Get in, pussy. We're finishing amd off.
>>54358413
Finishing... like 3.5 eva?
No, you aren't. Here's a better pic of the supposed 1080 though.
>>54358460
fpbp
>>54358413
>maxwell shrink
>>54358469
It's literally the same pic but cropped. How can you say it's better?
>At the Battlefield 5 event
>Meaning it will only be an unveiling event, no pricing or dates for GPU
>>54358413
>mfw the gtx 1080 can only display at 1080p because of vram bottlenecks
>>54358460
Cute gondola, mind if I save it?
I don't care whether Nvidia or AMD, but to be honest both suck nowadays.
Haven't released a decent product for a long time.
Remember the 4200Ti and such? Those were decent cards.
I will watch the performance-price ratio and see which one delivers the better.
>no cart connector
nice try dickmunch
>>54358413
B-but there only half a seat left.
>>54358460
holy shit that bant
It needs to be called the gtx80 calling it the 1080 is stupid
>>54358818
/thread
>>54358849
It's a marker of the maximum resolution you can attain before the card goes to shit due to its 256-bit bus and gimped VRAM.
>>54358579
be my guest anon
>>54358950
What about the 1070?
>>54359160
7.5Gb confirmed. Not kidding.
>>54359235
>>54359160
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-3dmark-11-entries-spotted/
>>54358413
http://www.techpowerup.com/222007/amd-polaris-10-ellesmere-as-fast-as-gtx-980-ti-rumor
>>54358500
It's better because you haven't posted it
>Fury X beats 980ti in 4k since last year
>980ti beats Fury X in 1080p and sometimes 1440p
>fast forward a few months
>DX12 pushed out
>Fury X blows Nvidia's shit
http://youtu.be/_sAjXKxCW6Y [Open]
GeFags on suicide watch
>DICE ditches AMD for nVidia
welp i guess i'm buying pascal then. i don't want no gimped bf5 performance on amd.
>>54359514
I don't think so.
>>54358413
There's no way in hell it actually looks like that. That would be the worst looking graphics card *ever*. Worse than the old ATI cards that were practically in cardboard boxes.
>>54359596
think whatever you want. that won't stop me from changing my mind from 2 490x's to 2 1070's so i can play bf5 in all its triple monitor glory. battlefield is the biggest fps of the year and i'm not going to purposely cuck myself with worse hardware and performance just to buy amd again.
nvidia have won me over with this.
>>54359697
won you over with rumor?
Literally nothing official is out senpai, calm down.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1598893/tt-nvidia-to-unveil-next-gen-geforce-on-the-same-day-as-battlefield-5/100
http://www.overclock.net/t/1599091/twitter-orderof10-packages-from-nvidia-are-showing-up-everywhere
Nvidia have never EVER hyped a new launch up so much.
>>54358413
Dammit why these stupid cards wont come out already, my pc is on life support and i need a new one asap and now i'm gonna have to hang by a thread and buy this shit like a retard as soon as it comes out
>>54359250
>currytech
post disregarded.
>>54359697
Dude, the game is using Frostbite engine, which is the one Star wars is using. There is no way nvidia will perform better in BF5.
>GTX 1080
Should went with GTX 4K
What a blunder
>>54359780
it doesn't matter what engine it runs on. it depends on what features are implemented to benefit each graphics card company. even with mantle nvidia cards outperformed amd in bf4. amd outperformed nvidia in sw:bf.
>>54359839
Nvidia BTFO all amd cards once you start overclocking.
>>54359720
This could mean they either have something that will be above and beyond what we expect, or it's DISTRACTION HYPE for what they know will be an utterly disappointing failure. Only time will tell.
>>54359864
>>54359864
>once you start overclocking
AKA buy next years cards. as that is all AMD does.
>>54359839
>it doesn't matter what engine it runs on.
Yeah, even if the engine uses DX12 instead of DX11?
>>54359880
>meme resolution
>30%+ of all steam users at 1080p
>less than 5% use any higher resolution
try harder
>>54359910
yep. all upcoming graphics cards fully support dx12.
>>54359945
>980 ti
>1080p
lol?
>>54359945
>Maxwell
>relevant
It's 2016, fag. AMD is going to crush the rebranded Pascal architecture of Nvidia this coming generation.
>>54359945
>what are millions of smurf accounts skewing
>what are useless BR and cyka stats
>more pixels are memes because I can't have them ;-;
Wew
>>54359960
The gtx 9xx series does not have full dx12 support, yet nvidia claimed they had. If I were you, I would believe nvidia, since it seems pascal is a maxwell shrink.
ayy lmao
>same performance as 980Ti but with less power usage.
