Cyrix
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
What this inspires you /g ?
>>54235092
>windows logo on CPU package
Boner intensifies.
>>54235092
>What this inspires you /g ?
Has anyone ever been so far?
>>54235110
>Don't recognize a cyrix cpu
>Pretend to be an old fag and don't know what the thread is about
>>54235092
>>54235141
Or he's simply taking the piss out of your ability to construct a sentence and you're all butt mad.
>>54235141
>Can't write a grammatically correct understandable 5 word sentence.
I still literally have no idea what partially formed thoughts are bubbling away in what you probably describe as a brain, because of your inability to communicate.
>Thinks a Cyrix 686 is an oldfag CPU
kek
>>54235168
If he is getting piss, he may better drink in the piss bottle standing on his desk...
>>54235182
Clearly English isn't your first language.
>>54235110
I saw that meme on a TV prank show yesterday. How does it feel to be a part of the normie race?
>>54235218
Wow a TV show used an ancient meme? Say it ain't so anon.
>He thinks 4chan is a special secret internet club
No John, you *are* the normie. And John was REEEEEEEEEEEE
>>54235092
I picked this CPU in my first self built computer 'cause it was the best i could afford...
>>54235092
inspires me to underachieve
> The game in question causing most problems for performance was id Software's Quake. Unlike previous 3D games, Quake used the pipelined Pentium FPU to do perspective correction calculations in the background while texture mapping, effectively doing two tasks at once. This would not have been a big problem for the 6x86 if, by that time, Quake had a fallback to do perspective correction without the FPU as in, for example, the game Descent. However, id Software chose not to include this. Quake also lacked the option to disable perspective correction, thus eliminating that potential speed boost for FPU-weak CPUs. This potential speed boost would have benefited not just Cyrix's users, but also users of AMD's K5 and especially of the 486. Quake's optimization for the Pentium went beyond FPU usage and catered to a number of other architectural quirks specific to the Pentium, further hindering performance of other CPUs even outside FPU operations. This bias in favor of the Pentium served to boost the popularity of Intel's Pentium CPUs amongst the gaming community.
So it was john fucking carmack who single handedly killed cyrix?
>>54235363
This is a jew conspiracy
>>54235363
Sauce for greentext?
>>54235092
holy fuck just think how much gold you can recover
>>54235092
>Designed for Microsoft Windows 95
No wonder Cyrix collapsed if they designed their processors around that awful OS.
Coming through.
>>54235527
Linux was awefull for 99% of people who installed it on their comp in the first place..
>>54235519
~$5 worth.
The Pentium Pro yields the most at $40 worth, the thing is a fucking monster.
>>54235595
>>54235618
The RISC core hidden behind the godawful x86 decoding frontend in the Pentium Pro and later Intel CPUs is basically a bad rip off of the Alpha.
>>54235660
Thanks Intel, IA164 will save us all
>>54235698
>IA164
Don't give them any ideas.
Notice that Intel have failed to ever introduce a non IA32 architecture of their own:
iAPX
i860
i960
IA64
All colossal expensive failures. Hell they even managed to screw up an IA32 architecture with Netburst. It's a wonder Intel don't punch themselves in the face every morning while they're trying to get dressed.
>>54235804
Intel mentioned in April 2015 that they're still working on a new Itanium.
Maybe next time's the charm and the compiler will be magic and solve the VLIW problem.
>>54235818
>Intel mentioned in April 2015 that they're still working on a new Itanium.
Bless 'em
>>54235840
The greed for complete dominance is overwhelming, Intel is run by a lot of hungry suits, they'll never stop trying to manhandle the market.
>>54235861
It isn't really working for them; they're laying off another 12,000 people. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Itanium get dropped, as it's clearly a money pit, but I have a feeling they have some contractual obligation to companies like HP to continue to develop it. Serves 'em right for killing Alpha.
>>54235861
>>54235893
what are you guys talking about?
>>54235893
12000 people where? Marketing? Human resources? Pen/paperpushers?
They won't hit their engineers, no way.
They're their lifeline.
>>54235904
Intel's complete inability to innovate.
>>54235912
Also if they fire them they WILL get snatched by Apple/AMD/Google/MS, Intel doesn't want that, firing their engineers is the stupidest thing they can do, longterm
>>54235861
Intel is becoming deaf to the market needs and is unable to create new market fields...
