What linux distro should I use /g/
>>54719297
Ubermix is pretty great
>>54719297
Anything but a gtk distro
>>54719297
If you are a casual user use Ubuntu, Elementary OS or Mint.
If you are new to Linux and want to learn more about it try Debian.
If you are an advanced user you could try Arch or Gentoo.
I swear, almost everyone on 4chins now in days is cancer.
>>54719297
None, install a cracked windows 7 without updates
अच्छा साहब, आप का उपयोग करना चाहिए Windows 10
t. Pajeet
>>54719436
Until it boots itself and install windows 10
>>54719297
Install Gentoo
>>54719335
>uses LXDE/LXQt
>thinks GTK is the problem
Rethink your life choices.
>>54719297
Depends on what you want to do with linux. If you want a good, stable desktop OS then use debian.
>>54719483
>Thinks it is lxde
Rethink suicide
answer is gentoo
>>54719297
Too much time on your hands: Gentoo
Boring office stuff like spread sheets: Red Hat, CentOS
Gaming and noobs general: Ubuntu
Entry-level coding: Debian
Reale serious coding, top-end server stuff and hacking: Arch
>>54719472
>not being able to Crack and configure windows 7
Hang yourself with your belt
>>54719531
>Reale serious coding, top-end server stuff and hacking: Arch
lol
Dr. Donald Knuth uses Ubuntu
Linus Torvalds uses Fedora
Dr. Richard Stallman uses GNewSense
(NOOBS)
Actual pros use Arch or Gentoo.
>>54719335
what's the screen capture thingy in the taskbar called?
seems neat
>>54719560
kazam
>>54719500
A good, stable and outdated OS.
>>54719297
Gentoo, Ubuntu, Debian, and Redhat/CentOS are the only ones really worthwhile.
>>54719583
>What is Debian sid/experimental?
>>54719583
>outdated
You can install software from the unstable and testing repositories, in case if you want to be bleeding edge.
If I trim down my kernel size, will my system boot faster?
like get rid of all useless drivers
>>54719601
An OS that has no security updates
>>54719586
I can agree with this.
Gentoo for personal computers (if you're tech literate)
Ubuntu for gaming systems or if you're tech illiterate, also for trying out Canonical technology (e.g. LXD or MAAS)
Debian or CentOS for servers
>>54719612
How is it better than Arch?
>>54719549
>Cracking own OS
>>54719628
It's actually very stable compared to arch, for one thing. It has more installation recipes and flavours than arch does, allowing for bigger customisability than arch. Almost every single distro out there is based off of debian, so you can be sure that anything which works on other distros, will work on debian easily. Everything also just works out of the box, debian aims to be easy to use as well.
Slackware.
>>54719472
>not knowing how to disable that
have fun with shillux, anon
>>54719628
>>54719689
Additionally all the packages in the repository are actually actively maintained and supported by the Debian Project, unlike anything in the AUR.
>>54719763
Do you know the status of graphic software? I need Krita, Gimp, Rawtherapee and Darktable to be fresh.
>>54719620
Wrong.
Debian sid gets the upstream updates in a timely fashion. It is also adressed in DSAs.
Good for most users: Ubuntu (or flavor)
For committed learners: Slackware
Debian is a solid choice to straddle most use purposes in one fell swoop. Read the instructions on how not to break your system.
Just start with something. It doesn't have to be one if the most commonly recommended ones.
>>54719297
Windows 10
>>54719882
Mageia.
OpenSUSE.
Deepin would keep many users happy.
>>54719557
Hahahahaha
>>54719297
Ubuntu GNOME 16.04 LTS
Everything else is inferior
Fedora
>>54719297
If you are a neet with a day's worth of free time *every* day, give gentoo a try. Otherwise, install Debian.
I use elementaryOS because I don't know what I'm doing and I'm not about to start. Also I think that standard Ubuntu looks ugly.
>>54719297
Install FreeBSD
PcLinuxOS
