Post your task manager, baka senpai.
>>54362630
You can't tell me what to do! You're not my dad!
>>54362630
>tfw didn't fall for the 1024 GiB RAM meme
>>54362630
>1024GB of ram
Do you work for the NS of A?
No one mentions the 160 cores
>>54362630
Where the fuck does 44 GB go???
Also
>160 cores
>>54362983
Well its an 8 socket machine with 8, 10 core 12 thread CPUs. For a total of 80 cores and 160 threads.
It might not be the NSA, but it's not the bakery down the street I can tell you that.
>>54362983
No, I like having extremely instant access to my collection of anime. :^)
>>54363054
*20 thread
my phone auto corrected cause even it knows 20 threads is retarded.
![mygod[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Xh5elrO.jpg "mygod[1].jpg")
>>54362630
my god it's full of cores
>>54363053
Chrome
>>54363083
I still can't comprehend it. Are you watching every fucking thread on every fucking board while buffering 4k porn in the background while having 30 YouTube tabs opened???
Ray trace something in 1080p using pov-ray with+A0.0, +Q12parameters plox.
>>54362630
Fujitsu Primergy RX900 S2?
>>54362630
>not using procexp
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/processexplorer
DEHSGOOSTIN
>>54362630
No please don't do that
>>54362630
can it run Crisis at 60fps?
Doesn't microsoft charge you per core?
>>54362630
DL970? I don't know who else makes an 8 socket machine.
>>54363329
n-no?
am I missing something?
>>54363573
They charge per socket.
>>54362630
How can I get this view of CPUs in task manager on Server 2012 R2?
>>54362630
POST RACK BB
What do you use it for and how much does it cost?
My schools in the process of commissioning a 20TB ram node for our cluster. Fucking scientists and their matricies
>>54363702
Looks good, but it's still Mint.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/b8/2011/10/27/using-task-manager-with-64-logical-processors/
OP is a faggot
>>54363702
Kek (Me)
Poorfag server reporting in.
Upgrade and virtualisation coming in this weekend
>>54363822
What is this? HP Microserver g8?
>>54362630
Sucks on single-core performance though desu senpai
>>54363856
These word filters work pretty well i even used some homoglyphes tbhfam
>>54363840
Self built computer using used parts off ebay running Server 2012 R2 + few Intel NICs.
It serves me well so I'm doubling the ram, SSD, and putting i3 onto it this weekend in order to do few VMs in Hyper-V.
>>54363856
Single thread performance is actually pretty solid, i mean it was ~$4,200 per CPU, and he has 8 of them.
>>54363909
But it's only @ 2.40GHz
>>54363949
it's still Westmere-EX.
And obviously if he has that many threads and cores, parallel processing is far more important than pure clock speed.
>>54362630
What is this machine for?
>>54363995
Minecraft
2012-r2 is just a VM
host is running proxmox (debian)
I am amazing.
sup
>>54364010
totally worth it then
>>54362630
>160 cores
>Virtualization Disabled
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>54362630
>>54364565
just because virtulization is a good use of more cores does NOT mean that is the ONLY use for more cores, retard.
>people are selling these for 100 bucks a pop on eBay
WHAT
What the fuck happened?
>>54363254
>Memoria
>>54364688
They only work in higher end server motherboards which run several hundred dollars.
Posting but kind of embarrassed at my rig vs OP's
>>54364816
>>54364510
same cpu brofist
>>54364777
Nice trips
>>54362630
Anything else is shit
>>54364107
htop ftw!
>>54364874
MARK RUSSINOVICH MASTER RACE
>>54364882
yerp
Wheeeeeeeee!
At least it's more than 4 cores
>>54363081
I love star trek!
>>54362630
Can I have your computer?
Thanks in advance
>>54362630
>Virtualisation: Disabled
What would you even do with such a machine?
>>54362630
>>54363054
8 Sockets? How is this possible? Most I've seen is 4!
>>54367049
Most major server manufacturer makes 4 and 8 socket servers now. They tend to cost $80,000+ though.
>>54366001
>Star Trek
Oh anon you made me kek
>>54364282
Why does this look weird, explain.
>>54362630
Neat
>>54367319
>80,000
That explains why I haven't seen any of those! My server has two sockets and even that's overkill for me.
