Who else is still on rocking 1024x746?
It's pretty much the perfect resolution.
>plenty of vertical space
>large, but also clear, rather than clear and tiny
>programs fill the whole screen without seeming too wide (perfect internet width
And many other reasons that science will one day prove as fact.
Nah you're just poor.
>>53931969
Muh old ass lcd Gateway monitor even does 1440x900 and it is worth $20.
>>53931959
Go be a poorfag somewhere else.
I have that resolution, and it sucks dick. I hate it
>1024x746
>746
wot
4:3 is a great ratio for text, yes. But 1024x768 is just too small for today's horribly designed webpages.
>>53931959
>amusing sly dig at this board
8/10
>>53931959
I have a 1024x768 monitor next to me. Should I plug it in?
10240x7680 here
>>53931959
>1024x768
Not glorious 1600x1200
>>53933111
>1024x768
>1600x1200
Not glorious 1280x1024
>>53932063
>I don't know how to scale windows
