you have 0.0000001 seconds to explain why you are not using the superior gnome version of ubuntu 16.04.
>>54152966
cause i like my botnet.
>>54152966
Can I get a screenshot of the trackpad settings?
>>54152966
nice icons, what are they?
>>54153111
nice theme, what is it?
>>54153153
Stylishdark-et
>>54153145
>>54153153
NitruxSA/luv-icon-theme
Because I am installing regular Ubuntu just now
>>54153153
>>54153189
the theme is actually just the stock dark theme, you just have to enable it with the tweak tool i think.
>>54153203
Thanks
Yup. Hasn't changed since I tried GNOME on manjaro. That's why I don't use it, you can't change scroll direction and you can't disable acceleration on a USB mouse., while you can on Plasma
>>54153203
Outdated version of GNOME.
>>54153242
they will just backport the newer version soon anyway.
>>54153237
This is the current panel. libinput has only supported flat acceleration since last October, you can set it with libinput itself.
>>54153265
Very unlikely. You'll need a PPA.
>>54153374
Well that's actually what I was looking for in plasma
>>54153417
care to share that firefox css?
>>54153417
>>54152966
Cause I'm on Arch.
>>54153434
https://userstyles.org/styles/116309/nightly-fox
Also use pic related
>>54153489
why do you need a DE at all when x is always broken?
>>54152966
>AUR
shit, took me 5 seconds to write this
>Gnome is slowly becoming flat design
>>54152966
I just don't like the fucking GNOME "interface". Unity all the way.
% do-release-upgrade
No new release found
Fucking kubuntu neets, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>54153508
Who said they were using X.
>Typical noobantu faggot doesn't know about wayland.
>>54153749
Why do you need a computer when your distro is always broke ?
>>54153776
> I spout memes
> It's the only thing I am good at
>>54153807
Hey don't get me wrong, I appreciate you guys alpha testing all those packages for me.
>>54153868
This would mean you are using an Arch Linux derivative and are a hypocrite.
If you really think any Arch packages are used as upstream in another non-rolling release distro you are more stupid than I had assumed.
>>54152966
>ubuntu
>gnome
might as well install linux
Because premade DEs are for dorks.
>>54153884
Yes. Gnome is only for arch.
>>54153969
Your new is showing.
because im not a cuck
Because I use Windows 10
>>54152966
Exactly OP. Gnome is to Ubuntu, what stink is to shit. Not to knock-on Unity too much, but it is an absolute failure of a DE, and the second shittiest one. I mean given what Canonical is competing against--Xfce, Mate, Cinnamon, KDE, Windows, and even Mac--it had to of been crystal clear that they weren't going to create the best DE. Not even eighth best.
So they took a different, albeit retarded approach instead. Someone said, hey, let's make the worst one of all time, and everyone in the company agreed that that was way more doable, and so they got to work, working their little asses off, and thus Unity was born. Unfortunately, as I said, it's an absolute failure, for Gnome 3 exists, and it is the worst DE of all time. Unity is such a failure that it fails at complete failure too. There's literally no reason to use it, not even ironically, if you happen to be a hipster douche bag. Science has yet to unravel the mystery of how that there are in fact people using it anyway. I guess the Gnome developers are pretty proud that no one can beat them at their own game though.
>>54154044
No arguments: the post
because Fedora 23 is still better
Wow this looks beautiful
>>54154044
Xfce and mate are both garbage. Cinnamon is just gnome skinned. You're an idiot.
Gnome and unity are shit too however, and so is KDE. Year of the linux desktop: never.
Ranks:
1. Any window manager
2. Fecal matter from my anus
3. Gnome
4. Unity
5. Cinnamon
6. Xfce, Lxde
7. Enlightenment
8. Putrified corpses covered in shit
9. KDE
>>54154183
>>54154128
tasty blacks free ebony porn?
>>54152966
Because I'm running Debian with gnome :^)
Because LXDE with Arch is objectively the best combo.
Just finished putting and testing
on a meh old notebook asus X5DI that has missing keys...
its quite awesome how everything works out of the box
wifi - no problems
mousepad - perfect with gestures
fn keys - of course
though I am Archer, I love that we have ubuntu to put on for normal users
tomorrow I will try xubuntu I guess
>>54154349
>3.14
so outdated.
Is 16 a lts?
