This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that is required to make a fine watch.
Required viewing for newbies:
http://youtu.be/508-rmdY4jQ
Strap guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous thread:
>>54386397
WRUW today /wt/?
>tfw the perfect watch for you was a limited edition in 2014
fuck you too, Oris ;_;
>>54410591
>>54410626
Oris is amazing, probably one of the most underrated Swiss midrange manufacturers.
>>54410626
Is that an acrylic dome I see?
>>54410591
>>54410706
nice Denzel Washington anon
After wearing my Steinhart exclusively for a while I realize how ugly my Orient Ray and Mako USA are. They're so fat and odd looking comparatively.
>>54410908
>muh Rolex knockoff so gud
>>54410925
Why are you so butthurt?
>>54410665
Copper oris
It has a steel back
>>54410706
Why the fuck would you put that on a nato?
This disgusting meme started by chinks wearing cuck wellingtons needs to stop.
>>54410665
>Oris is amazing
Hold your fucking horses there pal
Although >>54410626 is pretty nice
>>54410908
What model Steinhart?
>>54410979
It dresses it down really well and looks good. Pretty sure that anon wasn't going to a funeral wearing a tricolor nato.
>>54411060
>It dresses it down really well and looks good
Are you blind or retarded?
>>54411085
I'm sorry, I somehow didn't realize your casio databank was the height of elegance.
>>54411042
Ocean One GMT with black ceramic bezel. It just looks so much slender and the lines flow better. The Ray and Mako USA just look bulky.
>>54411113
Not sure, but he may be suggesting that it's not really possible to dress a calculator watch any more than it already is out of the box.
>>54411146
>dress
Meant 'dress down.'
>>54411113
It isn't. Neither did I imply that it was.
Still doesn't change the fact that you're literally braindead if you think a dress watch would look good on a nato in any situation.
>>54411116
I do have a Ray and I feel like the shape of the lugs and crown guards isn't the best.
I don't really get a feel of bulkiness from it at all though, and I don't really see the slenderness on the Steinhart - but then I'm only looking at pictures on a screen, so that doesn't mean anything.
Steinhart watches seem really nice, especially for the price. Of course the design is derivative, to put it lightly...
>>54411116
>It just looks so much slender and the lines flow better.
No it doesn't. You're talking about the Rolex submariner.
What you're referring to is a copy, and anyone who is knowledgeable about watches at all will call you out on your shit.
>>54411213
It's funny that you try to be all conservative about the classic, accepted looks for watches, but have no problem calling a >40mm watch with date window a dress watch.
Get off your high horse and try new things once in a while. Don't worry, nobody will see you using weird straps on your cheapass watches as desecration, and I don't think you own a vintage Patek where it would seem out of place.
>>54411249
At least Steinhart watches don't have fat fucking lugs.
>>54411280
They just have long skinny flat ones instead which don't look that great either
>>54411262
>>40mm watch with date window a dress watch.
Are you talking about the bambino?
I never defended the watch, and I dislike it's case size, hands and lug width.
But it is most absolutely in the style and is marketed as a dress watch. Just because /wt/ jerks off over smaller watches because everyone here is a twink crossdresser doesn't mean it's the popular opinion.
I dislike larger watches by the way (unless there's a reason for it, like sensors or for shock resistance).
>>54411280
They do have a chink made case and bracelet, a trash movement for the price and it's literally a submariner clone blown up to >40mm.
But it's "Swiss made" of course
>>54410626
What about an Intra-matic then?
Or an original 60s dress watch like what that these designs are based off of.
I'm looking for a watch under £100.
What do you recommend?
Cheers.
>>54411566
>Cucking yourself with low-end swatch
>>54411571
How about you save up a bit more and buy something that isn't dogshit?
Or you can go to r/watches. I'm sure they'll have plenty of suggestions for turds to smear on your wrist.
Wearing my Midas mechanical.
Good watch, could probably adjust it to within a couple seconds a day with enough twiddling.
