http://videocardz.com/59962/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-final-specifications-and-launch-presentation
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA
>>54566085
HBM2 cards when?
>>54566147
not for another year
>>54566192
Lol
Like DXTC wasnt' a thing for 10 years.
>>54566085
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
H.264 Encode Yes (2x 4K @ 60 Hz) Yes
H.264 Decode Yes (2x 4K @ 120 Hz up 240 Mbps) Yes
HEVC Encode Yes (2x 4K @ 60 Hz) Yes
HEVC Decode Yes (2x 4K @ 120 Hz /
8K @ 30 Hz up 320 Mbps) No
10-bit HEVC Encode Yes No
10-bit HEVC Decode Yes No
12-bit HEVC Decode Yes No
MPEG2 Decode Yes Yes
VP9 Decode Yes (2x 4K @ 120 Hz up 320 Mbps) No
FUCKING FINALLY
Posting in an epic shill thread keep going with those fucked graphs boys!
>>54566511
up to 10b HEVC (H.265) encode/decode (plus 12b decode) is welcomed and puts it above Intel's Skylake processors that encode/decode 8b.
holllyy shit
>>54566609
kek
>>54566609
I love these
>>54566641
>>54566631
>>54566609
you mad, AMDead?
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
That this thread is always at the top of page 1 means that you need TO FUCKING THROW AWAY THE GPU PACKAGING FOR FUCKS SAKE
>1.7% GAINS
FERMI 2.0 CONFIRMED
>>54566085
>>54566101
>>54566511
Do shills even know what this stuff means?
>>54567432
A moron like you wouldn't know
>>54567459
T. Idiot
>>54566511
What does this mean???
I'm buying a 1080 on release day, so it doesn't matter hahaahha
>>54566085
That has to be one of the strangest and most useless graphs I have ever seen.
Using 11-28% less bandwidth than the previous card really does not mean much of anything if bandwidth was not an issue in the first place.
One only creates graphs like this if they are desperate to show an improvement over the previous generation.
>>54567800
It's also completely pointless for anyone with half a working brain cell since the 4096 bit bus of a 4gb hmb2 rapes it to dust.
What's up with all this HBM hype
The Fury X had HBM and if I remember correctly it wasn't amazingly better at anything than the GTX cards
Why are people desperatly waiting on something that's not going to translate into real life performance? Not memeing, geniously curious
>>54568061
HBM2 supposedly will have some tangible benefits. They said that about HBM though, so who knows? As always, I'll wait for the benchmarks to show up.
>>54568061
The fury X did really well on 4k though, which is where I think HBM shines, on lower resolutions the cards aren't really that bandwidth starved
>>54566609
DAYAM
Those graphs they posted are shit.
>vr performance
Seriously?
Nvidia has nothing this generation. Just pretty words to make their shit sell to retards.
>>54568218
If the leaked AotS benchmarks are legit, then even a basic Fury isn't far behind a 1080 to where it's considered a massive goddamn upgrade
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-dx12-benchmarks/
This also assumes DX12 (and Vulkan to a lesser extent) get widespread adoption to where this matters, because I can't imagine words like "Windows 10 only" and "OpenGL successor" are positive phrases to publishers, who have only just started making DX11 mandatory for the last couple years
Does HBM have ECC by default?
So what's the verdict? 20% better than 980ti?
>>54569316
From what I have seen, 20% at best but overall no difference to a 980ti.
>>54569590
So 20% upgrade for $700.
Fucking wonderful.
buy polaris nvidia is dead
>>54568709
man, GTX 1080 looks worse and worse every day.
>>54566085
>Fast Sync
Oh thank God I didn't buy a Gsync monitor.
>>54569682
You can still get $400 for your Ti. But yeah.
>>54566511
>12-bit HEVC Decode Yes No
Thank Daiz.
rip nvidia
>>54566549
That graph it for kids.
>>54566511
finally? nobody needs 10/12 bit hevc encoding and decoding. it's a dead meme, and maxwell already has hevc decoding/encoding support up to 4k 60 fps.
>>54569009
no. ECC is a performance reducing meme
>>54566085
They're really trying to fill the gap between now and a new architecture eh?
Jesus christ how many times are these companies gonna release rebrands already.