Intel will die same way than DEC, being sold piece after piece before its very core goes destroyed...
>>54235918
Ohh. Okay.
What about AMD? Is AMD any good?
>>54235955
They have some nice ideas but don't have the cash to realize them.
>>54235912
Nobody but Intel know yet, because they only announced them a few weeks back. 12k people is 11% of their workforce though, so you can be sure there's going to be engineering layoffs included in that. They'll probably close some plants & design offices, maybe shuffle some headcount around, but they'll almost certainly lose some engineers. The Itanium group would be an obvious candidate for slashing some headcount.
>>54235964
So... Is there anyone else left in the market?
Texas Instruments? :3
>>54235972
ARM, combined with the (very large) companies that license & fab ARM.
There has been a slow push for ARM in the data center. They're obviously still a long way of Xeon performance levels but some companies seem determined to get there.
![525725_522823991087366_1674048679_n[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/sw87G7Y.jpg "525725_522823991087366_1674048679_n[1].jpg")
I'm gonna do it nigga's.
>>54235970
They could be hitting their older process fabs, 65nm, 45nm, etc.
Those two are at least 3000 people, and Intel still has multiple 45nm fabs.
>>54235182
Kek
>>54236008
I want a computer like this to play my old games.
Some of them run too fast.
>>54236010
Depends. Intel still fab a lot of those old chips for industry. Fab 12 has been operation since 1996 and still churns out 65nm chips.
![Loongson[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/CEE9FFw.jpg "Loongson[1].jpg")
>>54235972
Hi.
>>54236042
VM, you nigger.
>>54236008
>had 2 digits for turbo speed
>>54236047
I doubt they sell wafers cheaper than TSMC, at that process price is probably the main criteria.
>>54236052
Just stop, okay.
It. Does. Not. Work.
Runs too fast on VMs.
They run too fast on a Pentium II 266MHz.
>>54236008
>>54236057
weren't the speeds set with dip switches? it didn't display the actual clock speed
![Baikal-T-MIPS-P5600-2-_w_450[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ZryIosd.png "Baikal-T-MIPS-P5600-2-_w_450[1].png")
>>54236057
Dat keylock. I miss it.
Oh and...The Russians are coming!
>>54235997
Good. x86 dying and everything running on dirt cheap generic ARM openspec RISC-V Chinashit is my wet dream.
>>54236083
Can't remember. I know it had a co pro though. Or at least mine did. 486DX2 or something like that.
>>54236082
Then get on ebay, buy some old hardware and build it for $50
I still have some of that old shit in a drawer which I could probably give you if you was local.
>>54236098
>Good. x86 dying
w-what? is x86 dying? i don't want it to die!
>>54236123
i still have to figure out what hardware to buy.
i'd like something that can be underclocked but that also has a agp and ISA slot.
>>54236067
Intel do a bunch of MILSPEC stuff though, and you can bet the US DoD want that to be fabbed by an American company, in America.
>>54236144
Can't go wrong with a Pentium 3 or Athlon 64 X2 if you want something more 'modern'
>>54236167
They are not underclockable, so the games will run too fast.
>>54236174
What games are we dealing with here, anon? Wizardry 1?
>>54236174
Use DOSBox. It can underclock in its configuration files.
>>54236182
Wing Commander :3
>>54236187
Dosbox is cool, but nothing beats running on the old thing.
>>54235660
>>54235519
>destroying perfectly good hardware for loose change
People like you piss me off to no end.
>>54235818
That's just because HP signed some multi-decade Itanic support contracts with the DoD and similar, so they pay Intel a couple hundred million dollars every year to keep the architecture alive.
>>54236271
It's a chunk of obsolete silicon that has no value beyond "lol this is how the retards used to do it, can you believe it!?"
>>54236296
Not even HP wants it anymore.
>>54236306
They're stuck with it though. Serves 'em right.
>>54236187
but still without a crt it's a bust
dos games were designed for 320x200, but they displayed it as a 4:3 resolution, so non-square pixels
you'd have to scale it 5 times horizontally and 6 times vertically, to display it as 1600x1200
unless you have a 1200p/1440p panel, you'd have to crop the picture
>>54236330
What's the best CRT display out there?
>>54236341
Mine
a long time ago in a galaxy far far away...
