>$CURRENT_YEAR
>not using latest stable Firefox with Electrolysis enabled for DAT JANKLESS FOSS BROWSING EXPERIENCE
What's your excuse, /g/?
=================================
Go to about:config
Set browser.tabs.remote.autostart to True
Set browser.tabs.remote.force-enable to True
Enjoy your life.
I don't need it.
I got a SSD and I don't notice any hangs.
interesting, will have to try it sometime
>>54269645
>What's your excuse, /g/?
I use Chromium, a superior free software web browser that's had multi-process support for years. Enjoy your beta test. Maybe this year will be the year, right?
>>54269749
>inter-thread locking is affected by disk access
I swear /g/ is getting more and more tech illiterate by the day.
Where do I dl the latest Micro Mart? They're talking about the death of Firefox this month.
I use Microsoft Edge.
It's faster.
More secure.
Doesn't care more about womens right than application sandboxing.
Cares more about security and performance than gay marriage.
Is safe to use on a machine with an internet connection unlike sjwfox that got laughed out of pwn2own this year for being so easy to hack no money prizes were available for it.
>>54269762
What are you on, an atom? How would you notice a 100ms wait on the main thread without a fucking profiler?
>>54269760
>unironically using BOTNET
Not using MOZ FOX NIGHTLY
I'm very happy with my 40.0.3.
>>54269801
>implying UI locks by the fucktastic Javascripts and DOM operations of the modern web are in the 100ms range
>>54269819
I sure as hell don't notice them, but then again I don't go on cnet without an adblocker.
>>54269800
How can you know it's secure if it's not open source? Did you reverse engineer it?
>>54269830
I got fiddy cent that says he ain't reversed engineered anything other than a worn out vibrator
>>54269830
Being sandboxed automatically makes it 100x more secure than firefox which can only steal chromiums work and still EPIC FAIL at getting even shim to work.
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/tree/master/security/sandbox
top kekz
>using anything above esr 45
>>54269873
>not using Opera instead
>there are people in 2016 who don't have dom.ipc.processCount set to 1024
>>54269909
For what purpose do you need so much PIDs running
>>54269909
>dom.ipc.processCount set to 1024
>>54269645
listen here boy :
>Multiprocess Windows 0/1 (Enabled by user)
Thanks for nothing, latest stable doesn't support e10s
what's the benefit of this?
>>54269933
You can shitpost on /g/ or do other unimportant stuff while running Octane/Kraken benchmarks at the same time.
>>54269942
so it's supposedly faster? i've been seeing e10s threads on and off, but i never really looked into it.
i'll try it and see if i notice any difference and how stable it is.
>>54269967
It won't make your browsing faster, it'll just make it less prone to freezing while other stuff is happening in your other tabs.
>>54269972
sounds good, thank you.
>>54269805
bugs,crashes
>>54269942
>at the same time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia9rPW8yXqE
>>54269991
>bugs,crashes
I've used Nightly for years and only rarely have they fucked it up so badly it crashes at random.
>>54269918
>dom.ipc.processCount set to 1024
What are the benefits?
>>54270002
You got that telemetry pipe up yo ass so you can:make firefox great again!
>>54269967
it's slower in current state
>>54269991
Why would you post niggers?
>>54270028
How is it more secure with e10s?
>>54270042
it's not
>>54270047
>>54270047
Why do they keep saying it is?
>>54270042
firefox is insecure by nature desu if you want secuirity use chromium imho lad
>>54269930
Latest stable (46) does.
You need the "force-enabled" bit flipped as well.
>>54270054
because if something bad is happening in second firefox process that'll sure save you! believe them!
>>54269853
>>54269873
>>54269894
Prajeet triple post
>>54270062
I am on 46!
And nothing!
>>54270062
>browser.tabs.remote.force-enable
Not in stable https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis#Schedule_and_Status
>>54270100
>>54270073
Strange. It's working here for me on Linux.
>>54270072
>someone posted an opinion i don't like
>better call it bait and them pajeets
>>54270126
And be 100% accurate during that process.
>>54270119
>implying I use stupid hobby OS with no support or drivers or features
>>54270138
No, keep shitposting though.
>>54270119
>browser.tabs.remote.force-enable
I added as a rule and still nothing
>>54269645
>current year
>using firefox
Abandoned that trash years ago.
>>54270147
And take your shitposting fame away from you? Sorry bud,i post facts.I can elaborate if you would like me to personally embarrass you online.
