http://www.overclock.net/t/1599305/vc-first-gtx-1080-benchmarks
>>54392029
misleading title
>>54392029
We've been saying this for months retard
Everybody knew this
>>54392029
its better than the 980ti
>>54392081
Looks like you didn't click the article
Let me guess, you are a waitfag and this whole time you could get a 980ti but decided to wait because the 1080 was better and now you are on full damage control for being a blubbering retard
![b3867bf0_vbattach235410[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/CKsNhlj.jpg "b3867bf0_vbattach235410[1].jpg")
>>54392029
NVIDIA POR VIDA, ESE!
>>54392102
Are you retarded?
>>54392029
DELETE THIS
>>54392029
SHUT IT DOWN
>>54392078
>>54392102
>>54392131
>>54392174
>>54392191
>As always look at graphics score
3DM11:
27683 - 1080
24305 - 980ti
Firestrike:
10102 - 1080
8026 - 980ti
>>54392102
Looks like you didn't click the article, as 1080 one shows faster than 980Ti. Mhm
>>54392131
>that pic
KEK
Is the guy behind that random hiroshima chink real? I hope that the tattoo isn't if his neckbeard is.
>>54392029
Not like Nvidia won't gimp the 980 ti and make sure the 1080 stomps on it hard, just so you spend all your NEETbux on it.
>mfw it costs as much as a 980ti and actually slower
>8gb, wew had that back in 2013
>1850mhz core still cant beat a titan
House fire confirmed.
Guess nvidiots will be waiting for the 1080ti
>>54392029
how the fuck do people honestly expect the 490(X) and 1080 to be real powerhouse cards?
they are more efficient and whatever, but they they only have 256b memory buses, GDDR5X or not.
>>54392029
>synthetics
Oh good one OP
this thread is living proof that nobody on /g/ actually reads any of the articles posted here.
>1900mhz
HOUSEFIRE
>>54392225
ITS OVER, NVIDIA IS FINISHED
This benchmarks show the 1080 is almost 20% faster than the GTX980 Ti though.
its even faster than your average GTX 980Ti Overclock of 1500/4000.
Could the 1080 the first card to hit 2.0Ghz?
It boosting to 1800mhz out of the boost and this is a reference card, aftermarket cards should at least be able to get 500mhz more out of this.
>>54392191
SHUT DOWN THE MACHINE! SHUT IT DOWN!
Don't fall for the AMD shills, it's one final pathetic attempt before we finish them off for good.
>>54392197
>random hiroshima chink
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jen-Hsun_Huang
http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/25/caption-contest-nvidia-ceo-flaunts-tattoo-on-stage-still-servi/
>guy behind
Random fanboy
http://www.overclock.net/t/1144149/the-most-hardcore-nvidia-fan-ever/10#post_15401898
http://www.overclock.net/t/1144149/the-most-hardcore-nvidia-fan-ever/10#post_15415685
http://www.overclock.net/t/1144149/the-most-hardcore-nvidia-fan-ever/20#post_15421587
Man, the full chip with 60 SM enabled gotta be at least 50% faster than the Titan X.
Nvidia won, Why does AMD even bothers.
why do people even need these new graphics cards, what demanding and good modern video games justify them?
>AMD beats similar offerings in 3DM11 and Firestike benchmarks
>"Wahhhh these aren't real benchmarks and are synthetic"
>Nvidia beats it self in 3DM11 and FS and suddenly they are applicable benchmarks.
Not choosing either side here, but you people have to see this is retarded...right?
just wait till the end user has hardware in their hands before basing entire shill threads
on "leaks" and speculation
>>54392618
AMD always lies on benchmarks.
>>54392194
/thread
Only issue at this point is price; Polaris 10 will be the undisputed winner unless the 1080 goes for $500 or less
>>54392518
Because most people don't spend $600 on a gpu
>>54392728
I hope AMD beats Nvidia this time.
So they stop with this
>$1000 for 10% performance increase
Bullshit.
>>54392029
ya no shit thats why there will be a 1080ti
>>54392999
>there will be a 1080ti
no doubt held in reserve to cuck amd a week or two before they announce vega or some other top-end piece of kit
No red flags on the 1850mhz core clock?