>finishing amd off.
>>54359991
>>54360079
'no'
however much you delude yourself into believing nvidia is going to flop and amd is going to have global domination it'll never be the reality.
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-specs/
>>54358413
>1 fan
>small fan
How about no?
>>54360124
>300 Watts
>15.3 billion transistors
>610 mm2
>HBM2
>Only 55% faster than Maxlel
>Not available to server OEMs until 2017
>Not available to consumers ever
Reminder that NVIDIA has a lot more GPU market share than AMD and that any success for AMD is beneficial to NVIDIA customers.
>>54360124
> posting a card not hitting the consumer market for close to a year
> posting a card that's designed around fp64 and fp16 performance
> posting a card that's only modestly better at fp32 (9.5-10.6 TFLOPS) than current cards (8.6 for Fiji)
GP100 is like Fermi/Hawaii on steroids, not the second coming of stripped down Maxwells.
Could i play witcher 3 in 4K on decent settings at around 40 fps with the new cards?
>filthy casual couch gamer
>>54358413
it seems that they have removed tessellation from their cards
>>54360366
I can play Witcher 3 with a mix of high and ultra settings at 1440p and 40 - 50 fps with an R9 390, so you should be able to achieve 40 fps @4K with a mix of medium / high settings and the new cards.
A friend tells me AMD has better color saturation. Is that true? I'm using nvidia
>>54360135
That's just the reference model.
>>54358413
Yeah, no.
AMD will sell 350$ VR capable cards en masse making getting two cheaper than titan and Nvidia moves from GPU to tesla business entirely.
>>54360407
it's an old wives tale
>>54359235
>>54359250
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ANE2verd1dk
>>54358413
the 390/390X series is going to dominate for quite a while now.
very few people are looking to drop a thousand dollars on a new video card, for what exactly?
for a few hundred with AMD you can play new games with everything on high and get over 60 fps 99% of the time.
No async and better? Yea if you wanna run DX 9 games at 1000 fps and get silky smooth 24 fps in anything vulkan/dx12
>>54360419
"With the HDMI (or incorrect DisplayPort) connection the GPU sends out a ‘Limited Range RGB 16-235’ colour signal rather than the ‘Full Range RGB 0-255’ signal the monitor is designed to process and indeed sends out via DVI or correctly functioning DisplayPort. Without going into the intricacies of how these colour signals differ, there is a definite mismatch between the colour signal sent to the monitor and the screens native capabilities. This disparity leaves the monitor unable to display shades with an appropriate depth and variety. Black appears an obvious dark grey (overall static contrast suffers – this is measureable) and the gamma curve is shifted such that many shades appear a lot lighter than they should. The whole image looks like it has a sort of bleached haze over it, giving what is commonly referred to as a ‘washed out look’."
Nvidia will come up with a full line up.
GTX 1060Ti , GTX 1070 and GTX 1080 will obliterate anything AMD can come up with until Vega.
Do they call it 1080, because any resolution higher will hit the memory limit?
>>54358460
kek
>>54360521
>if that happens
>will cost 700,1000,1500 dollars
>>54360521
You better hope so, considering that Nvidia cards won't be here for another six months. By then Vega will be about to hit.
>>54360573
> missed the memo that they are announcing Friday and releasing next month.
>>54358413
God, I hate asymmetrical designs......
Maybe if they invested more time in creating an effective reference design instead of trying to get artsy with the tired, old blower-cooler......
>>54360573
Ayyy, Nvidia will be the first to release their cards once again, not AMD.
I bet 100$ that Nvidia will be the first to release a card with HBM2.
All logical, considering Nvidia is the bigger and more profitable company.
>buy a 7,5GB
>run something with dx12
>no Asynchronous Shaders support
>>54358770
Check r9 380. Amazing price-performance ratio. 229.99 for 4gb gddr5, runs all my games very high/ultra @ 1080p 60-90fps. Or if you're nvidia based, try gtx 960 4gb. Lower bandwidth bus but it is quite the performer for a little lower price. I've noticed that the r9 is a little faster, in my tests
>>54360615
>Ayyy, Nvidia will be the first to release their cards once again, not AMD.
Don't expect that. We haven't seen not even one working sample from nvidia. They will probably delay them like with Fermi.
>>54360655
They are both shit cards.