Chapter MCMXCV: A New Hope
>>54236356
Naah, dude. I'm serious. Do people still make CRT monitors or is it a piece of technology that isn't worth revisiting?
>>54236341
21" Trinitron displays. Bonus points if it's a Sun branded one.
>>54236048
Are they coming out with a new one? I can't find any of the old Yeelongs anywhere. Did the FSF hoard them all?
>>54235804
The iAPX 432 was far too ambitious at the time and it had some fundamental flaws (e.g. bit-aligned instructions) that doomed it from the beginning.
OTOH, the i960 deserved more recognition, but sadly Worse Is Better prevailed once again and Intel relegated it to the embedded market.
https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html
>>54236380
They don't make them anymore unfortunately, last I checked.
Hopefully you can find one by the side of the road that still works. Or on eBay/amazon/gumtree
>>54236547
That's sad...
I wonder if they've ever made a Full HD CRT.
>>54236561
Mine does 2048x1536, that's higher than 1080p.
>>54236561
In fact, 1600x1200 only has ~5% less pixels than 1080p, so you can also consider that as full HD I guess.
>>54236590
These things were pretty good, then.
Why did they fall out of use? Size and power consumption? Is that it?
>>54236608
>Size and power consumption? Is that it?
It's enough. They're also very heavy; a large trinitron monitor could weigh enough to bend a desk.
>>54236629
Oh yeah. There's that.
What about refresh rates? Can they do more than 75hz?
>>54236663
>Can they do more than 75hz?
Sure, but you'd pay a lot of money for the privilege.
>>54236663
High end ones could do 160+Hz in lower resolutions for MUH QUAKE
>>54236754
Even cheap ones could do 1024x768@85Hz in the year 2000 or so.
>>54236765
>High end ones could do 160+Hz in lower resolutions for MUH QUAKE
MUH BF4
that's actually pretty good. i want one of these things.
>>54236663
They cause severe eyestrain with extended use and make your eyes feel like baked potatoes. Using them with white workspaces is almost like staring into a lightbulb. Low refresh rates on CRT also subtly strain your brain in a way modern monitors don't because they have no persistence.
>>54237111
ohh.... okay... that sounds dangerous.
>>54236782
Mine does 1024x1280 @130hz, or 1600x1200@75hz, or 2048x1536 at 60hz.
Shit is so cash
>>54235104
I bet new Intels will have windows10-compatible logos on them
or rather, win10-only
>>54235804
Will Intel survive if MS or Apple go alternative/ARM?
>>54236299
The same logic can be applied to archeological findings as well
>some old retards built some temples that nobody uses anymore
>nobody uses them soclet's just grind them and use them in construction sites as sand
hijacking this thread a little now, what was your first PC/CPU /g/ ?
Mine was a 286 running at a whopping 25mhz, had 2 Mb of ram and rather spacious 30 Meg hard drive. Was running some flavour of dos iirc and was primarily used to play sam and max.
>>54238180
not quite the same but i get where your coming from, however archeological finds tend to be a lot older and a lot rarer and where never mass produced on the same scale as any 'modern' CPU
>>54238489
386 sx 25 here that could perform 33mhrz with the turbo button
>>54236098
That doesn't sound too fun.
I've got loads of old processors sitting around in the loft, might give them to the scrap men for gold as they are just taking up space.
I have liked the Athlon for a while. Still have FX processors in most of my rigs, but on my laptop I use Intel.
>>54235363
Yeah, that's well known. AMD at least found a way to catch up. Cyrix never really cared about gamers though, they worried about business software on cheap computers.
>>54238504
Old CPUs are already hard to find. To admit, that analogy was mostly a joke but you'll probably get more money by selling an old cpu on ebay instead of melting it in acid to get gold that's worth probably $8 at most. You won't destroy an old and functional device either.
>>54237703
Intel's SGX will almost surely be available to Windows and other proprietary OSes only.
>>54240288
AMD is more innovative than intel for more than a decade anyway...
>>54240938
>>54236590
Full HD is 1920x1080 and only 1920x1080, the same way that XGA is specifically 1024x768
>>54235418
it's from a wiki article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrix
>>54236341
>>>54236330
>What's the best CRT display out there?
24" Sony FW900
>>54242043
>sonycuck
LOOL
>>54242075
You retarded?
>>54235918
They made the pentium 4, though.
>>54235092
i had a pc with a Cyrix mII CPU
>>54242043
>best CRT display out there?
