https://www.haskell.org/
http://www.schemers.org/Documents/#intro-texts
http://www.scala-lang.org/
http://elm-lang.org/
http://miranda.org.uk/
https://www.functionalgeekery.com/
https://clojure.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_theory
https://jobs.functionalworks.com/#/job-board
>>54479203
Who programs in elm here?
>>54481024
I really wanna get into it but it's so rare that I do anything on the web that I haven't had a chance to. Although I'm pretty sure I'll end up preferring Purescript if I use Elm, assuming it has good FRP capabilities.
>>54479203
Why you keep posting this ugly cunt in all haskell threads? Faggot
Can you even call yourself a real functional programmer if you don't wear these?
>>54481607
my sides
Is scheme really only good for educational purpose? I'm reading good things about racket.
Should I choose clojure over racket for actual programming (like practical things)?
>>54481992
Scheme gets a bad rap for being so easy to learn and use. Racket is a scheme-based Lisp. It's not really Scheme anymore, it's a very big language. I'd definitely say it's good for "actual/practical" programming. The documentation is great, there's a shit ton of libraries (most important part for actual/practical programming), and it's easy to get up and running. It comes with some very nice Lisp-y image libraries that layer over OpenGL, which is a huge benefit. It comes with really good standard libraries for creating cross-platform GUI's too. Pick Clojure if you already use Java, want Java errors/stack-traces, and need to use Java libraries. Otherwise, I'd say go with Racket.
>>54479203
There is already a functional programming general in the catalog, with the frog on it.
Stop making this nonsense thread, with your boner killer mascot.