>>54360650
>asynchronous meme, when literally only 1 game has implemented it properly, while others won't because little gain for too much work
>>54360650
>le async meme
>5% performance increase
kek
>>54360680
The r9 380 is a great card for a poorfag like myself, if you're slightly poor-er get the gtx 960.
Get raped and kill yourself, you retarded fucking faggot sack of shit with down syndrome.
>>54360709
I can't play games in 60 fps on my r9 380 be it few year old far cry 4 be it dark souls 3
I regret gettinging 380 I should have save up the money and buy 390
>>54358460
kek
>>54360731
Processor? I literally play those same games 60fps no problem
>>54358413
AMD radars wouldn't even see it coming.
1080ti when?
I've been waiting so long, it hurts.
>>54360760
2017
>>54360135
radial cooler is much more effective, it blows hot air out instead of distributing the head in the case.
I hope Polaris does bring 980Ti performance at less than $400. The 1070 better have that same performance or it's fucked. Also, the 980 was definitely the shittiest buy last generation, they better not follow suit. Still, none of that even matters since Nvidiots will buy them regardless and the shilling will increase dramatically. Just watch Linusshilltips defending the cards despite being shit buys. It would be fantastic if they stopped riding the Nvidia cock and throw in some banter for old time's sake.
>>54358413
>>54358469
Better sell yo 970s and 980s. They about to get gimped.
>>54359697
>Playing casual AAA garbage.
ok people I have a 3.5 memecard and it won't keep up with my 3440x1440 monitor for much longer.
what should I get if I have 500 lesbianbucks to spend?
>>54358460
eyyyyyy
>>54361243
Godbless iqbd.
I'm on the same boat. I'd rather wait for Polaris 10 or 1070 or go full good goy and buy Vega or big Pascal.
>>54361317
>3.5 fans
Holy fucking shit.
>>54361317
you wot m8
>>54360789
and yet, my windforce gets vastly lower temps than the reference cooler...
>>54359945
If you aren't rockin 1440 yet you're doing it wrong senpai.
>>54362172
>not 2560x1080
>>54358460
First post best post.
>>54362205
>falling for the 21:9 meme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXZC71Oaqjo
>>54362373
>using the "falling for the xx meme" meme
>>54362205
>not 3440x1400
>>54362428
it's 3440x1440, m8
>>54361331
>>54362479
I know, I mistyped
>>54362205
>i want my screen to be chinese
>>54362205
2560x1080 is worse than 1440p in every way possible, it's literally a 1440p monitor with the top cut off
>>54362608
I'd have to agree, if you want to go ultrawide 3440x1440 is the way to go
>>54362608
This
>>54358413
That picture.
Does it come with wood screws again?
>>54360311
if i sell icecream and my neighbour does it 81% more because they had more advertisement means , if i gain customers, my neighbour will gain more customers due to that?
>>54359945
>meme resolution
Many Ultrasharps are 1440p, what the fuck are you babbling about?
Buy Polaris or wait for Vega with HBM2?
>>54362781
That's so fucking disappointing if true.
Fuck off AMD, I don't want 2013 performance once again you fucking faggots.
>>54362976
>not waiting for HBM3
fucking pleb
>>54363004
>Fudzilla
Must be true
>>54362953
It's not the most common resolution for low-end "gamers" and as such it's a "meme"
>>54360039
>what are useless BR and cyka stats
There is literally nothing wrong with being a BR
>>54363013
>if true
But it's in-line with other rumors. 2300-2500 shaders, very low TDP, somewhat better performance per shader, gimped with 256b GDDR5. Around 390X performance is somewhat plausible.
>>54362852
Nah the wood screws was that GP100 demo board where only two of the chips out of eight actually had HBM pads attached
So the new 1070 will have the same performance as a 980 or 980ti? At The cost of a 970?
Im returning my 970 and a month
>>54363116
If it has 2560 shaders and 15%~ improved IPC then it'll be around Fury levels assuming clock speeds are equal
If this thing hits 1200mhz stock though? Fury X performance, easy. Not to mention if the hotclock rumor is true.
Fiji has a lot more shaders but it's heavily ROP limited. If anything Hawaii was ROP saturated.
>>54363125
It will cost 100-150$ more than a 970.
>>54363205
>1200mhz stock
It is 800MHz stock and possibly 1050MHz factory overclocked according to a SiSoft benchmark
>>54363205
Keep in mind though that this thing has its balls cut off with 256b of GDDR5 though. No 512b bus or HBM here.
