>A new king
Nvidia GTX 1080 for $599, $699 for collector's edition
Available May 27
Also GTX 1070 for a few hundred less, available in June
Who's doing worse tonight, AMD or Tom?
>7GB of memory on the GTX 1070
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>FOUNDERS EDITION
LITERALLY WHAT?
>open source it
SURE THING GOYIM
What is founders edition please.
Polaris
>open source something or other
i'll take it
Finally I can run minecraft without lag
WOOOOOO DAMN
I CAN AFFORD IT
YEAH WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAT
>>54417866
AMD
Also RIP Titan owners
Tom's job has been saved.
AMD can't even win the budget battle, unless they go apeshit with their prices and slash them to nothing.
AMD IS FUCKING DEAD
D E A D
E
A
D
TELL ME WHEN NVIDIA RELEASES OPEN SOURCE DRIVERS.
>$600
Is this a joke? You could have bought 980ti and overclock it to similar performance levels months ago.
>>54417887
Of course 2 x 3.5GB = 7GB
no joke
AMD is legit done. they cant compete with $380
NOW WE DANCE
My fucking ears
$599 GTX 1080
$379 GTX 1070
BOTH FASTER THAN A TITAN X
May 27th
HOLY FUCK
>>54417913
>mfw bought a 980ti 1/2 year ago
Going to preorder 2x1080s as soon as they're available. Can't wait.
IT'S OVER
NVIDIA WON
>1080
Faster than Titan X, faster than 980 SLI
599 USD
>970
Faster than Titan X,
379 USD
Above can be translated as
AMD is dead
>>54417913
Are you brain dead?
>>54417866
$2000 Canadian.
How the fuck is that affordable.
Rrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
So uh. What the fuck is the difference between the founders edition and the normal 1080?????
when does the amd panel start
>>54417920
If AMD doesn't pull through with Zen then say hello to the desktop monopoly
>mfw the price AMD sets on the Polaris 10 cards to compete with that MSRP
>>54417940
It won't.
They just went bankrupt.
AMD ON SUICIDE WATCH
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN NVIDIA BTFO AMD INTO ANOTHER UNIVERSE?
When's 1060?
>>54417908
rumors say 480x $300 at 980ti performance levels. That's why Nvidia made this paper launch today
1080
Holy fuck I'll be able to buy 980 TI for fucking $100 now.
>>54417913
You can overclock a 980 Ti to 2xTitan X? I don't think so Tom.
>1070 faster than Titan X
>Less than half the price.
I feel bad for anyone who bought a Titan X recently.
>>54417937
hand picked GPU + factory OC'd
Who /1070/ here?
>mfw amd
>post yfw you fell for the wait meme
How long until the non-reference ones come out?
Or is it worth it just to get a reference card?
GTX 1070 7.5 GB?
>>54417937
They probably limit how much you can overclock/disable it entirely on the regular edition. So in order to overclock it well you'll need to shill out an extra 100 shekels.
>>54417893
OC edition. Basically 1080ti. similar to the way AMD has 390/390x
>>54417908
I wouldn't consider $400 to be budget market.
Polaris will succeed at the $200-$250 range and be just enough grunt for most people.
is this a flagship card?
>>54417866
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOHqG1nc_tw
Is Tom fired?
http://oddshot.tv/shot/nvidia-20160507279597
1070
>256bit bus
Wow, fucken nothing.
$600? Pshhh. I'm getting two.
>>54417913
>to similar performance levels
This guy.
No Titan XL?
>>54417935
not that guy but
>In this scenario GTX 1080 is faster than typical overclocked GTX 980 Ti (~8700 points). However if we compare it GTX 980 Ti running at almost the same frequency (1.8GHz with LN2 cooling), GTX 1080 is actually much slower clock to clock
http://videocardz.com/59558/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-benchmarks
lmao
FUCK FUCK FUCK I FUCKING BOUGHT A $320 970 A FEW MONTHS AGO AND THEY ARE RELEASING THE 1070 FOR 380
JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP SENPAI
>>54417963
1070 or 480...what comes best.
unles AMD pulls another 390 like with the 490.