>>54392550
I need to fill the void in my life somehow don't ruin this for me>>54392618
>>54393704
>shrink maxlel
>clock to the moon
>claim victory
it sounds like a pretty safe move to me, since it comes "free" with the process shrink
>>54392747
lol
You people are retarded, business as usual.
The flagship of Nvidia is the GTX980Ti and it will stay the flagship.
Same with the Furies for AMD.
And fucking no, the R480X won't have performance close to the R9 390X.
If you'd care to look at the benchmarks instead of just reading the caption, you would see it is anything but close.
You guys must be all underage faggots.
>buying jewvidia cards
good goym
>>54393704
Dieshrunk maxlel with smaller SMs means higher clocks
>>54392029
can the 1080 even do DX12 yet?
why is the 290x outperforming the 980ti in dx12 benchmarks. this should be impossible
the 980ti originally cost $900
>>54392747
What does that has to do with anything?
>>54392550
fuckin this
>>54392550
Currently with my 390x I can't hit over 30fps on Arma 3 at 1440p, I get 8fps at 4k. I'd like to one day soon hit 60fps at 4K, because it's fucking beautiful. That's why.
>>54393822
>>54393784
This is worrying, AMD has been steadily improving the IPC of their GPU while Nvidia is almost running at twice the clockspeed.
There is a rumor that Polaris is hotclocked, anyone know anything?
>AMDtards think AMD will deliver,....yes they deliver, just like how they delivered with those Fiji cards :^)
Polaris 11/10 is aimed at the lowend/midrange market, confirmed by AMD.
And the performance is likewise. The R9 490X will replace the 390X.
The R9 480X will replace the R9 380X with a performance boost of about 15%.
Nothing close to a R9 390X.
You people are guilty as fuck.
>>54393938
Thanks for posting evidence.
That's because the 1080 will be a mid range card. How have you retards not caught on to NVIDIA's tricks by now?
The 1080 is meant to replace the 980 though.
You will see a premium card meant to replace the 980ti later.
>>54393841
Because retarded developers.
Maxwell has more DX12 features than AMD, yet AMD marketing managed to trick people into believe async was the only DX12 feature.
async isn't even useful for Maxwell as Maxwell schedule already makes sure they GPU never enters an idle state or tries to avoid it as much as possible, unlike AMD hardware which expends most of the time waiting for instructions being underutilized.
async makes sure those extra 2 GFLOPS AMD GPU's usually have over their Nvidia counterpart cards finally get utilized.
Forcing async on maxwell cards is just trying to override the native schedule which is more efficient than anything a game developer could ever come to with async and only causes worse performance.
This is something you can see with Nvidia's near zero driver overhead OpenGL applications, it's wonderful and hopefully Nvidia will push for Vulka instead of DX12.
>>54393802
You're right, the 480x won't have performance close to the 390x, the 480 will have performance close to the 390x, which will cost somewhere in the ballpark of $200
>>54394149
>being this deluded
IQ below 100 confirmed
>>54394149
MAD
>>54392029
DELETE THIS
>>54394029
> maxwell cards is just trying to override the native schedule which is more efficient than anything a game developer could ever come to
>>54394298
120℅ mad
>>54394175
>>54394176
Ayyyy
>>54394343
Complete fake.
>>54394319
No, I just know that what you said is complete bullshit. The maxwell scheduler is a software one, thus using the term native makes zero sense.
Plus the major reason why maxwell sucks balls at async compute is because it requires a context switch - something that requires a pipeline flush on Nvidia hardware but not on GCN.
>>54394372
Just keep digging that grave.
>>54394029
DAMAGECONTROLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Are AMDcucks this much jealous of nvidia??
>>54394343
>reading the headlines without looking at the benches given
QED
So, 1070 will be as fast as ~970? Or closer to 980?
>>54394403
>spouts gibberish
>gets called on it
>replies with more idiocy
I'll give you a tip: 64 wavefronts will be the new hotness.
>>54392550
Im waitfaging for next gen gpus and more titles for the vive.. Probably getting all this in Aug
>1850Mhz clock
That doesn't fill me with confidence.
>>54392550
When you want to play games with Reshade and SweetFx at 4k 72 fps
>playing at 60fps with a 144hz monitor
Netburst ahoy!
Polaris Release date any one?