>>54570285
No and stop posting about things you don't understand
GM200 & GM204 does not have HEVC hardware decoding
>>54570315
>No and stop posting about things you don't understand
you are projecting; it is you who does not understand what you are talking about.
>GM200 & GM204 does not have HEVC hardware decoding
all gm20x chips do, only gm107 (750ti) doesn't have HEVC encoding and decoding hardware.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_NVENC#Third_Generation_.28Maxwell_GM20x.29
>Introduced with the second-generation Maxwell architecture, third generation NVENC implements the video compression algorithm High Efficiency Video Coding (aka. HEVC, H.265) and also increases the H.264 encoder's throughput to cover 4K-resolution @ 60fps (2160p60).
>>54570151
Gotta sell it to gaymerz, right?
Pascal still looking like a complete and total disaster, no reason to upgrade from 9x series until HBM 2 versions
>>54570367
>mfw gaymeryz think 2x perf think 2x fps
>>54570356
You're a fucking retard
NVENC is for HARDWARE ENCODING
GM200 & GM204 DOES NOT HAVE HEVC HARDWARE DECODING
>>54570315
Let's face it, systems running gm204/200 doesn't need hevc acceleration. Those in the extreme niche who need it would do fine with a 960.
Don't even know why you guys are making a big fuss about it. It's a standard "next gen" feature. The upcoming snapdragon 820 smartphone processor will have high profile hevc decode and encoding.
>>54570410
Wrong, again please don't post if you don't know shit
HEVC decoding is very taxing even on the fastest CPU
>>54570410
>Snapdragon 820
>Upcoming
Pretty much all flagships are already using the 820
>>54570386
are you retarded? they always provide ASICs for encoding and decoding together. GM204 and GM200 both have ASICs for encoding and decoding HEVC.
>>54570378
When is that again? I've heard 6 months but that sounds too soon. I thought it wasn't coming until around Q1 next year?
>>54570427
>HEVC decoding is very taxing even on the fastest CPU
i'm using a core 2 duo laptop from 2008 and have no problems watching 720p and 1080p hevc video, it's not taxing at all for any semi-modern CPU.
>>54570433
Again you're fucking retard
Hardware decoder is DIFFERENT from NVENC encoder
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8526/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-review/5
>Finally, and somewhat paradoxically, Maxwell 2 inherits Kepler and Maxwell 1’s hybrid HEVC decode support. First introduced with Maxwell 1 and backported to Kepler, NVIDIA’s hybrid HEVC decode support enables HEVC decoding on these parts by using a combination of software (shader) and hardware decoding, leveraging the reusable portions of the H.264 decode block to offload to fixed function hardware what elements it can, and processing the rest in software.
>>54570437
probably this time next year
So what is the verdict? I have a GTX 770 right now, is the 1080 a valid upgrade?
I've read people say it's a glorified 980ti.
But I don't follow this scene too closely.
Also I'm still rocking a Core i7 920 @ 3.2. Am I going to be bottlenecked?
>>54570386
>>54570427
Gm200/gm204 supports hevc main profile encode/decode. Only the the gm206 supports hevc high profile. To put it in stupid terms, the titan x/980 ti(gm200) and 980/970(gm204) fully supports 8 bit h265.
>>54570428
Nobody gives a shit about chink phones
>>54570315
>GM200 & GM204 does not have HEVC hardware decoding
>>54570356
>all gm20x chips do, only gm107 (750ti) doesn't have HEVC encoding and decoding hardware.
It seems you are both partially right and partially wrong.
>The seventh generation of PureVideo HD, introduced with the Geforce GTX 960 and also included in GTX 950 and GTX 750 SE, a second generation Maxwell (microarchitecture) GPU (GM206), adds full hardware-decode of HEVC Version 1 (Main and Main 10 profiles) to the GPU's video-engine. Feature Set F hardware decoder also supports full fixed function VP9 hardware decoding.
>Previous Maxwell GPUs implemented HEVC playback using a hybrid decoding solution, which involved both the host-CPU and the GPU's GPGPU array.
>>54570464
post some proof that doesn't come from a corporate-owned shill website, raja.
>>54570480
Why not stay with x70 series if you are poor? x80 is always just a stop gap until the good cards come out and you have to sell it if you want to remain a top dog.
>>54570464
Did you read your own citation?