Upgrading from a 7790
>>54417973
Except it isn't 1080Ti, it's just an early OC'ed card, before the manufacturers come with their own
A 1080Ti would be based on GP100
>>54417966
i always told fags to stop buying 28nm shit for 2 years
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT.
IT'S FUCKING OVER AMD IS FINISHED
HTC Vive = $600
GTX 1070 = $400
VR Ready for $1000.
Fucking Tom
>>54417973
>Basically 1080ti
That's a bold claim anon.
gtx 1050Ti when?
>>54417966
1080 looks great and you're an idiot.
>>54417937
metal shroud w/perspex window and LED lighting on the side
>>54417966
>mfw I told them all and they didn't listen
Why is the less powerful card coming out a month later
>>54417866
they are releasing locked and unlocked versions. the more expensive is unlocked for OC
>gtx 1070
>£263
i need this in ma lyf
>>54417966
It was easy because the current GPU's are so fucking shit. I just wanted something that can handle 1440p, not even 4k. Is that so much to ask?
>>54417956
It isn't 2x Titan X braindead /v/tard, it's a 20% increase at most, this is literally Apple tier graph reading
Also, the 980Ti is as fast as a Titan X at stock clocks, it's faster when OC'ed
>>54418019
Who gives a shit
>tfw bought 980ti 4months ago
A-At least it was used.
So basically we have to pay and extra $100 to overclock the cards?
>>54418019
No poorfags ITT, 1080 or bust.
>>54418000
yeah you're right, i'm an idiot
>>54418027
So people who are impatient will buy the most expensive card.
>>54417866
AMD will match or beat 1070 performance for less. Polaris 10 is supposed to be 980 Ti levels and 1070 is supposed to be slower than that. AMD has said they're aiming for a more mainstream price for Polaris 10 at $300-$350.
So I'm going with Tom being more fucked tonight.
WAITBROS
FUCKING
REDEEMED
WHERE WE AT?
>mfw dank memes on 1080
>980ti owners on damage control
if you sell it now you might get some of your money back :^)
>>54418027
Staggered releases aren't unusual
>tfw have to pray that EVGA will have the 1080 on their step-up by the 20th of June or I'll be left with a shittier, more expensive 1070
JUST
It's going to be sold out for 6 months probably. I'll just wait for some nice board partner designs too. So glad I stuck with aircooling as this thing probably is going to run pretty cool.
>WOW LOOK AT THIS 2.1 GHZ ON AIR AND TOTALLY NOT IN OUR TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED ROOM!
>YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DO THIS IF YOU BUY NVIDIAâ„¢ THE WAY IT'S MEANT TO BE PLAYEDâ„¢.
>YOU JUST NEED TO BUY THE $800 VERSION TO BE ABLE TO!
>>54418027
SPEND MORE
GET MORE NOW
SPEND LESS
GET LESS LATER
Well, it looks like I'm selling both my 390x.
Anyone want to buy two sapphire 390x?
>>54417946
Polaris 10 cards are aimed below the 1070's, they're 1060 tier
This shitty announcement might make AMD price them higher, at near 1070 prices due to that completely shitty performance improvement Nvidia delivered
>>54418035
Yeah, but 100% over 970 and AMD cards.
RETURN UR 970 NOW!
>>54417866
tfw sold my gtx970 meme card for 400 bucks a year ago
still using my gtx570
should I wait this one out too, I mean all those neat gimmicks aside there aren't currently any ''game-changing'' games to care, as I see it
i'll wait for the 1060ti and upgrade from my 970 then, doesn't look like AMD is gonna bother competing with GP104.
>>54418030
>VAT
>EU prices
It'll be £340 for at least 6 months
>>54418040
I wonder how high none reference cards will go.
The best part is it actually comes out this month. Holy fuck. I really didn't expect it to come out so soon.