The movement is loose as hell inside the case though. Probs gonna buy a gasket from ebay to seal the movement to the case so it moves less.
Pretty watch - the dial is a very deep red.
>>54411571
What do you want?
Is there any reason why I shouldn't get a Seiko sarx027 but another model?
I also want to get a cheap diver, what are my options other than the 007 and the mako? I'd like one with a better movement, even if it's not 200m certified. Any good Seiko?
posting my new quartz orient monterey. i like it a lot so far.
>>54411642
>le Swatch is automatically bad meme
If you like the watch and you want it then what the hell is wrong with that? It's not a great value for the money but it's a pretty decent watch with a decent ETA movement in it.
I'm pretty tired of this Swatch memeing. Yes their value for the money isn't the best, but if you like the goddamn watch and you're willing to pay for it then who gives a shit? You can try to convince him to get a fucking Bambino instead or whatever like everybody else in this /wt/ hivemind but if that's not the watch he wanted to begin with then did you really help him save any money by buying something he doesn't want?
>>54411657
A nice sorta-simplistic watch, I think the "military" watches are something I like. Nothing too weird. Also, I like the watches which as a hand that moves smoothly.
>>54411716
>I also want to get a cheap diver, what are my options other than the 007 and the mako?
Memexplorer.
>>54411742
Thats actually not too bad. I like the hands. I would like it a lot better if the date window was inverted though.
>>54411760
>If your wife wants to fuck other men then what the hell is wrong with that?
Fuck off swatch cuck
>>54411716
>Is there any reason why I shouldn't get a Seiko sarx027 but another model?
Other than it being crazy ugly? If that's the kind of shit you're into go ahead I guess but the SARX013/15 is far better looking, SARB033/35 if you want something less awesome but more dressy. Orient Star standard date is a nice choice too. As for divers the next step up from 007/mako/ray is the baby tuna or monster for a 4r36, turtle still costs almost as much as a sumo.
>>54410591
got my Laco on today.
I rather like the leather strap with the rivets that it came with, but I was thinking of putting something different on to give it a new look. I'm not sure what other styles would work though. I don't think a nato would be well suited for this design. Maybe a leather nato/one piece...
>>54411769
Seiko SNK809?
>>54411874
this, i love mine and I have massive wrists (not fat) and it still looks good
>>54411852
How much did you pay for that?
>>54411828
thanks. i wanted something that would work with a bunch of different dress styles, and it seems to fit the bill. not a huge budget, so i consider this watch at $100 to a pretty solid deal.
New thang
>>54411784
What? The explorer? I wish.
>>54411874
>Seiko SNK809
Yeah, that looks nice. Do you have any other recommendations?
>>54411742
What the fuck are these chronograph sundials?
>>54411974
Why bother wearing a fake?
>>54411995
>sundials
Subdials.
Phone
>>54411979
Yes.
>I wish.
What's the problem?
>>54411962
$300
Laco now has orange version that I also like, but at the same time sort of don't.
>>54411995
Looks like 10 minute counter and 12 hour counter? But then I'm not sure why the 12 hour subdial would be subdivided by 5 instead of by 6.
>>54411974
Why? I won't even ask why you bought that, but why the fuck would you try to show it off, here of all places?
Fuck off
>>54412025
>$300
laughingwhores.c
>>54412025
I really like it. Looks neat.
>>54411837
Why do you say it's crazy ugly? Looks clean and simple to me.
>>54412025
This one looks great.
>>54412019
The money?
What's the cheapest I can get one for? Before that I wanna get a bike.
>>54412110
$280 I think.
>>54412109
Yeah, looks great. A shame it's a quartz watch.
>>54411643
Nice watch i just love that look :D.
>>54412109
that is nice, I really like the striped dial, looks very snazzy. Prefer the Type B dial though. Also, that one is quartz
>>54412110
he's talking about the obris morgan explorer II.
a microbrand thought using "explorer" for their diver's watch was a good idea for some reason.
anyway, it's a good watch but super long lug to lug, and not available anymore I believe.
