NVIDIA WON
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
>FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
>FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
AMD BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
AMDrones AND ON SUICIDE WATCH 24-7-366
BENCHMARKS RAPING AMDs BELOVED ASYNC
TOP FUCKING KEK
>http://wccftech.com/async-compute-detailed/
>http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/2438-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-founders-edition-review-and-fps-benchmark/page-4
Ok.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOL
>>54620679
>full
nope, still shitty software version and not full hardware async
>>54620769
This. The 1080 is going to be fucking dogshit for VR.
>my beloved async
HAHAHAHAHA
>>54620679
Why can't you make a thread that doesn't have this Butch faggotry in the op
>>54620878
>he doesn't expect faggotry from a gpu brand fanboy
>>54620769
>not full
Amd was only performing well in dx 12 and async
Now It got BTFO so hard you wish it never existed
AMDrone in denial right here
I use Nvidia, but holy fuck you fan boys are the worst.
>New Card beats Old Card, AMD on suicide watch!!!!
>>54620945
this.
I'm (probably) buying a €550 980Ti (but I'll wait for Polaris 10 reveal first)
>>54620894
But still tho......
>X did slightly better than Y
>Y BTFO
>>54620970
>AMD new card comes out
>Loses to Nvidia card on every level
>bb.b..b...b..but ASYNC COMPUTE HAHAHAHAHA NVIDIA CAN'T INTO ASYNC COMPUTE FOREVER AMD EMPERORS OF THE GALAXY FOREVER
>Nvidia implements Async compute with their new cards
>well we never said it was that good anyway
>AMDicks
>>54620822
Nvidia LOOSING performance on DX12 and Async compared to DX11.
Top KEK
>>54620970
>still can't run 4k at 60hz
Welp I guess I will keep on waiting...
>>54620878
>>54620894
>>54620945
AMDrone has nothing to defend any longer
Literally shit on in every category
>POOLOORIS WILL SAVE US GUYS
Poolooris will be gddr5 with 125w mainstream GPUs
>Team Green
>Team Red
>Nvidiots
>AMDrones
I've got bad news, if you aren't buying the best price:performance piece of hardware in your budget because of brand loyalty you're completely fucking retarded.
These threads... They are part of the /g/ cesspool.
People who play games are alright. People who like anime are alright. People who think freedom is the only way are alright. People who like new tech is alright.
This. This is fucking autism on a new level.
>NVIDIA ON SUICIDE WATCH!!
>AMD BTFO
Fucking christ, grow up.
Just don't reply to it and sage
>>54621106
All GPU fanboys come factory overcucked.
>>54620679
>FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
>>FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
>FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
>>FULL ASYNC COMPUTE SUPPORT ON GTX 1080
NO ASYNC COMPUTE HARDWARE
>NO ASYNC COMPUTE HARDWARE
NO ASYNC COMPUTE HARDWARE
>NO ASYNC COMPUTE HARDWARE
NO ASYNC COMPUTE HARDWARE
>NO ASYNC COMPUTE HARDWARE
Wew lads we got a live one!
>>54621133
Makes me wonder if this is where all the kids show up, because othewise, if they actually believe this shit and partake in it, they'd have to be mentally challenged.
Same goes for the Intel/AMD threads.
>>54621154
why are you in so much damage control AMDrone ?
Cant believe something like this would happen to Async ?
Meh, I'll stick to my AMD card for now and see how this generation of Nvidia cards go. I personally don't see a point in aligning yourself with a company and eagerly defending it. Saying that I do want AMD to do well this upcoming GPU generation because competition lowers prices for the consumers.
>>54620679
>wccftech
Ah yes, they're the most trusted news tech site
Who can forget the Phenom 4 of course!
http://wccftech.com/rumor-amd-phenom-iv-x12-170-baeca-25nm-cpu-leaked-features-12-cores-6-ghz-core-clock-am4-socket-compatbility/
Or the legendary Faraway Islands GPU series!
http://wccftech.com/amds-future-gpu-architecture-code-leaked-faraway-islands-features-20nm-coming-year/
i'll stick with my 480
>>54620737
>>54620822
OH MY GOOOOOOODDD
HOLD ME GUYS
THANK YOU NVIDIA
>>54621012
Because nvidia is using an inferior way of handling async compute you retard, they're using some ancient 6 year old softare that they were using in their old cards anyway, they're not even close to achieving what AMD has
>barely beats the fury X , a card with half the memory . Not even by more than 8 frames at best
That's a nice toy you have there.