>>54418027
Two weeks?
GTX 1080 | $599, $699 for jew version | 27th May
GTX 1070 | $379, $449 for jew version | 10th June
>>54418054
This
Looking forward to their low-end cards. I bet even a 1050 will destroy the PS4 NEO for like $150.
WHEN DOES THE 1070 LAUNCH
IS IT REASONABLE TO ASSUME EVGA/ASUS AFTERMARKET 1070 @ $399???
>>54418027
Take a business course for once, AMD.
AMD is literally finished if the 1070 really is above TITAN X
For that price it's gonna sell even better than the fucking 970 did
>>54418056
WE DEM BOIZ
>>54418054
>Polaris 10 is supposed to be 980 Ti levels and 1070 is supposed to be slower than that
the guy literally just said at the end that the 1070 is faster than a titan x. i know what i'm going to be buying this gen.
>>54418056
I've been waiting for, let's just say, a very long time.
I...I think my wait is finally over.
>>54418080
The one thing you can always count on is Nvidia getting their shit out early to shit all over AMD.
>>54418098
o shit waddup!
I'm just worried if my mobo isn't compatible.
>>54417993
>>54417956
>>54417935
You can buy 980ti models that are 20% faster than a Titan X out of the box right now and more importantly could have bought them last summer.
Anyone who waited for Pascal must feel like an idiot now
>>54417986
>Only 6.5 TFLOPS
>Even my Pro Duo has 16 TFLOPS
>still runing a GTX 460
>thinking of upgrading by saving some money
>that 1070 price point
OH shit, I'm erect.
EVGA or Asus?
I know to avoid Gigabyte like the plague it is.
So is the 1070 faster than a 980ti?
ITT BUYERS REMOSE GENERAL
WAITBROS MASTER RACE
>>54417996
Well they dont have comparable amounts of processor cores, 2800 to 2500, what this tells me is Pascal really is Maxwell just shrunk and with some extra features.
First time I've followed the launch of new cards. When and where can we actually preorder? Surprised he made no mention given it seems to be coming out soon.
>>54418110
Seems fine. Why you worried?
>>54418097
Polaris 10 should be about 980Ti levels at a $300, still a great deal compared to the 1070. You also won't get another VRAM issue.
>>54418126
Yes
>>54418003
in raw FLOPs (single precision), they're on par with the 390X and Fury X
the stage is set, let's see what AMD deals next
>nvidia won the GPU monopoly again
THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT
>BUY 980TI ONE MONTH AGO
>REFUND IT WHILE ITS STILL IN TRANSIT
I FUCKING KNEW IT WAS WORTH WAITING
SO GOOD
WHAT BRAND SHOULD I BUY LADS? MY CURRENT GPU IS EVGA BUT IDK IF I SHOULD SWITCH
>>54418111
>posting percentages
>Not posting actual gains.
980ti OWNERS ON SUICIDE WATCH
Why are there so many nvidia shills in this thread?
Founders edition worth it?
>>54418127
Thank fuck nothing good came out on PC this year, made it easy as hell to wait a little longer.
I'll wait for benchmarks and polaris.
No hurry.
>>54418027
They're trying to take the enthusiast market before AMD can, they jewed AMD again
>>54418093
Last time Nvidia came first with the least powerful cards, that strategy was a hueg success
>>54418072
>RETURN UR 970 NOW!
2late, should had sold a month ago before getting /gimped/ for three times straight
>>54418135
well I was bummed that Skylake isn't compatible with it so I figured I might be locked out of newer technology this gen
>>54418139
lol you sound so upset
>>54418111
>heavily oc 980 ti faster than titan x
>stock 1080 non ti 25% faster than a titan x
>heavily oc 980 40% faster than a titan x
>stock 1080 ti 60-70% faster than titan x
feels good.
>>54418115
>AMD
>Fury X 2
>4 GB x 4 GB
>$1500
topkek
Here's the real question. Will the 1080 standard be worth it? Or should I jew it up for the OC edition? You think the difference in performance will be worth it?