>>54411995
it's got 1/10th second on the top subdial, and 12 hour on the bottom
>>54412163
but where are the minutes then
>>54412025
Really like that one.
Not crazy about the strap. Which strap could go well with it?
>>54412172
don't think it has that. chronographs are new to me though
>>54412159
>>54412128
Oh. Well, I actually want an explorer I. But a the Rolex.
How much does the 36mm one cost?
>>54412235
But.. The Explorer is not a diving watch.
>>54412315
Yeah, I know, and I don't intend to buy it now. I'm just curious.
Can I get one for €2000?
Reminder that Seiko stopped making LCD watches.
>>54412405
Didn't they re-release the G757 a year ago?
>>54411760
Can you explain to me the idea of "not good for the money" with Swatch? Say I get this one new for 500 yuro and thought it was a good deal for the watch. Was I wrong? Where does the entire idea of "low end Swatch is bad" even come from?
>>54412448
It was made by Wired XYZ, a Japan market only subsidiray of Seiko.
Technically, Seiko still makes LCD watches, with Pulsar, Lorus and Epson, but the designs are shit. Casio had Seiko give up on LCD by swarming the market with higher quality, reliability, battery life and shock resistance, yet way cheaper. But Seiko LCDs had killer designs and steel cases, unlike 99% of the shit Casio shovels out on a daily basis.
Something definitely was lost when Seiko threw the towel.
Whats the closest you could get to one of these
>>54412200
>don't think it has that
>>54411995
1/10 second on top, hours and minutes combined on bottom if it's the same movement as my brother's.
>>54410591
This "just" arrived. Any bezel suggestions? I'm pretty much eternally cucked by this black zulu strap.
>>54412553
German limited edition box set. Though the watch is pretty terrible, you're better off buying the Vostok Komandirskie and putting it on a bund strap.
>>54412669
>>54412671
heh, i still have a lot to learn about watches
>>54412553
Is that a date window at 6? There's probably a number of watches that would be similar
>>54412537
True, same can be said about Citizen.
So no more cheap all steel digital.
>>54412553
That timer design is fucking retarded.
>>54410626
>its like 1957 all over again
nice watch, gramps
>>54411566
the styling of an old refrigerator
>>54411249
Why are you so butthurt? No one's gonna call me out except for internet warriors and if you do call someone out in real life for having a Steinhart then you must have autism.
>>54412482
its just a name thrown on a generic eta based watch
its not bad but its not good, I think modern hamilton gets more hate for just being a purchased name to give one of swatch's lines a feel of history
500 euros seems really high to me for that watch though
>>54413733
>ts not bad but its not good
Why?
>>54413738
read the rest of the post maybe
What do you guys think?
>>54413754
I did, "seems really high to me" doesn't really cut it as an explanation of why something is "not bad but not good". Name or brand is irrelevant to the quality of the product too. Why are they not good? What makes them poor value as opposed to something else?
>>54413761
What the fuck is wrong with that date
>>54413780
still missing the relevant part of the post
>>54413761
ick.
my new watch pic related
>>54413793
There was none related to my question which was specifically why they are not good. There must be a reason why some people think that.
>>54412696
Dot & dashes is the best Vostok bezel IMHO. Or you can get a custom bezel that takes Seiko inserts.
>>54413818
It is just an ETA
the movement in it is only worth ~200usd
is your basic stainless case worth the other 370usd?
>>54413840
I actually agree with you. Aesthetically speaking I really like the dot bezels but I was leaning more towards a color suggestion for a custom a bezel. Thanks anyway.
>>54413981
Dot bezel, repaint it to match the face
>>54413981
Pepsi bezel.
But with the darker blue shade.
>>54410591
My Poljot.
>>54414631
I was considering this, thanks.
Should I change the strap? Cheap Chinese leather is barely long enough to be comfortable for my fat wrists.
>>54415126
Yeah put on on a longer leather. For the love of god no nato though
>>54414897
Just stop with that band, please.
Negative or positive display?
Negative looks cooler- when you can actually see it.
>>54415287
Negative.
