How will AMD recover from this?
>>54595321
>>54595321
CPU defendant game, so the results are less impressive
>dat 4k performance gain
bravo nvidia
the 4k card guys
the way it's meant to be played
>>54595321
those shitty graphs
>50 -> 100 = 50%
>100 -> 125 = 25%
>>54595349
>mfw i fell for the 4k meme
>>54595321
>Barely any improvements at 4K resolution
Well, it's been confirmed. The new Pascal cards are bandwidth starved as fuck. Only viable for 1080p.
Utter waste of a new GPU generation.
>>54595365
I'm happy with 1080p phamiliamlam
All I care about is 120hz gaming anyways
polaris will tear nvidia another asshole and will win the next gpu gen
>>54595249
>>54595249
GCG CALLS FOR AID
>>54595321
i just recently bought a 980 ti
>>54595321
Are there any Vulkan benchmarks?
>>54595472
Those are the only benchmarks from Vessel.
The guy did a terrible job, overall 3 minute long or so video. Maybe I can find it in my google cache and upload it again.
Also, the 4k benchmarks were done with 8xAA for some reason.
gtx1070 will be same or little weaker than 980(they will fuck up drivers of 9#0 series ), 1080 will be same or little weaker than Titan
all these +30% better performance memes are actually exclusively for VR
>>54595330
>Dat 4k
>5fps increase
What the actual fuck?
How is 30fps at 4k good? THATS FUCKING SHIT!
>>54595342
No those 4k benchmarks are terrible
>x8 aa
>on 4k
nope this review is also fucktarded
That doesn't make any sense
Why is it so shit at 4k? The low ROP count?
>>54595626
>Why is it so shit at 4k? The low ROP count?
Memory bandwidth.
>>54595374
I'm upgrading from my GTX 690 to 1080 when it gets released. No bandwith problems for 144 hz 1080p right?
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-review,1.html
>>54595806
Shouldn't be, no.
I can 144hz on my 770 on some games already.
>£619 RRP
Yeah, fuck that.
woop
HAHAHA! ITS A FLOP AFTER ALL!
>>54595927
Indeed. Lmao.
>>54595927
>Godrays
Now, I wonder how the Fury X would do if they were off.
Not saying it'd jump to 60fps, but I wonder how much it impacts the performance.
>>54595321
Nvidia won.
>>54596119
>>54599419
i now realise that's 4k. still thinking they put the god rays up to retard though, that said, 4k ultra is impressive to hit close to 60 on.
>>54596038
>>54596053
It's still better and will be cheaper than a 980, what's the complaint for?
Besides, this is for the stock nvidia card. The aftermarket cards will be bettter
>>54595321
>Tessellation
More underwater tessellation shenanigans.
Can anybody post 980 780 etc slides from when the 980 was released? Just for reference.
>>54599473
>700usd
>cheaper than a 980
are you fucking high?
>>54599605
you meme the driver gimps or?
>>54599493
>8xAA
>Extreme tessellation
>4k
Its like they want the game to run like shit
fucking retards
> Turn on 1080
> House catches on fire
LITERALLY FERMI 2.0
>everyone continues to push 4K
>we STILL don't have a card that can push 60fps at 4K in a high demand application
>>54599643
>8X AA
>4K
Lol stupid cuckolds.
>>54599735
because they turn the settings up to stupidly high levels of MSAA at fucking 8xAA+
Dont even need AA at 4k do you?
>>54595321
>50
>100
>125
>150
What the fuck, didn't a 60 FPS performance boost look good enough without fucking up the graph?
>>54599621
Just to compare how much better the 1080 actually is. If the difference between the 1080 and 980ti is the same as the difference between the 780ti and 980 (on release day)...
>>54599946
>1080 OC
>100degrees
>Still cant do 4k at 60fps
>>54599968
>100degrees
Not for games.
>Still cant do 4k at 60fps
Because of 8xAA
>>54595349
>FXAA at 4K
>>54600003
>Not for games.
>Tries to run 4K DX12 Vulkan game at max
>85 degrees at stock clocks
Fuck knows the thing will get to over 90 overclocked easily
Now I can play Alien Isolation at 12K then because I can already play that at UHD (almost 4K) at 144FPS maxed with modded xml files to force 16x the LOD that the default game offers on my GTX970 G1
>>54599593
>GTX 970 SLI 8GB
Discarded.
>>54599917
You don't even need AA at 1440p