>>54154496
yes
>>54152966
because I really cant be bothered
>>54154044
0 contents: the shitpost.
because of muh no amd
I tried to like it, but I just can't.
>>54154485
It's stable.
>>54154617
What's wrong?
>>54152966
But i am, OP.
>>54152966
Why is that title bar so massive thou. Is that some OS for grannies?
>>54154643
The fact that I need a stupid dock for it to be usable, also extensions that break between versions.
The notification system was unreliable, also wakes up the screen if it's dimmed (can't even configure the shit not to).
Eats memory like a nigger eats KFCs.
Somewhat frequent crashes.
I gave it 2 months and I'm not coming back.
>>54153700
KDE is so superior to the complete retardation of gnome3.
>>54154775
>The notification system was unreliable
In what way?
>(can't even configure the shit not to).
Try looking next time.
>>54154791
Its sad how far they have fallen Gnome 2 was getting close to perfection
>>54154838
>In what way?
Wouldn't show notifications for incoming mail about half of the time.
>Try looking next time.
Alright.
>>54154791
dream on...
who KDE Xenial here?
>>54154885
Just look at what they have done to Nautilus... They completely mutilated it removing a lot of features and they renamed it to a thing called "files" otherwise gnome3 users can have some serious psichological issues.
>>54154885
This. I loved GNOME 2 and I used to hate KDE before Plasma 5 came along, now I love KDE and can't stand GNOME 3.
>>54153885
Haha nice one faggot
>>54154916
A DE forcing you to install 3rd party extensions to be barely usable is complete pile of shit.
Anyone using the new mutiny layout in mate? Does it work fine or is it buggy?
>>54154996
i have no 3rd party extentions installed.
only thing not stock is docky.
>>54154996
When are you forced to install extensions? Vanilla GNOME is just fine.
Not all extensions are "third-party" either. Third-party is a strange term to use in the context of FOSS.
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell-extensions/
Should I try Arch?
If not fucking suggest another.
Obviosuly because the theme is completely incompatible with regular applications. White text and dark background always happens to bring problems with it, this derivate is mostly useless in it's out of the box state.
>>54155073
There's a dark version of the default theme Adwaita. If this breaks apps you should report it.
>>54155029
The applications menu is a extension.
>>54155048
>Vanilla GNOME is just fine
Is fine if you have a tablet pc. Is the worst thing ever if you have a mouse.
Third party because they are not mantained by gnome devs and they broke them in every gnome release.
>>54155102
the application menu is not 3rd party, you literally just click 2 buttons to enable it...
>>54155102
I just showed you a whole set of extensions maintained upstream on git.gnome.org. What constitutes a GNOME developer anyway? Is Rhythmbox a GNOME app or third-party? What about gnome-mpv? Free software centres around loosely defined communities, not first parties and third parties.
>Is the worst thing ever if you have a mouse.
GNOME is extremely mouse and, especially, keyboard friendly. That's how I use it. I tried using it on a touchscreen laptop and it's really bad currently. Don't make things up.
b-b-but I am!
>>54155102
>The applications menu is a extension.
And it's maintained by the same person who maintains gnome-shell.
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell-extensions/tree/extensions/apps-menu
>>54152966
>Ubuntu
>not superior Debian
>>54152966
>still can't straighten out rounded corners without installing a plugin
>still can't change the date format of the clock
Fucking hate GNOME.
>>54155168
>using negative ram
>>54155214
>a plugin
Lol, what? gnome-shell themes are CSS. It's very easy to make it even more rounded or straight.
Date format is affected by your localisation settings.
>>54152966
wow that looks great~
but does firefox have the black textbox problem?
there is this issue on fedora 23 if you use global dark theme and firefox. if you go on google and search some stuff the search box would sometimes flash a dark grey color. chrome also looked hideous with the global dark theme. using numix theme didnt resolve it.
same thing happened on fedora 22.
ill jump ship to ubuntu 16.04 if firefox doesnt have webpage issues with that dark theme.
Because ubuntu is a fucking meme os that's just as much of a botnet as windows 10 is, but you guys shill it anyway cus it's leencucks kernel.
>>54153498
thanks
>>54152966
Because I have to prepare for Gnome 3.20 to break all my themes.
>>54155359
To be honest i don't know because i never use ff.
Chromium looks fine though because i use chromes theme instead of gtk.
