[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
post your GPU
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 154
Thread images: 59
File: 0027349_0.jpg (168 KB, 793x1000) Image search: [Google]
0027349_0.jpg
168 KB, 793x1000
post your GPU
>>
>What will you make?

Not a whole lot with an i3.
>>
File: Y2ChHTZ.jpg (46 KB, 960x540) Image search: [Google]
Y2ChHTZ.jpg
46 KB, 960x540
>>54469374
thats not a GPU
the GPU is the thing with graphics on it!

pic related, is mine
>>
File: 15124782.jpg (28 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
15124782.jpg
28 KB, 480x480
Not as good as a fermi GPU but still does the job.
>>
>>54469481
fucking kek. I think it's speed "thermi" not fermi.
>>
>>54469767
spelt*

goddang autocorrect
>>
File: serveimage.jpg (33 KB, 480x445) Image search: [Google]
serveimage.jpg
33 KB, 480x445
>>54469778
spelled?
spelt is pic related
>>
File: 81xpePh4PnL._SL1500_.jpg (217 KB, 1191x1500) Image search: [Google]
81xpePh4PnL._SL1500_.jpg
217 KB, 1191x1500
Just waiting on a gtx 750ti
>>
>>54469799
why 750ti and how much
>>
>>54469799

does a 750ti let you boot MGSV or Far Cry 4?
>>
File: IMG_20160201_232600.jpg (37 KB, 450x262) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160201_232600.jpg
37 KB, 450x262
>>54469414


I got a gigabyte 480
>>
File: 19-117-315-TS.jpg (40 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
19-117-315-TS.jpg
40 KB, 640x480
>>54469374
>>
File: intel_core_i7_3770k_with_box.jpg (57 KB, 600x385) Image search: [Google]
intel_core_i7_3770k_with_box.jpg
57 KB, 600x385
Fisting current gen CPUs with my 2012 i7
>>
File: 1443756962984.jpg (188 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
1443756962984.jpg
188 KB, 600x450
>>54469852
kek this.
>>
File: d21vu35cjx7sd4.cloudfront.net.jpg (33 KB, 590x420) Image search: [Google]
d21vu35cjx7sd4.cloudfront.net.jpg
33 KB, 590x420
I use this. It might not be the fastest GPU but it is loyal and truly loves me.
>>
>>54469787
Spelt is the Commonwealth English equivalent of spelled in US English.
>>
File: happy.jpg (78 KB, 446x564) Image search: [Google]
happy.jpg
78 KB, 446x564
>>54469852
cucktiumfags BTFO
>>
guys, is my gpu a meme?
>>
File: fire.jpg (378 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [Google]
fire.jpg
378 KB, 1000x667
Sorry for the bad picture but this is as close as I could get to my GPU.
>>
>>54470026
> he fell for the thermi may-may
>>
pc 1: r9-270x
pc 2: r7-370
x220: intel HD 3000
x60: Intel GMA 950
server: NVIDIA GeForce 7025
>>
4790k + MSI 390
Feels good
>>
>>54470378
>4790k

what's that GPU overclocked to, anon?
>>
i5 4690k
>>
>>54470422
4.6, 4.7 stopped being stable after upgrading some stuff.
390 is at 1150/1600 i think? Maybe 1700. Crashes very occasionally but happy with it
>>
>>54470026
>reference 290x UBER
>>
>>54470452
Neat, I bumped up the base clock on my Memelake i3-6300 system from 100 to ~120 and it surprisingly still works. 20% OC on a locked multiplier chip feels bretty gud.
>>
File: 1461276556153.jpg (33 KB, 314x353) Image search: [Google]
1461276556153.jpg
33 KB, 314x353
>>54470455
>tfw the 290x heat "issues" only happen on retarded reference coolers that NOBODY uses
>tfw nvidia is the real housefire nodriver meme company
>tfw 2012 radeon chips are still tip top notch even today
>tfw nvidia took a gigantic shit on anyone who bought cards from them in 2013
nvidia shills, please rope yourselves, thanks :^)
>>
>>54470523
that boosts your pcie speed, does it not? enjoy your broken shit, i guess. you don't need the overclock
>>
>>54470541
Not using any PCIe cards m8. The audio fucks up sometimes but it's fine.
>>
>>54469399
Lel what does that say about AMD users
>>
>>54470556
your storage is on pcie
your LAN is on pcie
the audio fucking up might also be related
>>
>>54470556
you don't even get a real benefit out of that OC
>>
>>54470598
No shit, I did research before OCing so I wouldn't fuck up my PC.

