If Linux is so slow, why is it used?

Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-05-14 17:11:42 Post No. 54545952
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: bsd.png (31 KB, 580x300) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:11:42 Post No. 54545952 [Report]

If Linux is so slow, why is it used?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:14:48 Post No.54545980
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:14:48 Post No.54545980 [Report]

It costs time instead of money, which people generally don't find valuable until they're running out.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:18:34 Post No.54546029
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:18:34 Post No.54546029 [Report]

.7z doesn't preserve owner/group info, so it's not really suitable for nix archiving anyways.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:22:01 Post No.54546068
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 17:22:01 Post No.54546068 [Report]

>>54545952
"lincucks is superior to windows" lmao

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-14 19:09:16 Post No.54547697
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 19:09:16 Post No.54547697 [Report]

Are vastly outdated benchmarks some new meme?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-14 20:54:01 Post No.54549199
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 20:54:01 Post No.54549199 [Report]

>>54546068
Linux does a lot better than Windows almost certainly, it's just that FreeBSD sometimes is marginally better than Linux

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-14 20:56:45 Post No.54549245
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-05-14 20:56:45 Post No.54549245 [Report]

File: 1436881421589.gif (916 KB, 490x367) Image search: [Google]

>>54545952
>Debian 2.6