is.
..you're...
....body....
.......ready.......
..............?
i can't wait for my 980ti to become weaker than a 1060 in a few driver updates
seriously fuck nvidia
>you're
Retard
>>54473639
yes please
at least a company is pumping out good products instead of that useless heap of shit that AMD is pumping out nowadays
>>54473639
Learn to write instead.
>>54473639
is your fire extinguisher ready?
That shit looks like a dildo
>>54473652
>Not buying AMD
we told u bro
>>54473639
Yes I can't wait to get my hands on a 1070. Faster than titan x performance for £300. Fucking bargain mate.
>>54473639
10 rupees have been deposited into your account
>still can't do async properly
kek
>>54473652
I'm already experiencing frame drops on my 980ti rig
It cant even do 100 fps stable on my woltk private server anymore
>>54473639
>7,5
My 980ti is stable @1400
>>54473639
My body is, but my wallet isn't.
>>54473639
Yes reggie! Now let's continue invading this board because several boards for video games is apparently not enough.
>>54473838
Show me just a single dildo remotely similar to that shit and I might consider getting one.
>>54474189
my 980TIs stock clock was @1470
at 1600MHz the GTX1080@1800 was still faster than my TI.
nvidia showed a GTX1080 running at over 2000MHz
Thank god I managed to sell my TI for 600
>>54473639
You know shills are underpaid when they can't even type a word or sentence properly.
>is...you're.......body...........ready.....................?
>>54474688
>>54473816
Can you fucking redditards leave already? That bait has been used for ages for idiots like you.
check the catalog and keep it in one thread, Rajesh
Is there any reason not to wait for them to release the same card with hbm in a year or so?
>>54473639
Gotta hand it to them, this is fucking amazing gpu. Very hard to top.
Shill introduction video.
https://youtu.be/JUL6Gc2g4kg
>>54473928
yet still is going to beat AMD in every single game there is. The way it is meant to be played.
>>54473639
It is, as well as my wallet. I got a Vive and 3 144hz monitors and a projector and 3 7inch lcd's that need to eat up that power.
>>54474745
why are you pretending to be retarded?
>>54473652
>>54473947
ok, I hear this every graphics card generation, but I've never seen empirical evidence for it
if it's true, there's serious potential for a class action
>if we use 'gaming' enough times teenagers will buy our shit
>>54474760
I'm pretty sure he just naturally is.
>>54473639
>tfw people were laughing at you for being a waitfag
>tfw they all bought 970's and 980 ti's
>tfw my 1080 will beat the piss out of both while consuming much less power and giving more room for overclocking
Literally can't wait for all the tears famalamadingdang
>>54474792
>tfw my several year old gpu can still play any recent game on max settings flawlessly
Keep buying meme cards fa/g/got.
>>54474792
>new card will outperform old one
WHAT IS THIS WITCHCRAFT
>>54474760
Nvidia can just give some money so they will run better on Nvidia.
There are less than 10 dx12 titles coming up and none of them are good. By the time they are out AMD is hopefully bankrupt ;^)
Nvidia runs cooler
Nvidia has better drivers
Nvidia has better industry support
Nvidia has more "the way it's meant to be played" titles.
Nvidia Nvenc/cuda/physx/gsync/shadowplay
Nvidia SLI scales better and works smoother.
Nvidia has bigger budget, bigger than entire of AMD.
There is no reason to ever pick AMD.
>>54474792
>tfw some faggot will post this at you in a couple months and you're going to feel like shit
>>54474745
>>54474826
>this much autism
I can't make you shut up, but I can filter you :')
Unpaid shills are the most autistic.
>>54474893
You sure showed me. Leave the GPU's to the professionals, leave it to the Nvidia.
>>54474826
Kill yourself tripfag
>>54473639
>599 for reference model / """"founders"""" edition
oy vey, I like nvidia but that's just retarded.
>>54474826
/v/ is the other way around
>>54474905
>nvidia
>professional
Kek.
>>54474826
>the company that has the most marketing deals has the best products
Are you serious mate? Besides market share the companies and their products are extremely similar. I think you fell for the green text le epin gaming meme.
>>54474961
it's 699
>>54474770
Sort off. A guy in /v/ posted his screens and documentation of it and found the newer drivers dropped his fps by 1 or 2. He noticed the impact slowly increment as the updates got newer. I've even had times where newer drivers fucked me. But so far I haven't seen any proof that nvidia are intentionally gimping these drivers.
>>54475018
>699
:^(
goyim not happy
>twice the gaming performance
Wow I feel compelled to buy it already
>you're
>>54474597
>my 980TIs stock clock was @1470
The fuck?
