This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that is required to make a fine watch.
Required viewing for newbies:
https://youtu.be/508-rmdY4jQ
Strap guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous thread:
>>53865356
>ninefag has nothing better going on in his life so he has to keep reposting the generals to have something to do
>>53892266
>anon will never remove the dicks from his mouth
I remember reading this 17 years ago. Thanks to the internet I can look it up and relive it now.
>I recently read an article about the Rhodope Mountain people in Bulgaria. They live forever -- they've got one of the highest ratios of centenarians in the world. The one common denominator, a doctor who studied the group said: they don't wear watches.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/03/opinion/somewhat-lost-in-time.html
>>53892299
>can't refute my claim and resorts to avatarfagging cats
>>53892404
>avatarfagging
ruh roh, another who doesn't know what this means
anyone have animals wearing watches? I find it quite amusing
>>53890314
But it's $900 MSRP from Japan. Not sure what retailers will be selling it for or if they'll even get a release.
>>53892461
that is quite amusing
r8 me pls
>>53893529
Why don't you just slap on the lug width, diameter, and lug to lug while you're at it.
>>53893529
a strong zero
>>53893650
diameter: 40mm
lug to lug: 22mm
not really sure about lug width sorry
>>53893678
thanks for the honest opinion. i appreciate you.
>>53893766
He means print it on the dial, because they put everything else there.
>>53893784
sorry my autism prevented me from picking up the sarcasm
honestly the dial isn't that busy
>>53893800
It helps that they put it in between the numerals. Besides 'titanium' which is in a really interesting spot. I assumed they were going to put it at 9 o clock but then it was too big and conflicted with "21" so they dropped down instead of reducing its size.
>>53893529
my other beater
>>53893858
solid 0
>>53893858
points for swiss made. it takes certain qualifications to be able to put that on a watch.
2/10
>>53893910
your zero is not a real opinion but thanks anyways
>>53893529
>BERTUCCI
>TITANIUM
>12 1 2 3 18 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
>A7813
>JAPAN MOVT
>THE REST FROM CHINA PROBABLY
>SAPPHIRE, LITHIUM, STAINLESS STEEL, PLASTIC, NYLON, STRONTIUM ALUMINATE DOPED WITH VARIOUS METALS, TITANIUM AGAIN, PROBABLY SOME OTHER SHIT
>SUPER LUMINOUS
>3 HANDS
>DATE
>SUPERLATIVE
>>53893967
>criticizing a watch for having numerals, a date, and 3 hands
>>53893529
>>53893967
Reminds me of this.
>>53893529
Should've got a Citizen/10
i generally don't really care for speedmasters but FOIS is pretty neat
>>53893910
What would a 10 watch be, or even a borderline 0 instead of a solid 0
>>53894882
10 would be pic related, borderline 0 would be your watch but with no shitty arabic numerals and without the stain on the dial
>>53894882
This is a 10/10 for sure!
>dat gold
>dat PVD
>dat skeleton dial
>dat leather on a 'diver'
>dat cage to make sure dial isn't bashed
>dat screw down crown protection
>>53894816
Yes
>>53894906
give me your best
l u n a r c o r e
>>53895702
Seiko Spacewalk
WRUW /wt/?
Also what do you have coming in the mail?
>>53895702
This is the best. Really, it hardly gets better past that point.
And pretty much the only one. I mean, maybe the Accutron Spaceview, Seiko G757 and Casio AE1200, but I don't think it gets better.
I wish they still made analogs with visible panels.
>>53895702
Does the Casio F-100 count?
Any other anons here who shower with their watches on?
Or am I weird like that.
>>53897476
i used to, but then i read that the water resistance rating is for still water and that streams of water can fuck it up (though i know that's unlikely) and got paranoid
now i just wash it in the sink (not under flowing water) every once in a while
>>53897702
>i used to, but then i read that the water resistance rating is for still water and that streams of water can fuck it up
In most cases, no, that's a myth.