>>54418148
Only for 1070
>>54418143
EVGA is the gold standard for Nvidia cards
>>54418125
why?
>>54417966
>tfw all these marketing jews tempted you with $250 open box 970s and 290s and you held strong for Polaris/Pascal
>mfw upgrading from 6950
>>54418139
Are AMDcucks this delusional?
Do I sell two 390x and buy a 1080????????
>>54418158
I thought he said 1080 was twice the performance of Titan X.
>>54418116
my god she is perfect
can somebody that's objective and not a memefag explain how AMD can compete with this?
>>54418092
May 27th
>>54418126
It's faster than a Titan X, all while being at the 300 usd range, think about that for a second.
>>54418067
>Implying your room isn't temperature controlled
Do you live in a poorfag country with no A/C anon?
>>54417996
>and then you overclock the 1080
>>54418176
Sell your sister for a 1080
>>54418197
if Polaris doesn't suck and is priced competitively?
>>54418141
>inb4 390X is as fast as 1080 in 2 years
lmfao
Why is the 1070 not on the page?
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/architecture
>>54418155
By replying to you, it might sound like that, but not really. I'm glad Nvidia is releasing another great buy in the *70. The retarded price jump to the 1080 will not stop being retarded. Also, they can fuck off with their goy edition at a $100 increase, fuck you Nvidia.
>>54418196
>>54418176
Do it faggot.
Sell to AMDrones at high price. Exploit them as much you can.
How much could I sell a 970 for?
>>54418179
i think that was performance per watt. i doubt it'd be 200% more powerful
>>54418153
Did you buy a prebuilt? No way you can be this clueless and picked out all the parts to make a working PC
>have 560 Ti
>waiting forever to upgrade
>gonna get a 1080 asap
>mfw
>>54418176
Wait for big Pascal and Vega
>>54418197
better price/performance at the price points people actually buy.
480x is a 230mm^2 chip.
1070 is a cut down 310mm^2 chip
Both will have similar performance but 480x will be closer to $300 while the 1070 is closer to $400
>>54418189
She's pretty cute ye
>>54418197
pretty sure they won't be. polaris 10 is only 232mm2 and has less cores than the 290.
>>54418219
Based Nvidia man.
>mfw when i skipped the 900 shit and gamed on my 780 that rekt any shit at 1080p
>bought 980 about a year ago
probably won't be buying anything until 1280
>>54418214
not talking about in practice, just raw computations.
NVidia's always been behind with their raw FLOPs, but made up for it with good drivers and low overhead. now that they match, AMD better have an ace up their sleeve.
>>54418220
I'm thinking $750 for the pair. Doubt I could get 800.
>>54417911
Lhh fammo tbqh I'm sure you are the only one here that cares about that dumb shit. Smdh
>>54418229
yes fellow waitfag 560ti bro
we can finally upgrade
>>54417966
I've told my self this for the last couple of years. It seems to be finally working
GEFORCE GTX 1080
GPU Engine Specs:
2560NVIDIA CUDA® Cores
1607Base Clock (MHz)
1733Boost Clock (MHz)
Memory Specs:
10 GbpsMemory Speed
8 GB GDDR5XStandard Memory Config
256-bitMemory Interface Width
320Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)
Technology Support:
YesMulti-Projection
YesVR Ready
YesNVIDIA Ansel
Yes - SLI HB Bridge SupportedNVIDIA SLI® Ready1
YesNVIDIA G-SYNCâ„¢-Ready
YesNVIDIA GameStreamâ„¢-Ready
3.0NVIDIA GPU Boostâ„¢
12 API with feature level 12_1Microsoft DirectX
YesVulkan API
4.5OpenGL
PCIe 3.0Bus Support
Windows 7-10, Linux, FreeBSDx86OS Certification
Display Support:
7680x4320@60HzMaximum Digital Resolution1
DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVIStandard Display Connectors
YesMulti Monitor
2.2HDCP
Graphics Card Dimensions:
4.376"Height
10.5"Length
2-SlotWidth
Thermal and Power Specs:
94Maximum GPU Tempurature (in C)
180 WGraphics Card Power (W)
500 WRecommended System Power (W)3
8-PinSupplementary Power Connectors
1 - 7680x4320 at 60 Hz RGB 8-bit with dual DisplayPort connectors or 7680x4320 at 60 Hz YUV420 8-bit with on DisplayPort 1.3 connector.