>2Ghz GPU
IT'S OVER AMD IS FUCKING MURDER
>>54394620
Computex soft launch, June hard launch for Polaris
Pascal has a soft launch tomorrow at 6pm PDT, but isn't rumored to hard launch until June
>>54392029
SOUND THE HORNS
LIGHT THE TOWERS
NVIDIA IS BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
AMD IS LOVE
AMD IS LIFE
>>54392194
So around 20% improvement? Meh expected more.
>>54394719
>>>54392194
>So around 20% improvement? Meh expected more.
1080gtx is 130w....
>>54392550
Literally nothing. People who buy expensive gaming machines don't play jackshit, it's all blatant consumerism. The actually good games are either console exclusive or run on literally anything.
>>54394733
I don't give a shit about watts, I have an oced 980 ti. Guess I need to wait for the 1080 ti or whatever amd releases.
>>54394733
Give me whatever shit you're on.
10 of it.
>>54392550
I can't play some games on my 770 because 2gb of vram is not enough.
>>54394804
It is you're being memed
>>54394804
>imfuckingplying
>>54394817
Maybe, but Batman and JustCause3 still work like shit for me
>>54394804
2gb is pretty fucking old. even the low midrange gpu's like the 960 and 380 have 4gb now
>>54394850
that has nothing to do with vram
batman is literally the most unoptimized game ever and just cause 3 is not far behind
>>54394431
this
>>54392550
You need it to run Citra
>>54394703
TY brother
>>54394298
>>54394372
>software schelude
You are mixing up two completely different things, I can see why would you make that mistake though.
Of course it doesn't, but don't worry.
They are either going to cripple the 980ti or kill it with a driver.
Future games will run like ass on the old generation. Trust me.
>>54394969
>memoirs of a kepler user
>>54392029
considering that the thing is clocked to the moon i somewhat doubt there are any solid archtiecture improvements. looks more like a shitty maxlel shrink. and that means no ACEs aka no proper DX12 performance.
>>54394969
True. Nvidia will pretend something about their new architecture makes it way better, when really they're just gimping Maxwell. Fucking Nvidia.
>>54394969
>tfw GTX 770 owner
>GTX 1070 confirmed 7.5GB card
Are you ready for the memes /g/?
>>54394850
>>54394873
>>54394892
Yeah no, 2GB is too little. Nvidia is always too cheap with VRAM for their cards. The 770 should have had at least 3GB.
>>54395065
No it isn't you fucking idiot. That is a card meant for 1080p at the very best and you won't be running newer stuff on high anyway.
>>54395036
As long as they admit it there is no problem. Nobody would have complained if the 970 would have been advertised as an 3,5GB card. The problems started when people discovered it 3 months after release...
>>54395011
It still hurts, anon. How could they do this?
>>54395090
I don't think people care that much about their missing 512MB.
A bigger problem is when a game thinks it can use the full 4GB, which it actually has, but slow down drastically because Nvidia fucked up.
>>54395036
locked and loaded.
>>54395096
'Cuz /g/ lubes up first.
Pic related, the 280x (aka 7970ghz) murdering a 770. This also says nothing of hawaii versus big kepler.
>>54395161
Post up to date drivers anon, we are up to 365.xx branch now, the GTX 970 gets over 100FPS on Black Ops 3 now.
>>54395036
>that jpg compression
It's like you used ms paint from windows xp to save that.
>>54395131
Wonder if they will eventually fix this. But making the driver report 3,5GB would be fully admiting that the card is flawed... For now one can only hope that the driver will able to keep up the good work in keeping load under 3,5. And considering the huge success of the 970 I am quite sure nvidia wont dump it right away when the new gen hits.
>>54395193
I would be very surprised if the 970 flatout doubled performance at 1440p.
>>54395193
damn, 100fps??
thats amazing
im glad i chose the nvidia family of products
>>54395221
most of the time drivers do that
I set GTAV to the limit, so it reported that it's going to use ~4080MB VRAM, while afterburner reported something around 3500-3550. After a while it shat itself to 12 fps when vram hit 3700MB. alttabing off and on fixed it.
>>54395221
Have they not fixed it? I'm sure there were huge issues with the memory allocation that were fixed in a driver update. I'm asking because I'm thinking of buying one of these pieces of shit as they go cheap.
>>54395221
>>54395260
>>54392029
>Nvidia shills actually defending this
Can't wait for Polaris to BTFO nvidia
>>54395275
Yep, just like that.
