mpv or mpc-hc + madvr ?

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
mpv or mpc-hc + madvr ? 2016-05-22 00:00:56 Post No. 54675616
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: cursor.png (1 KB, 50x50) Image search: [Google]

mpv or mpc-hc + madvr ? Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:00:56 Post No. 54675616 [Report]

so mpv is lighter on resources , it's perfect untill you realise it uses libass.

mpc-hc + madvr = better quality , but a resource hog.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:02:51 Post No.54675631
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:02:51 Post No.54675631 [Report]

>>54675616
>it's perfect untill you realise it uses libass
It uses a fork of libass which isn't garbage

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:03:29 Post No.54675644
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:03:29 Post No.54675644 [Report]

File: 1440008265508.png (624 KB, 1161x719) Image search: [Google]

>mpc+madvr = better quality

I love this meme

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:07:58 Post No.54675700
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:07:58 Post No.54675700 [Report]

ok..

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:10:37 Post No.54675735
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:10:37 Post No.54675735 [Report]

Why not use plain MPC-HC like a non-retarded person would do?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:16:03 Post No.54675797
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-22 00:16:03 Post No.54675797 [Report]

>Why not use plain MPC-HC like a non-retarded person would do?

MPV > plain MPC-HC