Did I mention all this is ASYNC and AMDs own precious benchmark to go game Ashes of Singularity
POOLOORIS WILL SAVE MEEEEE
>>54620679
AMD esta acabado y en bancarrota.
>>54621453
>POOLOORIS WILL SAVE MEEEEE
At least it will save power, I guess.
>>54620737
YOOOOOOOOO GUYYYYSSSSS THIS NEW GEN CARD GETS 7 MORE FRAMES THAN THIS LAST GEN CARD!!! AMD SHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH.
>>54621453
>S-SEVEN EF-PI-ES!!
>AMD IS DEAD
>W-WE DID IT GUYS
>>54621509
Most def on suicide watch
Because you won't see better performance with the upcoming GPUs from AMD
So your waiting meme is irrelevant aswell this year
aka BTFO
>>54621482
>AMD esta acabado y en bancarrota.
No doubt about this
>>54621407
Oh wow it's so superior it's yielding literally 1 fps more by comparison while AMDtards crow about it like the second coming of jesus.
>>54621539
Ebin
Also rember that the fury x is keeping up with a 1080, what will happen when polaris comes out
>>54621550
>Because you won't see any better performance
Can you predict the future or something?
Fury X loses to GTX 980
cant deny the facts
>>54621086
This. I am hopeful these shill threads are 90% trolling. Then again I have cousins who do just two thing work and game and they are nvidia and gaymurr rice fanatics. So such shilling retards drop exist.
>>54621509
>last gen card
>launch price of the 980ti $650
>launch price of the 1080 $599
The last gen card is the 980, you can safely compare the 980ti to the 1080ti in about 12 months.
Nice try though retard.
>>54621622
>using old drivers to troll
When will this become a bannable offense?
>>54621602
Nothing, polaris is literally mobile parts that are aiming for 290x performance.
By the time Vega comes out the 1080ti will come out.
>>54621662
>launch price of the 1080 $599
Why do you have to lie about that? The only 1080 you can buy at the moment is $699.
>>54621662
I'm talking about the fury x nigger.
>>54620822
>>54621625
shut the fuck up you literal NEET this is how GPU are handled on every release basis
You have shit in your eyes or something ?
Every benchmark destroyed your AMD preferred game by GTX 1080 EVEN in Async compute.
Stay mad & always 10 steps behind Nvidia
>>54621691
And how much did the fury x cost at launch?
OH TAHTS RIGHT $650 as well
>>54621685
>Nothing, polaris is literally mobile parts that are aiming for 290x performance.
That's only the small Polaris chip, anon.
The big one will land squarely between 1070 and 1080 in performance and cost less to boot.
>>54620822
All I'm seeing is the fury X beating the 980ti. You can't really say nvidia won till amd releases their new GPUs
>>54621698
>AMD preferred game
Literally no such thing dumbass
>>54621723
>I want to believe!
>There will be a big one!
kek, the big one is called Vega, you're literally retarded if you don't know how AMD will literally rename shit to fool consumers into thinking it's a totally different product.
>>54621726
>AMD fag in denial
Face the facts you fuck NVidia will still BTFO the Vega when it releases
>>54621579
>literally rename shit to fool consumers
Exactly like NVIDIA just did with the 1080? Which is a die shrink? And they suddendly changed the name of reference editions to founder's edition? I'm sure that wasn't meant to fool anyone right?
AMD retards mad as fuck hahahaha
>>54621692
meant for
>>54621037
>>54621799
>Which is a die shrink
>He actually thinks that polaris isn't simply a Fiji die shrink
>He's actually naive enough to think that AMD actually spent their non-existent money on R&D
>>54621579
>1 fps more by comparison
Is this the so called stealth marketing.
>>54620737
>brand new GPU
>16nm FinFET
>vs old 28nm part from the competition
>less than 15% faster
So this is the power of Pascal
>>54621846
>%
Show FPS not percentages if you're not being a lying cunt.
>there are people in this thread that are going to pay $699.00 for a non-ti maxwell refresh that will be completely btfo in six months by vega
>>54621622
doom switched to OpenGL 4.4 when it detects AMD cards. payed for by nvidia shekels
>>54621861
>>less than 15% faster
>AMD will release a card that is 15% faster than their last best one
obviously in denial.
