computer into the current decade and it seems like it's going to cost around $600
Any other ideas for upgrades that will make sense and not cost me a whole bunch of money at once?
Thanks /g/
>>54719506
How do you guys like my PowerG3?
>>54743780
screenfetch mistakes a lot of ARM processors for powerpc g3 m8
>>54743806
Does it even have ARM profiles?
Got my beast here, ready to game.
>>54743861
>witcher 3
why even bother with the game on low graphics?
>>54743914
I completely agree with you, which is why I haven't played past the first few hours. Waiting till I upgrade my PC. I was able to run it on high, but I was getting some serious drops every now and then.
>>54743861
SIMBLY EPIC
>>54743990
Hey man, I know shes a little old, but I've been using this beast for almost 5 years now. Shes served me well. That 7950 has lasted me since I bought it. Shits going hung up on my wall when I replace it.
>>54744031
>Shits going hung up on my wall when I replace it.
Like my Voodoo 2 PCI
>>54744031
I was talking about your desktop, it's really nice. I don't give a shit about your pc parts.
>>54744072
oh... sorry
>>54743634
There are cheaper ways to upgrade, a major sell off of 8350s and mobos are expected during Zen's release, also there are many different Xeon options, you can get 2 quad core Xeons, a server board and 32gb of ram for just over $100 that will rival an i7
>>54744133
Thanks for the response!
What does all of that mean?
>>54744133
why would someone with an i7 want to "upgrade" to a 8350?
>>54744221
i may be tech illiterate but 2.8ghz is shit for gaming regardless of i5 v i7, right?
>>54744221
>>54744249
Well my 9590 runs at 4.8GHz
>>54744133
>you can get 2 quad core Xeons, a server board
Unless he wants it for gayming, then a server board with two CPU's would be idiotic.
>>54744271
>Well my 9590 runs at 4.8GHz
lol what's the power draw on that?
My 5820k hits ~200w at 4.5Ghz
>>54744290
Over 200W, more when its boosting to 5.2GHz
>>54744306
>5820k
220*
>>54744249
my xeons runs at 2.9 and it's just fine for gaming
anything post 2010 is just fine for gaming unless you're doing full retard 4k/vr
>>54744320
Are you using TWO CPU's for gayming?
That's a extreme bottleneck right there, that's why you can't game with Xeons and have to buy a more expensive CPU with better single core performance, sorry bud.
>>54744249
>>54744271
Clock speed means nothing when comparing different CPU architectures, especially cross-brand.
Efficiency, transistor count and cache size all play a much bigger role- just look into benchmarks for your applications and see what works for you.
>>54744306
At stock the 9590 is a 220w power draw, so I figured it would be more than 200w by default.
I personally can't recommend anyone purchase an AMD chipset right now, AM3 and the 900 series chipsets are 3-4 years old at this point, they dont even have PCIe 3.0 or USB 3.0 native support. And they only support a handful of SATA 3 lanes, you need add on chips for more, same with USB.
Not to mention all future AMD CPUs will be on socket AM4, so there is literally no upgrade path available.
Wait for zen or buy intel, that's really your only choices at the moment unless you're on a SUPER extreme budget.
I should have fucking waited for Pascal. But whatever.
>>54744347
I got mine in 2013
>>54727194
Going from a $1000 CPU to a $250 CPU expecting an upgrade
>>54744331
well I'm using a 660 ti, so
>>54732856
>>54744366
Oh no, I wasn't talking about you, I was more commenting about the other guy upgrading from the i7 860. I can't recommend AM3+ or an 8350/9590 in mid 2016, a year+ ago sure, not now.
>>54744372
Does not matter, the PCI lane with the 660 is only connected to one CPU and it's fucking hard for anything to use the second CPU, drivers and Windows are still trying and cucking the game performance to shit.
>>54744381
Yup, it would be a stupid thing to do.
Better Intel shit now-a-days.
>>54744389
I'm not using windows
Never fall for the ULV meme. This laptop is an absolute piece of shit.
>>54744271
dual Xeons both overclocked to i5 speeds is not bad for gaming and it will only get better when multithreaded games become the norm, of course this will not beat an i7 with 4 cores at current games, but it will destroy that the i7 at some of the new ones and you save about $500.
>>54743634
>>54744133
>>54744419
So if I kept my i7 860 and got a GTX 960 that would be a smart move for the next 4-5 months while new CPUs are released?
>>54744410
>it's just fine for gaming
Anything else then Windows is not fine for gaming, as much as I hate to say it.