2 - DisplayPort 1.2 Certified, DisplayPort 1.3/1.4 Ready.
3 - Recommendation is made based on PC configured with an Intel Core i7 3.2 GHz processor. Pre-built system may require less power depending on system configuration.
How did 10x go down to 2x?
Looks like a nice card.
Should I upgrade my gtx 260 to a gtx 1080?
>>54418227
No I build it myself.
clueless about what exactly?
I rarely freak out about pctech, but I genuinely think AMD is fucked. Even with HBM I don't think their cards can stand up to these.
>>54418197
Polaris 10 aims at the 960 price point, ie. below the 1070 while delivering 980Ti performance
Vega should compete or beat the 1080
It's pretty obvious it's like this, specially with this rushed announcement
>>54418250
as if
>>54417911
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=nouveau-fights-radeon&num=1
>>54418197
I read that many sources saying that Polaris is near fast as 980ti at ~$300. However, Polaris is already rekt by 1070 because it is just $370 and has an air-cooled. Polaris needs a water cooled (inefficient).
You can get 1070 sooner than Polaris.
>>54418235
All this delusion. You can't compete.
>>54418230
Big pascal? vega?
too far away.
although i don't like the idea of having to buy a g sync monitor
>>54418269
No, that card is plenty for today's games
what was the energy consumption of the 1070?
What kind of a performance increase can I see upgrading to the 1080 from my current R9 270x?
>benchmarks come out
>charts confirmed bullshit
>1080 is only barely better than the titan X if at all
>1070 is just as gimped as the 970 was with 7.5gb vram
>vega comes out and the 490/490X and Rage Xtreme blows them out of the water
>AMD wins again
screencap this. it WILL happen
>>54418207
I live in Canada so very few houses have A/C here. But that's besides the point, I'm talking about industrial server room tier temperature control, which I'm assuming you don't have in your house.
Can't fucking wait for those board partner designs. I'm looking at you, Gigabyte.
>mfw bought a new 970 7 months ago at $240
I should have stayed with the 670, but it was already dying ;_;
Lads, how much of a performance upgrade will I get when I replace my 770 with a standard 1080?
>>54418203
>what's a node jump
Also, the Titan X isn't faster than the 980Ti, is about as fast
GTX 1080 SLI
Why does Nvidia always have their reference cards with the shitty blower style cooler?
>>54417963
Depends on actual reviews and comparisons to AMDs new cards. I'm aiming for best price/performance ratio when black Friday/cyber Monday sales arrive
>>54418229
>>54418258
Me too! :3
>>54417996
DELETE THIS
>>54418278
>third party
I'm talking about amdgpu you tard.
nVidia does nothing for the FOSS community, AMD is contributing driver code for the kernel.
>>54418264
that's talking about memory
>>54418212
The real kicker is the fact that AMD got jumped on the multi viewport technology like when they did the same with their 5000 series and Eyefinity.
At worst, it might not make Vega but it should be able to get in considering the timeframe. But it's a pretty decent technology to have developed right now especially with VR.
Reminder to not buy MSI GPUs ever
Especially the overclocked GAYMEN EDITION ones
>>54418308
That SLI bridge is sexy as fuck..
Want.
>>54417891
>Founders Edition
Guaranteed no gimping by drivers
>>54418292
I think you're right. Thanks :^)
>buying the shittiest price to performance 1080
You niggas never fucking learn. Buy the Ti at $700 when it comes out next year.