>>54475033
I have a 780 and both of Nvidias March(April?) updates fucked my rig up. There was articles on it and I honestly couldn't believe it. Lucky my card wasn't bricked or anything, just my windows installation was screwed. After reinstalling the OS, Ive been using November drivers. Everything works fine now and I'm actually afraid to update drivers now. Call me paranoid but if I hadn't experienced it first hand I would've never believed it.
>>54475073
what driver version?
>>54475073
I have two 780's and theat game ready update they had for mgs IV fucked the performance for skyrims. I had to roll back and wait for the next update. But having to reinstall your OS just sounds like you fucked something up to be honest.
>>54475093
I don't remember. There was 2 for that month. I think it was March. I'm on mobile so I'm too lazy to confirm.
>>54475033
>A guy in /v/ posted his screens and documentation of it and found the newer drivers dropped his fps by 1 or 2
you fucking entitled millennial babbies are fucking ridiculous, even if the 1-2 fps drop is statistically significant it's well in line with what could be expected with a driver update for a myriad of reasons. just don't update your drivers if you're happy with what you've got or roll back to an older driver.
But most games can already be played on high settings with a much older card
>>54475103
Trust me, all I did was update the driver like normal and play dark souls for a few hours. The only other thing I had opened was a document I was typing up. Nothing out of the ordinary. The pc stayed on the loading windows screen only and never went through, sometimes it would attempt automatic repair. I tried everything to fix it buy just gave up and decided to reinstall. I'm glad I keep everything on my other drives. Look it up on Google. One of the symptoms was problems to the OS.
Friendly reminder the GTX 1080 showed to be 10% faster than a 980ti in leaked benchmarks and not that "twice a Titan X" monster NVidia is trying to sell
>>54475180
twice the performance was in VR wasn't it, idiot
>>54475134
Did you not read the last line? I said it doesn't seem like they are doing it on purpose.
>>54475138
That sucks man. Do you think it was intentional or just a fuck up?
>>54473639
>fermi 2
I'm excited just for all the new house fire memes.
>tfw 750ti
>>54473947
I am getting frame drops as well on the private WOTLK server(warmane) and i even set everything to low to test it and i still get frame drops so you know, maybe it's not the graphics card fault. Running an i5+280x. And we are talking about a game that i ran back in the day on a single core celeron 2.4gz, 512 ram and fx5200.
>>54475217
Sometimes the installer fucks up on its own too.
>>54473639
GTX 1080 Founders Edition = GTX 1080 The Graphic Jew
Do I buy AMD stock and sell when the Zen comes out or buy NVIDIA and sell when 1080 comes out?
Is you are body ready? >>54473639
>>54474745
AMD retards cant accept the truth
fact is 980TI still fucks everything that AMD has to offer and now the GTX1080 is gonna do everything the 980TI can even better
the R9 series is ATIs HD 2000 series all over again, it's fucking laughable
>>54475330
buy fingerprint cards
>>54474808
>tfw my several year old gpu
ofcourse it does when you only play games like lol/dota/cs
or shitty indiegames/ports
>>54475227
you must be living under a rock the last couple of days
>>54474770
There are multiple articles on the internet. People posted lots of benchmark comparisons with different driver versions.
>>54475760
any links?
>>54475033
slow decrements over a long period of time could be due to lots of things, like an aging HDD -- there needs to be some more rigorous testing
![[HorribleSubs] Boku no Hero Academia - 05 [720p].mkv_snapshot_00.47_[2016.05.04_16.31.47].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Gz8tJup.jpg "[HorribleSubs] Boku no Hero Academia - 05 [720p].mkv_snapshot_00.47_[2016.05.04_16.31.47].jpg")
>>54473639
>gaming perfected
Yeah, because playing games is the only thing you can do with a strong GPU.
>#GameReady
Fuck off.
>>54475936
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/831639/geforce-700-600-series/nvidia-is-deliberately-downgrading-kepler-gpus-performance-in-favor-of-maxwell-/
This is just example. Google "nvidia gimping" there is a lot of shit to read.
>>54475674
>any recent game
Stop projecting faggot
>>54475982
I was hoping there'd be something more compelling than "NVIDIA isn't supporting previous generation cards with driver optimizations"
but there's nothing here that says as far as I can tell that they are actively gimping performance with driver versions
>>54475978
Tbh i rarely even game anymore. I use gpu mostly for high quality anime playback on muh PC.
>>54476001
>>54475982
obviously a 780 ought to outperform a 960, but you have to show that at one point in driver history it did, and now it doesn't
>>54475978
>>54476004
>they buy gpus for their anime
>>54476029
Anime is serious business, man.
>>54473652
780ti user here
It is less gimping and more they just don't update drivers for new games. Nvidia has absolute SHIT long term support. They seem to stop driver optimizations almost the day after there new arc comes out. They still do bug fixes though.