>24" Sony FW900
it depends on whether you want 16:10 or the highest refresh rates.
while fw900 had 121kHz/160Hz (1152x720@160Hz) bandwidth, a handful of other 4:3 monitors like from Iiyama could reach the realms around 140kHz/180Hz (1024x768@180Hz).
>>54242312
The pentium 4 had the worst frenquency / performance ratio of all time.
They've built this architecture only foor marketing purpose 'cause muh high feequency
outta my way plebs
>>54236008
Imagine trying to hit the turbo button and accidentally pushing the hard disk reset button
>>54236296
>>54236299
75% of banking transactions are handled by Itanium chips. Not that you NEETs would know anything about banking.
>>54235092
lol I had an old Compaq laptop with a Cyrix II and 96Mb of RAM no less. Used Windows 98 for a long time, eventually put DSL on it on a RAMdisk.
>>54246519
>>54236098
>x86 dying
It's not dying where horsepower counts. Other chips have lost the datacenter market.
>>54241340
P4 in P3? wat?
>>54235618
I've got an old PA-RISC workstation the CPU is giant, wonder how much gold I could get out of it..
>>54235840
Probably due to contractual obligations
>>54246519
That's funny, I've worked for a financial institution for coming up on 9 years now and have never seen a single IA64 server.
Ours is is IBM Power architecture, not that I expect that that's super common.
>>54244415
Hell yeah dawg
>>54246732
>Ours is is IBM Power architecture, not that I expect that that's super common.
Power is far more common than IA64. Most financial institutions still use mainframes (which are nearly exclusively IBM).
>>54236144
You can't use some shit like Dosbox? It can be set to run slower where needed. Must be some really obscure shit if you can't emulate it these days. There are whole communities dedicated to running old as shit games on new hardware.
>>54246823
Central banks and government banks use Itanium. Medical field also. Mission critical. Itanium is interesting as fuck. The problem with Itanium is fewer and fewer clients want Unix based systems anymore.
>>54246902
>Central banks and government banks use Itanium
They're phasing that shit out. Not even Intel cares anymore.
>>54235092
>being this french
>>54236299
>it doesn't make my games go fast so it has no value to anyone
you can make anything worthless with the "it's just a rock" argument, unless you're running a business or doing some heavy scientific calculation there's nothing a computer does that you can't already do by hand
there are plenty of chip collectors out there and others who like working with it, history is history and nice engineering is nice engineering
>>54246519
not really, IA-64 chips mostly found their way into cost-no-object supercomputers, database boxes and mission-critical systems
the financial industry has always been the domain of z series mainframes, AS/400s and POWER systems
>>54246660
gold extraction is only lucrative if you're a big recycler with millions to throw at a facility to process lots of the shit at once and a steady network of donors and lots of advertising
you'd get more out of selling it to a collector on nekochan or something, plus PA-RISC shit is rare and interesting, why destroy something cool and artful like old HP gear for the jack shit $10 or $15 a jew recycler will give to you?
>>54246902
which ones? I would be pretty interested in knowing about some large-scale deployments still out in the wild
very few Itanium workstations worth a shit were ever really developed that I could see in medical work, the SGI Prism was an utter failure
>>54246935
China Construction Bank
>>54246902
>fewer and fewer clients want Unix based systems
It's because of the Pajeet invasion. Pajeets don't know how to use Unix.
>>54246987
amd-64 was backwards compatible and had an established set of tools to work with. And Itanium was kinda doomed from the start anyway, but thats a whole other story. I also know companies AOL, Daiwa Institute of Research Business Innovation, PinkRoccade Healthcare use Itanium based systems.
>>54246978
makes sense when you think about it since there are a lot of Chinese vendors making Itanium iron like Huawei and Inspur
still I'm willing to bet they mix it in with some IBM mainframe gear for the really mission critical shit
>>54246987
it also just really wasn't economical anymore, the dotcom bubble and the rise of Linux really put a dent in UNIX vendors they'll never recover from
>>54247061
Ultimately it isn't just Unix, Pajeets don't know how to use Linux either.
>>54246935
>you'd get more out of selling it to a collector on nekochan or something, plus PA-RISC shit is rare and interesting, why destroy something cool and artful like old HP gear for the jack shit $10 or $15 a jew recycler will give to you?
