>falling for the GTX 1080 meme
If the Fury X is so good how come it can't beat the GTX980Ti?
>>54612109
Do you people just randomly make up charts to stir up shit?
>0,4 tflops more
>>54612135
These are legit specs though.
The chart just proves the point.
>EVERYONE FELL FOR THE MEME
>TEMPS HIGH AS FUCK
>WORSE THAN A TITAN X AND 2 980S SLI
>POLARIS SET TO BE BETTER THAN A 1070 FOR LESS THEN 350
http://www.overclock-and-game.com/news/pc-gaming/46-gtx-1080-what-s-not-being-discussed
>.5 ahead in shit noone cares about
>>54612109
> IIT everyone's too stupid to understand that OP's making a joke
Americans
>>54612109
>Deliberately make the scale on your chart as misleading as possible
Love it
>>54612208
Copy & pasting this is every thread you can. Its hilarious. Are you heating that bedroom up too with the amd card?
>>54612206
I still don't get it how hardware specs can look so good on AMD cards, but a Fury X is weaker than a 980Ti usually in everything it does. Is it a driver problem?
>>54612206
So a more expensive GPU beats a cheaper GPU? What a surprise!
>>54614592
>a Fury X is weaker than a 980Ti usually in everything it does
It's not though? They're neck and neck
>>54614614
Depends on the benchmark, but that isn't the point I was really trying to make. The question was, why is not Fury X much better than a 980Ti?
>>54612109
Fuck off already
>>54614630
But...anybody that actually builds and tests knows that real in game benchmarks are much more reliable than benchmarking programs. Benchmarks and the real thing are very different due to developer differences.
>>54612109
>>54614877
make it logarithmic
>>54614675
still not answering the question
>>54615089
DX11 driver overhead
>>54612109
top fucking KEK, delete this graph
abusing charts like this is patented by nvidia
>>54614514
Yeah, fucking hate fuzzy numbers.
>>54615089
>>54614630
The Fury is slower when gaming due largely to AMD drivers. If they were better at writing efficient drivers for gaming, they'd be neck and neck with NVidia. If you're using the AMD cards for computation, they consistently trash NVidia. Hence bitcoin miners preferring AMD.
>>54612109
>Comparing two slightly different numbers with hugely different graph sizes to get your point across
Wew lad
>>54612109
>>54618339
I'm going to see the price on that grilled cheese before it gets my money.
>>54618339
Underrated post.
Grilled cheese is a viable low-cost alternative to more expensive GPUs.
DELETE THIS
>>54612109
>on paper amd cards are fantastic
>in real life performance they get shit on by on paper weaker cards of Nvidia
All that shows is AMD's incompetence
>>54622289
Different architectures are good at different things. For compute on paper AMD destroys Nvidia and in reality they do as well.
>ITT: Nvidiots get butthurt over satire of the kind of charts Nvidia is notorious for
good work op
>bar 9 times as long
>5% difference
I mean i hate nvidia and this is dumb buy holy crap that chart is troll shit
>>54622393
This can't be real, what the fuck?
I'm an AMD fan but this made me chuckle.
>>54623388
it is, Nvidia does this all the fucking time lol
they're as bad as Apple when it comes to charts, you always take them with a mountain of salt
>>54624040
But why? People intelligent enough to assemble PCs are probably intelligent enough to read graphs?
>>54624040
It's not real.
>>54624169
most people who buy shilled GPUs based solely on press releases aren't intelligent enough to assemble PCs.
If they are, it's a savant-tier thing.
>>54622344
>FP64
Things no one uses outside of workstations applications where that kind of precision actually matters.
I just got myself a three 1080's in sli and it's pretty great desu
made my room a little hot though
>>54612208
You know the temps have been tested right? LinusTechTips have done a video on it
>>54624348
>made my room a little hot though.
>judging a next-gen card based on current-gen technology
Seriously, DX12 is going to KILL nvidiots.
Intel graphics anyone?
>>54612208
I heard Polaris isnt for desktop anyway
USE WHAT YOU WANT TO USE NOBODY ACTUALLY FUCKING CARES
>>54612130
45% more shader ALUs than Hawaii, 45% more TMUs, 0% more ROPs.
It's hard to tell exactly what the fuck they were thinking.
also, getting raped by absurd levels of JewWorks tessellation.
>>54612338
It's not even americans... It's fags straight from reddit.
>>54626456
Dedicated GPUs are a scam, all popular games run on integrated
>>54624532
Lol'd so fuckin hard at the video card in the box where the rocks are supposed to be
Lmao I like how stretched out that graph is to make it look like worse than it is, top kek, nice bait
>>54627558
FIJI is not ROP bound at all. Good thing you aren't the one designing GPUs.
>>54612109
I can make deliberately misleading graphs too.
>>54612109
I god damn LOVE charts like these.
>>54614877
That may be more accurate, but it's not as fun man. And fun is the entire point behind charts like OPs.
>>54624270
He literally just said some cards are better than others at different things, then you say
>b- but no one uses a gpu like that
Ok but which one is best for osu running two osu games at once. AND Firefox?
>>54614630
Because the geforce beats it in just about every aspect other than peak tflops.
>>54628226
intel integrated
>>54612126
STOP TALKING ABOUT TECHNOLOGY IN MY TECHNOLOGY BOARD!!1!11
>>54612135
That and false advertising because they are getting paid to prefer a brand (and I'm talking actual reviewers, not the make believe 'paid shills' people think are getting paid to browse 4chan) or are the type of fucking spergs that do it for free.
>>54627853
the charts are equally accurate
jesus you people are
so
fucking
stupid