>NVIDIA’s hybrid HEVC decode support enables HEVC decoding on these parts by using a combination of software (shader) and hardware decoding
>and hardware decoding
Seems to contradict what was asserted in>>54570315
>GM200 & GM204 does not have HEVC hardware decoding
>>54570485
I am right, GM200 & GM204 does not support HEVC hardware decoding
Only GM206 has the full HEVC hardware decoder
So many retards here don't even understand simple English
>>54570480
Pick up a 290/390 or 980ti like a month after the 1080 comes out.
I bought a GTX980 for $350 the day the 980ti came out from some guy who upgraded.
>>54570505
>if you are poor
When did I say I was poor?
>>54570518
>Only GM206 has the full HEVC hardware decoder
>full
Moving the goalposts there skippy.
>>54570480
your CPU is ancient. better off getting a 1070 or a 1060 and investing in something better on the CPU front.
>>54570515
It doesn't contradict anything, it's not a full hardware decoder but you're too stupid to understand that
>>54570505
>>54570522
>>54570480
> x80 is always just a stop gap until the good cards come out and you have to sell it if you want to remain a top dog
>I bought a GTX980 for $350 the day the 980ti came out from some guy who upgraded.
pretty much this
>>54570531
>full
Yeah, no.
>Let me try and stick an extra word in the original assertion and hope no one notices!
>Damnit! They noticed. I'd better try and claim it was there all along and anyone who tried to read what I literally wrote literally is an idiot!
>>54570527
No one is moving goalposts
Hardware decoding means full implementation, if you're too stupid to understand that not my issue
>>54570550
>Hardware decoding means
Nice semantical argument there skippy.
>>54570549
Buttmad faggot that was proven wrong but can't accept the fact and has too much pride in himself
>>54570528
>your CPU is ancient.
Yeah but so far there hasn't been a compelling reason to upgrade. Until my CPU starts to be a limiting factor in gaming, which so far it hasn't, I don't see the reason to upgrade yet. I've thought about it multiple times. The only downside is that it runs hot.
>>54570550
It's not full because it only supports up to 10bit. So you're wrong there too, even after trying to move the goalpost.
>>54570563
>Buttmad faggot
Correction
>Damnit! They noticed. I'd better try and claim it was there all along and anyone who tried to read what I literally wrote literally is buttmad!
>>54570562
Buttmad faggot that can't win by facts by tries to shift goalposts by semantics
>>54569758
Wait for Vega or 1080ti
1080 still isn't a 4k 60fps card. It's a future proof 1440p 60fps card
>>54570574
Wrong again, try again when you actually have real facts, faggot
>>54570590
>It's a future proof 1440p 60fps card
thats called the 980ti
>>54570563
>Buttmad faggot
>>54570580
>buttmad faggot
>>54570580
>Buttmad faggot
What's the definition of autism?
>Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication, and restricted and repetitive behavior.
>impaired social interaction
Clearly.
>non-verbal communication
Unquestionably.
>restricted and repetitive
Obviously.
Go take your meds and take a break from posting on 4chan for a while. It's for your own good. But given how you are not only suffering from autism but overly investing yourself emotionally in your posts I'm sure you're going to disregard this advice.
>>54570605
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yeah fucking right. That barely scrapes by an it is. Wait til ue4 gets widely adopted or cyberpunk 2077 comes
>>54570522
I think Polaris might be a better way. We should be getting a 390x with half the power consumption for less than $300.
>>54570590
I was trying to do the math whether 1080Ti will be single card 4K 60fps. I figured it will need to be 100% more powerful than the 980 Ti to do that. 1080 is looking like it might be 50% better than 980Ti at the very best so will the 1080 Ti be 50% better than the 1080? How much better than the 980 is the 980 Ti? ~50%?
>>54570614
This post is the most autistic in the thread. And I wasn't involved in the shit flinging.
>>54570633
Thats what AMD said they are targeting Polaris to be, a 290x/970 performer for under $150
If this card exists, it would sell a ton.
>>54570571
>Until my CPU starts to be a limiting factor in gaming,
it has been for a while now m8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSD40aoNRIc
>>54570652
>I'm sure you're going to disregard this advice.
Now I expect you'll claim to be a different poster as if somehow it is plausible to believe a completely uninvolved anonymous who is not emotionally invested in his opinion, just decided to be an ass and insult another anonymous for no reason rather than the autist trying to claim he is a different poster to distance himself from his own immature conduct.