This is what you get for being an early adopter.
>creating complete shill/shitpost threads before any actial confirmed info is released, be it amdtards or nvidiots doesn't matter.
Why do i bother coming to this board again?
>>54392029
>nVidia struggling against ancient GCN technology
AMD IS FUKKEN MAD YOU HEAR ME
FUKKEN MAD
>>54395275
This is fucking bullshit. I have a meme card and GTA V and there is no such thing as stuttering on fucking 1080p.
>>54395567
yeah, no http://webm.land/w/P6TF/
in settings it says 4189MB and 4082MB, but in reality it's 3500 when it's smooth and 3700 when it shits itself
>>54392029
Why does anyone here even care? We've all got it's not like any of us have ti cards.
I've got a plain-jane 980 and it works fine.
>>54395601
Good to know I have a magic gtx 970 card then
>>54395647
set msaa to 8x, everything to max, drive around the map for a while and then report back
>>54395654
>msaa to 8
Are you retarded? Do you also want 4k?
>>54395672
I want VRAM usage to be between 3,5 and 4,0GB
it runs at around 30-40 fps with that AA
>>54395684
I put literally everything on max and I'm driving around at 30-40 fps just like you said and there's no stuttering whatsoever. Pic related is the vram.
>>54395780
then start drivin at fast speed across the city, so game has to load more resources
at some point drivers simply shits itself and lets vram usage go above 3.5GB and framerate hits the floor
>>54395792
What is your CPU? I have literally NEVER had a single stutter in this game ever and I play for the most part with the vram above 3.5gbs. I have an i7 3770 though.
>>54395803
[email protected]
when vram goes through that 3.5 barrier, framerate plummets like wall street in 1929
>>54392029
>980 ti owners got next gen performance a year earlier
>will still have flagship performance for another year
>all for $150 extra
sounds alright
was afraid it would be 30% or something
>>54395856
Mini recording I just did. In any case why would you ever set msaa to 8x? You do know that shit is a massive resource hog, right?
if you bought a gtx970 after finding out about the 3.5 you're just a fucking idiot.
>>54395991
Because I have the right to use it.
And as I said earlier, play for a while and sooner or later that card will shit itself because of vram issue.
>>54396020
You also have "the right" to use 4k as well, doesn't mean you should. And for the record, I kept driving for over 4 minutes and no stutter.
You do know gta is optimized like ass and a lot of people have trouble with it, right? Put that thing on an SSD asap.
>>54396040
>GTA V is optimized like ass
>You should expect 4fps using 8x MSAA
>>54396040
>doesn't mean you should
that's what they say about using more than 3.5GB of vram.
Game doesn't shit itself because it can't handle loading assets. It goes to 12fps when vram is at 3700 or 3800. I can leave it like that for many minutes and it won't get any higher.
That vram is faulty and you can't deny that.
>>54396085
You SHOULD expect a massive performance loss because msaa 8x is literally a massive hog that is akin to fucking 4k.
>>54396108
You do know that most of the vram gta uses is for caching, right? What you listed isn't even what exceding the vram does anyway. When you exceed the vram your game should STUTTER, which means the fps would tank and then it would go back up. It DOES NOT stay low, that has absolutely nothing to do with how exceding vram works.
>>54395684
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6MDUjFiUR4
>>54393704
>>54393912
Clock speed is ultimately a useless metric when comparing two different architectures, but it sure is a great marketing tool. Nvidia are doing this right.
>>54395260
>>54395275
>>54395601
>>54395654
>>54395684
>>54395792
>>54395856
>>54396020
>>54396108
get a load of this falseflagging shill
literally btfo by >>54396167
>>54396144
oh yeah, except for the fact that when vram is at 3683MB at given place, game renders at 14fps, but when vram drops to 3300MB, game renders at 50fps
it's totally not nvidia-gimped-shit related
if denying the truth makes you happy, keep on doing that
>>54396243
>bbut that card isn't gimped guys, I swear
yeah right. When someone spits in your face, you keep telling yourself that it's raining.