Has anybody used the website World's Best Showcase to buy a watch? Found a really good price on a Hublot there but don't know the company.
>>54415259
Perlon or nah
>>54415259
What's wrong with his band?
>>54415332
You can't see it unless it's in direct sunlight though
>>54415487
Not him but it looks like shit honestly
>>54415489
It does not need direct sunlight. Most any light will do, including the light function of the watch itself
>>54415487
Slow thread today
>>54416048
What watch?
>>54416136
Casio Oceanus
>>54415487
End links are the wrong size for the case and the style belongs on some cocaine-era monstrosity.
Why is this thread attracting more and more retards?
It was always /g/ people interested in watches but now we have literal mongoloids from what looks like r/watches and WUS.
How do we get them out?
who else is hype for LP9?
>>54416516
You posted your trash yesterday and no one gave a fuck.
Take your sqeele and leave faggot
>>54416556
Don't know why you're so angry m8, i thought this was a watch thread so i posted my watch :)
>>54416685
kill yourself
Absolutely loving my Alpinist.
>>54416725
'no'
>>54416761
nice
>>54416556
I agree that his Squale is trash but you're unironically posting a oce-ANUS. Please think that over.
>>54416511
Get ninefag and his autism rebanned. Reddit and WUS at least have variety.
>>54417062
>Reddit and WUS at least have variety.
I absolutely agree with the former but you're just wrong here.
All they do is circle jerk over dogshit, then one retard comes in with a slightly expensive watch and gets upvoted, and of course if you call any of them out on that they downvote you until you're hidden. What a great community.
WUS is pretty decent as long as you avoid the chinkshit and and swiss forums.
>>54416995
You still haven't given me a single reason why you think it's a bad watch.
>>54417326
>You still haven't given me a single reason why you think it's a bad watch.
It's dogshit.
>>54417326
See, you say this while posting the same Oceanus for the past week. That is not variety. Yes there is a lot of dogshit brands like Fossil, but there are plenty of other interesting models too that I would have otherwise not known about. Reddit and upvoting as a whole is terrible, but the content isn't.
>>54410508
Best Watch.
>>54417326
>You still haven't given me a single reason why you think it's a bad watch.
The only reason why I hate this watch is because you won't stop posting it. Because of you Casio is losing potential sales, good job.
F91-w vs AE1200 for a good cheap watch? The AE1200 looks a lot fancier but it's a lot bigger too and I'm looking for something fairly minimal, and really just to tell time simply so I'm not sure that I need the extra two displays. Other than the world time and the analog display, what other differences are there? Are those two features really that useful?
>>54417406
And why do you think that?
Is casio jewing you; selling you a watch with materials that cost far less than what they're demanding?
No. It's titanium, with a 9.5 hardness TiCN coating, blued sapphire crystal and completely solid links with machining and contouring on each one.
It has the 2nd best movement Casio currently makes, and will keep atomic time anywhere but Africa, and you can change timezones on the fly and the list continues.
>>54417518
>See, you say this while posting the same Oceanus for the past week.
I'm also Casio-shill if you haven't noticed. I've been posting all the databanks, g shocks and that negative f91w from last thread. If trips weren't for faggots I'd make one
>>54417571
So you admit to shitposting? Have you considered acting like a retard is what is attracting retards?
At least post obscure Casio.
>>54417547
I would say the latter is a better deal, especially in SS.
Seems like you want a relatively low profile digital with a lot of features, how about this?
>>54411354
There's also a non solar/atomic version that's half the price. Both have all the timezone switching and whatnot that you want.
>>54416048
>>54416136
>>54416556
Is this proof that paid shills walk among us? Because I honestly can't think of a single reason to ever post that dogshit overpriced mall watch unless I was a paid shill
>>54417646
>Posting very underrepresented watches on this thread
>Somehow that's equivalent to shitposting.
>>54417723
>Because I honestly can't think of a single reason to ever post that dogshit overpriced mall watch unless I was a paid shill
Sure thing pal. Also no, I'm not paid sadly.