>>54570590
problem is, I think it's Gimped, less CUDA and less Transistors are preparation for far superior Ti version in half a year.
>>54570642
I don't think the 1080 Ti can do it. If you want 4K your best bet is to get two cards now. Wait to see how well the 1070 overclocks and ideally you can get a away with two of those. That's what I'm planning for right now. If the 1070 doesn't do much better than 980 Ti then you'll have to get two 1080s which won't be cheap but at least you'll be set until 4K 120 Hz or 5K or whatever your next monitor will be.
>>54570714
gp100 only has 1000 more cores than the 1080, unless nvidia releases a different 600mm2 die with the fp64 support cut out again then it's probably not going to be much better than ~25% over the 1080.
>>54570687
I'm failing to see the practical difference between 80FPS and 120FPS when my TV is 60Hz though.
>>54570800
"Only 1000"
1000 is huge ammount
>>54570809
Not the same poster but if you are gaming on a 60hz TV I don't think the problem is your video card.
>>54570825
per core performance was reduced in pascal, so 'only' 1000 cores isn't going to be as impactful as it was with the 980 and 980ti.
nvidia needs to tack on 1500-2000 more cores with the 1080ti if they want it to fly off the shelves.
>>54570841
OK so I guess I need to upgrade my TV, my CPU, and my GPU. I'm going to drive all of the new equipment to my newly-built home in a brand new car. Anything else I need?
>>54570898
>OK so I guess I need to upgrade my TV, my CPU, and my GPU.
Only your TV from the sounds of things. It seems you are just trying to make it sound more extreme than it really is for some strange reason.
>>54566663
I don't think you get the joke buddy
>>54570915
>more extreme than it really is for some strange reason
Yeah, how about that.
>>54570941
>how about that.
How? I suspect it is about some trumped justification to not feel any need to upgrade anything.
>>54571014
Sorry.
>>54570642
A single fury x / 980ti can do most 4k very very well (battlefield 4, 64 players, everyhting ultra)
THe only game that gives people issues is Witcher, which no one plays anymore
A 1080Ti will handle all 4k games @ 60 fps no issues
>>54571292
Nah, I have two 980 Ti's and GTA V is quite demanding for them at 4K. Future titles are only going to get worse. BF4 is a pretty old game now.
>>54571340
ok aside from GTA5 and Witcher 3, everything else is fine.
>>54571292
>Witcher, which no one plays anymore
Hello Bioware
>>54571499
And every new release you want to play for the next 3 years
I'm basing my gpu needs on those games as well, but I'm not retarded; games that I'll want to play, albeit a few only, will come out and demand ridiculous horsepower to get 60fps at resolutions I'm used to like 1440p
I won't buy a new card until I can get the performance that I desire plus a little headroom. Buying a card that can play gta v and Witcher at 60fps 1440p at 60 fps means jack shit because it means you're dumping money into a card that's essentially DOA; anything more taxing won't do
>>54566609
>>54570480
>770
It will be alot more than $599 so for your money a 980/980ti will be a HUGE upgrade
i went back to a trusty 390
>>54566609
>>54570687
>mfw my i5 4690 is going to bottleneck anycard faster than a 980ti/390/fury
kill me
Zen when?
>>54570687
All this is telling me is that a first gen i7 should last another fucking decade if I buy a new cooler for it
Man, my new i5-6600k might actually last a decade...
>>54570687
i7-920 is 8 god damn years old now.
Still not a bottleneck unless you're using a 120hz monitor.
>>54573343
Make that two decades, or as long as your CPU is going to stay alive.
Consumer CPU sales are going to die after people have upgraded to these newer generations.
>>54573233
You are always cpu limited in some fashion at 1080p. It is why you see AMD cards gain performance (relative to Nvidia) as resolution increases - the driver cpu overhead stops being so limiting because the cards are being saturated.
Its why at 4k these days a fury x is faster than a titan x.
>>54574287
Bretty cool
Explain this to me in production cost terms.
Why do they lower the bus? Isn't it the same freaking bus they make for the last 5 years?
Why AMD always has a bit wider bus on same class GPUs? Is it marketing bullshit to sell more Tis?
>>54575270
Money, little things like that is how companies make profit, wider bus need bigger memory controllers which require more die space and power.