AFAIK it doesn't work, or at least I never managed to get it to work. A friend found it on the side of the road and thought I might be interested lol.
For the record it's an old HP Visualize C200, not particularly unique or anything, and only 200MHz.
Also got a pair of Sun E450s... Managed to install OpenBSD on the nicer one (NetBSD running on everything is bullshit, their spare support is garbage). Had no real use for it though due to being old and slow and using tons of electricity.
I love the sun aesthetic though, all that cool gray and purple lol.
>>54247050
HPE has like 25% of the market m8. Itanium is for high uptime shit like banking and medical. It has its niche use some how.
>>54247086
Just goes to show Microsoft's long term stance of ignoring piracy has really paid off.
>>54247061
yeah Intel made billions selling inexpensive Xeon systems for like 20k vs. sparc for 200k
>>54247181
At one time there was a significant performance gap for certain workloads but that was years ago. Now there isn't near enough of one to justify the price gap. Hell, even double is too expensive.
>>54247181
Also, Intel has better watt/dolar performance than SPARC or POWER.
>>54247096
weird, I've got a similar box to yours (C110) and it doesn't work either, still kind of cool though, in my experience even one of those is kind of unique, PA-RISC is easily the least common of the major RISC architectures from my personal experience
>Had no real use for it though due to being old and slow and using tons of electricity.
yeah, U450s are cool and you could probably get some use out of them in a home setting as a box for remote access/web/other non-compute heavy tasks but you'd be better served by either a lower-end system from the same era like an UE1/2/150 or a newer workstation/Sun Fire
I run a V100 for most of my unix-y jobs, it looks nice and doesn't put out a lot of heat, but does a great job for what I do on it, the only thing I don't like about it is the use of IDE drives which means you get fucked by the 128 GB controller limit
>>54247181
the price used to be justified, back at the height of high-end RISC that shit was practically alien technology, you wouldn't buy anything but an SGI box for graphical work, a Sun system for development, an Alpha for raw power, and so on
PCs started really bridging that gap around the early 2000s or so and were competent enough to take over the baseline of most of the core markets of classic workstation vendors, which were pretty strapped for cash and innovation already; SGI was rehashing the R10000 over and over again, Sun the same with the UltraSPARC, Alpha didn't have the fastest clocks anymore, IBM and HP were always niche as fuck to begin with
>>54247340
SPARC and POWER systems are so niche that it really doesn't matter as much anymore, datacenters aren't full of those things, they're off in the corner doing mission-critical shit where a little downtime or loss in performance will cost you far more than an extra $300 a month on your power bill
>>54247340
SPARC is cool as shit. What is it? 8 threads per core, with an 8 core chip? No overhead encryption? Pretty nifty iron, too bad you have to gobble Oracles big fat one down
>>54247447
>8 threads per core, with an 8 core chip
What is this, 2007? The newest SPARC chips are running on 32 cores now.
>>54235092
motherfucking cyrix
its not fair what happened to them
there is no punishment for intel for what they did to cyrix
cyrix was the real AMD, or the only real competition intel ever had
>>54247464
256 threads to weave?
>>54235595
i was the first one to meme the DEC alpha on /g/
none of you ass clowns browse the anus of wikipedia hard enough to find this shit
>>54240288
>>54247510
hell yeah senpai
>>54247511
>tfw I actually own an Alpha system and it's totally dead
>>54246642
No, this was for putting Pentium-Ms (Banias, Dothan) into Pentium 4 Northwood/Prescott socket (479). Was popular with fags that didn't like P4 but were too snobbish to get Athlon 64.
listen here you niggers
>>54246642
>>54247630
It's not either of those, it's an adapter to allow you to use newer Socket 478 Pentium 4s in the older Socket 423, since otherwise you were shafted with no upgrade options better than a 2 GHz Willamette.
I don't believe Pentium Ms are pin-compatible with a Pentium 4, let alone chipset-compatible.
Look at all that fucking cooling
That is some powerful shit.
You can't even destroy it by throwing it in lava. It will remain at a steady 39 degrees celcius.
>>54247536
Ooooh, it has a window that shows the CPU die. How cool is that.
>>54247687
Slot was the tits for cooling.
>>54247681
Ah, I did know about those 423 adaptors, but didn't check properly.
Adapters for sc479 were a thing, but IIRC they were a bit more complex, not straightforward stuff like sc370 era slockets.
