Could a company reintroduced a retro product say a iPhone 4s or a PS3 or 2 even a Note 2 or SG3 and just fucking sell it for 49.99-99.99$
>>54572931
>retro product
>iPhone 4s
Underage faggot found
>>54572931
>a retro product say a iPhone 4s
>>54572964
Retro simply means a design from recent past.
>>54572931
I don't see why not they were and still is good products
Why not target Walmart poorfags ?
>>54572931
We have something called copyright law that prevents that.
If you mean reproduction copies for collectors and historical interest, that's a grey area, but if the company is still alive and kicking, it's most definitely something they would sue you for.
>>54573021
Wtf r u talking about? So apple is going to sue apple for reintroducing the iP4s to poorfags..