Also because AMD fucking sucks even with their xbox HUEG memory bus they can barely keep up, so there is no reason for Nvidia to use a wider bus despite the fact that their cards would get HUGE performance boost with more bigger bandwidth.
>>54566609
This can't be real hahaha.
![147x21[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zir0tDt.jpg "147x21[1].jpg")
is there any reason to not get a used hd580?
>>54575652
Common sense?
>>54573129
>>54566609
>autistic kids first graph
nvidia still better hahahaha
Download RotTR
r9 270x
Should be fine. It's not.
Check settings
Automatically turned every shit medium, except novidia's shitty tesselation, pure hair and other shit. Those are maxed.
Turn them off.
Looks almost the same, 20fps+
THANKS YOU SHAGGED NOVIDIA
are you ready for maximum benchmark autism in the coming weeks?
it'll be glorious.
Hey fags what do I need to run black ops iii at 1080 at least 125 fps?
>>54571340
yeah since ps4 and xbox are getting an update we can expect (finally) a little bit more demanding games for pc
>>54567675
>>54566511
You can play really, really high quality video files on your computer easily. There was a thread recently where we tried to play some real 4K shit.
Not even OC'd 6700K/4770K CPUs managed to play it properly.
>>54577264
>Download RotTR
It's a shit game.
Press X to win, press Q to see what to do.
3 hours play time.
>>54577864
My GTX780 can push out around 70-90, so maybe this new 1080 card would do that solid 125fps you are looking for.
>>54570873
>nvidia needs to tack on 1500-2000 more cores with the 1080ti if they want it to fly off the shelves.
No they won't. Because It's Nvidia, fanboys will buy it regardless
When it's out and bentchmarked I will believe it.
>>54578041
shut up and wait for your androMADa fanboi
>>54568709
DX12 is going to be more widely adopted once devs see how much of a performance increase it is when it's built into games from the start
>>54569682
Wait why would someone own a single 980ti anyways? It's overkill for 1440p, but isn't enough for 4k
>>54579753
>overkill for 1440p
No, it's just right for 1440p
Raise your standards
>>54580543
>8xmsaa
>second hand 980Ti
>600 EUROS
>>54579219
What? I have only Nvidia cards, and the new Tomb Raiders are fucking awful.
>>54566290
>Like DXTC wasnt' a thing for 10 years.
Delta Color Compression is for rendered frame tiles being pushed out, not for resource textures, which have been compressed for several decades already.
Give me one reason why I shouldn't just buy top of the line cards from both Nvidia and AMD and just switch between them depending on the game?
>>54581556
>maybe you should upgrade from the noVidia GTX G1MP to a 980ti oc amp! edition cuck but only if you want to get shekelbusted by the 1080
>>54581184
Lol that is such a bad deal. A new one costs 600 eur anyways.
>>54580612
>implying
980ti doesn't even have breathing room for gta v or witcher 3 at 1440p max settings, AA and distance scaling aside. How can you call it overkill?
> 2016
> next generation GPU
> Can't run a shitty game at 30 FPS.
Thank you Lord Nvidia!
>>54566758
> 2016
> Don't use the catalog
Where did you live? Under a rock? GTFO, you trump idiot.
>>54581991
Nigga, learn to shitpost.
>>54581897
You're giving double the money to double the jews.
If money isn't a problem for you, follow your dreams my nigga.
>>54582213
>Frametime
>fps
>>54566085
reminder that GP104 still has broken async.
> Maxwell = command list level context switching = Mac OS8 level cooperative multitasking
> Pascal = instruction/pixel level context switching = normal host CPU type preemption
> GCN = simultaneous multithreading = HyperThreading-level per-cycle context juggling
>>54582441
>top kek
>>54582150
Max settings includes 8xmsaa which is a performance killer.
>>54582213
> people this retarded post on /g/
welp.
>>54582213
>amdrone reading comprehension
>>54566609
>>54566641
>>54573129
Damn I forget the term used in statistics where they do this... someone help me here it's going to bother me.
>>54582488
>max means max
Kill yourself
>>54570663
>a 290x/970 performer for under $150
If this card exists, it would sell a ton.
Wouldn't happen
>>54582860
(misleadingly) truncated graphs
>>54582860
I've always called it deception.