>>54396167
More videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW-H0qNw38M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COEwgUI6D3w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljHgKO1E3s4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEnZO3DiywY
You people don't even know how this issue affects anything. The card can use it's full 4 gb of vram 95% of the time. The only time any issues will arise is when the resources in the last 0.5gb segment are fully remapped, which very few games do. It would be like a game having a textures and resources for dry terrain which suddenly change to wet resources and textures instantaneously. The last segment of vram will be slow when doing this conversion which can potentially cause slight lag and micro stutter.
>>54396393
Please, hush. You have no idea in the slightest of what you're talking about. Stop being a shill for one day in your life. Let people make their own decisions on what they want to buy.
>>54393905
It's your cpu you fucking retard
>>54394029
sure thing. Maxwell supports DX12 approx. as well as the GeForce FX did support DX9. On paper yes, in practice... rather not.
>friday night, 2AM
>you won't want to miss it
>>54396514
slide it, shlomo
>>54396601
Can't wait for nVidia to relase their new 2000 dollar graphics cards!
>>54392550
Because my six-year-old GPU isn't quite cutting it anymore and I might as well get the newest shit if I'm getting something new.
Eh, doesn't matter to me. I won't be upgrading til the 1080 ti anyhow. Then these two 980 Ti's will go into a second system I'll throw in living room on the tv.
>>54396684
what are you? poor?
>>54396673
>8xmsaa ultra on any video card
You seriously have to be an inbred retard to blame the graphics card for fucking up with these stupid settings. I can have 3 titan x's and I still won't be able to play any game at 8xmsaa without stuttering.
>>54396601
>Nvidia UK
Which means it's prime-time for the USA. You didn't really think Nvidia would do a separate stream for Europoors with a country that's literally barely as big as a single US state, did you?
>>54396746
yes
>>54396749
Shh kiddo, just look at the vram usage and framerate. Shitty, huh? Now let me alt+tab to desktop and back on, so it sorts itself out.
>>54395131
Basically this. If they simply locked off the final 512MB there would be no performance issues because the real problem only comes when you actually try to use that memory.
>>54396790
>>54396749
Oh look, when vram dropped below that magic 3.5GB, framerate went up.
But NVIDIA™ would never lie, there's no vram issue!
>>54396673
>>54396790
wait how do we even know this guy has a 970? the guy could be using some shitty low end amd card with 4gb vram and blaming his shit performance on his shit card on the 970. this video practically proves him wrong so im almost sure he's false flagging >>54396167
>>54395471
>not coming to 4chan to argue over petty bullshit during your free time
>>54396847
>b-b-but it can't be like that
>>54396847
Nice try Sanjay, we'll get 'em next time!
>>54396903
>GPU temperature
>8
Lel, nice shooting yourself in the foot
>>54396951
no, that's power in percent of TDP
you never used afterburner, right kiddo? Labels are on top, not on the bottom.
>>54396969
>Labels are on top, not on the bottom.
Only Europoors are retarded enough to do this
>>54396951
That's the percentage of the power limit being used, you dumb fuck.
>>54396903
>single hand accounts of no problems frpm an anon in this thread
>video evidence of this not being an issue
Yeah nah. I'll believe the actual evidence and not some guy with a faulty card.
>>54396993
>MSI
>European
nip ning chong fong, senpai
>>54396757
well it's the same for the rest of europe but that's not the point.
the tweet is just hilarious because you can't expect people to watch that shit at such a time.
WHO THE FUCK CARES
As soon as this gets released there will be another, faster GPU and you manchildren will start posting about that instead.
>>54396903
>failing the edit this hard
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>54397117
the circle of life
>>54392029
Nah fuck amd I am done with their fucking bullshit. I bought a 390 based on the retards on this site saying it was better than a 970 yet I get fucking terrible performance compared to friends who have 970's and the same cpu as me. Fuck amd, they're fucking finished. I can't wait to buy the 1070.
>>54394484
>>54392618
It's ok when Nvidia does it
>>54394029
>more features
Oh yes I'm sure Conservative Rasterization is a major feature that will be used in every game. I mean it isn't like it's almost fucking useless except for a specific transparency implementation.
>>54397799
Conservative Rasterization is a god send, thanks to it we have more efficient and better AA algorithms, but you won't know about that seem it how you think it can only be used for transparency implementation.
>>54396903
>>54396837
>>54396790
I don't have this issue.
I think you've got a hardware problem there, probably PSU or CPU.
