>>54585677
At least php isn't littered with OOP.

>>54585677
PHP definitely.
C++ isn't even bad.

>>54585677
PHP, at least C++ is actually useful for high-performance code

>>54585677
C++ had lambda.

PHP has HIV

>>54585714
http://php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.php

>>54586896
PHP has had closures and anonymous functions since long before C++

>>54585677
PHP definitively, because it's weakly typed

>>54586896
C++14 has lambda again

>>54585677
PHP is such an absolute madness language I wouldn't consider it being bad. It's like the guy sat down and thought "you know what would be good? no rules".

>>54586936
>PHP definitively, because it's weakly typed
this desu, having control of how much memory variables take up is good

I'm going to say PHP is worse, but C++ suffers a lot of the same problems (poor design choices, synergistic interactions of said poor design choices, and featuritis.)