>fast sync
...why when theres gsync to work with???????????????????????????????????????????????? why the fuck are they doing this???????????????
>>54578003
youre retarded
So if I had a choice between 970 or 290x the drivers for the 290x would only get better over time, right?
>>54585648
g-sync causes input lag. input lag in VR is shitty, it needs to be instantaneous but running with an unlocked framerate, even though it eliminates input lag, it can feel choppy due to the fluctuating framerate. this new fast sync is like vsync but with the response time cut in half, which is in theory a very nice piece of tech.
>>54585780
970 performance is going to fall off a cliff when the 1070 launches
An R9 270 will be able to beat it
>>54585780
Yeah, 290x trumps it in almost everywhere except goyimworks and it will be supported for much longer
Was a specific time mentioned for when NDA ends for the benchmarks or did they just say May 17?
>>54588203
Probably. Don't know what it is though
>>54585908
>g-sync causes input lag. input lag in VR is shitty,
>input lag in VR is shitty
>VR is shitty
ftfy
>>54588298
Well according to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrrCi96ZLME
He says they'll have a review up before 10am pt or 1pm et
can't wait to finally get some real numbers and out of this speculation shitstorm
>>54585908
Gsync only causes input lag if your FPS is around 144
>>54581184
> Brand new 980Ti
> 950+ DOLLARYDOOS
Being an Australian is suffering, and not just because of the venomous wildlife.
So if I am building a computer from scratch and I need it about a month from now, should I just shill out the money and get the 1070, or just buy a 970 or 390?
>>54590105
wait, buying 970/390 is a waste unless you can get them super cheap.
at my place, people are now selling their 980ti at 980 price.
good goyim itt
>>54585780
>if I had a choice between 970 or 290x the drivers for the 290x would only get better
it looks like AMD is sticking with GCN for at least Polaris and probably Vega, if not also Navi, so 290X/Hawaii will at least benefit from driver optimizations made for new games for the next few years.
Maxwell is gonna get driver optimization priority dropped like a hot potato any month now, but do realize that the 290X will still have its downsides like lower power efficiency, no HDMI2/DP1.3, etc. relative to the 970.
Getting a 460 or a 1060 or whatever might not be the worst thing even with the price premium, given that they will be >2x more power efficient than last gen stuff.
>>54590192
more like, best goyim
AMD lost
>>54590953
AMD loses with every new game release
>>54591057
opengl is biased towards nvidia, not a fair comparison
>>54591245
I thought it was biased towards AMD and Nvidia was better in DX?
>>54591245
>opengl biased
>opengl
>open
alright
>>54591285
its not even a good game anyway
>>54591057
>Nvidia is running a version of opengl that launched 2 years later than the one that amd is using due to a fuckup on id's part
>>54591291
>I'm going to ignore everyone raving about the single player
>>54591304
Explain
>>54591325
AMD doesn't properly support OpenGL 4.5 so AMDrones are blaming id
>>54591291
I guess a certain degree of denial is required to be an amdfag
>>54591057
http://wccftech.com/radeon-crimson-hotfix-r9-390-significant-gains-doom/
A fix came out.
>>54570687
Could a i7 x980 bottleneck me?
>>54570687
>4460
>3200 MHz
Did he disable turbo-boost? Mine always runs at 3400 MHz in-game
>>54591346
The game should have supported Vulkan at launch but Nvidia wanted to look better than AMD in benchmarks and Vulkan doesn't look to good on Maxwell cards so they delayed the Vulkan version until the Pascal release.
>>54570537
>always
>what is 480, 580 and 680
What you meant was "recently".
>>54570687
>920 on par with 4460
>920 OC outperforming 4460
>920 OC outperforming 4790K in certain games
Holy shit you just prove that most of it is software dependent and old CPUs dont bottleneck in most of the situations at all compared to newer, lower tier CPUs.
So how about you rethink your statement and kill yourself?
3770k @ 4.5Ghz here, the day I update my CPU is the day we hit year 2k30.
>>54566085
So...when does this thing come out?
1050 when?
>>54594511
4790k performance in some of the games was twice as good as 4469.
i some how can't believe that at all
>mfw embargo lifts in less than an hour
>>54595346
There's already been a review from vessel
The retard broke the nda, the video is now removed
there's a thread on here about it
>>54595249
Come, friends!
>>54578003
what