All this on a single GPU.
>>54621865
Posted in the thread already. See >>54620822
NVIDIA literally loses 1 FPS with DirectX and Async while AMD gains 17 FPS
>>54621854
It has to be. It's simply too boneheaded to be anything else.
>>54621875
>AMD following release schedules
Try 24 months.
>>54621854
>stealth
Nvidia shills don't know the meaning of that word
>>54620679
Nvidia shills on full damage control
AMD without Async worse than shit from Kepler LOL
>>54621930
>42 to 46
>Is 17 fps gain
Please literally eat shit and die
I need to buy a new card regardless, so when is the best time to buy a 1080?
Something about reference cards and that jargon.
Is the card more expensive the first month or something before other vendors release there versions?
There's literally no reason to spend money on a high end GPU other than consumerist faggotry and e-peen sucking.
>>54621940
even if that is the case(it's not) the 1080ti fully unlocked GP104 is going to come out with the same price. People are buying a fucking stopgap card.
>>54621960
Maybe we should remind them of the fact that games that support DX 12 let alone async computer are number about 8 for the next two years.
>>54621963
I said DX 11 to DX 12+async you godawful retard
>>54622022
>People are buying a stopgap card
Every card is a stopgap card. What sort of retard keeps waiting to buy hardware forever then crows about how something that comes out 6-8 months later is marginally better?
>>54622002
The reference is 699 so they don't compete with their own partners, just wait a month to buy an aftermarket one which is guaranteed to be cheaper, faster, cooler and quieter
>>54622002
The reference cards are more expensive and perform worse than aftermarket cards, and by the time the aftermarket cards are released, Vega will be announced and you will end up with an inferior card so you won't be able to stroke your e-peen
>>54622026
>AMD has shit performance on DX 11
>It's a performance gain on DX 12!
Is this what retarded AMDrones actually think?
>>54621539
i love this chart
>>54621729
>hitman
>ashes of singularity
https://www.amd.com/en-us/markets/game/featured
THERE IS NO SUCH THING
THEY ARE ONLY FEATURED ON THEIR FUCKING WEBSITE
>>54621723
>NVIDIA’s loyal opposition, AMD’s Radeon Technologies Group, has strongly hinted that they’re not going to be releasing comparable high-performance video cards in the near future. Rather the company is looking to make a run at the much larger mainstream market for desktops and laptops with their Polaris architecture, something that GP104 isn’t meant to address.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10326/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-preview/3
>>54622059
Yeah, how could you think anything else? Dx12 is an objectively superior api with lower level hardware optimization.
Losing performance on dx12 means that your card for some reason is shit at implementing it dx12 performance gains should be expected
>>54621602
>he still has hope up with polaris
poor soul
>>54622055
>>54622044
Okay got it.
So the cards are releasing on May 27, so by mid July I can expect to find these aftermarket versions?
Thanks
>>54622064
I want to to explain to me what technology those games Use which is exclusive to amd. Please. It's not possible to make games that favor amd hardware because they only use industry standard technology
Nvidia games do some Jewish nonsense like ramp up tesselation, force game works, force physx, etc to cripple amd
Now what do these games do to favor amd?
>>54622041
a process shrink is supposed to be a generational leap, equal to at least double performance over the older cards. that's the way it was in the past. So people who have a 980ti should wait until there is a truly a generational successor.
>>54622086
>objectively superior API
>literally 99% of new games won't utilize it because it literally only benefits AMD cards and it's not worth throwing out months and months of works to pander to 15% of total performance GPUs.
>That and the fact that Consoles won't be able to use DX12 or Vulkan until the next generation of consoles
>Win 10 exclusive
Kekked hard. It's DX10 all over again.
>>54622119
Nobody is asking anyone with a 980ti to get a 1080. A 1080 is a replacement for the GTX 980.
>>54620822
So the new 1080 flagship killer mammoth is like what.... 4 fps better xD
> 28nm vs 16nm
> HAHAHAHA
> FURY X CAN COMPETE WITH A FUCKING 1080 WHAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
>HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>>54622150
Well it IS objectively superior to dx11 in terms of capability and performance. Of course Vulkan is a million times better, but Nvidia still is refusing to properly support dx12 which a shit load of games will still use. Those are all unbiased facts
It's only shit on Nvidia cards because of Nvidia. There's no AMD specific code or technology at play here.