LAN and storage have had no problems, but audio is definitely feeling the boosted base clock.
>>
File: i7-4770k-box1.jpg (132 KB, 754x767) Image search: [Google]
i7-4770k-box1.jpg
132 KB, 754x767
>>
>>54470615
I know, I just like the nostalgia of raising up the base clock, reminds me of when it was worth it.
>>
File: 4L_Ffaif7dk.jpg (1 MB, 3264x2448) Image search: [Google]
4L_Ffaif7dk.jpg
1 MB, 3264x2448
>>54470688
>>
File: power_booster.jpg (78 KB, 640x537) Image search: [Google]
power_booster.jpg
78 KB, 640x537
>>54469908
fisting them you say?
>>
>>54470774
>dat shit IPC
>>
File: pressshot.jpg (28 KB, 410x240) Image search: [Google]
pressshot.jpg
28 KB, 410x240
should i buy this hard drive? I've never heard of that brand....windforce?
>>
File: 1431.jpg (164 KB, 500x320) Image search: [Google]
1431.jpg
164 KB, 500x320
>>54469374
nvidia quadro 1000m. plays gta5 bretty gud and i love that it's upgradeable
>>
File: why arent you usign a pentium 4.jpg (174 KB, 1200x900) Image search: [Google]
why arent you usign a pentium 4.jpg
174 KB, 1200x900
>>54469374
> your
> not you're
>>
quality thread
>>
>>54470774
Neat. I bought mine in 2013,14 or whatever
>>
>>54471005
it's 5-10% below skymeme, not shit at all.

And you might say the stock clocks are shit, but the 5820k and 5930k both OC to 4.4Ghz+
>>
>>54471054

Just 1000M or M1000M?
>>
>>54470533
>>tfw the 290x heat "issues" only happen on retarded reference coolers that NOBODY uses

Except those were the only cards available for months after release. It wouldn't have been a problem if non-reference cards were launched alongside reference.
>>
>>54471176
fucking intel and their "always one or two years behind" "enthusiast platform"
>>
>>54471244
7950/7970 were already a thing and those were just enough. nobody really needed a 290/290x
>>
>>54471176
why do people not like Skylake? take over Broadwell too soon or just the performance shits?
>>
>>54469374
Fx 6300 here
>>
>>54471254
When you want more cores, you're less concerned about the IPC anyway, so really not sure what you're trying to get at.

Sounds like you're taking a gamers perspective on what you want from intel's high end platform, which it is not at all made to be for gamers.

>>54471312
Just another incremental update with nothing besides 5-10% IPC improvements. That and the super thin IHS which has shown to bend is a bit of an issue.
>>
>>54471312
broadwell on desktop was a fucking failure, NOBODY bought that
they made it so it has a strong gpu and that's it. who the fuck needs that on a desktop?
>>
>>54469414
Onboard graphics.
>>
>>54471350
the 6-core came as a reply to a 4770k
>>
File: 07152014127.jpg (2 MB, 4000x3000) Image search: [Google]
07152014127.jpg
2 MB, 4000x3000
I use a Radeon HD7750 1GB GDDR5.
>>
>>54471350
5-10% increase is better than other refreshes & new families (broadwell), but hey it did bring DDR4, better USB 3.0 type C/thunderbolt support, sure might've been too soon, or too little, but it's something.
>>
>>54471370
So then why reply with
>dat shit IPC
when the 5930k and 5820k IPC is better than the 4770k? The 4770k is just clocked higher at stock, which is negated the moment you OC.
>>
File: CPU-3.jpg (219 KB, 650x508) Image search: [Google]
CPU-3.jpg
219 KB, 650x508
Waiting on the new flagship cards from AMD/Nvidia.
>>
>>54471362
broadwell was decent to an extent, unnecessary but decent.
>>
>>54471382
Haswell-E already had DDR4 and USB 3/3.1.
>>
>>54471395
We need another 32nm sandy bridge-like breakthough, much like the 65nm core 2 duo which was a must-have.
>>
>>54471385
you were right before with the i7 6700k ipc compared to the 6-cores

it's just weird that you'd respond with a 6-core to a regular quadcore
>>
>>54471403
we are getting close to the limits of using Silicon for CPU manufacturing.
>>54471398
it did, but the platforms for it (like Mobos) were too expensive, or too overkill for a lot of the consumers.
>>
File: Quadro FX 770m.png (200 KB, 551x346) Image search: [Google]
Quadro FX 770m.png
200 KB, 551x346
Heatpipe connects directly to the CPU before hitting the fan so it keeps my toaster nice and hot.
>>
>>54471423
>but the platforms for it (like Mobos) were too expensive
How would you babies have ever survived back when motherboards were $300 for a cheap one?