>>54270148
Well, you know what they say!
>Works For Me™
>>54270165
3/10
>>54270154
what do you recommend?
>>54270175
chromium
>>54270171
10/10
>FTFY
>>54270165
>Sorry bud,i post facts
>>54270184
Do you get it in pure form?
>>54270184
>2016
>still no usable Vimperator-style addon for Chromium
>all imitations literally wait for the page to load and then inject the Vim keybind userscript
Into the trash etc.
>>54270170
After I made the rule, restarted and works
>>54270193
yes builds from woolyss
>>54270184
It's been lagging for me lately so I switched to opera
>>54270198
>autism
>>54270207
>my legs hurt from running so I cut them off and use a wheelchair
no.
>>54270198
you're the only one who uses it
>>54270192
Overly defensive there prajeet,calm down.
Try loading 300+ comment thread on firefox and compare that to generic chromium build (I'm using Iridium)
The difference is clear. Shit lags on firefox(nightly), even with electrolysis enabled.
>>54270214
Naturally all operations requiring more work than firing 2 neurons is autism for Chrome users.
>>54270203
Getting it
>>54270222
Tabs kept on being less and less responsive, I don't tolerate such bullshit.
>>54270231
So don't open 300+ comment thread then, fucktard?
Freedom and social justice is more important than childish fucking websites, who cares if they lag or take longer in Firefox using Firefox is what matters.
>>54270231
Prajeet in hyperdefensive mode
>lulz.. Do they ever end
>keep hearing that firefox is slow while using it from version 2.something
>ignore because it just works
>install chromium
>pages load 2 times faster
I can't go back to fx anymore. it's just bad on a modern PC even with e10s, unfortunately. I wish we had chrome engine with fx much more refined UI and overall usability
>>54270119
>Strange. It's working here for me on Linux.
I'm on version 45 and managed to enable the multi-process mode.
what build are you chromiumfags using? Comodo Dragon here
>>54270148
Change these settings as follows.
who here /palemoon/ing?
it'sbrowser.tabs.remote.autostart true
extensions.e10sBlocksEnabling false
btw
>>54270290
>process count
kek
>>54270292
That browser is dead, even the developers say so. It's barely more than an ESR firefox
Thread music 10/10
https://youtu.be/9f0LEoDwFO8
>>54270311
I got a new laptop recently, hadn't used firefox for years thought I'd go back...
Less than 4 weeks it's already doing the same shit it did 7 years ago, running like a fucking brick. I just found this palemoon 30 mins ago, all I want is the most minimalistic simple quick browser minus botnet
wat do?
>>54270296browser.tabs.remote.autostart to True
extensions.e10sBlocksEnabling false
dom.ipc.processCount=4
browser.tabs.remote.force-enable to True
These four configs are what I have enabled now. It now works faster.
>>54270336
>Palemoon 30 mins ago
This new? Please refer to thread music.
>>54270350
>>54270290
Does increasing that processCount thing even do anything useful?
>>54270336
Palemoon is getting more and more unusable because it can't keep up with all the new stuff. It's based on ESR firefox and is maintained by very few developers. And don't fall for the Cyberfox or Waterfox meme either, it's all the same shit.
Personally, I used Chromium for a while but lately it started freezing pages and it became way less snappy. So I switched to Opera, it even offers integrated free VPN to those who wish to use it.
>>54270376
no. read electrolysis wiki
>>54270398
Opera's EULA is fuckery
>>54270461
>autism
>>54270467
Said the autist
>>54270398
>Personally, I used Chromium for a while but lately it started freezing pages and it became way less snappy. So I switched to Chromium
FTFY
>>54270528
The Opera kind of Chromium is more snappy so I don't give a shit, I'm a pragmatic guy, not an autist. Everyone's switching to Chromium, you'll be hard pressed to find a browser that won't be based on it in the future. Unless of course you plan to use ESR firefox.
>>54270588
Opera is literally chromium with chink bloat on top. There is no way it is snappier.
>>54269645
Firefox is botnet.
That's why.
>what proof
WebRTC, anything that supports it is botnet.
>>54270292
Here.
>>54270292
Except it's not at all.
>>54270603
I don't theorize anon, it proved snappier in practice and that's all I care about
>>54269801
because sites with fucked up JS will lock the UI for a good half second. Very noticeable
>>54270715
>I don't theorize
that's right, you eat the placebo raw
