Explain to me how barley managing 120fps is impressive?
Nice billion dollar investment, nividishit
Barley who?
>>54479608
who is barley?
>>54479639
>>54479644
Nice reddit humor, Nvidia shills.
>>54479639
>>54479644
Doom guys name.
>>54479658
Back in The Good Old Days™ anon would have screencap'd your post and then made three or five consecutive posts zooming in on your error.
The post timer has ended this ancient tradition.
>>54479719
sounds funny hehe xD
>>54479639
>>54479644
>>54479719
Note these shills attempting to derail the thread, see how their meaningless strawmanning and awful bait attempt to draw your attention away from the point
>>54479608
it was payed by the gaymurs/gaymen kids, who cares.
>>54479608
>Doom
>120fps
I thought Doom on DOS ran below 60 fps?
doom3 graphics on year old gpu
wow
>>54479658
>>54479667
Wait what
He's called Doomguy or Marine
>>54480030
back in the good ol' days, it was analog - essentially infinite frames per second.
>>54480055
You mean 35 fps?
http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Uncapped_framerate
>>54480070
I think he means the analog days, where you actually ran around shooting people
>>54479608
The number in the upper right corner is 156fps, and the devs have said that it occasionally got up to 200fps, causing their game to glitch up. That said, current cards will likely manage 120fps, so it's not a hard game to drive in general. More people will lack the displays needed to show such refresh rates than lack the hardware to render the game fast enough.
>>54480080
>planck time
>>54480055
CRT displays also had refresh rates, albeit fairly variable ones. If you ran at the full resolution of the monitor, you'd typically get around 75-90hz, but since games ran much lower at like 640x480, when the monitor dropped down to that resolution your refresh went up anywhere from 120-160hz or even 200hz depending on model.
>699
>less transistors than the 980ti
>less memory bandwidth than the 980ti
>paper launch
Dead in the water
>>54479608
V U L K A N
>>54480216
>699
for the founders edition that you don't have to buy, it doesn't feature anything over the regular version.
>less transistors than the 980ti
pointless metric
>less memory bandwidth than the 980ti
as long as it doesn't impact overall performance, who cares? what type of scientific compute do you do where memory bandwidth is the limiting factor?
>paper launch
still out before Polaris
>Dead in the water
for (you)
I don't even care about the 1080 but this is just the niggest shit I've ever read.
>>54480172
>he fell for the planck lenght meme
>>5448030
Can't do 4k60 on 320gb/s memory bandwidth
>>54479608
Nothing impressive. Doom runs well even on a GT940m.
>>54479871
Kill yourself, you deluded manchild. Your insistence that the anons derailing your thread are shills only highlights your bewildered stupidity. The reality is that everyone else couldn't care less about your retarded video gaymes and your obsession with purchasing your consumer technology from the correct Jewish company. You are cancer, and your childish "AMD vs NVIDIA!!!" fetish stifles discussion of real technology topics. You have only yourself to blame when you get shit replies to your utter shit thread. Install Gentoo or fuck off.
>>54480055
The only display that operate the way you are describing are gas discharge plasma televisions, they essentially draw the image 480-4000 times per second with 1-bit of information at a time
even though they are perfectly capable of refreshing in the kilohertz range the Hollywood/Sillicone Image HDCP chips embedded in every unit strictly enforce "standard" television resolutions and will not allow any signal higher than 60hz to pass through digitally to the timing controller, it's kind of stupid because variable sync could be used to lock onto film cadence smooth out television broadcasts and things of that sort
>>54479608
>brand new, top of the range gpu
>completely static tiny room with 4 enemies
>viewmodel covering 1/3 of the screen
>max 130fps
Why is everything so unoptimised nowadays?
>>54480824
I once bought a G500S "gaming mouse" because it was comfortable in my hand and from day one the thing lagged like a sack of balls, barely usable for general tasks let alone gaming
Little did I know I had to update the firmware
>>54480824
I once bought a G500C "gaming mouse" because it was comfortable in my hand and from day one the thing lagged like a sack of balls, barely usable for general tasks let alone gaming
Little did I know I had to update the firmware
>>54480824
I once bought a G500S "gaming mouse" because it was comfortable in my hand and from day one the thing lagged like a sack of balls, barely usable for general tasks let alone gaming
Little did I know I had to update the firmware
>>54480824
I once bought a G500C "gaming mouse" because it was comfortable in my hand and from day one the thing lagged like a sack of balls, barely usable for general tasks let alone gaming
Little did I know I had to update the firmware
>>54481051
>>54481075
>>54481090
>>54481149
I guess you need to update your firmware again.
>>54481171
Is this some sort of new copypasta?
>>54480824
I once bought a G36K "assault rifle" because it was comfortable in my hand and from day one the thing reloaded like a sack of balls, barely usable for general tasks let alone home defence
Little did I know I had to update the firmware
>>54481090
That's your fault for not doing research on sensors.
>>54480045
>not knowing his canon name is John
>>54481194
I once bought a G36C "assault rifle" because it was comfortable in my hand and from day one the thing reloaded like a sack of balls, barely usable for general tasks let alone home defence
Little did I know I had to update the firmware
>>54480307
>>less memory bandwidth than the 980ti
>as long as it doesn't impact overall performance, who cares? what type of scientific compute do you do where memory bandwidth is the limiting factor?
I bet you also think that you have nothing to hide
>>54479608
barley managing any amount of frames is quite impressive IMO
Who the fuck would buy a GTX1080 to play video games at 1080p? What a waste of money.
>>54479608
Is it running at 4K?
>>54482183
1080p.
>>54482263
>a flagship GPU can run at game at 1080p
stop the fucking presses
1080p poorfags will defend this
The game is running at Ultra settings, the beta only had Medium settings and already used 50% GPU on a GTX980Ti at 60FPS cap.
>>54483397
The game is unoptimized garbage?
>>54483488
Welcome to the 2010s, where RAW POWAH is all developers care about because they license engines and libraries they don't understand for convenience
>>54483655
Took you 4 hours?
>>54479608
That demo would have been impressive if they ran Homefront the Revolution. I don't think i've seen anyone run that thing at a high/stable frame rate.
>>54480307
>still out before Polaris
Since when is a paper launch some kind of victory? kek nvidiots sure are desperate.
>>54480728
#fuknwreckedm8
>>54483655
>THOSE
>RAINBOW
>PIXELS
HOLY
SHIT
