Does windows have support for containers?
>>54476888
Yes. Our company is using Interschalt MACS3, but there are other cheaper alternatives available tho they are mostly designed for sub-5k-teu capacities and are lacking support of auto-updates using satellite networking.
>>54476888
Could you be any more vague?
>>54477043
Well, this is neo-/g/ after all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating-system-level_virtualization
Yes, but those container for windows are more like sandbox for desktop, to run untrusted binaries and reduce risk of malware or something.
>>54477067
Great, another highly technical Wikipedia article that doesn't have the Simple English language.
>>54477043
>>54477618
Get the fuck out
This is way too complicated for 4chan we're just simple weebs that want fast anime
>>54477618
Alright boys we're in a BAIT thread.
Yes it does. Server 2012 R2 can be deployed in containers, and the new Server 2016/Nano will ofc support it.
I have some running as docker containers.
>>54476888
20 or 40 ft?
>>54479020
But can you run docker containers *on* Windows Server?
>>54479255
I think docker added windows support in the last year or two
>>54476888
Do you mean if containers have windows? I dont think they do but you can always diy.
>>54476888
Yes, we call them folders.
>>54479020
>>54479255
>>54479296
How ? Does this mean you don't need Virtualbox to run Linux VM ?
On dockers website, it stated that you need to run Linux VM. This Linux VM will host dockers.
>>54476888
There's an upcoming feature in Windows Server 2016, developed in collaboration with Docker.
Yes, any terminal controlled container, refrigerated or otherwise, should be using a seimens controller, which many newer models have Windows XP, 7 and vista support
Yep
>>54479891
This is correct, it's also true on OS X as well, but the docket toolkit automates the whole stack.
>>54480597
The question was if the windows kernel has support for containers.