>>54363822
If it doesn't have a Xeon or Opteron CPU and ECC memory then it's not a server
>>54367682
Well I know the 8 socket 18 core per socket from Fujitsu starts around $160,000, I am sure the 10 core CPU version costs a decent bit less, but I wouldn't be shocked by $100,000 or more depending on support, RAM, NICs, and HDD/SSD selection.
>>54364123
With just 2gb of ram you should probably get a decent linux distro. Doubt you can play games anyways.
>>54363054
Why is that even running Windows and not some headess linux server or some shit
1tb of ram wtf
>>54367915
There are servers that support 12TB of RAM.
My shit system
lol good enough for me
>>54368325
>Six-Core
>implying
Even Windows sees through AMD's lies and correctly reports 3.
>>54367720
>>54367319
You could probably buy a used 64-core opteron server on ebay for cheap these days, if you really just wanted more cores in your task manager for some reason...
Anyway, here's mine.
Here. 48 cores. close enough.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dell-PowerEdge-815-Server-4x-AMD-Opteron-6234-2-40GHz-12-Core-64GB-2x-300GHz-/262395344268
Build is from 2009, no need for upgrade.
>>54370309
your basically out of ram
Ehhh..
>>54363822
M8 I ran a file server off a dual core celeron 1.5ghz for two years. Celeron 1007u is bretty gud.
This'll have to do
>>54370518
what gnome theme is that
>>54362630
>all that power
>Windows 10
>>54367611
why the fuck is your home screen using CPU when your in settings
>>54370518
what desktop environment is that?
>>54372388
Not that guy, but it's Arc Dark. Some guy named Horst3180 (or something similar) made it.
>>54362630
Fucking fight me.
>>54362630
>Windows installed on a server
You aren't impressing anyone.
>>54374274
How to spot a jobless aspie: the post
99% of all corporations around the world uses Windows Server for their critical systems.
>>54374363
And another 120% use OS X.
>>54374363
>99% of all corporations around the world uses Windows Server for their critical systems.
I work as a sysadmin in the real world and everything runs on linux
Even windows-heavy environments have their mail, domain etc. servers run on linux
>>54374425
No, most companies uses office 365 for mail services, unless we're talking about governmental organizations.
>>54374425
>domain servers run on linux
hahahahaha, this is the most stupid shit I've seen today on /g/.
Windows Server is mostly used exactly because of AD. Just because you use samba on your home server doesn't mean it's gonna work stable and reliable for 5000+ users around the world.
Kys.
>>54372622
windows server 2012 r2 most likely
>>54374805
Well, I'm talking about the types of companies that would need on-premise sysadmins.
>>54363698
Fucking scientists
>>54374825
>Windows Server is mostly used exactly because of AD. Just because you use samba on your home server doesn't mean it's gonna work stable and reliable for 5000+ users around the world.
Just checked, our samba/ldap domain controller serves an average of about 100 users concurrently, with about 10,000 registered users total.
>>54362630
>tfw fell for 1024 Gib meme
>>54375778
You mean GiB, right?
b = bit
B = byte = 8 bits
>>54363054
The real question: what do you do with this beast?
>>54376886
I'm trying to compute your mother's mass.
>>54362630
I'm actually super jealous. I could use that machine....
>>54362630
mirin your hardware OP
is that a server or a workstation?
if a workstation, how large is it actually?
>>54367049
HP Integrity Superdome
>>54377413
those can fit 32 sockets
>>54367873
Because SURPRISE! Linux isn't actually that fucking useful for a huge majority of tasks, especially when the rest of your work domain is windows based.
>>54363329
That's VMWare
>>54364107
>Connected to a VM
>To use Putty
>To remote into the host machine
why.
>>54374201
Are you blind?
>>54374425
>I work as a sysadmin in the real world and everything runs on linux
>>54362630
All dat RAM and cores gone to complete waste with Windows..
>>54367703
Fuck you!
>>54377274
How did you unlock NUMA nodes view under Windows 8.1?
>>54378019
Familia~
>>54378060
>8.1
I don't think that's 8.1...
poorfag reporting
>>54378138
It doesn't look like Server 2012/R2
in 2012 you can't change the default disgusting theme.