Cant wait for DX12 Gimpworks to come and buttfuck everyone.
>>54476029
this lol wtf
if anything you shouldn't get the $600+ cards you should get a quiet one or even a completely silent passively cooled one, it should still be stronk enough for anime
>>54476001
It seems you just dont want to believe into nvidia gimping desu.
> Nvidia forums ablaze with Kepler-gimping accusations
This doesn't just apply to the Witcher 3, but it looks like many of the latest drivers put out by Nvidia have been purposefully gimping 600/700 series cards.
>Kepler is being badly neglected and even 1st gen GCN is slowly pulling away from Kepler cards in newer games.
It's pretty ridiculous. The lifespan of Nvidia cards is shocking.
Another example: http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/more-evidence-shows-nvidia-gpus-losing-performance-32925136/
>What's even more troubling is that thanks to Gamworks performance is actually worse now then before and is especially hitting Kepler owners (GTX 6XX/7XX) series who play Fallout 4 who sees an astonishing level of performance decline.
>The author puts the lack of optimization of nVidia GPU's to what he calls nVidia's "planned obsolescence" where as he later points out when Pascal comes out and the benchmarks for Pascal come out the owners of the GTX 7XX or the GTX 9XX series will only look at the benchmarks of Pascal and compare that to their current GPU's so if nVidia can gimp or not optimize their current GPU's it will give them more incentive to buy new GPU's
>>54474712
>taking the bait
Grow up faggot
>>54476137
my 720p anime plays fine on my ice age atom n270
>>54476114
nvidia has much better long term support than amd, they have years longer support for each product, the fact that the optimizations top out sooner is due to GOOD driver support, do you want better performance now or do you want it to slowly improve over several years
>>54476160
is it 10-bit though?
>>54476162
>nvidia has much better long term support than amd
You are fucking delusional if you think that. The 780TI is faster than the 970 on early titles and on some new shit it manages to be even slower than my 7970ghz edition. I know the gimping first hand.
>>54476187
lags occasionally on 10bit but still
>>54476162
>do you want better performance now or do you want it to slowly improve over several years
You basically saying that gimping their cards is ok because you gain some edge in performance before new cards are released.
>As you can see GTX 9XX series is losing performance with the Kepler series being hit hard with the GTX 780 Ti, Titan and GTX 770/680 is now losing performance by 30% whereas AMD GPU saw performance increase of of 24%-30% with the Fury X is getting an astonishing 30% boost in performance. Which is pretty significant even when compared to an overclocked 980 Ti.
AMD ages like wine.
>>54476217
yeah like 1 fps slower at 4k or some irrelevant shit like that
>>54476234
>AMD ages like wine.
because they're slow as fuck to get their drivers up to par, idiot
>>54476232
fair enough
>tfw you realize a graphics card has more memory than your current machine
should I off myself? or my machine?
>>54476238
The delusion. Damn.
>>54476256
i'm definitely upgrading my shit this year
![8d0[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/OPUqbZ3.jpg "8d0[1].jpg")
>>54476249
>>54476238
this is the power of Nvidia
WOW
So is there hardware ASIC on pascal? or is it software emulation bs all over again.
>>54476285
>being this delusional
if amd had good driver support they'd have optimized drivers much sooner, not several years after release
>>54476313
this is your brain on Nvidia
>>54473845
With AMD, you don't have to wait for the updates. It comes that way out of the box
>>54476343
kek
>>54473639
>nvidya cucks
Why do you even need a meme graphics card anyway apart from underage FPS games?
Anybody who buys nvidia this generation gets what they deserve, you suckers need to wise up
>>54474826
>SLI scales better
LOL no chance.
>Shadowplay
Raptr GVR
>Gsync
Freesync
>>54476001
>>54476162
>Results seemed to show that since the release of Maxwell in newer games Kepler based cards performance has decreased to such a point where the GTX 780 was performing almost the same as an R9 280x.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1529108/are-nvidia-neglecting-kepler-optimization-since-maxwell-release
>>54476365
i have a hd6970 and fuck you, i can't even run dual desktop monitors without the fan ramping up and it heating up the room like crazy, fuck you i'm getting a gtx 1070
>>54476398
to be fair 6970 is a shit card in terms of heat ouput, had mine scream like a banshee each time I played CS 1.6
>>54476379
that sounds about right what the fuck are you even on about, the 780 ti equivalent card fucking years ago was 290x and the 780 was always significantly weaker
>>54473639
does the gtx 1080 only do 1080p gaming?
![sad-jew[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/OQapxbl.jpg "sad-jew[1].jpg")
>>54476365
Nah. They're good buying flagships every year!