I am sick and tired of the circle jerk around the same 3 or 4 watches that goes on around here though.
Also your chinkshit is awful
>>54417723
And yet, you post that piece of steaming shit
>>54416556
Also shit
>>54417868
>underrepresented
Yes, until you keep fucking doing it.
>>54417944
Looks like you're doing it too
Keep it up
>>54417999
I'm not posting the same shit over and over for weeks like you've been.
But go ahead and keep questioning where the cancer is coming from. Enjoy your thread.
>His watch doesn't sing him happy birthday
http://youtu.be/TAOrSlL_hJE
>>54418034
I remember wanting one of these like a decade ago, do you remember if they were expensive?
And yes, I'll enjoy it.
>>54416511
>>54417646
>>54417944
>>54417999
>>54418034
I hate this digi-digi shit.
And I hate you all.
>>54416761
Can you explain what is the use of 360 degree rotating bezel? Does it actually have a magnetic compass in it?
>>54418167
Fuck you too.
>>54417691
I said I didn't necessarily want the fancy features, but that looks cool thanks! I'll check out the cheaper version. So is the f91w just considered mediocre?
>>54418174
Kindly fuck off to /fa/ then
This is a technology board you dumb shit
>>54418167
Also imagine using this during class while your watch plays Mozart
http://youtu.be/aptDgSovXzM
>>54418204
>So is the f91w just considered mediocre?
It's an excellent watch. Just a little lacking compared to slightly more expensive models This seems pretty perfect for what you want.
Basically a more rugged f91w.
http://www.amazon.com/Casio-G-Shock-DW5600E-1V-Mens-Watch/dp/B00H083C3W/ref=pd_srecs_cs_241_1?ie=UTF8&dpID=41U3D-zgyOL&dpSrc=sims&preST=_AC_UL250_SR149%2C250_&refRID=1WBZDQ7AKRQ89DQ6PSVB
>>54418204
>So is the f91w just considered mediocre?
Always
>>54418276
http://www.amazon.com/Casio-GWM5610-1-G-Shock-Solar-Watch/dp/B007RWZHXO/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_bdcrb_top?ie=UTF8
Here ya go
Pretty much the same as the 40 dollar one other than the atomic syncing and solar charging
>>54418267
Yikes that's $80 CAD from amazon, pretty steep. My budget is ~$30-~$40 CAD tops. Anything similar but a bit cheaper? Thanks so much for the help!
>>54418354
You can get the f91w or the world time one then.
I would recommend just saving up for that one though, it's worth every penny.
>>54418409
Between the f91w and the ae1200 you'd go for the latter tho right?
>>54418595
I own and like both but yeah.
Get it on a bracelet. It's like 5 bucks extra.
>>54418664
I'm sorry, what does get it on a bracelet mean?
>>54418767
http://www.amazon.com/Casio-AE1200WHD-1A-Stainless-Steel-Digital/dp/B0094B79CI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1462590767&sr=8-1&keywords=casio+world+time
>>54418922
What's so much better about this? Is the material more comfortable?
>>54420514
The regular band can be kinda flimsy if you're rough on your watches
>>54420531
But you can swap the bands out right? Like, say for a NATO strap?
>>54420531
>>54420567
My concern is that the metal will be a lot heavier, won't it?
>>54420567
Not really. It has a weird lug width so you would have to notch the strap down.
And no the bracelet wont be heavier.
I still recommend that you save up a bit more and go for the G shocks though
>>54420586
I really can't, it's just out of my price range. Thanks though, I'll go for the metal AE1200
>>54420586
Wait, are the F91w straps more easily replaceable with nato straps?
>>54420612
Yeah but you have to squeeze them in, and they look wrong.
Also why the hell are you so broke? Get a job man
>a smartwatch where the huge crown does literally nothing
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1567495264/the-interchangeable-smartwatch
>>54411354
Why would anyone buy anything other than 5600
Kind've a neat plug for this kickstarter watch on Ablogtoread.