>>53897773
I'd rather be safe than sorry: http://www.seikowatches.com/support/faq/water.html
>Avoid washing a water resistant watch directly under running water. Wash it in still water in a sink or a receptacle.
My local Seiko service center offers a regulating service for $10. Do we need to do this for a newly purchased automatic watch?
>>53898055
You only need it if it's running out of spec
>>53898055
Depends on just how much times yours gains/loses. Might be bearable, might not be. Wear it for a fortnight or so and see how the time is on it.
>>53898006
Your sink or shower only puts out a few PSI, it's just not enough to make a difference. Watch companies put that sort of bullshit in because like everyone they want as many excuses as possible to not provide warranty service.
>>53898201
I understand this, but i'll still take it off to shower.. no drawbacks
>>53898201
Actually the real reason is that some watches' water resistance increases with pressure. This is the notable case of Amphibias, which are more airtight 100m deep than at sea level. So obviously, a sudden, directed, strong jet of water precisely hitting at a junction would allow water to get in.
This is an unrealistic scenario though, whether it's the eventuality of encountering such a jet of water, or the fact Amphibias are still very waterproof at sea level.
>>53896403
Is this the ultimate meme watch?
If only i had another £800
>>53898778
If only you had better taste. That's fucking vile
>>53898808
Ok seiko shill
>>53898725
If you're going by the actual definition of the word, yes.
>>53898778
Disgusting. Especially those NASCAR numerals.
>>53898778
Now that's some awful shit right there.
>>53896403
>Also what do you have coming in the mail?
Taxes probably.
r8
>>53899010
What movement and how much?
>>53899010
Looks pretty good, Anon.
Less than 7 seconds variance in a month :^)
>>53899010
if i wore that, i wouldnt be able to not think "Louis Retard" every time i looked at my wrist
looks nice tho
>>53899032
Modified Valjoux 7750, a bit over 1k. Half the(inflated) retail.
>>53899084
I think so too. I'll take a better pic later.
>>53899010
I really hate how popular the 6,9,12 subdial arrangement got. It's hard to find an affordable chronograph without it. It looks unbalanced.
Probably stupid question but is there a more scientific way to calculate how much faster or slower the time is running per day on an automatic watch?
>>53899088
Meh, nothing special. A regulated 6R15 can achieve such a result.
>>53899645
Somewhat of a stupid question, but it depends on how the whole machine works and on the enviroment.
It depends on how the regulator is set, in what condition are the rest of the watch innards, magnetism to some degree, ambient temperature, and positional variance among things.
A few quick pics.
>>53899725
>>53899645
You can put a watch in a controlled environment and put the watch in different orientations relative to the ground and measure the timing different l difference between them. But if you want real-world measurements you would need to bring the watch into the real world and just keep a log
>>53899737
>>53897476
>shower
don't
soap will inevitably collect in places where it shouldn't
drying out and fucking up seals and compromising WR
>>53899796
also, hot water = bad
Thinking about getting pic related.
Should i?
>>53899833
Only if you are a middle-aged office worker.
>>53896403
Hello fellow memester.
>>53899725
That's nice
>>53899812
Hot water isn't any different than cold water, the soap is a different issue though.
>>53899833
It's not a bad choice really, the Citizen grand classic is a significantly better watch in the same price bracket but you might not like the design.
>>53899982
I can get it at about 250$ shipped, but not sure about it.
>>53899897
Where to get one with roman numeral date window like that?
>>53900114
Oh in that case it's going to be pretty nice, I'd get one myself but I just don't cares for how the bracelet looks.
>>53900205
It has a 22mm band width, and it will come with some Hirsch strap, plus i got a genuine buffalo strap.
But i'm still unsure.
>>53900290
For that kind of price it's a very good watch, beats the shit out of a sarb
Post dreams people. I hope one day I shall get a reverso...