>>54622113
>industry standard technology
you mean async and their own cancerous drivers ?
It's jewish nonsense when Nvidia features games and uses their shit but its not when AMD does.
cool and rare meme right here
>>54622150
Oh, also the xbone uses dx12 today and both consoles can use vulkan at any moment
You just don't know what you're talking about. Battlefront on the xbone uses dx12
>>54622233
The new 1080 flagship also launches $50 less than the fury X did. I don't see why you're laughing considering it's cheaper and faster than anything AMD have out for the time being.
>>54622235
>objectively superior
Only if you have an AMD card. Otherwise it's literally not worth the trouble.
>>54621723
>>54621743
The big one is not called Vega. There are 2 chips.
-Polaris 10 running with GDDR5x and will be equivalent to the 390X at a lower power consumption.
-Polaris 11 for Laptops, so I never both to read up on spec's
-Vega 10 & 11, No official spec's other than HBM2 to be released end of 2016 beginning of 2017
Fury X will be the only flag ship for AMD this year.
>>54620820
And nothing of value was lost.
>>54622246
You're an idiot. Async is not amd specific technology. Nvidia could implement it but doesn't for some reason. Async is not the equivalent of AMD game works
The difference is that amd doesn't do what Nvidia does with crippling game performance on the competition. They only feature open technology that they happen to be good at. If Nvidia wanted to beat amd at that game it's on them, whereas game works shit is impossible for AMD to use
>>54622276
No, the api itself is objectively superior
Nvidia is just shit as using the better api, so it's only bad on Nvidia cards. Nvidia refusing to properly support a better technology does not make that technology suddenly less valuable
>>54622119
Shit that's what I'm doing
Was going to get the 1080s and ditch my 980tis but it is barely a performance increase so I'll hold back until I see what AMD has up their sleeves
>>54622311
>API is objectively superior
>Low adoption/performance benefits
DX 9 vs 10 all over again. Please stop with these 'objectively' arguments.
>>54622233
1080 demolished fury X
compete =/= lose
You can't just put a couple fps under the carpet little drone
>>54622311
>Nvidia is just shit as using the better api
You haven't considered the possibility that nVidia's DX11 implementation is simply good enough that even you had direct and immediate hardware access, you couldn't really improve performance all that much anyway?
>>54622299
>meanwhile a $380 1070 will rape all of AMD's 2016 lineup
Why are they so incompetent? I really want them to do well but they never do
Their tranny CEO even said thy want to shed their poorfag status and be more competitive at the high end again but this is exactly the opposite of what they're doing
Big Pascal is going to be a monster and I hope Vega will be able to match it I really do
>>54621429
Higher amounts of memory only matter if you need to use it, which you don't at 2560x1440 with a single card.
>>54621539
Im crying
>>54622311
>Async is not amd specific technology. Nvidia could implement it but doesn't for some reason
They left it out of the final design of Maxwell, and since Pascal is just a Maxwell die shrink it doesn't have it either.
It is able to keep up with AMD in DX12 simply by being a faster card, not because of any hardware advantage
I have a GTX 580. Should i keep waiting for a 1080ti?
>>54622403
wait for the 1180ti
>>54622403
>Not waiting for Volta 1180ti with 16gb HBM3 and 6nm process node
Enjoy your shit performance
>>54622403
If you get a 1080, it will surely be a radical performance improvement, but if you don't need that, why do you care?
Just get whatever the greatest card is when you have some game that your 580 can't handle. There will always be something newer around the corner.
>>54622403
Do you want the best price/performance or do you want diminishing returns?
>>54622433
K, I've been waiting since the 780 tbqh. I can keep it up.
>>54622439
In all seriousness I'm waiting for a decent single 4K card.so I can watch 4K Netflix on 1 monitor and play 4K games on the other
>>54622481
If you know what you're waiting for, then you can clearly just check whether some specific card fulfills that.
>>54622481
You'll have to wait for the 1080ti at least. The 1080 offers 2X the performance of a 980 not a 1080ti. Can't into 60fps @ 4K
>>54622299
AMD is hurting really bad. They have to make small and secure steps right now. Even the release of Fury X I'm not sure why they did it. Technology their cards are nice, but nice alone don't cut it.