I recall there were even AMD slot A slockets, but they were not reliable.
>>54247688
>window
most mice have one
>>54247698
THOSE PLASTIC SINKS BROUGHT THE HEAT RIGHT AGAINST THAT FUCKING 70MM FAN SO THAT IT COULD LITERALLY RAPE THE COLD MERCILESS AMBIANT AIR INTO ITS HOT ASS CPU, EACH WHIFF YELLING "FUCK YOU" TO THE HEAT THIS GODLY COMPUTING MACHINE PRODUCED AS IT TORE THROUGH ITS ANUS LIKE A BARBARIAN INTO A VILLAGER'S WIFE.
>>54247754
You only had 70mm fans on socket 754/939 coolers. Pentium II/III slot 1 coolers and socket 370 as well used 50mm ones. I had a few. Socket A boxed heatsinks for Athlon XPs used 60mm ones.
>>54247754
>PLASTIC SINKS
The hell processor were you using!?
>>54247791
Thank you for ruining my fun. I'm going to bed.
>>54247811
Pentium II. I believe that was the stock cooler for the 300 MHz one.
>>54247832
my 300 MHz PIIs are about as metal as they come family
>>54236057
>when trying to force the 5.25" floppy lever down without a floppy in the drive
>DX4 100 MHz get rect by Pentium 60 MHz
Even then, clockspeed wasn't everything.
>>54247862
Then 233 MHz? It was 15 years ago dude.
>>54247897
nah nothing in those sinks was plastic but the clamps, they usually just used undefined "metal"
>>54247863
>floppy lever
>not a bootflow accelerator and software-defreezer
Dude don't you know shit about computers?
>>54235092
Intel 486DX2 checking in
>>54247832
The plastic was just from back side. Front was black-painted aluminium heatsink. I think some might have plastic shroud over that, maybe you had that.
>>54248112
No it was probably black painted metal. I never bothered to touch it or look at it from close enough.
>>54236082
DOS game or Amiga?
>>54240938
I had a very similar mobo to that, but mine was an AOpen board. It had the same chipset and features. I definitely want to get an ATX board once I upgrade to the AMD Zen platform or maybe Intel. I'm so sick of having a budget mATX board in a normal sized case.
>>54247536
Back in my tripfag days I endlessly posted pictures of my Athlon machine here (in a spray painted fluorescent green case) while anons tried to insist it was a Pentium III. I had a Pentium III-based Celeron machine for 10 years as well. It was a Tualatin at 1.3 GHz, so it stayed useful until I fucked up the motherboard doing something to it.
>>54247340
No it's don't.
Sparc currently is winner.
>>54248876
>>54247340
I'm taking a Computer Organization class this semester and we have to learn how to write basic programs in assembly on different architectures. We did the ARC, which is a simpler subset of the SPARC. Everything is done in registers. The ARC has 32 and the SPARC has 128 registers. The x86 has a lot less (EAX-EDX and the stack, segment, pointer registers, etc.), but it's easier to work with stacks, arrays, arithmetic ops, etc. since so much is built in. Judging by simplicity, SPARC would have to be faster since it is totally RISC. I hated doing stuff on the ARC though.
>>54249214
Whatcha gonna do with those?
>>54249253
cry about Sun and what could have been
>>54235092
ST's HAL for their stm32 stuff is utter garbage. That's what inspired ihn me
![hqdefault[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/KK6WcDA.jpg "hqdefault[1].jpg")
>>54250352
>>54236381
>tfw my school has this and some Sun boxes
I can't wait to see them selling the stuff, there's like 8 of them in pristine condition
>>54247989
Is this your PC? Are you one of the few AT2 musicians?
>tfw no R8K microsupercomputer
>>54246519
The only reason why there are still so many Itanic systems around is because HP arbitrarily chose not to port VMS and HP-UX to amd64.
>>54235092
Silicon Graphics rulez
>>54251521
>>54251675
>compact housefire
>>54251461
But can it browse 4chan?
>>54254271
Might be able to connect to some network and runs on debian shits so i guess yes
>>54254271
Fuck yeah it does
>>54250756
This is my PC & Pic - I'm still dabbling in AT2 and shit, no where near as good as the ones that make shit for the public - probably going to start using it more in the summer - trying to move my klystrack and renoise tunes over with muh FM synthesis.
>>54251461
>tfw no reality station