>>53900343
r8 my grail watch
>>53900356
Incredibly boring/10
>>53900356
Would you really rather have that over a 5396? To me, the 5396 is just as complicated, but is so amazingly clean by comparison.
>>53900356
imo there are waay better looking PPs
>>53900343
Literally worst JLC.
>>53900343
36mm high intensity titanium snowflake dial spring drive VC Patrimony.
Just got this one for $130
>>53901101
I hope you meant 13$...
Should I sell my Sturmanskie chronograph for 300€?
Anyone have any suggestions for a travel watch pouch/roll? Ideally looking to hold 3 watches. Something like pic related but not for $100 like on goddamn jewinkee
>>53901345
When you buy a watch from a dealer, especially an authorized dealer, you can probably snag something like that for free. For cheap watches I've generally just packed them in my clothes.
>>53901399
I like the old air king. Some of the small wristed among us still has a chance to snag one while there are still some brand new ones around
>>53897281
How would you not include the speedmaster 3750.50 in that list?
>>53901345
I've seen a couple of nice ones on Etsy a while back.
>>53898778
>
>>53901399
horrible dubs
>>53902017
>seiko poorfag detected
>>53894906
mfw the 1675 is in for a service right now.
>>53902055
God has left us
>>53902055
WHAT IN OBLIVION IS THAT?
>>53901275
Can you?
>>53902839
I don't know yet, but I think it's worth to try since I've seen some going for that price before. It would take ages to sell though.
I love this watch but for that money I'd gladly get rid of it since I need the money for future trips.
>>53902927
>for that money I'd gladly get rid of it
>but should I sell it?
you seem to already know what you want.
>>53900343
Not really a dream, but it would be nice to have an IWC. They are really overpriced though, so I probably couldn't justify getting one even if I had the do$h.
Feel free to ask me again in ten years, though.
>>53903005
You are right, I just wanted to read some anons' opinions. Maybe someone could convince me of keeping it.
What does /wt/ think?
What does /wt/ think about Hamilton?
>>53903335
>diver
>100M water resist
kek, even my dress watch, which is a SARB has the same water resistance.
>>53903533
>I am anon, I often dive beyond 100 metres
>>53903584
Don't be so butthurt anon, I don't even have a single diver in my collection. I'm just saying that having a diver with such a shit water resistance is pointless. The watch is cool looking though, don't get me wrong :^)
>>53903658
But how is it pointless? The only thing any of us buy divers for is the look.
>>53903478
Eh. It's a watch. Nobody's going to mistake it for a Swiss brand though. And personally, I'd take a 6R over a 2824.
>>53903335
Seiko 5/10.
and like the other guys say,
>100m resistance
You can easily get the 200m stuff cheap too.
>>53903675
if you only care about looks when buying a watch, I wouldn't be surprised if most of your other watches are fashion brand dogshit.
I wouldn't feel comfortable wearing a 100m rated diver and I'm sure that other anons would agree.
>>53903816
If you don't dive though what difference does it make? 100m water resistance is more than good enough for any activity that isn't actually diving and even then it's probably fine.
Now that I finish ricing this I think I will sell my seiko 7002.
>>53904191
You want that over a 7002?
>>53903816
Anyone that dives at those depths would never do so with this model Seiko anyway, so what's the issue? i'm sure you would care to elaborate on what you wear and your decision behind why you like those items..
>>53904232
I have both but maybe will sell the 7002 and keep the amphibia.
>>53904240
10bar water resistant watch is for snorkeling and lighter activities. That's why it says "100m water resist" and not "Diver's 100m."
>>53902819
I actually read this in the voice of the Imperial fucking guardsman...
God damn it.
>>53899277
>putting the day date at 12 o'clock
>>53904949
ow, the edge
>>53903816
>I wouldn't feel comfortable wearing a 100m rated diver
very autistic of you
>>53904622
But what if they performed exactly the same up to say 120 mph? A 100m water resistance rating is functionally identical to a 200+ if you aren't a legit diver.