>>54476418
for proper maxed out gaming at high frame rates you're looking at 1080p regardless of what setup you have, maybe 1440p, 4k can be playable but with settings turned down
>>54476432
As someone with a 2560x1440@144hz monitor and a Fury X pushing it, I'd say if you're looking for 144hz stable, you'd need to be looking at 1080. If you don't mind as long as its 60 or above, 1440 is possible in some games, but not in others.
>Inb4 some Nvidia shill comes along
No, not even a single 980ti would do it. Not 144hz stable in the newest games.
>>54473639
>10: GAMING PERFECTED
So is this the last nvidia card? Last graphics card we will ever need?
Can't improve on perfect, can you?
>>54473856
If you think we will get American low prices then you are deluded.
>>54474792
I think you mean mfw, newfag
>>54476343
HUE
>>54473639
>>54473808
>>54474826
>>54475036
Is your body ready for 5 more FPS!!!!!!!!!
>>54476584
>b-but muh amd
>muh async compute
>>54476637 <--HURTINNN!!!
>>54476653
being THIS delusional, even in this amd-optimized shitty shit game with the async compute meme it still beats the fury x by a significant amount
>>54476584
Doesn't change the fact that it will be 40-50% faster than all AMD's offerings in every other game.
>>54476375
Freesync and raptor are fucking trash. Sli still scales better than driverless crossfire amd setup.
>>54476365
AMD users are still buying the same card after 7-10 years.
Amdcucks argument muhhhh async.
>less than 3 games are going to benefit from this until 2017 maybe even 2018
>>54476687
But it doesn't scale better, it scales worse.
It typically has better frametimes, but it doesn't scale better.
>>54476249
>>54476687
>Sli still scales better than driverless crossfire amd setup.
people should be banned for posting misinformation.
>>54473639
is you are body ready?
do you even english mato desu ne?
>>54476637
>>54476584
>>54476682
That's WITHOUT a-sync on.
I should know, I have a Fury X and own Ashes.
Asynchronous shaders ON makes it run much, much better.
>>54476682
Amdcucks in nutshell. Meanwhile greens are enjoying bitchin fast 3D,new technologies and new architectures, while MAD cucks are still buying same card in 2016... I mean 2017
Selling my Fury X for a 1080 because it's better.
AMD is targeting the midrange this gen.
Simple as that you cucks.
>>54476709
why don't you post a benchmark chart of that then, stupid amdcucks with your unsubstantiated claims
>>54476737
>AMD targeting 95% of the market, not NEETs
Sounds like a solid plan
>>54476748
Give me 3 minutes, that's how long the bench takes.
1440p crazy preset, ya? On it.
I wonder what kind of CPU i'll need to run those cards (r9 490 included).
If my i5 3550 is enough for a 970, it must be enough for a 1070/R9 480, r-right guys?
>>54476916
95% of market doesn't even know AMD or keeps it as shit poorfag pajeet brand.
>>54476916
>Implying NEETs have the spare money to buy high end cards
Kek, also the GTX970 was the bestseller last generation.
I will only buy an AMD card if the R9 490X is somewhat faster than a R9 390X AND has the average power draw of a GTX 970.
Yes, electricity bills here play a role, and so does the cooling and the heat dissipation therefore.
Efficiency is everything.
>>54476748
Okay, I take that back. I was mistaking the crazy and extreme settings results.
Here's my log, since I couldn't get screenshots because lolnooverlay.
So yes, I was wrong. Like I say, I'd mistaken it for the extreme preset results.
DOOM on Pascal GTX 1080 hitting 150 fps at times powered by Vulkan based on AMD Mantle API. SAY FUCKING THANK YOU A.M. FUCKING D!!!!
>>54476687
>AMD users are still buying the same card after 7-10 years.
I'm running 2 7950's from the year of 2012. Both of them are capable of A-Sync on DX12 and Vulkan. It's 2016 and not one GTX1080 card can do this.
>>54477035
ma nigga, thats sweet.
>>54476584
>>54476748
This is DX11.
>>54477035
Nigger you tested in wrong resolution (2560x1440). Test 1080p. Also look >>54477077
>>54477106
Go back to the original image; it has a 1440p bench below the 1080p bench.
Still, I'll do it for you. It'll likely come out with the same numbers that the original image did.
>>54477057
Hey, if I'm wrong I ought to own up to it. I want that from other people, so I should be doing the same.
Here's the extreme bench, which is what I play on and why I was mistaken by the whole only 45fps thing.
>>54476114
>It is less gimping and more they just don't update drivers for new games.
>They seem to stop driver optimizations almost the day after there new arc comes out.
This. I've never seen old games get suddenly worse, but all of a sudden with new releases your card just isn't competitive with its former peers anymore,
> t. GTX 670 owner
Of course AMD quit optimizing pre-GCN as much too, but I get the feeling that they don't intentionally give every architecture they release a 2-year useful lifetime.