>>54744419
You could have two i7' with 8 cores at 4.5GHz, and it would still suck, unless you use SLI/CFX, because how the card talk to processors. It would actually make the performance worse then a single same i7.
>>54744440
yup, cheapest and best move to make.
Then you can examine AMD's Zen performance compared to whatever Intel has out at the time.
>>54744459
I've had no issues with games on linux
everything I play works on linux
>>54744440
Definitely
>>54744475
It might work,
might work better even on Windows
come at me br0
>>54744494
>CPU is meh, fine, depends on OC
>8GB? And 800Mhz RAM? Timings are OK.
>A 970A, nice cheapo workhorse.
>970? Boo, that's a toy card
>No SSD, no RAID, bunch of different sized hard drives.
>Realtek HD audio..sigh
>>54744542
>800Mhz RAM
speccy doesn't double the speed (DDR is double data rate) so it's 1600Mhz.
>>54744573
Exactly. Not even 1866.
>>54744542
>CPU is meh, fine, depends on OC
Got it a year after the 8320's came out, can only hit 4.2, its lasted fine for anything i need it to do
>800Mhz RAM
1600........
>A 970A, nice cheapo workhorse.
100% trash for overclocking unless i get a 8320E, my stock voltage is 1.4v...
>No SSD, no RAID, bunch of different sized hard drives
WD 10,000RPM Velociraptor 250GB as my OS/Boot drive, got it for a very good price years ago when 250GB SSD's cost a arm and a leg
All others are ones i've filled, the newest is the 3 TB drive
>Realtek HD audio..sigh
I can also pump audio out thru the 970 :^)
>>54744494
Did you overclock the 8320?
Does 8320 bottleneck the gtx 970?
>>54744573
>>54744602
What I mean is, 1866 is exactly the MAX a FX series CPU can take, you are cucking yourself with a few %'s of performance just laying there.
>>54744607
>WD 10,000RPM Velociraptor 250GB as my OS/Boot drive
Ugh, no where near SSD in performance, it's like a slightly better HDD.
>>54744607
You'd be better off with a 60GB SSD.
>>54744609
>Does 8320 bottleneck the gtx 970
Not in any way that i would notice it, i play a decent amount of Planetside 2, when its 100 VS 100 on some bases it can drag it down
>>54744615
>you are cucking yourself
Im cucking myself more than you think because its only single channel
>>54744624
>no where near SSD in performance
Again, SSD's prices were to high when i built this new computer, was not worth the extra cash when i've had not a single issue with it.
>>54744636
>single channel
witch is useless because you'd need to get new ram anyways
>>54744630
>You'd be better off with a 60GB SSD.
Not really, im already at the maximum amount of drives on this motherboard at the moment and i wont need more space for awhile, getting a SSD boot drive would mean i LOOSE space
>>54744648
I mean, I got a 240GB for $70 on sale, just pick one up. It's night and day difference
>>54744651
.. Or just another 8GB stick at 1600 9-9-9-24, but i wont do anything to it until ZEN comes out wanna see where that takes me
>>54744665
>Not using PCI-E SATA/RAID cards with bunch of DDR3 for cache.
>>54744671
>It's night and day difference
I've built systems with SSD's as the boot disk, its a bit faster but i'm not about to go out and buy something i dont need
Not going to upgrade any time soon, maybe I'll get a higher capacity SSD
>>54744542
what´s so wrong with Realtek
>>54744699
>i'm not about to go out and buy something i dont need
I could already tell from the AMD platform, 1080 60hz main monitor and the 1024p 5:4 2nd monitor.
>>54744714
>generally shitier then a decent DAC with DSP and with a bunch of opamps.
>>54744722
>1024p 5:4 2nd monitor.
Someone sounds jealous
>>54744759
I have one sitting right next to me actually, not particularly jelly since it was replaced 4 months ago by dual 2560x1440p IPS panels.
>>54744786
im not impressed
>>54744808
That's okay, I didn't buy them to impress you.
>>54744826
Rate me
>>54744699
>its a bit faster
It's fuckload faster then a bunch of 7200RPM drives in RAID0, latency bitch, not bandwidth.
>>54744850
Eh, almost same specs as my phone!
>>54744853
>It's fuckload faster then a bunch of 7200RPM drives in RAID0
I dont have fucking RAID dipshit, i dont even reboot my system too often and like i fucking said before i dont have a issue with my velociraptor
>>54744607
>100% trash for overclocking
Goes up to 5GHz easily with many fine tweaked options about memory, bus speeds, voltages.
Don't see how its tash?