>>54398048
the only hardware problem is the gtx shitting itself
when you change settins and apply the change, so it reinitializes, it fixes itself
i.e. reflections from 8x to 2x, apply, then back from 2x to 8x, apply, and you get normal framerate instead of that bugged 17fps, and vram drops also
I don't have any other games that push vram near 4GB, so I can't test it more. And I don't feel like installing 20 dragon dick texture mods for skyrim.
>>54398100
nah m8, you've got yourself a broken PC.
You're the only one with this issue, PSU isn't supplying enough power to the card, most likely or just a hardware failure.
And for games that push to 4GB of vram, Shadow of Mordor and Watchdogs are the games that I've seen fill the 4GB completely, no issues whatsoever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COEwgUI6D3w
>>54397988
>better
MLAA is a mess and you know it.
>>54398237
What are you even about?
>>54398187
>PSU isn't supplying enough power to the card
not really
witcher 3 runs smoothly at full power, when card draws around 105-108% of tdp after oc and it doesn't get these shitty fps drops
yet when it goes into gimped 0.5GB of vram in gtav, it gets a massive fps drop
Still here sheep...still shitposting...
>>54398345
just fill a rma, why are you so stupid.
Obviously you're having an issue with your system and you refuse to do one the most basic form of troubleshooting..
>>54398187
don't listen to this asswipe. there's so much evidence posted in this thread proving that this isn't an issue. you can tell he's false flagging. no one with a perfectly functional brain will buy a product and proceed to talk about how bad it is whilst still using it. any normal person would have returned it, asked for a replacement if faulty or sold is as these gpu still sell for quite a bit of money.
>>54393732
Another void filler here. No girl, no friends. Only hope is VR gets better. Please don't take this dream away from me.
>>54398345
Different games and features will use different parts of the hardware on the GPU requiring more or less power depending on which piece hardware is being used.
TDP means jackshit , I have my card modded to 330watts, yet I've seen it hit GPU usage at 99% with only barely going above 50% power usage, sometimes going over 70% power usage while not even reaching 99% GPU usage.
these threads always just devolve into people that know what theyre talking about teaching people that think they know what theyre talking about how things work. of course, thats how it is pretty much anywhere. theres nothing really to talk about, only to teach, on the internet
>>54392131
>>54392029
The way it is meant to be played bro
>>54395275
why you should update your athlon 64
the meme
>>54398437
I realize that. Memory controller load, fb load and other things. Even fans running at 100% speed draw 3% of tdp on msi card.
But still, even in gta, being in exactly the same spot with exactly the same settings gives different results based on vram usage. Is it because of how gtav manages vram? Maybe. Maybe it tries to load/save to that gimped part, so it goes to shit. Simple way to reproduce that is to die. When you respawn at hospital, it loads surrounding assets without flushing previous ones. High usage, low framerate.
I managed to bump vram to 3700+MB while flying around in space enine and it didn't affect performance, but that game isn't gpu intensive, so yeah.
>was about to pull the trigger
>see this
Oh boy, 1070 can't come soon enough. Reference 1080 is stronger than OD'd 980ti. Hoping 1070 gets close to 980.
>>54398771
>about to pull the trigger
>on a product that isn't even out yet
>without seeing the competitor offerings
>>54398729
>I managed to bump vram to 3700+MB while flying around in space enine and it didn't affect performance, but that game isn't gpu intensive, so yeah.
are you really this stupid? seriously you can't be this stupid. you don't actively try to make the game run like shit just to make it run past 3.5gb vram. it doesn't matter if the game runs past 3.5gb in a non gpu intensive game. that's not the issue here. the issue is strictly about potential issues arising from going over that amount of vram only. the game being intensive or not should have absolutely no effect on your judgement of the vram usage. i can't believe you'd call the card going over 3.5gb vram in a non gpu intensive game a irrelevant benchmark. you literally just proved yourself that it isn't an issue but you're discarding that because the "game isn't gpu intensive".
>>54398858
Looks like it. FB usage jumps like crazy, as seen on this screenshot. It tries to read/write that gimped segment like crazy. While playing normally it's in 60s, when bugged it's in high 90s. When alttabed to desktop, usage is close to zero.
>>54393905
Arma 3's generally locked down by the server, no?
>>54398828
I meant the 970. I literally had all the parts at checkout.