>>54477041
>150 fps indoors
>relevant
Give me some open world performance and then we can talk.
>>54477077
That's odd, since I never, ever choose the DX11 option - I always choose the DX12 one.
What's the odds that the bench scoreboard doesn't filter out crossfired/SLI GPU's as what they are? Would explain why they're #1 on the board too.
>>54476418
>does the gtx 1080 only do 1080p gaming?
it's sure as fuck not going to be a 4k card given its gimped memory bus/bandwidth.
> 1440p probably at least reasonable
>>54473639
I may leave /g/ for a couple of weeks.
My body is not ready for the constant shill post that we have to endure prior to a gpu launch.
PSA for non shill anon if any (doubtful at this point): Wait for benchmarks and reviews.
>>54477175
Its says (mGPU) if you use sli, crossfire or whatver. So it must be a single card.
>>54477106
So here you go.
i7 4790k @ stock paired with a Fury X @ stock, 1920x1080 crazy settings DX12.
Matched up to what the graph said >>54476584.
>>54477232
I might just screencap and frame this post on my wall as it's an incredible show of sanity compared to the rest of the board.
Everyone loosing their mind over a card that's fractionally faster than Titan X? The minority with half a fucking brain cell or more can safely assume it's not a miracle.
Remember everyone. Nvidia still cannot into ASync
my classified 980ti is fine, thanks
>>54477256
Now show the entire leaderboard for that.
There's a fucking Radeon Pro Duo that has obviously been benchmarked by a reviewer using Ashes.
Its in fifth place.
To have a single Fury X in front of it, I don't even know how. Either its a hack in software that makes two Fury (X?)'s look like one, or its some kind of SUPER OC'er who does balls to the wall insane stuff like phase changing the GPU.
>>54474826
your /v/ is showing anon...
>>54477258
>>54477308
I dont know anymore....
>>54474826
>>Nvidia runs cooler
By Design, I'll give you this
>>Nvidia has better drivers
That include huge amounts of bloatware the average user doesn't need
>>Nvidia has better industry support
"Better" than AMD? No open-source support.
>>Nvidia has more "the way it's meant to be played" titles.
This is what your money goes to when you buy their products, not better hardware, it goes to Nvidia to Shill out and give free hardware to production studios to make titles with UltimactusXXX support for Nvidia (ie. They are paid to give nvidia the privilege)
>>Nvidia Nvenc/cuda/physx/gsync/shadowplay
x264, x265, intel quicksync > Nvenc
"MUH CUDA CORREESSS!!!"
PhysX ouch you got me. But if you really cared about the progression of technology then you wouldn't support this argument. NvidJews care more about their sheckles that they do the industry.
FreeSync > G-Sync (Clue is in the title)
Every other screencap program > bloatwareplay
>>Nvidia SLI scales better and works smoother.
Not a chance, and "works smoother" doesn't mean a fucking thing.
>>Nvidia has bigger budget, bigger than entire of AMD.
This is not an argument point. Apple has more money than microshills, doesn't mean they make better products.
>>54477041
>I'm running 2 7950's from the year of 2012. Both of them are capable of A-Sync on DX12 and Vulkan. It's 2016 and not one GTX1080 card can do this.
but they can get 70% more framerates regardless, with single card.
380x is just 7970 rebrand.
>>54477146
A good man you are.
>>54474826
actually
nvidia typically doesn't run cooler, at least not from my autistic anecdotal evidence. but if you check benchmarks and compare temperatures the 390 runs cooler than the 970 in most cases. same thing with the fury/fury x vs 980/980ti
amd's drivers are just the same
kek industry support, just no
who cares about mfgr bias titles, that's not what the consumer wants anyway you idiot
vce/opencl/freesync/raptr (gfexperience is just the same kind of bloatware), physx is not a positive and you know this
nvidia sli LITERALLY scales worse than amd crossfire ever since the 290/290x launched and supported XDMA
if nvidia has the bigger budget why have they failed to snuff amd out?
i have a 980ti classy, btw. but you're entirely wrong
>>54477329
Open sour.. What? Nobody gives a fuck.
Gsync is better than freesync it doesn't crap itself if framerate dips.
>This is not an argument point. Apple has more money than microshills, doesn't mean they make better products.
Nvidia can make quickly better gpu than AMD, if AMD puts something decent. Not just quicker but also cheaper.
Gosh why can't AMD go bankrupt already? All they have done is put shit out and broken promises.
You amdfaggots can scream of async and other irrelevant bullshit while I go silky smooth 3D
>>54477332
Yes they can get more frame rates as with any newer cards. My point is that even for old cards they are compatible with DX12 features that are now being made/released. An nvidia card from 2012 or 2016 does not take full advantage of DX12 or Vulkan but all the AMD rebrands can. Do you understand nvidias architecture is old? It's fucking OLD! it's years behind.