Would I be a bad son if I asked my parents to pay half of a Tudor black bay for my graduation?
>>53905800
Depends on the result of your graduation.
>>53905837
What, getting a job?
>>53905873
Not being a failure, in essence.
Expecting anything from anyone because you did what was ultimately best for yourself is quite frankly astoundingly selfish.
However if your parents offer to.
>>53905937
I'm not expecting it. I'm asking if I'd be a bad son for asking.
>>53906040
Not exactly targetting you directly in that statement.
>>53904949
the teeth look cool actually, not sure that insert goes well on there though
>>53900343
either this or the green Rolex Sub, but I like this more
>>53907406
Just what?
>>53904949
Was this a competition to make the ugliest 007 possible?
>>53898251
>>53898693
There is no truth to the jet/running water myth. Nothing to it. If your watch is 100m water resistant, and you've actually had it pressure tested, and you don't SCUBA dive, it will never leak while you're wearing it.
>>53903712
>Hamilton
>Nobody's going to mistake it for a Swiss brand though
What.
>>53908096
Correction: the average person's not going to look at that and go "ooh swiss".
>>53896403
>>53899897
Help me decide between the black or pepsi bezel /wt/.
>>53900343
I'll probably cave in and get the rep once it's released.
>>53904191
nice
>>53903157
it's a pretty sick watch I would keep it, not a lot of people really have it either because they can't justify the 2-3 hundred for it over a seiko when they won't be buying many mid range watches. It's a cool watch people get when they already have some other shit and have money to just get whatever they want around 2-300.
>>53895702
COSMOCORE
>>53896403
Imported from Japan.
A gift for you http://www11.zippyshare.com/v/tpuqyW1p/file.html
>>53910066
Another http://www106.zippyshare.com/v/AXn77J2y/file.html
>>53910150
Last one http://www41.zippyshare.com/v/0xL8AfnR/file.html
>>53910066
what is this
>>53908048
What about 100m resistance and wearing it in the spa?
>>53909862
pretty neat what is this?
>>53910533
thanks checking these out
>>53900343
>>53901535
It's not lunarcore though, because lunarcore is not about space- or moon-related apparel, but a specific set of colors and styles mostly pushed by movies more than reality, and revolving mostly around shiny jackets and velcro shoes.
>>53912632
>niheicore
Didn't think /fa/ read nihei.
>>53912632
Not strictly true by any means
>>53893529
Minus infinity points
>>53901345
If youre travelling take one watch you fucking moron
I got tower.time perlons today, I put the grey on my penis quartz. I also got a navy blue to put on my gold vintage Seiko 5.
I'm not 100% on the look of it, but it's bloody comfortable.
I'm a sucker for Seiko.
>>53914494
Same but for the Seiko 5 design with the glowing marks around the watch face
That tacky utilitarian appearance combined with the fact that it feels like it's built like a boat compass makes me moist
>>53892299
HAHAHA BRO GEE LOVE ME
>>53914527
they feature that too, you can see the lume on the minute/hour hands and atop every hour interval.
Is there some reason why Spring Drive movements only get installed in freakishly ugly watches?
>>53914573
>I have never seen the snowflake
Ok m8.
>>53914396
Here's the Seiko 5 on the navy perlon. I do like the look of this very much. I might have to wear it a bit more regularly now.>>53914396
>>53914494
Vintage Seiko 5 is best Seiko 5.
>>53914609
>>53907513
>he doesn't get the hottest memes
>>53912632
apollo 11 then
>>53914573
Is this bait?
>>53914930
Obviously
>>53915720
OM is 2blocky4me, but if you feel it matches you then wear it in good health. For me I'd get a Huldra if I'd want a 9015 microbrand diver.
Are the extremely cheap aliexpress denzel washington watches convincing? Ordered one to mess with a mate who has a genuine one.
>>53917204
Depends on which one you get.