>>54622354
>a few fps difference while playing a game
Slightly noticeable, might be a small annoyance
>knowing I'm supporting nvidia's shitty Jewish tactics
Ever present thorn in my side, just shoot me noe senpai
>>54622605
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf6lpFmCKGQ
over 40+ frames in tomb raider
over 30+ frames in other games
>j-just a c-c-c-couple f-f-f-f-rames g-goy!
>>54620737
DELETE THIS
holy shit man I feel bad for AMDrones
Christ, GPUfags are the worst. Spamming this board with there all caps and childish underage shit.
Fuck off and kill yourselves.
>>54622681
you're so late to this party.
>>54622481
You'll need to wait around a decade for that.
>>54622706
y-you too
>>54622369
This >>54622555 was for you
>>54622717
I b-been here. is t-this a t-thing n-now?
>>54622555
This
You have a moral obligation to support AMD regardless of what the performance is
>>54621188
This what /g/ has become
I have XBox one
>>54622635
>a next gen, die-shrinked card is beating an older card in a medley of games that are more or less built around nvidia cards
>ashes of the singularity dx11
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA I wonder why nobody wants to post the vulkan results?
Its like the contract tech sites signed to get a test card specified certain games or something...
>>54620822
Virtually no difference across DX11, DX12 and DX12 with async. This just proves that Pascal still does not do async compute if anything
>>54622403
whatever you do - do no consider even looking at any AMD cards.
You will regret it. You will wait for drivers and cry. You will be unhappy and your penis will behave the same way in VR porn.
>>54621453
Effects are gimped with Nvidia drivers, we've seen this before
>>54621677
Never, you faggot. It's like you haven't spent more than 6 months to a year on this site.
>>54622825
>vulkan results
Vulkan on 1080 will put another 50 or more frames on top of that.
Vulkan isnt optimized for games that are currently out. Maybe handful of them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueRjbYdcXbs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anrvBD4aTGY
>>54622856
All I see you getting BTFO
What effects ? This game is featured by AMD
>>54620679
It's over A(lways)M(assive)D(isappointment) faggots are finished!
W-wait for vega wait for polaris wait for zen wait for fury... We got it right this time we promise!!!
Go get em Nvidia! Stomp these Faggots on throat.
>>54622936
Such as ashes of the singularity?
Couldn't find any vulkan results for doom aside from those, because it hasn't been officially released yet though, yet to see what the fury x would be able to do, and I suspect it would be competitive.
>>54620679
> nvidia promised 2x perf
> from the slides I calculated and estimated 1.7x, already knew that nvidia is lying
> actual is maybe like 1.4x over 980
kek so many lies
>>54623015
you sound like such a retard.
all the nvidia cucks in this thread. it must feel good choking on nvidia jew cock LMAO, take out another loan for that GTX 1080 garbage 20% faster speed LMAO.
I'll take that AMD $399-499 god tier 1080 KILLER LMAO.
NVIDIAKEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH HAHAHAHA
>>54623129
Go back to your wait shed you cuck.
>fury range comes out
>entire range in one go
>has trouble beating 980i and titan released before it
>BUT DX12 AND DRIVER PERFORMANCE UPDATES
>1080 comes out
>first card in the range
>beats fury range
>ONLY 15% FASTER THAN CURRENT GENERATION CARD? LOL
Why are AMD fags so desperate?
>>54623186
(You)
>>54621482
>15% increase since last gen
sure fag
>>54623186
Saltiest anons around these fucking amd wait cucks. I used to root for AMD but they always delivered broken promises and shitty performance. That feel when 1080 and 1070 will be best cards for next 6 months minimum and probably longer since I doubt high end AMD will deliver
>>54622253
Playing devil's advocate - Fury X launched almost 1 year ago. About $650 IIRC - goes for 530-580 now. 1080 would be found the cheapest at 600 with founder's being 700.
>>54623155
> take out another loan for that GTX 1080
confirmed AMDrones poor as fuck + waste money on inferior hardware
>>54623270
And then the 1080Ti and Titan will come out.
>>54623322
And again it will shit on everything that AMD has to offer as usual. The loop never ends. AMD should have focused on processors and never bought Ati.
>>54623378
They've got a focus now. Mass producing chips for consoles aka PS4.5 neo and whatever the fuck is on their list. Mobile Phone cpus and such things. But definitely not GPUs.
>>54623515
Even consoles can't run some games 1080p at 60 fps so they fucked up there too. Probably because of weak cpu they decided to use in them. You are right though.