>>54744909
it's more about application launch latency. I click google chrome and I am on my homepage within a heartbeat. I click on one of my bookmarks, same thing.(i'm also using a RAMDisk for temporary internet files though)
>>54744909
YES, exactly, you don't, because even if you did they would still not be faster then a SSD. You fail to see the point, uh? English ain't your first language I guess.
>>54744921
>Goes up to 5GHz easily
Wut....
My board literally has to cut the voltage and power draw because i'm pretty sure it would catch fire if it didn't.
>>54744927
>I click google chrome and I am on my homepage within a heartbeat
Me too! because chrome is already in RAM thanks to superfetch
>>54744933
>You fail to see the point
I'm not the one failing to see the point, i never said it wouldn't be faster, it's just that i have no reason for a upgrade like that since i dont suffer slowdown i can feel.
>>54744960
You're the guy who talks shit about how little the upgrades would be for you, then act like its a whole new world when you do finally upgrade and have your mind blown and you rave about how amazing shit is.
I hate you.
>>54745013
This
tfw already mid range
>>54744960
>My board literally has to cut the voltag...
I owned that board and it was very stable at 4.8GHz with 1.4500V core.
>>54745031
>single GPU
>5930k
Lol a fool and his money.
>>54745013
>little the upgrades would be for you
Yes, for me, who else would i be speaking for dipshit?
> then act like its a whole new world when you do finally upgrade and have your mind blown and you rave about how amazing shit is.
I never said it wouldn't be amazing, i have used and built systems with SSD's they are a bit faster at booting up and launching programs, ut once again, I HAVE NEVER HAD A FUCKING ISSUE WITH MY SETUP, you keep failing to remember this point
You should kill all of your blood family then commit suicide
>>54745038
>I owned that board and it was very stable at 4.8GHz with 1.4500V core.
Pls stop anon i can't handle it anymore :( ive spent too much time trying to get it above 4.2 and it just wont
Temps while playing bonerwatch
>>54745068
Ya see, I consider a slow as fuck HDD system a piece of shit, you could make a $60 quality of life investment and buy yourself an SSD and at least make it FEEL faster.
As it is you're just screaming out I DONT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS
No fucking shit, it works but it's slow as dicks.
Dont tell me it runs fine, I have a fucking 10k raptor drive too you stupid nigger, its slow garbage and has been for almost 8 years.
>>54745068
this is my cpu-z from ages back on a GA-970A-DS3
>>54745103
>I consider a slow as fuck HDD system a piece of shit
It's a good thing your opinions are shit too
Jesus fuck do you own stock in companies that produce SSD's? You haven't shut the fuck up about how i should upgrade because you think it will FEEL faster to me. Im already at the maximum number of drives, i dont want to replace my boot drive, deal with it nigger.
>>54745071
The only LITERAL difference between the 5820k and 5930k (besides the $200 price increase and meaningless clockspeed bump) is the fact it has 40 PCIe lanes at your disposal compared to the 5820k which only has 28 PCIe lanes.
Now if you're unaware, PCIe lanes are really only useful for GPUs and other PCI cards (RAID cards or 10Gbps NICs, GPUs, etc) The simple fact you have a SINGLE GPU using up a whole 16 PCIe lanes (It would only lose 1-3% performance dropping to 8 PCIe lanes but that's besides the point here). Leaving you a whopping 32 unused PCIe lanes on that CPU.
So TLDR here is you spent extra money on a 5930k when it's getting you zero benefit over the 5820k which costs hundreds of dollars less. If you stole the 5930k or happen to have gotten as part of the Intel insiders program, congrats. But otherwise it was just money wasted.
Only get the 5930k if you're doing triple or quad GPU, or you have a stupidly large RAID array or similar. Single GPU or even Dual GPU will be fine on the 5820k and save you a good chunk of change.
how amd meme am I?
>>54745136
>FX-6300
That might be why, i have a 8320, and a TDP of 125
>>54745172
oh you are sperging out on the price. i got mine for free. even if i didn't i would've gotten one from ebay anyways where it was only $40 more than the 5820k at the time because people were flooding it from retail edge.
>>54745257
Yeah like I said in the post, if you got it for near 5820k price it's fine.
Never knew speccy was so informative; I like.
Cpu temp lies.
Speedfan report is accurate tho.
Also, why does my 1.5tb show as 0?
>>54745103
They should make a Raptor SSD, it would just spin the SSD around so fast that it would probably create a vortex, if we were to use the theory of relativity who knows how this would increase or decrease performance or if it would create a black hole that sucks up all your trap pics.