Why not just strap dog excrement to your wrist and tell him you also enjoy your Denzel
>>53917243
kek
was going to link the one I bought, but the listing seems to be gone. Images looked convincing enough, but I probably shouldn't trust those.
>>53917204
They are pretty convincing. I bought one to see how shit it was and it came with a box & manual. I sold it on eBay in the end for about 5x what I bought it for.
>>53916111
Bloody hell that's a nice watch. That's the first diver I've seen that makes me want one at all.
I'm guessing they're a small batch company?
>>53916111
You're such a square.
>>53918149
You'd be right. And their runs are small.
>>53914396
>>53914609
Enjoy it laddie.
Would a Sinn 556a be a good purchase or is it overpriced? There's no technology in it and it's $1000.
>>53918243
Thanks, it was a bustard to get the perlon on the penis quartz though because of the lug design.
>>53918262
Does the concave bezel look weird?
>>53918285
>bustard
I don't quite get what you're trying to convey here.
>>53909702
Cosmopolitan maybe
>>53918322
It's a bird.
Also a Caldari deep space transport
Look what came in the mail today. A Deep Blue Ocean Diver 500. 500m WR, Sapphire Crystal, ETA 2824-2 movement.
>>53918149
I think you can still order one if you want.
>>53918585
Interesting.
But the trick is make sure that the tip of the perlon is slightly curved.
>>53918593
I can't help but to see how cheap looking is the box.
Also that bezel font looks absolutely disgusting.
>>53918674
It's an actual pelican case
>>53918322
Goddamn auto correct - bastard.
>>53918295
A little. But it's hardly a deal breaker.
>>53915720
have you thought about dieting?
![screen-shot-2013-06-18-at-19-34-39-copy[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nmZ2gdf.jpg "screen-shot-2013-06-18-at-19-34-39-copy[1].jpg")
What's the best value Flieger watch for under $200?
I was looking at the Tisell, which has a Miyota 90S5 movement for $190, is that a good movement for the price?
http://tisellkr.com/product/TISELL-40mm-Pilot-MIYOTA-90S5-Automatic/31/?cate_no=1&display_group=2
>>53892226
Howdy doody' neighbourino!
>>53919157
Orient and Seiko have some nice ones.
I really like the Tisell that I just picked up, though.
This is pretty based
>>53919127
I am.
>>53919351
Tissel is supposed to be pretty much Parnis, but with decent QC? At least for models they seem to share.
>>53919959
yeah it's chink parts assembled in korea with a semblance of QC.
they also use miyotas in some watches which is obviously a plus.
>>53918149
I had to wait 8 months for mine and they sold out over the weekend. Almost would have missed it, too, if it weren't for a nice Anon here that mentioned they were back in stock.
>>53919672
What is for dieting philosophy or direction? Low cal? Low fat? No grains? Udon only?
Also what is that watch strap made of? Looks like denim in that picture
>>53919959
With brands like these, I feel like you always have to expect that you might be disappointed with what you get. I think Tisell>Parnis, though. Apparently, Parnis isn't a true brand, but just a name that different Chinese manufacturers with similar boxes of parts stamp on watches that they produce.
>>53920285
Just regular ol' calorie intake. Less calorie intake, more exercise. I've been busy for the last few months and I've had a noticeable change in weight.
It is made of denim. I made it. Posted it a few threads ago.
>>53837241
>>53920433
>Less calorie intake
Literally all you need. Start to count calories and have some backbone to keep the diet. Becomes easy and nothing out of the ordinary.
>>53921059
I've also been drinking a ton of water to keep me fuller. At least 4 liters a day up to 6.5. Sometimes it dehydrates me because I have to pee so often, but I'll slow down when that happens.
How are the reliability and accuracy of Vostok watches? I'm interested in buying another watch but I'm wary of "glorious" Soviet workmanship.
>>53920270
Nuts. That blue is gorgeous, and that lume/marker design is top notch. It's a diver, but a little bit more than that. 20 bar WR and AR coated sapphire's the cherry on top. All at a reasonable price. Guess I'll lust for that now...