It could potentially reach Fury X levels, but I imagine it would need GDDR5X then.
>>54363258
It can do just fine with 8000MHz memory, Hawaii was only using 6000MHz IIRC.
>>54363206
and how much better will it be
>>54363309
6000MHz but 512b. If it's not GDDR5X it's going to have bandwidth below Hawaii and most definitely below all the Furies.
>>54363346
Yes, but the faster clocked memory will somewhat compensate for the smaller bus, and if they've gotten some work done better using that bandwidth(and they probably did considering the 128but bus on P11) then there won't be a bandwidth bottleneck
>>54358413
nvidia cant into parallel processing. they cant brute force better performance past this "new" innovation AMD has been putting in thier cards for a long time now. they didnt think amd could efficiently use this and that was a stupid move. DX12 is already being used in every port coming out in 2016. If they develop something gen after next then they may have a chance. but until then they are pretty screwed.
>>54363369
Somewhat, but not entirely. I'm sure it won't have issues reaching 390 performance levels in any case, what I said was that I believe it would need GDDR5X if it's supposed to reach Fury X levels on a 256b bus.
AMD also keeps banging their drum about lowering the price point for VR, which is a 290, so basically almost the same shit as a 390. I find it very plausible that the 390 level is what AMD is aiming for with performance Polaris.
Don't get me wrong though, I own a FreeSync 4K monitor and I would absolutely fucking love it if AMD released something that can compete with a Fury X at stock, but I'm skeptical based on their statements. All they say is "price per watt", "value" and "lower price for VR" and neither of those sound like a serious upgrade in high-end performance.
>>54363455
I mean "performance per watt", derp
so in terms of performance, how can you compare them to current GPU's?
>>54363682
Polaris 11 is 4 times slower than GTX950
>>54360746
Not him but I have a r9 390 and dark souls 3 has consistent frame drops to the 40s.
im reading somewhere between 450-600 for the 1070 and somewhere between 700-950 for 1080, anyone have any real ideas what these are gonna cost?
>Make a card advertised to handle 4k
>Can only do 1080p proficiently
>>54363809
Not that much. Probably $350-$400 for the 1070 and $500-$550 for the 1080
$700 for the 1080ti and $1000 for the Titan
>>54363833
AMD?
reminder than AMD believes 20FPS is 4K ready
It's debateable whether or not you should upgrade from a 970 or higher but will it be worth it to upgrade if you have a 760?
>>54363894
>but will it be worth it to upgrade if you have a 760?
yes
>>54363323
how the fuck would anyone here know? Nvidia and AMD are being tightlipped about anything specific except the perf/watt, AMD wouldn't even show the Polaris 10 playing 1440p Hitman without an FPS cap, we literally know nothing about how well these cards will perform
>>54363868
Please work on your English skills, Pajeet. It's important that you do the necessary to ensure great profitability.
>>54363711
bullshit. also dx12 is now.
>>54363918
Crying about my English won't make 20FPS acceptable.
Amd cards are shit, and always will be shit
Stop being so butthurt about your dying company
>>54358567
>>54363952
Stop being a retard, NVIDIA loves to fuck you up the ass as it is, if they had literally no competition you'd be paying $500 for GSync modules to use with your $800 GTX 960.
AMD needs to release something not shit and offer proper software support for it or the gaming graphics card market is going to be even more fucked up than it already is.
Feels good that all the people supporting nvidia these days are either trolls or retards.
>>54363952
>your dying company
hahahahahahahahaha
pic very related
if nVidia (or Intel) jumps 50% in a single day, I'll eat a Titan.
>>54360615
this hbm capable card will be 610 mm2 on finfet 16nm and it will cost more than the titan x... you cant compare polaris with that. polaris is a low cost consumer card smaller than any pascal card and will take over the market up to the 400 dollar point due to that.
>>54358950
>3.5+5 = 4
Jews are very very evil people.
Hitler was right.
>>54364138
fuckin shit! I need to get on this.
>>54358460
/thread
>>54363952
It's like you niggas forgot all about Fermi and how Kepler has fallen behind to based Tahiti. Fuck you guys that are actually serious.
>>54362918
But you are the end user here. Nvidia having to compete more means cheaper/better products
>have GTX 970 3.5
>max out majority of what i play at 1920x1200
>occasional video editing with no hickups
>literally no problems and got it for $100 less current price
AMDfags really need to start thinking of new damage control memes.
