Pity post

>>54713087
what's going on?

rip amd

What are you on about now, retard.

Do we know whether the 1080Ti will have HBM or HBM2, or will it be GDDR5X garbage too? Honestly, Nvidia won't stand a fucking chance for the power crown if it is using that ancient shit.

>>54714496

Nvidia is using gddr5x on a 16nm die which is larger than amd's 14nm, higher clock while polaris is at 800mhz base sub 150w, overheats - same heat as maxwell.
Lied in their benchmarks (2x titan x, 10x maxwell)

Tesla p100 based on GP100 (full pascal) tbr next year, next gen vega is converged to compete directly with current gen pascal

Navi = victory

Nvidia knows this from their sources and is under pressure

Intel is bankrolling AMD graphics in their partnership on IGPU

File: 17225882-14615334164356906.jpg (57 KB, 635x423) Image search: [Google]

57 KB, 635x423

>>54714746

P100 based on full pascal

>>54714746
>Intel is bankrolling AMD graphics in their partnership on IGPU

How come nobody ever works with Nvidia on partnerships? Everyone always comes to AMD for tech.

>>54714981
Because AMD actually innovates

>>54714981
>How come nobody ever works with Nvidia on partnerships?
because they''re a historically shitty partner to work with.
For pretty much everyone

>>54714981
Because Nvidia has a big head from having most of the dGPU marketshare. When they work with even bigger companies like Apple, Intel, and Microsoft they don't realize that they're the small fry and generally end up burning bridges(ha). The reason AMD is choosing to go for the mainstream first(other than waiting for HBM for the high end chips) is so that they can throw the mobile versions into partner laptops, namely macbooks. Having free reign of the majority of the market that Nvidia has priced out with their upcoming lineup is likely just a bonus.

In a nutshell:

AMD's early adoption of HBM vs nVidias early lineup release

>>54714981
>How come nobody ever works with Nvidia on partnerships?
PS3 has Nvidia in it
PS4? nope

meet me @ defcon op