>>54155407
ah o k
im downloading the iso right now and ill see how the live version is on a USB.
Nowadays GNOME is fine if you install some extensions and PCmanFM.
But at that point you might as well install KDE and get a proper file picker.
>>54152966
>superioir gnome version of ubuntu 16.04
I thought ubuntu uses unity?
Tfw I just happened to install Ubuntu as they had a new release so now I look like a bandwagon
>>54155168
Which theme is that?
>>54152966
what icon pack?
>>54155522
>pcmanfm
And why exactly would i use that piece of scat over gnome files?
>>54155649
Lurk moar.
>>54152966
Because Windows is still the superior platform
>fucking 2016
>using shitnome 3.xx
For gosh shake!
>>54152966
Because it's outdated by 3 versions now.
>>54155689
Only for the gamers and photoshop cucks.
>>54155769
Arch/beta testers pls gooo
>>54155785
It's faster and has all of the same software available as any version of Linux plus some. Unless you're Richard Stallman why would you not use Windows?
>>54155845
Because i dont want my os to call home and report everything i do with it.
>>54155886
It's all aggregated. It's not like some poo in loo is looking up your personal checking account numbers or anything. And if you're that worried about it, turn off advertising ID.
>>54155845
The very fact that you're still using windows anyway despite microsoft absolutely cucking you of your own privacy is what makes them get away with it. Say no, stop using windows. If enough people do it, microsoft will realise they were morons and revert it.
because i use xp
>>54155966
You and I both know that will never happen. And the privacy concerns are all pointless anyway. Like I said, it's all aggregated and automated. Still a lot less intrusive than that Android botnet phone you're carrying around in your pocket right now.
>mfw Gnome 3.20 only has three zoom levels for Nautulus' grid view
>mfw the three zoom levels are large, huge and xbox hueg
>>54156160
Actually disregard that 3.18 brought that shit in
3.20 "fixes" it by having 4
Videogames.
>>54156195
Install gen- oh
>>54156195
>uses gentoo
>doesn't use latest version of software
upgrade to 3.20 slowfag
Because Linux is an inherently crippled OS for elitist assholes.
>>54155275
>Date format is affected by your localisation settings.
There's still no way of removing that fucking abbreviated day from it.
Because Kubuntu is a buggy mess
Considering installing Open SUSE desu
>>54156194
How is that not a fix? What size do you want exactly?
Anyway, the nautilus has been undergoing extensive refactoring for about a year which means you'll get a responsive flow in 3.22. Check it out.
https://plus.google.com/112055140785156832357/posts/bgyjhP3Gqgu
>>54156332
Because the smallest size is 48px
I'd prefer a bit smaller desu
>you'll get a responsive flow in 3.22
Good
Whoever came up with the 3 level zoom (while the smallest one is still huge as fuck) needs to be dragged out back and shot
>>54156238
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/gnome-base/gnome-light
>>54156358
So what, 32px, 16px, 8px, 4px? You have to sanitize the size ranges somewhere.
Before 3.18 you could make the icons so small the labels disappeared and that's completely broken, or they could be so large only one column fit in a moderately sized window. Again, broken. 48px is fine if you take the standard use case of an icon view being viewing icons, not stuffing as much information on screen as you can. To me, the real fix for having denser views is to cut down on padding and make it resize dynamically, which is what they've been working on.
Because fuck gnome it uses too much resources.
Can someone please tell me how the hell to get a searchable library of unicode characters in linux please?
>>54156709
Get a modern computer if you want to use modern software.
>>54152966
looks like shit senpai
>>54157006
This is a mess on all computers, OS X is the best ootb.
Please respond if you find anything, I am looking for the same.
>>54157006
Something like this?
>>54157637
What is this?
>>54157637
yeah, how did you get that? Is that a gnome feature?
>>54154342
kek
>>54157672
>>54157681
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-characters/
>>54157717
cool
>>54157437
Also I found a kde version too
https://www.kde.org/applications/utilities/kcharselect/
>>54152966
Hey that look just like OSX. Neat.
Can I do this with my Mac?
>>54154183
Can't tip hard enough.
>>54154689
Pls tell me how you got the taskbar like that I'm an Ubuntu noob
>>54152966
Because I prefer Xfce. I cant stand Gnome3.
But I am anon
>>54160055
>two bars