>>54363252
An engineering sample you mean
And that's what I meant by hotclocked. If the shaders run at a different clock from the rest of the chip. Nvidia did a similar thing with the Tesla and Fermi architectures.
need
>50fps min. for 2k resolution with middle to high quality MSAA presets
>less powerdraw in heavy gaming than 160Watt
>costs less than 350€
>>54364570
Same, plus the Zotac GTX 970 is very small and fits in my Optiplex 7010
>>54361317
This can't be a real card. It's not a real card. Is it a real card?
>>54366116
I wish i had known about it before i got my 970s.
Shit looks sick senpai.
>>54366116
It's a GTX 690
>>54366116
It's real:
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/inno3d-ichill-geforce-gtx-980-and-gtx-970.html
>>54366116
>>54366826
I had one, the 980, looks like cancer but the coolers are great. Heaviest factory OC 1.55 GHz and only 52° on load.
>>54361333
Holy shit, lost.
>>54358836
>Implying that ive ever ran into problems with my 3.5gb...
>>54364570
This...
>>54358950
>that math
Made a vocaroo just for you faggots
repost as needed
http://vocaroo.com/i/s15FwBpFekc3
>>54368468
Autism +2
And seriously if the card isn't better than a 980ti then it was stupid not to by that a year ago for $600
>>54366116
That fucking thing is one of the fastest GTX 970s around, and apparently one of the quietest too.
>>54364570
>not even 1080p
>Look guys i dont even have problems!! A-amd sucks!
>>54368702
looks like somebody is butthurt that they cant make a vocaroo link because their balls havent dropped yet
also polaris 10
>175w tdp
>300-350$
>faster than gtx 980 and closing on 980ti
>thanks to geometry engine can run full bore on weaker CPU's
this card even if slower than a 980ti thanks to that engine taking load of the CPU means it runs faster than a 980ti on i3's and FX chips since its not as bottlenecked and its going to run full bore on laptops which typically used dual core mobile SKUs or quad cores with very low clocks compared to desktop parts
>>54358413
>that gay ass plastic design
>no HBM2 until after AMD
>with AMD's jump to 14nm it will likely draw more power than the AMD equivalent
>anyone who doesn't upgrade will have their card gimped or fried by the next driver update
Enjoy getting raped Nvidiots.
>>54362781
Ouch.
>>54358413
you're blazingly loud and hot desktop now has radar protection to match the stealth mouse
>>54362420
>>54362420
>>54364054
>>54368920
>this card even if slower than a 980ti thanks to that engine taking load of the CPU means it runs faster than a 980ti on i3's and FX chips since its not as bottlenecked and its going to run full bore on laptops which typically used dual core mobile SKUs or quad cores with very low clocks compared to desktop parts
So I was still better off buying a 980ti a year ago, then hoping for a new card that does the same and costs 2/3 the price at a later time. Even if Nviida releases nothing, they could reduce the 980ti price and still compete.
>>54364356
hehe eat it goyem
he was your last hope
jdl gon getcha whiteboy
>>54359697
>Buying 2 1070s
>Not 1 1080
SLI has tons of problems esp on new games. I blame youtube shills for spreading the SLI bullshit on lower end cards
Why do they call it the GeForce 1080?
>>54370451
Because you can finally play games at 1080p maxed out with the gtx 1080
>>54360585
>not a single pic of pcb
>not a single running sample has been seen
Paper launch at best
>>54368468
>http://vocaroo.com/i/s15FwBpFekc3
I agree with some of it like the VR stuff and the cheap gpu reason but some of the other veiw points just don't add up
for example the Fury X2 is only 10 FPS behind a SLI 980ti
because of having single PCI_E is bottlenecked on a Fury x2
You one of these retards that regard DX11 like its the fucking holy grail.
like in WCCtech website Nvidiaidoits are taking about the number of Dx11 games vs the number of DX12 games out there right now.
And how amd is only focused on DX12 will not sell them cards and so far that has been proven right.
However my bet is on GPU Open as it opens up current API's used by AMD to increase proformance on those old games. (whitch more people play anyway than AAA titles)
I can't see hardware getting better if anything its slowing down and basicly dead in the water the performance from companies difference is now like 10-20 FPS as of Apirl its really nothing like fanboys call "rubbish"
to me its all software holding us all back with proprietary crap like gameworks and unrealistic tessellation that even tessellates crap not even on the screen (see crysis 3 and Unreal engine)
and i think proprietary soft is okay but it shouldn't be able to gimp not only your own card but the others too because that's just defeatist mentality (yes i'm aware some of Gameworks is open source)
there are alot of changes that could be made like fixing Blur effects and clipping/missing textures (even after 10 years is still a issue)
So tell me /G/ what is your take on this GPU OPEN?