>>54378228
Why, familia, why?
xp is like 15 years old already, and the x64 version is absolutely disgusting
>>54378228
>CPU: 0%
what
>>54378501
centos 6 x86 minimal
>>54378474
>just because is old have to be bad
your mom is not bad in bed
>>54378458
you can if you install desktop experience from features
>>54378528
>no device drivers
thats why I stopped using XP x64 the moment vista released, despite vista being shit.
>>54378528
She's dead. And xp x64 has no drivers, no software support and no security updates. It's more vulnerable and insecure than your personality.
>>54378561
>>54378554
everything just working fine in here
also running in ahci
>>54362630
You have more RAM than I have disk space.
>>54362630
why would you cripple that thing with windows?
fuck you
>>54377501
>Linux isn't actually that fucking useful for a huge majority of tasks
Except 96% of all public servers on the interwebs are running Linux.
>>54378968
Citation?
>http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/operating_system/all
>Unix
>67.7%
>Windows
>32.3%
>>54379034
http://www.w3cook.com/os/summary/
>>54379034
>>54379124
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Public_servers_on_the_Internet
Both numbers (yours and mine) are based on different interpretations and samples of the Alexa ranking.
>*shrugs*
>>54379221
i doubt its under 5-10%, i could believe 15-20% though.
>>54374363
I work for an organization with 30,000 active users, and about 80% of our servers run Linux/Solaris. We have 4 RHEL Samba servers, 2x as a load balanced domain controller, 2x load balanced taking care of our 20TB share. We also have 4 load balanced RHEL LDAP servers. We do have a single Windows AD policy server thrown in the mix, though.
Mail used to run on Linux, but has since been migrated to Office365.
>>54379265
I work for a company with a over 1000 stores in several countries.
Everything is Windows...
>>54374425
Odd, Because I work as a sysadmin in the real world, and most companies use windows. The only times they don't are when they let one sperglord IT they hired at startup build their infrastructure before their software and service needs were fully developed. Then they end up in a world of shit every time they need to expand or integrate new services.
>>54362630
nice cores
>>54362630
nice kvm brah
Life is suffering
>>54379345
>most companies use windows
Based on what random sample, my good sir? Just because you haven't witnessed violent crimes doesn't mean they are not common elsewhere.
Needs more cores.
>>54362630
>uptime
fag
gao
>>54364107
>>54364882
Htop Woot,
love da custom options
>>54372622
You are retarded if you can't tell that is win8
![2bdcba633b[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/2Y9dHR2.jpg "2bdcba633b[1].png")
>>54374363
>99% of all corporations around the world uses Windows Server for their critical systems.
>dat bait
b-but OP-san...
>>54380517
>six-core processor
>Cores: 3
even windows can see through the marketing.
>>54380534
Yup, 3 cores 6 modules, its not hiding anything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldozer_(microarchitecture)
Still blows any 4core Intel CPU out of the water.
>>54380576
>any 4core Intel CPU out of the water
uhh...
Maybe in something SUPER highly threaded.
But it would be a rare program, and probably only a synthetic benchmark would consistently show the AMD beating a current intel i5.
>>54380632
Go google some benchmarks with single core performance against i5's
It is superb in multithreading against Intel, that was its selling point back in 2011, but it's not a bad CPU at all.
Looking how Quad cores are still costing more then the old FX from 2011 what's brand new right now around 90eur.
Just checking some benchmarks shows that the single core performance against a HT'd 8core i5 is same and multi core just barely lower score (12%).
>>54380762
With both CPUs at stock, an i5-6600 and an FX-6300, the i5-6600 is almost double the single core performance in Cinebench 10
Are you high or are you just cherry picking benchmarks that make your AMD look better?
>>54380830
Are you comparing a Q3 2015 CPU with a 2011 CPU?
>>54380869
see
>>54380576
>Still blows ANY 4core Intel CPU out of the water.
>>54380887
Guess not the new ones.
What its worth it was a good CPU back when I bought it.
>>54380926
I wont argue that, Fx-6300 was fine on a budget for when it was released.
However, any current intel will destroy it in single core performance.
BUMP FOR JESUS MOTHERFUCKERS
WE NEED MORE CORES
SHOW ME ALL YOU GOT, /g/
>>54367703
/thread
>>54372082
Gnome3. Using Arc-Dark. Should say it in the screenfetch I posted.
>>54380632
>Maybe in something SUPER highly threaded.
6 threads aren't many threads senpai, stop living in 2006