The age of ~$100-200 good quality motherboards really only started in the mid 2000s, before that sub $200 was considered cheap and generally garbage quality.


I get your point, just stupid seeing kids complain about hardware costs these days when it's so fucking cheap compared to what it used to cost.
>>
>>54469983
Yes.
>>
File: 980.jpg (846 KB, 2560x1440) Image search: [Google]
980.jpg
846 KB, 2560x1440
980 here, gonna upgrade to Pascal ASAP, cause they really devalued the Maxwell family.
>>
File: DSC_0391.jpg (3 MB, 3840x2160) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0391.jpg
3 MB, 3840x2160
I fell for the ASUS meme.
>>
>>54471456
>or too overkill for a lot of the consumers.

I built my first PC in the early 2000s, so hey not my fault i wasn't there when the decent mobos were at least $300. Other than media workers, not many consumers needed the extra 2-4 cores that the 5---k/x family brought, and hey not everyone will pay premium to browse facebook & play candy crush.
>>
>>54469399
>Not a whole lot with an i3
What do you mean? I make music and work on graphic stuff with an i3
>>
>>54471584
i3s have Hyper Threading right?
>>
>>54471604
Yes
>>
>>54471604
idk, I think so
>>
>>54471648
well hey the cache is utter shit, but the hyper threading works well.
>>
>>54471071
my grandma's cpu lol
>>
>>54469917
A i3 could, topkeks
>>
>>54471271
>7950/7970 were already a thing and those were just enough. nobody really needed a 290/290x
Thats your fucking defense?????
>>
File: 4.jpg (68 KB, 720x960) Image search: [Google]
4.jpg
68 KB, 720x960
some fuck ass was selling a pentium 4 machine that "wouldn't boot up properly", bought to add the Pentium 4 to my CPU collection, attempted to remove IHS, and the fucking heatspreader came off and so did half the die, fuck ass glued it on the cooler.
>>
>>54469374
Intel Celeron G530 @ 2.40GHz
>>
File: NBGTS250-1GMU-F_580.jpg (84 KB, 1000x698) Image search: [Google]
NBGTS250-1GMU-F_580.jpg
84 KB, 1000x698
>>54471742
aw shiet you said gpu, hold on a sec
1024MB NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 (Elitegroup)
>>
File: Celeron N2800.png (27 KB, 400x494) Image search: [Google]
Celeron N2800.png
27 KB, 400x494
>>54469374
Celeron N2840 Intel HD Graphics
>>
File: gig980g1-1b.jpg (246 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
gig980g1-1b.jpg
246 KB, 1920x1080
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming
I got it for an early christmas present because my Zotac Geforce GTS 250(eco) aka a 9800GTX was 5 years old and the fan sounded like a blow dryer and ran idle @58c. Plus the
"next gen" consoles sucked so I play games on my pc again, I had a 8800 Ultra back in 2007 it died in 2009 it was a BFG Tech card and they went under so a GTS250eco was all I could afford.
>>
File: d2edwedw.jpg (187 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
d2edwedw.jpg
187 KB, 1920x1080
Not sure what the point of this thread is.
>>
EVGA GTX 980 with the ACX 2.0 cooler.

As beefy as the new card is, the card it replaced was an EVGA GTX 570 that kicked a mountain of ass for a little over 4 years. As far as I know, it's still going strong in a friend's computer. The 980 might be the shortest-lived card I've ever had, the way things are going.
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (22 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
22 KB, 480x360
>>54471973
>>54472051
>>54471472

>all these niggas who bought a 980
>>
File: muh gpu.jpg (164 KB, 500x320) Image search: [Google]
muh gpu.jpg
164 KB, 500x320
dis lil nigga right here

aint buying shit again for like 5 years minimum.
>>
File: 91vUJpgWLEL._SL1500_[1].jpg (289 KB, 1191x1500) Image search: [Google]
91vUJpgWLEL._SL1500_[1].jpg
289 KB, 1191x1500
Is it worth upgrading my GPU????