>>54477396
>Open sour.. What? Nobody gives a fuck.
>/g/ - Technology
>stallman as board cover pic
>install gen2
MODS, this payed shilling is getting embarrassing, pls remove kebab
>>54477396
>open source
>nobody gives a fuck
Where do you think you are?
>>54477435
its pre 2011 tech really
AMD has been full DX12 and Hardware async since the 7970 and 7990
>>54477436
Stallman thing started as a joke but idiots (newfags) ate the shit up. Freefags are fighting a war they can not ever win.
>>54477435
It's so old it makes AMD look like a joke in performance charts. Dx12 will not be relevant this year and not next year either, by the time it is,Nvidia already has got market in pockets.
>>54477308
lol amdcucks btfo! comparing dual fury x gpu to single gtx 1080
>>54477594
LOL SHILL BTFO!
Again, its the exception to the rule. Chances are its either firmware not reporting it to be what it really is if its MGPU -- OR -- its a stupidly high OC'd phase change cooled unit.
Don't forget that its still AMD who holds the crown according to this benchmark list.
>>54477646
ashes of the singularity is irrelevant, it's not representative of a typical game, it's a really shitty amd-optimized game that's the exception to the rule that nvidia rekts amd's shit
>>54477594
>Comparing Pascal to Fiji
GTFO fanboy
>>54477678
Anon please, moving the goalposts doesn't help you at all.
>>54477308
Somehow, I think Matt is from the future or something. No way is this legit.
>>54477691
what else is there to compare it to? polaris? LOL
>>54477702
>Fiji used HBM, Maxwell did not
>300 series BTFO'ing nvidiots mid-range cards
>stronk 970 VRAM
Go use that last 0.5 GB of VRAM on your 970, smartass.
>>54473652
Why hasn't this been proven yet? How difficult is it? Just do a benchmark now, and do another one next year or when you notice a difference. What am I missing?
inb4 "what you're missing is that these are just memes"
>>54477747
>fiji used HBMeme
>pascal does not
>waahhhh it's not fair to compare pascal to babby fiji
>>54477780
Waiting for Polaris to kick your ass, in the meantime I will enjoy using my full-speed enabled VRAM on my AMD card while you will be stuck with 0.5 GB of stronk nvidicuck VRAM.
>>54474826
>SLI performs better
Objectively wrong in every benchmark you can find.
>Nvidia has better drivers
Nvidia drivers have a news report a month about how they are crashing constantly
Wew lad, this is a pretty shill post but it does seem like its normal work hours now for Nvidicuck offices
>>54477815
polaris is gonna be "mid range" (low end) that's what all the amd shills are saying at least
>>54477838
>what is latency
>what is microstuttering
you should know by now that frame rate is not a good measurement especially for multi gpu, quality > quantity
>>54477852
You read that on nvidiacucks.com?
>>54477308
You guys are just noticing this?
>>54477869
no i read it on 4chan people are saying it's gonna be like gtx 970 but cheaper (which is funny because the market is already saturated with gtx 970), certainly not a gtx 1080 competitor
>>54473652
>buttmad an old product is not as powerful than a newer product
Cool story
>>54477838
>using multi gpus for gaming
>>54477870
people have been saying since its "release" that ashes is a shitty game to use as benchmark
>>54477883
So the Polaris flagship with 14nm process compared to 16nm of Pascal it's going to perform less than the 970.
k.
>>54477918
we'll see in a month/few weeks
>>54477918
but flagship is vega no?
>>54477987
Vega is the successor of Polaris, and it will launch in 2017, if I remember correctly.
>>54478027
but only vega will have hbm2 right? that makes me think it's the flagship. like fury vs 390x
>>54473639
High end graphics cards are a dying breed.
For all the children screaming AMD vs Nvidia at each other you all have the wrong picture. AMD are trying to compete with Intel, not Nvidia.
AMD APUs in all current gen consoles, most likely AMD APUs in all next gen consoles. This makes up well over 50% of game sales for companies like Ubisoft, EA, activision. AMD have positioned themselves so that game developers are making games on their hardware, and porting to PC.
Their manufacturing process is cheaper with higher yields than Nvidia, who can't justify the smaller profit margins in console GPUs, and pretty soon, AMD will move their production into multiple under-powered gpus on the same chip to fall in line with dx12, vulkan and better multi gpu support that does away with inefficient alternate frame rendering.
Once developers start making games on this kind of hardware, and it gets ported to PC, Nvidia cards will be broken on these game. Nvidia will be relegated exclusively to expensive, high end cards, which have a very small market, and AMD will have the money behind it to get back into making CPUs, which is where all the real money is.
