>2016
>/g/ still uses ext4
You have 10 seconds to explain why you are not using superior XFS.
Also, /filesystem thread/. Post your$ inxi -P
>>54460304
>Not using f2fs
>>54460304
>>/g/ still uses ext4
But I am using ParagonFS.
>not using an old version of btrfs and running a balance and inadvertently destroying your data
>tfw using NTFS
it just werks
>>54460371
Enjoy your fragmentation.
>>54460400
jokes on you. I'm using SSD
>>54460418
Enjoy your extra write load leading to faster NAND wear.
>>54460304
>2016
>not using zfs or exfat master race
b t r f s
t r f s
r f s
f s
s
>>54460304
I supercharged my pc by windows 8.1 pro with bullshit updates uninstalled and disabled
+ tweaked stuff for speed
+ disabled hot corners
+ added start button.
There is no reason in years now to use any other OS for me. This works great.
>tfw no zfs on OS X
>>54460325
/thread
>>54460304
what's wrong with ext4?
>>54462288
fuck off tripfag cancer
>>54464831
Literally nothing. It's a stopgap until btrfs or xfs.
>https://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL%20filesystem%20fuzzing%2C%20Vault%202016_0.pdf
>Ext4 2h
>Xfs 1h45m
>Hfsplus 25s (twenty-five seconds)
>>54460304
zfs.
>>54460304
can i turbocharge my pc?
You need a real filesystem with Arch. Running btrfs with Arch is plain too memey. Some of us psuedo-neets can't risk melting our data every week
>>54460304
But OP, I am using XFS. :) with ext2 on /boot
>>54460304
I'm using BTRFS at the moment. Convince me to switch.
>>54465086
>ext2
Why?
CentOS default is XFS so obviously have XFS
>>54464861
namefag*
>>54465679 not him but I always did ext2 with boot as well. i was told i was told. never had issue either
>>54465571
Reliability?
>>54465906
Haven't lost any data in 2 years I've used it. It's reliable enough for me.
Idk what the fucking difference between them all is desu senpai, I just use ext4 like I was recommended
only think i don't like about XFS is that volumes can't be shrunk
>>54460304
why does it matter?
>>54460304
>XFS
>Not ReFS
>>54464946
>REFER