What would you suggest?
>>
>>54472141
I'm just glad I didn't go for SLI. The price was right at the time and, even if I knew I'd only get two(ish) years out of it, I'd probably buy it again. It's staying in my build until the 1080ti anyway.
>>
>>54471604

4170 does
>>
>>54469799
got this and a 650ti , looking to get an AMD GPU soon
>>
>>54472189

HD 3000 is pretty dated but unless you see stuttering on HD 1080p resolutions on streaming sites theres no issue.

also if you have a mobo that lets you physically supply more ram to the IGP, my MSI lets me give it an entire gig
>>
File: 1453590254459.jpg (78 KB, 1024x994) Image search: [Google]
1453590254459.jpg
78 KB, 1024x994
>>54469374
>i3
>>
http://ark.intel.com/products/36750/Intel-Core2-Duo-Processor-P7350-3M-Cache-2_00-GHz-1066-MHz-FSB?q=p7350
>tfw no vt-x
>>
File: DSC_0144.jpg (191 KB, 1356x900) Image search: [Google]
DSC_0144.jpg
191 KB, 1356x900
It served me great
That's 0db gaming
>>
File: 4130t2.jpg (19 KB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]
4130t2.jpg
19 KB, 300x300
>>
Guess who's GTX580 died yesterday!

...

:'(
>>
Celeron M 540
I don't need no recent CPU
>>
>>54470533
>>tfw the 290x heat "issues" only happen on retarded reference coolers that NOBODY uses
dude you literally just replied to a guy saying "reference 290x", stop getting so defensive on an anonymous taiwanese tapestry board
>>
File: Výstřižek.jpg (92 KB, 1240x774) Image search: [Google]
Výstřižek.jpg
92 KB, 1240x774
I am from Europe, and I want to buy a new Graphics card for my PC with i3-2120.
I want to play games on medium on FHD resolution like Total war: Attila and new Warhammer: Total War when it comes out.

I am probably going to buy some GTX 950, because GTX 960 is much more expensive here.
What version should I buy? The EVGA one?
>>
>>54469481
looooooooool 10/10
>>
>>54469879
mein negro
>>
>>54474427
I dont think there are many people out there who wouldn't let a guy cum in them for $10m

that's a lot of money for a relatively minor degradation assuming you're straight
>>
>>54474450
thanks
>>
>>54474427
a 970 wild hardly run those games..
>>
>>54474567
i dont need high settings
>>
File: whew.jpg (46 KB, 606x417) Image search: [Google]
whew.jpg
46 KB, 606x417
>>54470533
>tfw bought nvidia card in 2014
>>
>>54469374
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600.

Still no reason to upgrade.
>>
>>54474427
r9 380 mate
>>
File: 71V53vTiVhL._SY355_.jpg (17 KB, 308x355) Image search: [Google]
71V53vTiVhL._SY355_.jpg
17 KB, 308x355
Just waiting for good sub 200W gpus.
>>
Geforce 820M
>>
>>
File: notcatchingbait.webm (184 KB, 960x540) Image search: [Google]
notcatchingbait.webm
184 KB, 960x540
>>
>>54474753
This is a really good idea actually. There are some low-binned xfx 380s that go for $170 (2gb) or $199 (4gb) and outperform the 960 in most games nowadays. Too bad reference is ~180-195W and non-reference anywhere between 220-250W.
>>
>>54469852
https://youtu.be/hkZftp0ztaU?t=46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFpuUj0hWBA
>>
>>54471312
Essentially it's the 'incremental upgrade' meme that comes in play here, which I don't believe in. They have ~5-10% higher clocks and 5-10% higher IPC, as well as more efficient cooling (FinFet) and some other goodies (more lanes, ddr4, m.2. raid 0, thunderbolt, etc.).