It's a piece of shit, but it's an interesting piece of shit. Exposed twin 6-beat balance wheels are my jam.
It's too bad that they are so poorly finished, but an anon could probably do worse for the price. Good fucking luck when it comes time to have it serviced though...
>>54421234
Price?
>>54421264
$400 for the kickstarter.
>>54421234
A halo that encircles the hour but isn't a jump hour, but constantly moves? That crown looks kinda 'cute,' considering it might be hard to actually use sitting between the lugs.
Certainly more interesting than most anything else that gets posted to kickstarter
>>54421234
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT-10I6CPXs
Hipster as fuck.
>>54421459
It's pretty exotic stuff for the price range.
I don't think this one is for me, but I hope it does well. I'd be interested to see more in the same vein from them.
>>54421627
It's not like they made the movements. We could see others producing similar if you like it.
>>54421627
They're doing a round one, too.
Rather nice domed crystal.
>>54421670
Perhaps.
>>54418184
Here you go.
>>54421234
Does it say where the movements are made?
They look awfully chinese to me.
>>54421670
>+/- 45 secs
That's horrid. No wonder they're so cheap.
Interesting design, though.
>>54420890
Because solar & radio controlled for dat accuracy.
>>54413805
model?
>>54422200
Looks like a Laco Flieger type B
>>54421459
>closeups emphasize the terrible finishing
>hipster mustache
lel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xaNbO7sqlM
Reminder that omega used to use tuning fork movements developed by max hetzel.
>>54422348
This is the quality you get from chink manufacturers.
I put a cheap metal strap on a cheap MDV106.
Feels good, man.
>>54421459
I havent cringed this fucking hard in a while
>>54410591
My Jog & Walk.
Sports day.
>>54416934
Model?
Got my new watch today.
>>54422511
>>54422333
Might actually be Stowa Flieger instead.
>>54410706
Model?
>>54422683
Bambino V3
are second hand 'vintage' watches from india worth buying?
>http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/131796604728?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
or is it poo in loo quality
>>54422708
>http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/131796604728?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
poo in the watch.
And a repainted dial too boot.
>>54422708
100% frankens with shitty repainted dials. They will also be filled with pajeet's DNA.
>>54422705
thanks
>>54422640
Not him but Orient defender
>>54422732
>>54422726
yeah nah get enough poo DNA from breathing air in Australia.
Some of them go for good prices, 31 dollars for a HMT pilot
>>54422778
>Good price
>HMT Pilot for 31 bucks
I'm still looking for someone to give him mine for free.
>>54422778
That's a terrible price.
They sell for sub 15 shipped and they ain't even worth it. Go buy a cheap Poljot,Raketa or a Vostok if you want something cheap and reliable.
I'm going to do it, I'm gonna get a strap from a local store, I hope I don't get jewed.
Next is a tudor or rolex, I also have two seikos totalling 2,5k€
I only get things I like fämälämävacation
>>54412767
>So no more cheap all steel digital.
Actually, no more steel digital at all.
I mean, I'd be glad to be corrected if I'm wrong, but aside from limited edition extra rare G-Shocks, and vintage models, there isn't any steel digital Casio anymore.
Suunto still makes some, but they're not exactly watches.
>>54417723
>honestly can't think of a single reason to ever post that dogshit overpriced mall watch
Because it is the highest quality quartz on the market right now perhaps?
>>54410508
Is it worth getting any >$250 automatic? Given it would cost almost as much to service it as to get a new one.
>>54423068
To be honest fampai, mechanical movements are an anachronism these days, useless and overly expensive. As most passions are, owning mechanical watches is unreasonable.
That's why many people stick to cheap mechanicals like Vostoks, so they get the best of both worlds: a very decent mechanical, at a price a third that of servicing.
If the price puts you off, it's either Vostok/Chinese movement, or quartz.
>>54422940
The OG G-Shocks have a steel case with a protective resin outer shell.
>>54422880
Trip's already over.
Everything looked like shit and he tried to sell me something identic to my 1 buck chink strap for 6.