>all the retards crying ITT that they bought X card in the last year
we told you to wait
>>54418264
It is for 1080ti&Pascal version Titan.
>>54418262
>2560 cores
AMD = cucked
>>54418295
>>54418302
No one knows yet, but possibly a fuckton
>>54418264
That's for double precision
>>54418229
>>54418258
>>54418314
I too have been waiting with a 560Ti.
Was considering getting a 380 last week.
upgrading my 3 yr old 760 ... yeahhhH!!!!
And now time to wait for 1080ti.
>>54418302
Like 3x at least
>>54418326
Fuck you my MSI 970 is fantastic
>>54418262
>256-bit Memory Interface Width
Is bus width less of an issue with gddr5x? The 980ti is 384.
>>54418289
>getting cucked by Nvidia for being an early adopter
It's okay if you want it like that, but you could burn your money too
>>54418264
You can advertise anything if you add in the small print that it only applies to some very specific use cases and only if you compare 8 GPU servers with 4 GPU servers
note to Google: Buy yourself some of those 8 GPU servers and teach them to recognize those god damn pictures of rivers
>>54418308
looks gay tbqh
>>54418308
>STILL USING THE SLI BRIDGE
DON'T THEY KNOW? SLI AND CROSSFIRE ARE OBSOLETE
>>54418277
it's true, the Titan X could only handle 6.1TFLOPs (single precision)
I'm not saying they are worse cards, only that it was a weak point that is now gone
>>54418344
Same.
Even if the performance increase over 980ti isn't massive, it'll be massive for us moving up from a midrange card from 4 years ago.
>>54418308
Hnnnggh. Just like my animes.
>tfw my computer wont have a goofy CPU/GPU combo much longer
7.5
>>54418296
What if I screencap you, and it doesn't happen? You're just making future caps for "MAD FAGS ALWAYS DELUSIONAL ALL THE TIME".
>>54418279
>polaris inefficient
>needs water cooler
Are you retarded?
>>54418350
It is since GDDR5X has faster clocks
NEW SLI BRIDGE
SOLID PIECE
>>54418296
do you think a 4670K at 4.2Ghz would be a bottleneck for a 1080? I'm thinking probably not, but I'm not sure
>>54418262
>Windows 7-10, Linux, FreeBSDx86OS Certification
Good thing it has BSD certification
>>54418378
>goofy
winky-wonky*
>>54418343
grabbed a 380 7 months ago for 150 on sale. I'd say it was worth it to upgrade from a gt430. Gonna grab the 1070 when it comes out.
>>54418295
Hello 270 bro
I've also been waiting all this time for this
>>54418390
Not even a 2500k Bottlenecks a 980 Ti SLI
>>54418384
it's a chunk of metal over a PCB, get over it.
Is there any reason to buy the $699 version over the $599 one?
>>54418384
Why do we still need a bridge?
Why can't Nvidia do it over PCI like AMD?
>>54418381
>Nvidia stock air cooler 2ghz+ = 67C
>AMD stock water cooler 1ghz = 95C
>>54418327
> Want.
> Can have.
> Will get.
750ti.
>tfw I waited
>>54418400
What about a 6700k?
>>54417919
I have a feeling you are right. AMD is going to focus on the high end and blow Nvidia out of the water in the enthusiast market but that doesn't mean shit for them if they can't move $800 dollar cards only popular youtube streamers can afford. Time for another rehash of the 290 with 10% improvement over then 390. Meh.
>>54418392
that's a technical term
>>54418398
hopefully it was worth the wait, friend
>>54418384
>>54418411
Crossfire is garbage though. Thank you bridge.
>>54418410
this
i want to know; i have the money for it but idk if i should drop 699 shekels for it
>>54417866
SPENDFAGS BTFO
AMD BTFO
>>54418400
Depends on the game
>>54418294
180W HOUSEFIRE
>>54418262
>8GB standard memory config
does that mean there will be cards with more from the aftermarket?