>>54383207
The OS is ok, but every android app is still designed around tablets and phones, using them with a keyboard and mouse is awkward at best. Like trying to use a windows desktop program on a tablet.

>>54383217

How's the performance though? I'm thinking about replacing Windows with it on my Intel Z3735f HTPC system.

>>54383268
Can't imagine it would run that badly. But again, there's no point since no apps are designed to run on a desktop.

I ran it as a liveusb on my netbook but had to stop because it was so shit. You get all of the lack of basic functionality as a phone/tablet OS with all of the lag of Android now on your desktop.

>>54383207
Literally shilled here
And it sucks

>>54383207
Lagdroid for the desktop. What do you expect?

>>54383207

No but now that you mention it I wonder what it'd be like on my x86 Chink tablet (Vi8)

>>54383207
got it to dual boot on my tablet because android x86 refuse to work on it for some reason.

its ok, everything just werks.
i obviously wouldn't use it as my main desktop, but its way better for gaming and running apps than any emulators