>>54621922
>>AMD will release a card that is 15% faster than their last best one
amd got hamstrung, they made a gpu for the 20nm process that never came out, its why the fury was a powerhouse on paper but in practice got fucked. amd paid a LARGE fine for breach of contract to move to a different fab that won't fuck them.
will not be shocked if a massive gain is had, but the first card that comes out is the mainstream. bringing 350-450$ gpu power down to 200-250$ price points. nvidia can have their small window for the single fastest gpu.
>>54621786
yea... probably not.
but we will have a better idea when polaris 10 comes out.
>>54623582
>Even consoles can't run some games 1080p at 60 fps so they fucked up there too.
Na, that's more the console developers who go for minimum space requirements resulting in no thermal control and thus having to use subpar graphics processors that only manage to perform as well as they do because of the performance improvements of developing directly for a single set of hardware.
I remember when I was 12 and shilled my preferred brand on /g/. Buy whatever is good at the time, brand loyalty should be a fucking myth
>>54622249
a version of dx12, and bone does not support vulcan at the moment, but next nintendo will, macs do, linux does, ps4 does, ps4.5 will and devs love to save money, so what will get used more without microsoft footing the bill?
not to mention, vulcan runs on win 7 and win 8 and win 10, so you don't have to sacrifice any platform.
>>54623292
as of now, only 700$+ for the card,
>>54623155
>I'll take that AMD $399-499 god tier 1080 KILLER LMAO
Which card is that exactly?
>>54622825
they do, nvidia pushes them fucking hard to only do certain games and include certain cards, they fucking hate you using reference cards.
>>54620822
>loses performance with async and dx12
How can you fuck up this bad?
>>54623186
The funniest is that Power Duo double fury x card. People hyped that pile of flaming rubbish for months last fall.
>>54623627
1070 will cost less than Polaris. Polaris being 4~5 months behind sales of the 1070 gives Nvidia more leeway in price and manufacturing.
AMD can't compete price wise because it'll be up against cheap 1070s and can't compete in the enthusiast market because they have no equal cards.
>>54623809
I chuckled at this.
>>54623813
>1070
1070 is 380 later or 450 when it comes out
the 380 was 200$
the 380X was less than 250$
the 280X was 300$
and the 280 was i don't fucking remember off the top of my head, but it was less then 300$
amd will put out the 380 (polaris 10) for less then the 1070.
how powerful the card is... that's completely up in the air and we got no fucking clue, but given the 980 to 1080 we could extrapolate what the 1070 will do.
>>54620737
>Nvidia gains 2.8% with Async
>Improves Async on results by 5.7%
>AMD gains 9.2% on last gen
Polaris can't come soon enough
>>54623861
AMD users are tech illiterate. This actually makes sense as to how there are people that still buy their gpu's.
>>54623787
Yup, the Ferrari of the tech world
>>54621086
>I've got bad news, if you aren't buying the best price:performance piece of hardware in your budget because of brand loyalty you're completely fucking retarded.
Personally, nvidia is doing all they can to fuck with my gaming experience, while amd is doing their best to improve it.
while amd is still competitive, and they are, that's where my money goes when i need a new card, its also why i haven't gotten a cpu in 6 years but deadline is zen, if zen sucks ill bite the bullet and get a 6 core intel.
>>54623870
You can bet if it gets similar performance it'll cost the same.
AMD cards despite being the budget brand are always more expensive because Nvidia cards goes on sale more often due to volume.
>>54623861
L M A O
>>54623861
>guy explains why it would be pointless
>OMG bias bias!!!
Fucking idiots
Did nvidia start the 60fps or its shit meme?
>>54623952
its all about die size and yields, not end performance. they want these to be mainstream and vr ready, that is sub 300$
i would be disappointed if amd choses to battle price for price with nvidia, but they usually don't.
>>54623989
No, common sense did that.
>>54623998
Why do you NEED 60fps at every resolution ASAP? It seems so pointless.
>>54623994
I bet they want to be successful too but look at where they are.
It'll be like the fury x all over again. Cost the same but objectively inferior.
>>54622555
R&D costs money, plus the 980ti was not out at that point
>>54624014
Because below that point there is noticeably more jankiness.
>>54624014
I don't need 60 FPS at 4k, I just want 144 FPS at WQHD.
