?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
?
>>54484339
I think you should post more of that hawt qt.
>>54484339
python
>>54484339
she looks disappointed you even asked
Depends what you want to do. A lot of the best CS books ever written seem to be in lisp. But for purely functional programming, haskell is a better bet
>>54484339
You should learn Lisp, Python, and C++ (>=11).
Rust borrows some things from Haskell and ML and has overall been a joy to use for server side stuff, fwiw.
>>54484339
Lisp. It fits in your head, it just werks, it is magic.
Haskell is just a neverending puzzle of type system extensions, it's for not-bright autists. Lisp is for wizards.
>>54484339
Learn racket first.
>>54484339
probably haskell, since strong static typing is pretty comfy
i always liked scheme though
>>54485525
This, so learn Rust and Haskell as well.
>>54485621
Second for Racket master race
haskell, then lisp
>>54484372
>hawt qt
>could not be more of a generic anime
>>54484339
what anime is this
>>54485603
Common lisp is the c++ of the lisp languages. It's a behemoth of a language. CLOS alone is complex. It's also a lot more imperative and object-oriented than people think it is, it tend to get lumped under "functional languages" for some reason.
You might be thinking of the scheme languages.
the only correct answer
If you won't miss your 9 and 0, lisp.