>they even throw in a nato
>>53904949
Does this P.O. style bezel fit this watch better than the previous insert?
>>53922322
Absolutely.
>>53922059
A bit too much if you don't do a lot of physical exercise.
I dropped about 8kg in a month via 3 liters a day and at least 1 hour of combined workout (15+15+30) per day. Diet was only slightly changed, more meat mostly and a lot less junk.
>>53922158
I'm not an expert on Vostoks but they're fairly reliable and can last for decades, plus if the movement go's bust they're dirt cheap to replace. As for accuracy, from what I've heard they're not so great, but good enough to for fill the general need of timekeeping.
Overall they're generally good only at the sacrifice of accuracy. But you do get a large amount of customisation/modding options with Vostok watches plus they're dirt cheap to fix and replace parts.
>>53922158
They are as reliable as they get, i've owned mine for two years and besides the case swap it's been running rather well.
Likely going to buy another one really soon.
>>53922344
I just bought a vintage Midas mechanical for 40 bucks. It was NOS.
Did I do good?
Is there actually any good Chineese watch brands out there. Isn't Parnis chineese and don't they make some nice reliable watches that basically copy the looks of expensive watch brands?
>>53923146
Maison Celadon is Chineese.
>>53923146
The ones I know of are as >>53923186 said, Maison Celadon, and Beijing Watch Factory (bjwaf). Both of which are considerable decent brands.
>>53923186
This.
>>53923146
Communist Chinese is bretty gud if you count vintage.
>>53923096
About as much as i paid for mine, that came along with a Swiss watch with weird goo on the dial.
Out of curiosity, did you check it was a Swiss or a French one?
>>53923146
Wouldn't suggest Parnis over something like Orient or Seiko
>>53923146
Seagull, Shanghai, Beijing, Perpetual
>>53923146
>>53923186
>>53923234
>>53923240
I greatly agree. Maison Celadon is a really good brand of semi-affordable watches that happens to be chineese. I enjoy mine everytime I wear it.
>>53923515
Sup lawyeranon. Actually about to buy a third series imperial myself.
>>53923515
Well this is an uncommon sight.
Are the /fa/ threads starting to get boring or do you just post once a month?
>>53923515
Hey good to see yoy again lawyers one how've you been?
>>53923252
Nope. No just wanted a vintage mechanical and since this was working NOS I leapt at it.
Why?
>>53923263
Of course not but they do have some "original designs" and you can snag some on ebay now and then for 50-60 bucks fairly new. Any vintage Orient or Seiko are usually pretty beat up for anything less than that and anything new will cost over 100 so it's preference I think
>>53923854
>Orient or Seiko
>new will cost over 100
Only if you buy one of the models that cost over 100.
>>53908976
Jesus christ so much text I just can't handle it.
Where to cop nato straps made with a material like this?
Hey /wt/, I was thinking of getting the Casio G-Shock Gulfmaster in blue. I do a lot of hiking and shit so I think it would be a good buy. Obviously I would replace the shitty plastic band immediately with a nato strap. Thoughts?
>>53923564
Nice and congrats! But, may I ask, why a third?
>>53923598
/fa/ threads are always kinda boring, too much kinds into "muh minimalistic" trend.
I post more often than you think, but not always with my nametag. I have noticed that, when I post in a anonymous matter, people tend to be more perceptive and objective. See the opposite effect with NineBalls. Since I had to write about my personal experience I thought, why not?
Plus, I can only write about my collection for so much before I start sounding like an ungrateful snob brat.
>>53923843
I've been fine, thanks. My sabatic year is making wonders for me. I've visited India, UK, Germany, Spain, Egypt, and if everythig goes well I'd probably make a trip to Russia and Japan in the next few months. I'm living a blast, thankfully.
