Is this real? No gddrx? 128 bus? This seems so unlike amd

>>54543025
AMD is literally cornering the laptop market, which BTFO the desktop market you stupid NVIDIOT. AMD literally going bankrich, NVIDIOTs on suicide watch.

>>54543036
Oh im retarted. Didnt read its the mobile variants.

>mobile gpu
okay

>R9 M495X
Thats probably Polaris 10 spot or Vega? Eitherway, not really interested

>>54543025
The only ATI card I had was the out of the box one on my first pc, the Radeon 9200. Just by that name you can tell it was shit.

What the fuck happened to there naming scheme. This is retarded.

>>54543045
Nope, not at all.

Nvidia is dominating the notebook market GPUs, thanks to the efficient Maxwell architecture.

AMD can't do shit here.

Deal with the reality.

>>54543075
Why is the naming scheme retarded?

M = Mobile

490, 480, 470, etc = 400 Series
390, 380, 370, etc = 300 Series

Higher the number in same series = more powerful card. 490 > 480 > 470, etc.

X is unbinned cards. 5 at the end is stop-gap/filler.

Is it really that confusing?

Its literally the same format for CPU/GPU from intel/nvidia with different numbers and letters.