>>54360650
>async compute
>have to overhaul engines completely for 3-5 fps benefit
Well memed.
>>54358413
Why does this look like a robot leg or something?
Makes me think of Frozen fractals all around....
>>54360414
they will never fully pull out of the gaming market, however they likely will only pursue the highest of high end.
>>54371235
Autistic rambling
>>54360486
personally, 120fps is amazing, and also never dropping below 60fps is something that's very relevant to my interest but not my budget sadly.
>>54371460
turn it down to 720p then dickshit
>>54371235
Do you have any form of mental illness by any chance?
>>54359945
>nvidiot too poor for anything higher than 1080p
oh the ironing
>>54372281
Not poor, just smart with money.
>>54372318
>actually believing this
pathetic poorfag
>>54358413
You are also going to push a new update to finish off any number of older Nvidia cards too.
>>54371235
>because of having single PCI_E is bottlenecked on a Fury x2
there is currently no gpu in existence that is bottlenecked by pci-e 2.0 x8
>>54358471
>>54362296
back to pol
>>54372345
Poof bcause idk
http://forums.evga.com/Can-a-Titan-Z295x2-saturate-a-PCIE-20-x8-or-even-x4-bandwidth-m2211012.aspx
this kind of had this discussion a year ago but people there only based it on theroy because they are too poor to try it out I.R.L.
also the only ones that could do it are lastest firepro / quatro which few pwoplw in the world could ever get let alone buy quad crossfire/SLI
so i guess we will never know.
>>54372336
im staying with 362 and earlier.
DX12 support in software, older and new games still run good
>>54367122
No one implied that, moron. >>>/v/
>>54372676
I have a 770 but staying on my current driver, which is 361.
Im not going to brave it, Nvidia is pretty awful with their drivers
>>54358460
well 8gb vs 3.5gb.... breddy egual id say :DDDDDDDDDDD
>>54358460
Should have bought Liberty Mutual to get a whole video card
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ah5VHXiTcI
>have amd
>all games have NVIDIA ads at the start
>monitor requires NVIDIA g-sync to go above 60hz
>get 980ti
>144hz 1440p
>buy hitman
>AMD ad starts
>AMD reking NVIDIA on Windows 10 exclusives
Good thing I don't use Win10 xD
>>54360680
Sounds like Nvidia in here. "Asynchronous shaders don't do anything too hard to code for."
"Yes, we are working very hard to have this implemented on future cards."
>>54372723
>>54372676
Do these work on w10? Gtx 680 here
>>54359839
Nvidia cards don't even support mantle. How can they beat AMD cards when they're literally rendering 0 frames per second?
Fucking retard.
>>54373022
its clearly being said that even with mantle the amd cards were losing to nvidia without that mantle support.
>ayymdrone reading comprehension
>>54368920
>3.5ghz the lowest quad core clock for laptops with broadwell
>very low clocks when conpared to desktop counterparts
>>54359960
Pascal doesn't have ASync still
>>54362781
>our well informed sources.
Ok
http://orderof10.com/humanityshallbeenlightened
Are you ready for enlightenment?
>>54359966
I have a 4k monitor but I still game on my 1080p monitor simply because a single 980 Ti can't even run AAA games at 1080p 60fps with maxed out settings. Also while the difference between 1080p and 4k is huge in terms of graphical fidelity (seriously, it's huge), I value a smooth experience over muh graphics. Lowering the settings is also not an option because then the games usually just look like shit even compared to 1080p. Full HD (and maybe to an extent, 1440p) simpy hit the sweet spot where you can have the very best visuals gaming industry offers, while sustaining a solid and playable fps.
>>54359777
Lucky
>>54368911
are u dum
>>54377308
a 980 ti can run most games at 4k with respectable framerates. using witcher 3 is a bad example because even high binned, massively overclocked cards struggle with it at 1440p maxed out. im using a 980 non ti and i can run 90% of games at 4k 60fps on high settings.
>>54361333
This gif is broken as fuck, learn to use WebM
>>54360792
its funny back in late 2014 i got rid of my 290 i had in 2013 and got a 770 4gb
initially i wasnt that impressed but it almost caught up until DX12 came along.
Ill miss it but its time to rejoin the red team.
Nvidia fucked up one too many times for me