For anyone claiming it's bullshit, it's clear AMD have changed their target markets and are no longer interested in competing with Nvidia. They won't need to once their insidious master plan comes to fruition.
>>54477286
>cucked internally
>>54478061
As its rumoured, Vega will be a successor to the 400 series GPUs (that's Polaris). No one can be sure for now, I suppose.
>>54478063
this.
Why go head to head with nvidia when you can try to take over the ecosystem.
>>54478106
see pic from AMD conference
>>54473639
>buying a 256bit overclocked maxwell rehash meme
>>54478141
rebrand?
>>54478063
not everyone is a poorfag, consoles can't even do 1080p, sometimes not even 720p at fucking 30 fps, delusional idiot
>>54478111
>>54478141
>>54478148
This.
>buying a die shrink with gimped bus, no full dx12 compat, 10 year old GDDR5 and which can't even top 10% of the current performance
ground breaking.
>>54478063
>AMDrone excuses
>but but they have other focus
>but they are trying to this
>but but they have smaller budget
Nvidia gives them a bit of playroom they are not able to pull off even with 14nm and HBM
Intel will choke them to death
>>54478156
You're making my point for me mate, 75% of the video game market is sold to people with machines that can't consistently hit 30fps at 1080p on some games... Companies like sony and microsoft want these GPUs because they are cheap as shit and the masses don't care. The margin for profit might be small for AMD, but once game development is tailored exclusively for their hardware (Which makes up the 'poorfag' 75% of games sales and machines) how do you think that will translate to how these games will run on pc?
>>54478141
>pascal
>rebrash meme
kill yourself
I see the mods aren't doing their job.
Fuck off back to /v/ faggots.
Unless you use Quadro/FirePro GPUs, you can go fuck off to the gaymer containment board with your gaymer Razer shit and gaymer Razer tier GPUs.
>>54478205
Can you cunts even read? I'm saying it's a bad thing, as AMD are attempting to monopolise the game development process. Gameworks is going to look like fucking childsplay compared to what AMD wants to do. The monopoly will go the other way, and any monopoly is bad for the consumer.
>>54478238
>Gameworks is going to look like fucking childsplay compared to what AMD wants to do
one AMDrones dream
hahahahahaha
Gameworks is like they holy grail in the future you autistic paki shitstain
All the improvements and open source they have presented
Delicious tears
>>54478215
amd has had their apus in consoles for quite a while and nvidia is still dominating the high end discrete gpu market segment
>>54476416
Maybe because the 680 was besting 7970s and the 7970Ghz was barely keeping pace with it?
Maybe because the 780 was handily beating them all, aside from the 290x?
Can you guys do this on /v/?
>>54478300
can you fuck off to /sp/ ?
this is amd only board
>>54477699
>>54477323
The top four Fury cards are running on LN2 overclocking. It's from a competition sponsored by AMD back when in January
>AMD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lTGk0R12gs
>>54478300
Can you go back to /a/?
>>54478263
Fuck people like this actually exist.
>>54478263
Arguing on the internet is pretty fun right? :)
Nvidia's advertising, marketing and brand position puts AMD in the fucking ground every time. They also have a much better relationship with big tech reviewers. Coupled with some uninspiring refresh releases from AMD I can see why people get so frothed up over Nvidia.
But look at the silicone. AMD is already trying to incorporate 2 weak gpus in one piece of silicone that is recognised as a single gpu. It's cheap, and it's the way hardware will go.
As for gameworks, fallout 4, a GAMEWORKS GAME following the latest patches has seen a pretty substantial decrease in the performance of Kepler cards... Gameworks is basically Nvidia's version of planned obsolescence.. No better than apple kek ;)
Maybe not for the high end enthusiasts that make up 1% of the market, but for major game consoles and entry to mid level cards. I think it'll be pretty bitter for any large, powerful single gpu owner, AMD of Nvidia, when their cards are getting smoked by weak multi gpu set ups because of the way the games are being developed.
>>54478360
To be fair, the performance goes to shit only if you enable gameworks related effects. If you stay away and disable all gameborks effects, the game runs very well on my titan.
>>54478263
stop it anon, not even nvidiots like gimpworks
>>54478360
gameworks adds legitimate features and you can turn it off, you can't expect games to look the same forever, technological progress is good in my book
>>54473652
>le keppler cripple meme
No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvCsT_dk-1E
>>54478385
That's true, and the same can be said of Witcher 3 and disabling tessellation (which admittedly shits on AMD cards way more than it does on nvidia cards), but surely a company like Nvidia can develop shit like gameworks and actually create a performance increase for their cards while making the game look better.
AMDrones
on suicide watch as ever before
>>54478420
As an 'AMDrone' I think the 1080 looks pretty amazing. And it will be the fastest single gpu on the market for a good while (radeon pro duo clearly does not count) I don't like the reference card dodginess though and i think the 1070, which is much more within the budget of most people, will be bottlenecked by it's memory bandwidth before long...