>polelris
Top cuck fampai, I'm not looking back at AMD/ATI. It would be nice to see Pascal completely BTFO everything that is out on the market right now so AMD is pressured to step it up, or if they can't then maybe under cut nvidia's prices. Either way we consumers win.
>>54398917
>It would be nice to see Pascal completely BTFO everything that is out on the market right
amen. fuck amd. they're fucking trash. never fall for their memes
>>54398987
>>54398917
>they think shrunk Maxwell will BTFO anyone but your fusebox
>>54392333
Sauce?
>>54399297
That face reminded me of... The wolf among us?
But I'm not sure since I've never ever played it or saw gameplay, only couple ads on steam so I'm probably wrong.
Do we know price points for any of the cards coming out this year? The last card I bought was a 750ti years ago.
>>54392029
I received my 980ti in the mail 2 days ago. What does this mean for me?
Paid $520 after rebate on newegg. Can't find any solid word about the new cards, all just speculation so I decided not to wait.
>>54398437
Wow champ, has it occurred to you it might be physically impossible for your card to draw and use 330 watts?
I can mod my GPU's BIOS to have an upper limit of 250w, but fuck me it's just an old 7870
>>54399562
It means that you're a fucking retard. Saying that you couldn't find out that new cards were just around the corner is utter bullshit. It's been widely reported that they were coming around June for months. It's been known for a week or more that Nvidia are holding a press event to show them off tomorrow.
Enjoy having paid extra for 2GB less VRAM, 20% less performance and 50% more power consumption, cuckboi. :^)
>>54399615
>physically impossible for your card to draw and use 330 watts
What the fuck are you talking about? Lots of cards have two 8-pin PCIe connectors, good for 150W each. Add the 75W from the slot and you can draw way over 330W and remain within spec.
>>54397695
It's ok when AMD does it.
>>54392029
>GTX 1080 benchmarks leak: Does not outperform 980ti
Don't worry, it'll outperform the 980ti once driver updates will start gimping it in new games.
>GTX 1080 is only a little bitter than 980 ti
>980 ti is only a little better than a 980
>980 is only a little better than a 780 ti
>780 ti is a little better than 780
>GTX 780 released 2013
>The only difference between playing games on a GTX 780 and GTX 680 is frame rate and resolution. Actual graphical fidelity is 99% identical.
How many years until video games actually look better than they did in 2010?
>just bought evga 960
>will submit a step up for a gtx 1080
feels gud. thank you evga. never let me down.
btw my old gtx 570 was my fav
>>54392194
people pulling numbers out of their ass
my 980TI gives me ~27000 3dm11
and 9701 in firestrike
1080 = disappoint
>>54399652
Fire up a program that will absolutely max out your maxed out card and show me it will use 100% of that (or as close as theoretically possible)
That japanese guy's tripcode searcher is built for both opencl and cuda.
>>54394029
Yeah and Nvidia marketing managed to trick people into thinking that AMD cannot into DX10 because they had them beaten in tessellation, in scenarios where you have more triangles in a strand of hair than you have pixels.
How does it feel to have the ice cream licking back?
>>54399652
It's okay. I think if this is the worst thing that ever happens to me I'll persevere.
Also, I knew the cards were coming out. Just not what that entailed. I haven't unboxed it yet so I can still return it if I change my mind in the next week or so.
>>54394733
>1080gtx is 130w....
>>54394733
>1080gtx is 130w....
source for this pls
>>54392029
30% more than 980 Ti? That's beautiful.
>>54392550
Oh I don't game. I just like having the hardware and knowing I COULD game if I wanted to.
>7168 + 1024 MB VRAM
>>54399297
BioShock infinite
>>54399976
:^)
>>54399544
>>54399297
It's Bioshock Infinite.
>>54392029
Core clock 570mhz? Does that seem right? Shouldn't it be at least 1,000?
I'd really recommend never buying a x80 series card. Stick with the x70 until the x80 Ti comes out. Hasn't failed me for a couple gens.
>>54399562
That raw performance is good for $500. But Nvidia will gimp Maxwell.
>>54399731
They have looked better since 2014
>>54392550
@1080p? Nothing. My 290x maxes everything at 1080p. But if you're running things at 4k some games require more than that.
>>54394490
as expected of any novideo's kid
>>54401332
Why not buy a 80 card now, 80Ti later when it comes out?