Unfortunately, this is more of a CPU issue than a GPU issue, because most devs can't optimise for shit or use shitty engines like UE3. I've yet to get a game to run a stable >100 FPS in any of those games, shadows off.
>>54622041
you wait till your hardware cant go on anymore and then see if its worth waiting on the next gen or if its far enough out to say fuck it and get this gen.
>>54622403
you are good till amd shows off their high end cards at the least.
>2-Way SLI bridge- $29.99
I'm selling my ATX case and motherboard and going mITX so I'm never tempted to SLI again. This is my tipping point. I will not be nickle and dimed like this.
>>54622690
thats what happens when you use physx and nvidia tells them to up the checks from a low number to 300, it tanks amd performance bad.
>>54624043
I wonder they're going to dump fiji after one gen.
>>54623582
>>54623688
Its a mix of game devs pushing graphics passed what they should resulting in 30fps or lower at 1080p
and its not amd putting in bad parts, its literally what sony/xbox/nintendo order.
>>54624141
Wait atleast until the SLI 1080 results and exclusive posts on /g/.
It will be the nail in the coffin.
>>54620679
>tfw more fps than money
>>54624141
Normal 2 way "designer" bridges already cost that much.
Do you complain about the cost of thermal paste too? Jesus fuck
>>54624141
Nvidia is literally Apple now
>YOU WILL ONLY USE OUR HARDWARE IN THE EXACT WAY WE WANT YOU TOO, USING ONLY OUR APPROVED ACCESSORIES THAT WE CHARGE YOU FOR!
I'm surprised they don't charge extra for overclockable chips like Intel does
>>54624031
nvidia got wind of amds card and killed off the titan cards to compete.
but this time amd wasnt expecting a 20nm node but get fucked back to 28 for another gen.
>video games
>>54624224
That's why I'm going buy Polaris, it won't overclock for shit and crossfire never works so I'll never be tempted. AMD wins again.
>>54624141
I wonder if you can just use two of the old style bridges instead. They probably made sure you can't though.
>>54622845
This, if it did it would be outperforming the Fury X by margins similar to what it does in DX11 games.
I want to see Quantum Break benchmarks as the 390 pounds the 970 in that and it is a DX12 title.
>>54624218
I don't want a designer bridge. You realize it's just a ribbon cable right? This Monster Cable tier idiocy.
>>54624283
I'll test it when my two $700 card arrives. I won't let Nvidia jew me out of $35.
>>54620970
>buy
>>54621687
>buy
>>54622002
>buy
>>54622044
>buy
>>54623699
>Buy
>>54624272
>buy
>>54624456
>purchase
>jew
meanwhile at AMDs HQ - no sales at all. Lmfao.
>>54622690
>Project Nvidia Cars runs bad on AMD
>>54622690
holy kek i play this game all the time with an nvidia card. thank god i didn't fall for the amd meme
Nvidiots. Fucking nvidiots everywhere.
>>54624593
You have to go back to lebbit.
Maxwell nerfs when?
>>54624593
>being this assblasted nvidia have won once again without even trying
beautiful, absolutely beautiful.
>>54621350
I'm just stating a fact
Okay. Now that we finally all agreed that AMD is history and bankrupt until end of 2016 who will persue to beat Nvidia ?
AMD lost because of female CEO you know deep inside its true. She probably a trap anyways.
But probably its all the poo that is seen on the streets too. Hence the name poolooris and the bat performance.
When will Toppest Lelkek kill himself?
>>54624688
Hopefully some Taiwanese company.
Why i always see so many shitposting nvidia fanboys in every graphic card related thread? Especially as of recently. I mean people that prefer amd do not shitpost nearly as much.
t. currently nvidia card owner.
>>54624794
You are obviously an AMD card owner.
>>54622690
I like how the graph goes all the way down smoothly but comes up only step wise. Glorious.
>>54620679
>ON SUICIDE WATCH 24-7-366
>24-7-366
>7-366
>366
Kek
>>54624794
i feel the opposite
t. amd owner since 2006
>>54624815
Because i talk like a normal person? You know you can express your feelings and thoughts like adult.