>>54478414
Only for the current generation of cards. It makes sense for them to turn performance to shit for old gen cards.
Morons like this >>54478263
will see that their older card cant run these new placebo effects and drop mad cash to upgrade.
Vega cant come soon enough. hawaii ages do well compared to kepler.
>>54478413
>tech yes city
>le clickbait yubtub reviewer
>>54478420
>gtx 970 consuming 150W of power
Your shitty edit isn't even fucking funny. Get the FUCK out of here goddamn retarded shill cunt.
>>54477308
>295X still at the top after half a decade
Glorious.
>DX11 ASICs
ain't dis sum shit
>>54478468
>gtx 970 doesn't consume 150w of power
Niggers everywhere
>>54478460
I'm not advocating for a halt to progress for the sake of keeping old Gpus relevant. I guess it comes down to how much each company pressures developers to support one brand over another when developing graphics engine improvements and stuff.
Haha all the people selling their 980tis to buy 1080s, such a waste of money, and an already amazing card.
I'm pretty stoked for vega, it will probably be the last truly powerful, enthusiast grade cards that AMD make.
>>54478468
HE DIDENT EDIT IT...IT'S REALLY AND NVIDIA EDIT AND THEY FALL FOR IT YEARS AFTER YEARS
This thread is like one big, happy family :)
>>54478420
this is so true
Had AMD card never again, literally power bill emulator and crossfire only possible with 1500w PSU
never again
Nvidia wins again, it hurts tbqh
>>54473639
>is
>you are
>body
>ready
>?
original postaroo
> MFW Polaris is bottom of the charts
http://videocardz.com/59725/nvidia-gtx-1080-polaris-10-11-directx12-benchmarks
>>54473639
Is you are body ready? Wtf
>>54478543
it is very underclocked, speculated at 800mhz
>>54478568
Any proof to back up your claims?
>>54478394
Too true, big performance decreases for both brands..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esm8YzFBPOk
>>54478507
Neither do I but why does AMD try to optimize things for older GPUs while nvidia entirely forgets about the last generation once the new stuff rolls out?
Seems intentional.
>>54478543
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AMDKEKS on 24-7-366 suicide watch
POLARIS WILL SAVE USSS LLOOOLL
>>54478590
Admittedly a lot of that is just human pork dumpling rage, but I understand the sentiment
>>54478568
>underclocked
kek, AMD cards shit the bed at 900MHz
that seems like stock clocks to me
>>54476361
Listen kid. If you don't want to be seen as a complete faggot..try using the word meme in the correct way.
What the fuck is a meme graphics card? Tell me what card you use? No card? onboard chip because all you need it txt editor because you are a 'serious' pc user? Is that it? Are you really unable to see how fucking stupid your question makes you sound?
>>54478583
there is proof somewhere, I don't have time to find it right now
maybe somebody else can link it
>>54478590
is this dude as fat as you are ?
might wanna try /fit/
>>54476365
You sound like a very informed 13yr old. Just the kind of fella I like to take advice from.
>>54478591
I guess that comes down to money and fanbases. AMD can't afford the massive R&D costs associated with developing new architecture (which I think is in the billions) so they squeeze as much life as they can out of cards like the r9 390s and r7 370 (I have one of these somewhere, refresh of a refresh of a refresh and it still overclocks decently haha, insane)
Nvidia on the other hand have cash to burn in the gpu market and a devoted (read mindless :P) fanbase who are prepared to pay for the best of the best every single year.
>>54478543
>>54478594
Polaris is mid range low power card. This has been said over and over. Fury is the flagship card for now until Vega.
>>54478140
>>54478614
Having pendulous man-titties helps me smuggle new pc hardware out of unsuspecting pc shops, no one ever looks under there.
>>54473838
Six hunna dollas ain't SHIT to chaaad waadden
>>54478468
mad cus Nvidia won ROFL
>>54478187
>>54478187
actually 1080 uses ggr5x but it's the slowest gddr5x since it's not even suppose to be on market yet
Fuck off back to /v/ faggots, and take your gaymer toy GPUs back with you.
>>54478156
come now, halo 5 on xbone can do 60fps at 720p with god awful textures and no aa :3
>>54478543
LOLOLOLOLO
>>54477918
>>54478141
>Trusting a slide which doesn't even have a base unit to judge against
>>54478795
>relative gaming performance
it's fucking easy as shit middle school tier math
>>54478795
this is a edited nvidia slide to help cut through the marketing bullshits
>>54478808
The 960 isn't at 0. So what card is?
What card are they basing all of this from?
The 950?
>>54478811
Why would Nvidia want to cut through their own bullshit?