The real downside imo is that the socket is dead. 4 physical cores at most. Garbage for upgradability. You NEED a k variant to push for a decent amount of years, BUT overclocking reduces the lifespan of the cpu, paradoxically in terms of durability.
>>
Lol guess who got 390 ITS FOR EPIC GAYMEN
>>
File: msihd6850-8b.jpg (306 KB, 1280x1024) Image search: [Google]
msihd6850-8b.jpg
306 KB, 1280x1024
Got it for free and runs like a champ.
>>
>>54476496
what the fuck were they thinking
>>
>>54476646
It's inside a metal box never to be seen again. Even if it was pink I wouldn't give a shit.
>>>/v/
>>
>>54476496
i had one of these and it died eventually
>>
>>54476672
You should clean your computer every once in a while
>>
File: image.jpg (765 KB, 2524x1874) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
765 KB, 2524x1874
I fell for the "your cpu wont be a bottleneck bro!" meme
t. bulldozer
>>
>>54476672
Is your underwear pink too? Nobody is ever going to see it either
>>
>>54476672
>>54476795
What did pink do wrong?
>>
>>54476795
I buy the cheapest underwear I can find. Even if they had Hello Kitty on them, I would've bought them.
>>
>>54469399
Who are you quoting?
>>
File: 1448369833746.gif (2 MB, 448x252) Image search: [Google]
1448369833746.gif
2 MB, 448x252
>>54469852
>>
>>54474433

Meu negro. :3
>>
I just use a 5930k, only play games, dunno what else is better, if there even is a uppgrade.
>Mah cores
>>
File: msWwiqw.jpg (13 KB, 240x180) Image search: [Google]
msWwiqw.jpg
13 KB, 240x180
>>54469374
>>
File: 291.jpg (86 KB, 500x320) Image search: [Google]
291.jpg
86 KB, 500x320
Still going stronk
>>
>>54471378
Cool
>>
>>54469374
7970

Will literally never upgrade.
>>
File: AMD-FirePro-W5000-360W.png (121 KB, 360x264) Image search: [Google]
AMD-FirePro-W5000-360W.png
121 KB, 360x264
I got it for free .
I don't think it supports dx12 though
>>
>video game hardware

/v/edditors pls
>>
>GPU
>posting his CPU
Ayy.

Since OP is as faggy as always, I'm posting both.

FX8350 @ 4.6 GHz and Palit GF GTX770 Super Jetstream
>>
File: 20160302_223514.jpg (3 MB, 5312x2988) Image search: [Google]
20160302_223514.jpg
3 MB, 5312x2988
>>54469374
>>
File: IMAG0008.jpg (2 MB, 3264x1840) Image search: [Google]
IMAG0008.jpg
2 MB, 3264x1840
>>
>>54480374
Hot
>>
>>54469374
ASUS 20th Anniversary Gold Edition GEFORCE® GTX 980 Ti

Bought it not too long ago for 1100€, sadly no pictures on phone...
>>
>>54469799
Don't waste the money just get a 950.
>>
File: gpuz.png (38 KB, 399x493) Image search: [Google]
gpuz.png
38 KB, 399x493
>all these nvidiots
>>
File: 1459041252981.jpg (51 KB, 879x930) Image search: [Google]
1459041252981.jpg
51 KB, 879x930
>>54471021
No don't by this psu, but you could buy this mixer instead
>>
>>54485003
I would seriously buy one of those if it actually worked
>>
>>54485003
>>54485021
Surely something like this could be made today if anyone was retarded enough. A shitty SoC wifi--lan bridge powered by Ethernet.
>>
>>54485021
> POE
> tiny Power Supply
> maybe a bit longer and thicker
> tiniest avaliable WiFi module
It could work though by today's technological standards.
>>
>>54485062
> longer and thicker
becaue of inductors (which would tale most of the space)
>>
File: Capture.png (3 KB, 358x61) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
3 KB, 358x61
I'm waiting for 1070 before I get a 1440p monitor.
What's the cheapest?
>>
File: 14-202-006-07.jpg (33 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
14-202-006-07.jpg
33 KB, 640x480
>>54471723
>Glued
Please tell me you`re joking... Intel used to solder the IHS on all of their cpus. That is clearly fucking solder. That is precisely why the bottom of the IHS is gold and not aluminum.

The only reason you didn`t rip the entire die off is because the solder separated 3/4`s of the way across from heat cycling.

Incidentally, this is my GPU
>>
File: 06G-P4-4993-KR_MD_1.jpg (15 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]
06G-P4-4993-KR_MD_1.jpg
15 KB, 250x250
>>
>>54485152
>1600x900
I feel bad for you.
>>
Thread replies: 154
Thread images: 59

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.