>>54423249
Doesn't that severely weaken the push buttons? They don't seem as durable when protruding that much, seems they would easily bend.
>>54423558
They don't protrude at all when the resin shell is on. If they were shorter you couldn't push them when the watch is fully assembled.
>>54416866
How much?
>>54423625
Yeah I know that, which is the point: without the resin bezel, aren't they much weaker?
>>54410591
>>54422798
>Poljot,Raketa or a Vostok
>>54422794
thanks guys :)
is there any guide to chink watches?
Next killer tsunami when?
I need a new watch. Would love a Super KonTiki myself.
>>54424033
What's wrong with these?
Some cheap Tissot, not mechanical but looks nice in a shirt.
>>54423985
Probably weaker, not sure how weak though.
My point was that Casio still make steel cased digitals.
Is a little over 7 inches a small wrist? Also what would be the ideal watch size for this size of wrist?
>>54424753
That's a rather normal wrist circumference.
I got 7.25 inch wrist, i can wear 42mm (SKX007, NY0040) easily. Though i smaller watches are a lot comfier, 38mm is very comfy.
Got a custom grimoldi milano and a breitling not too sure on the model
>>54424753
Pretty average. Unless your fat or skelta a wrist doesn't vary much in size, it's up to personal preference, I prefer the feeling of smaller watches on my wrist around 36-38mm. But someone of my size (I'm not fat) they look too small
Decent sizes I've found are
Dress- 36-38mm (40mm abosolute max)
Dive- 40-42mm
Chronograph 40-43mm
You won't look out of place with a big watch these days but people around here will bullying you for wearing anything over 43mm
>>54424656
i meant they're great cheap watches
hence >Thanks guys
soz if u misinterpreted
>>54422665
You should be ashamed.
34mm hand-wound max bill looks sexy
Post your favourite summer watch.
We should really make an updated buying guide including digital watches, quartz and mechanical, also a vintage section.
>>54425207
Go ahead.
Base it off the old guide.
>>54424953
Nice watch but
>>54424900
>soz
>:)
Global rule nr. 2
>>54424708
Indeed, but hidden beneath resin, and not really meant to be worn without.
That hardly constitutes a wide choice of steel digitals though.
>>54425260
get that poorfag shit the fuck out of here
>>54425280
OMFG HOW FUCKING DARE YOU NOT WEAR YOUR WATCH THE EXACT WAY THAT I SAY!
YOU ARE SO FUCKING DEAD WHEN THE WATCH POLICE CATCH YOU KIDDO!
>>54424940
Why should he be ashamed?
>>54425347
for weareing a fake.
he must feel cheap, dirty, poor, worthless and depressed.
I hope he kills himself.
![1419705022[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/SbBTbsG.jpg "1419705022[1].jpg")
>>54425346
If you are gonna wear a watch like a faggot you might as well buy a faggot watch
>picture related
kill yourself senpai
>>54425429
did I trigger you? go on, rail more you autistic fruck, it makes me horny
oh and I'll STILL be wearing my watch how I want!
You mad?
You mad?
You mad?
is your ocd making you rage?
I drink your tears like wine
deal with it.,
>>54425466
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting
The sun was out
I got drunk
Bridet Regan
Secretly loves me
>>54425571
Hey my watch is always below the bone bump
>>54425643
you're doing it wrong.
>>54425657
He's not, though.
As long as it's below wristbone it's good.
>>54425334
>poorfag
Didn't even bother look beyond the first title.
>>54424013
I wish Seiko's current offerings are as classy as this.
>>54425683
>As long as it's below wristbone it's good.
>It's below wristbone
>below
>>54425358
It's a fake? How can you tell from that picture?
>>54425759
That isn't classy.
>>54425347
The Tangente with the red 12 was made to support doctors without borders.
Buying a fake of this version in particular is extra scummy.
just got this watch yesterday. My first analogue watch.
>>54426229
Are you blind? Or is it because I said below instead of next to?
>>54426756
Below the wristbone means it's next to the hand. A wrist watch should be worn just above the wrist bone.
