Your desktop OS:
Are you a capitalist?: y/n
Do you believe Whatsapp's E2EE is secure against ALL third-party?: y/n
>>53903389
>using whatsapp
win10
y
y
forced to use windows 7
i don't know
no
>>53903389
W7
N
N and I don't give a fuck because all the government is going to read is when I go have some beers with friends.
>It's a datamining thread
>>53903476
good lad
This is a particularly insidious data mining thread, linking OS to political ideas
>>53903434
Forced by who?
>>53903523
Lack of software, a parametric eq to be specific.
OSX/Win10 (rarely)
yes
no
>>53903560
FFMpeg has a parametric eq, though it might not be exactly what you want, but your parametric eq probably runs fine on wine
Linux on laptop (dev machine), Windows on desktop (gaymen and VM machine)
No.
No.
linux on laptop, w8.1 on desktop
y
n
>>53903389
dual boot
we all eat from the trashcan that is ideology
no im not retarded
>>53903713
Meant a system-wide one, like EqAPO for Windows.
I don't think running it on wine will affect a YouTube video playing on Firefox for example.
>>53903389
1. Windows 10 for vidya, Linux Mint 17 for everything else.
2. Bills do not get paid if left alone, so yes.
3.
>2016
>Believing anything is safe
^C
# sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /
>>53903389
ubuntu
n
n
>>53903389
no comment
no comment
Yes - http://ia.cr/2014/904 - http://noiseprotocol.org - https://github.com/WhisperSystems/libsignal-protocol-java
>>53904057
You can use any LADSPA plugin with ALSA
>>53904275
WhatsApp is obviously backdoored
The Signal protocol is unbreakable, unless the NSA made some massive breakthrough, but it's pretty obvious that a closed source messaging app owned by Facebook is going to be backdorred
>>53904333
>You can use any LADSPA plugin
I don't know what the fug is that but will google it, thanks anon.
Linux Mint
Somewhat
You'd have to be severely intellectually crippled to trust them
>>53903389
>Your desktop OS: WIndows
>Are you a capitalist?: N
>Do you believe Whatsapp's E2EE is secure against ALL third-party?: N
They claim it encrypts every message with a different key which sounds pretty suspect when it actually comes to security, this would mean there is a lot of key handshaking going on and the key generation must be short, or it would impede the message delivery time.
>>53904490
They got faggot marlinspike to integrate the signal protocol into WhatsApp, it's based on OTR with a few improvements, and it's audited
I wonder how will this change WhatsApp score in the EFF Scorecard
>>53903389
>Your desktop OS:
OSX master race obviously.
>Are you a capitalist?: y/n
I certainly participate in the capitalist society while finding most of its ideas abhorrent ... guess that's a Y.
>Do you believe Whatsapp's E2EE is secure against ALL third-party?: y/n
N, there is no 100% security.
1.Parabola
2.Yes
3.what is that?? Some sort of proprietary software??
>>53904529
>it's based on OTR with a few improvements
I'm sure the NSA is going to enjoy those "improvements" quite a bit.
>>53903389
We really need Tox to stop sucking up so much resources on mobile, then we won't need stupid threads like this anymore.
>>53904648
It's audited senpai, by multiple organizations
>>53904743
An audit on proprietary code means nothing to me. For all we know they paid some company off.
>>53904788
The Signal protocol, not WhatsApp you dumb fuckwit, lrn2read
There's a FOSS messenger that uses it, Signal, it has been audited too and it's what you should be using, the only shitty thing about it it's that the dev, faggot marlinspike, hates F-Droid and likes to rely on Google Push Messaging
Some guys have forked it to use websocket and not Google Push Messaging, but it's still in alpha
>>53903389
Arch Linux with Gnome3
No the increasing pressure for efficiency makes human beings only worth their productivity. The helping Hand of the free market crushes the environment and exploits the 3rd world. People express themselbes through products and depression is increasing. Socialism with a lot of reforms in the way rosa luxembourg described it is the way.
I am a socialist.
No
Kinda
>>53903389
Antergos
Yes
No
>>53904842
>Signal was audited therefore whatsapp is secure because they claim X and Y
Christ are people just trolling at this point?
>>53904842
>Signal
>Using a centralized messenger
Enjoy having all your metadata collected and analyzed.
>>53904898
I never said WhatsApp is secure, but the Signal protocol, if you could read past the first three words you would had noticed, I explicitly said that WhatsApp is obviously backdoored
Are people from Reddit nowadays?
>>53904920
There's no good decentralized messenger, much less one that is audited and maintained by competent people
>>53903389
OS: Arch, also windows.
Capitalist: No
Will whatsapp be secure against all third parties: dunno, it's not so open that it can be vetted but it'll spring up in the news eventually if they're backdooring.
Debian stable
y
n
>>53904938
>There's no good decentralized messenger, much less one that is audited and maintained by competent people
I use Tox and it's perfectly fine as long as you don't use mobile too much. The same shills who are claiming whatsapp is "secure" because signal was audited will claim Tox is insecure because it hasn't been audited, but no one has ever found any security flaws in it even with the never ending stream of trolls and shills.
Anything is better than proprietary/centralized shit.
>>53905214
We all know how shitty Tox development is anon, you can't trust Tox until it is audited
No one has claimed WhatsApp is secure
>>53905243
>We all know how shitty Tox development is anon
What are you talking about? The code side of things has always been clean and they have a professionally written protocol spec. Yes, an audit would be nice, and I wouldn't use it if my life was at risk, but it's still far better than the alternatives that are more likely than not compromised on a basic level.
OS X and OpenBSD
No
No
>>53903389
>Your desktop OS:
Debian
>Are you a capitalist?: y/n
I guess?
>Do you believe Whatsapp's E2EE is secure against ALL third-party?: y/n
wut?