Also, I bought myself a Citizen Air Wave. The Velsheda keeps eluding me. :^(
>>53924352
My first concern is the size. Are you sure you'll feel comfortable with all that metal in tge sides? Second, unless I'm not seeing fine, that looks like PVD. If you're that active you may prefer a simple metal finishing, like brushed titanium, as the black will wear off really fast otherwise.
>>53924438
>But, may I ask, why a third?
Well the first and second series are sold out, and I'm buying straight from Celadon. Plus it'd have the same white plum guilloche as the first series.
>>53924438
Good to hear you're in good health and living it up, maybe you remember me (pic related). I've decided to begin saving up for a Tudor Black Bay and after that begin saving for a Celadon like yours.
>>53924598
>mfw apparently I can't fucking read for my life
I originally understood that you were about to buy a third one, wich meant you already had other two, and I wonder why not try something else.
Well my friend, I hope you enjoy your Imperial as much as I enjoy mine, and wear it in good health. Benjamin is a breat guy and if you're buying directly from him expect a great service experience.
Cheers!!!
>>53924767
Cheers m8. I'll post some pics here when I get it.
>>53922322
Yes but it still looks like shit. The regular Seiko style looks fine, why don't you keep that?
>>53924677
Yes, I remember you mate. Good to read you've been bitten by the watchbug again. Best if luck and when you get the Black Bay pkease post pica in here. Also, as with anyother person with limited resources, I suggest you to check the second hand market before pulling the trigger. You might get a better deal or find something even more appeling to you. Just remember to always check background and authenticity. Buy the seller, not the watch.
>>53924787
We'll be expecting m8.
>>53924825
I have three different bezel setups I just snap off and on when I feel like wearing the SKX.
>>53924125
I like this strap.
>>53924859
Thanks for the advice and yes the watchbug has bitten me hard. So far am saving for the Black Bay first and I'll take your advice of looking for a better seller rather than purchasing it directly from a dealer. But the Celadon on the other hand am not sure where i can find an imperial second hand. I may just have to bite the bullet and purchase one directly. And may I ask some advice from someone with buying experience, which shall I get first? The Imperial or the Black Bay?
>>53924976
The imperial is made in very limited quantities, so that first.
>>53924976
>which shall I get first?
Which onw do you covet the most? Unless you need one for a specific situation say, the Celadon for gormal attire at work, go with the one you feel more urge in buying. Follow your heart anon!!
Also, with manufactures as small as Celadon you pretty much don't have other choice but to buy from them but, as I said before Ben(jamin) Chee is a really cool guy and it's well worth the experience. You'll appreciate it more than a few saved bucks.
>>53925014
This is also important to consider.
>>53925014
>>53925088
>>53925101
Very good points. I guess the Celadon it is. Should be able to save up faster for it too considering its a little cheaper than the Black Bay. Thanks for the great advice. I'll definitely try to get my foot in the door for an Imperial.
>>53924492
Yeah the metal edges don't concern me too much, and the bulk isn't too much of a problem for me as I'll really only be using it when outdoors. I have another smaller watch to wear during formal occasions and the like. As for the colour its a resin case with a stainless steel bezel. Would there be any other problems with the watch? Are there any known problems?
>>53926107
>>53925773
Any exposed metal that is covered with a colored material will eventually show wear and start reveling the inner metal, disregarding if it is PVD, plate, TiAN, heat-colored or even patina, although the last one will endure far more, as it bonds with the metal. That's why high-end manufactures tend to prefer colored materials, like carbon fiber, ceramic, or even minerals, instead of selling something that will show bright edges in a few years. The bezel will age badly and I think it's something you should consider. Regarding the caliber, well, this type if watches are very reliable, so you'll probably safe in that area.
>>53925147
Best of luck m8.
>>53926107
That looks like an ugly robot face without the mask, the kind that apears in japanese programs and gets raped by fat japs that will never touch a real girl.
>it suits you
>>53926107
Have the Italians done anything nice lately?
How do they manage such a thing?
