>>54435049
object oriented

meta programming sounds cool

>>54436479
Lisp?

>>54436502
I said the name sounds cool but I don't know what it means.

you've pretty much named the exact use case for which object-oriented programming was designed/optimised

interfaces/inheritance, codefile separation and pass-by-reference make it easy to work separately on disparate components/libraries and support modern test/deploy frameworks (plus TDD)

>>54435049
Not letting the original coders quit.

>>54436609

lol good luck

>>54436539
macro that kind of shit

functional

>>54440357
Haskell?

>>54436540
this

>>54435049
Kidnapping Linus Torvalds and making him do it.

>>54435049
can someone write examples of each? i was just learning basic shit when i was in school but always hated oop

the hell is aspect oriented programming?

>Procedural masterrace
its the best
prove me wrong
>protip: you cant

>>54442838
Who are you quoting?

>>54442880
noone, just a statement

>>54435049
>Concurrent is a separate paradigm rather than a program attribute
>Meta-programming is a separate paradigm rather than a language feature
>Imperative is contrasted against Functional (instead of e.g. Declarative)
Whoever made this stupid graph knows more about graphics design than programming languages.

>>54442907
Gotta get that meme game up, senpai

>>54435049
functional because referential transparency and modularity through function composition

>>54438496
Chain them up in the janitor's closet. No-one has to know.

Managing large projects and code bases is why OOP was designed.


It's also why there is such a focus on OOP.

>>54436609
>coders

You mean appers surely?

>>54440357
Literally the worst paradigm for maintaining large codebases.
The worst for working in groups too.

It's great at everything else,
but by that point no one cares.