Is there any reason to not install pulseaudio?

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-05-02 23:34:07 Post No. 54348647
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1462229708512.jpg (80 KB, 600x900) Image search: [Google]

80 KB, 600x900

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:34:07 Post No. 54348647 [Report]

Is there any reason to not install pulseaudio?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:36:29 Post No.54348677
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:36:29 Post No.54348677 [Report]

If you don't want to. It's a choice, like everything else in GNU.

WELCOME TO GNU, WE ARE HERE TO SERVE YOU, IF YOU DON'T LIKE HOW A DISTRO DOES THINGS YOU DON'T FUCKING HAVE TO USE IT

HOLY SHIT WHAT A RADICAL GODDAMN CONCEPT

/thread

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:37:24 Post No.54348686
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:37:24 Post No.54348686 [Report]

>>54348677
Wat? Just wondering if there was some huge con to it.

Does it require systemd?

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:41:06 Post No.54348749
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:41:06 Post No.54348749 [Report]

>>54348686
Not really. systemd does things a bit more efficiently but with some tradeoffs (size and basically taking over a lot of what would be self-contained services, which isn't bad or good, just different).

It's all up to you. Freedom.

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:42:27 Post No.54348766
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:42:27 Post No.54348766 [Report]

you'd lose things like per-application volume and shit like network/bluetooth sinks nobody uses

>>

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:42:32 Post No.54348768
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-05-02 23:42:32 Post No.54348768 [Report]

>>54348749
Holy shit you have missed the point in two posts.

No there's no downside to having pulseaudio.