>>54402865
why keep buying and selling cards so frequently? why pay for a card that gives you poor bang for your buck?
>>54402865
You could and I have done that but it's a waste of money usually as the 80 price tanks when the Ti comes out.
>>54392550
3D & VR
>>54401375
I called newegg and the guy I spoke to said I could send back the card for a refund and then just wait until the 1080 launches, no questions asked. It's unopened so there shouldn't be a restocking fee.
>>54402865
why don't people just buy every card that comes out?
>>54403166
Last gen I own a 970, dual 980's, and then dual 980 Ti's. I seriously need help.
>>54403298
So you do it because of the placebo efect, right? Like audiophiles, you need serious help.
>>54403603
The worst part is I only play Dota.
>>54396397
>You people don't even know how this issue affects anything.>
The card can use it's full 4 gb of vram 95% of the time.
BUT IT CAN'T!
IT CAN EITHER READ OR WRITE THE 3.5GB OR READ OR WRITE THE 0.5GB.
BEFORE IT CAN ACCESS EITHER ONE OF THESE MEMORY-REGIONS, ALL OTHER TRANSACTIONS HAVE TO BE FINISHED, AKA SLOW DOWN.
![Crysis2_2[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ga2YILo.jpg "Crysis2_2[1].jpg")
>>54401392
Not nearly enough imo
>>54392550
I have a 560ti and it's getting shit on.
>tfw only going to have a goat gpu for 12 months
How much is the value going drop on a used 980ti after these ones release?
>>54404653
Depends on AMD, 980ti could drop 100-200.
But don't expect much to change after Nvidia releases theirs first
>>54392550
>I'm poor and play old trash pls upvote
>>54403830
That's literally what the post says.
>>54404653
people are struggling to sell them for $500 used. the window to make the most money back on your previous generation card has passed.
still waiting for vega to upgrade anyways, going to be fun watching the shit flinging for the next couple of months.
>>54396397
>>54403830
nVididiots will actually defend this.
>>54405529
I have a 390 and I'd take the 970 any day of the week. I even posted my specs in the other thread. The 390 and it's drivers are absolute fucking trash. One of the worst investments anyone could make with amds constant shit performance, bad autodesk drivers and black screens.
As an amd user I'd highly recommend you buy nvidia next time round. Fuck amd.
>bought a 290x a year ago
>tfw i didn't fall for the wait meme
feels good this thing runs everything on ultra
>>54405529
As you can see from the videos linked, it's very rarely an issue hence why no one has this problem. You can fanboy all you want but that won't stop me from buying the cheaper 970. I'm not going to spend £30 more on a 390. I can buy a whole game with that money or even some RAM or case fans.
>>54394772
This
>>54392518
Your stupidity is showing again. Contain it.
Don't wanna quote all the 970 fuckers.
Maybe you man children should stop playing games, and do something productive.
I also own a 970, but I never complain about the VRAM, because I dont game like a child!
Lower some settings and that is it, should have done some research before getting it.
>>54405718
nobody cares if you want to cuck yourself idiot. you're the one who has to live with your decision.
>>54405793
Dude, the only people who have problems seem to be amd fanboys who are apparently concerned about everyone. They've been told time and time again to let people make their own decisions yet they keep coming back trying to imply they care about you.
>>54405793
>do something productive
>4chan
kill yourself retard
....
holy shit you are retarded
>>54405858
>he's unironically trying to get someone to spend more money for worse performance just to buy his beloved ayymd
This is gold. I knew amdrones were bigger shills than sonyponys but this is something else.
>>54405963
but i have a 980 you absolute fucking idiot. i owned a 970 and i wouldn't recommend it to anyone other than poorfags who can get one for $200 or less.
speccy for proof because i know you're a nvidia cock sucker.
r9 390 8gb >>>>>> dog shit > 970 3.5gb
>>54405590
>>54405718
samefag
>>54405993
Dude I had a 390. It's fucking trash. I'm >>54405590 and I've had nothing but problems with amd. I'd take a 970 any day of the week. I can't even redeem my free fucking game that came with my card because amd are full of such colossal Faggots.
For anyone considering amd. Don't buy into the /g/ memes. Amd are fucking trash and nvidia are way superior.
>>54406068
>It's fucking trash.
You are just dumping this and explaining no reason why the card is trash.
