Why don't they make non-shitty mice anymore?
>>54557716
If the mouse doesn't break, the user won't buy a replacement.
mine finally died this year after having it since release. I cried.
Mines still going. It's gonna be a sad day if it breaks
G400(s) sold too well and lasted too long. So they just started making crappy shit that dies after a few years.
>>54557716
Why do you insist on buying the hipster mice that nobody uses because they suck?
There are good mice on the market, but they are very mainstream (ie. G502, Deathadder).
>>54557716
That shape of Logitech mice was shitty though.
>>54559018
>razer
Wew
Most similar like this one?
>>54557716
Because the cheapest logitech mouse is fine enough if you aren't a sperglord.
Mice with no cable stress relief and whining capacitor is non-shitty.
All right.
i had a4tech x7 for seven years without problem until my brother stole it
Looks like pajeet shares a mouse hand with a wiping hand.
What's wrong with this?
Works great for me!™
My son
Mice are like RAM. If they die within 5 years, you'll never buy that company again. Thats why I'll never buy razer again. And I'm hoping all my logitech shit will be good. If not, i'll move along.
But at the same time. If a company relies on their consumers only ever buying a product every 5 years, thats kinda shit. Razer makes their shit break in 18 months, so thats good for them cause they can release their next fisher-price black and green desk dildo every 12 months, ready for when your current one breaks. Logitech appears incompetent at times, but I think they figured that out already being in the input peripheral market for decades. They revamp their shit occasionally, and rerelease their shit at the same time.