>AMD SHILLS KILL YOURSELVES
>NVIDIA WON AGAIN
>MUH PREMIUM HARDWARE AMDKEKS
>>54624846
>falseflagging
>>54624794
>amd fag so deperate he posts as undercoved nvidia fanboy
smart
>>54623783
the one after 4-5 generations of poolaris, and even then will probably have a hard time with broken drivers etc
>>54623298
>Daaad please I need those 700$ for this this new king so I can be cool
When did spending more became good? Holy fuck go and get some Quadro then, so you can have muh superior hardware and brag about it with the other kids
>>54624872
really now? what proof do you have? i currently own an amd toaster and all i notice is nvidia fans with the banter and amd fans taking it seriously and getting really over emotional.
>>54624330
The new bridge isn't really new, to begin with already available solid bridges already do most of what the new bridge does.
You are an idiot.
>>54624507
same can be said for ashes of amd
>>54624930
>already available solid bridges already do most of what the new bridge does
>You are an idiot
k
>>54624965
Indeed you are a dumbass idiot, EVGA has been making upgrades to their bridges for years now, from time to time they release a new version with better capabilities, this is just Nvidia trying to standardizer the SLI bridge.
>>54624939
>le there is such a thing as amd optimized mod
>oy vey there's no difference between industry standard api development and proprietary anti-competitive technology; amd is just as bad as Nvidia!
>>54625006
You are just totally wrong, I'm sorry. There is no upgrade to SLI bridges. It's just a cable. Your $100 Monster Cable HDMI cable also doesn't improve performance. I'm sorry you had to find out this way.
>>54625089
lmao you are dumbass, the Nvidia ribbon cable works with all cards because thats the standard set by Nvidia, the better EVGA solid bridge only works with some cards.
Please go be a dumbass somewhere else.
>>54625019
what ? Nigger your AMD optimized game is losing to Nvidia on Async. Clearly hard case of denial.
>>54625019
>what is specific architecture optimization
>>54625127
>it's solid so it's better because the electrons are more solidified.
>>54625089
Nope you are wrong. You can improve bandwidth on SLI bridges aswell as performance, transfer rates, connectivity, overall speed, stability, response time etc. Just couple to make it more obvious.
>>54624939
ashes doesn't use any proprietary amd blackbox software. The devs and the nvidia worked together since beta/alpha stage. You can't fix hardware issues. More than 8 months of "fix" and this the results dont change. Infact in that period of time, AMD drivers had made even more performance gains.
>>54625230
You've been memed. All first gen bridges are the same performance regardless of if they are solid or not. Perhaps you are thinking of the new dual bridges.
>>54625267
Your old SLI bridge wont work on pascal. Whats your point ?
>>54625302
The other guy was trying to claim solid bridges provided better performance.
>>54625317
Oh. Yea thats not true. Its just a standard cable for everyone. The new dual SLI HB bridge is different.
>>54625006
The performance increase is from superclocking the GPU. Reference was a bit slower overall. EVGA always brags about clock speeds.
Wow! It's fucking nothing.
>Closes and hides thread
>>54620737
>>54620679
IF it has full support why does the Fury X gain 5fps, while the 1080 only gains 3fps?
The 1080 only partially supports A-sync with it's pixel pre-emption
>>54625597
Quality AMDrone denial post
async compute should help computers with less gpu cores than more, so you would really expect a bigger boost with the 1080.
>>54625490
evga is dead.
they are bankrupt
>>54625706
Really? They just announced some new motherboard rebrands.
>>54625632
Because thats within the power of the 1080 on this game and drivers ?
You tell me why your beloved hardware Async performs worse vs DX 11 and DX12 and GTX 1080 on 4k ?
Meanwhile in normie land. The PC desktop gaming market is puny. Nvidia serves a tiny percentage of hardcore gamers. Most people continue happily playing on lesser graphical eye candy using their console under the TV.
You guys really need a reality check.
>>54625706
But muh extended warranty. Muh excellent customer service gibs free card.
>>54625706
[source and citation needed]
AMD is soon tho
So wait. Does this mean they will support Free Sync monitors?
>>54625727
well i work for a local hardware support and we sent in an evga 780ti because it wasn't working properly anymore and it still had warranty.
they contacted our customer and said that they are in a insolvency proceedings and can't send his card back because "it is their property for now".
the customer told us that he is about to sue them with german rights.
>>54625740
Why the Fury X performs worse? Because the 1080 is around 20% faster than it or a stock 980ti, even with A-sync it can't make up the difference, and Hawaii seems to support A-sync better than Fiji cards
Pic related
>>54625727
also, zalman did also announce new products before they left the market
