Why do retards try to say that 0b1000000000000000000000000000000 doesn't equal one gigabyte?
In what world does it make sense for 0b111011100110101100101000000000 to be one gigabyte instead?
Why do retards try to say that 1000000000 doesn't equal one gigabyte?
In what world does it make sense for 1073741824 to be one gigabyte instead?
>>53865480
Because computers use base two. We can redefine it once we start using computers that operate using base ten.
gibi
vs
giga
>>53865674
puddi
>>53865551
>Because computers use base two.
Which is why they should also use base two prefixes like gibi
>>53865674
>you're not allowed to correctly use SI prefixes because base two is confusing :((
>>53865376
>In what world does it make sense for 0b111011100110101100101000000000 to be one gigabyte instead?
In the world where Si system is used and giga means multiplied by 10^9.
>>53865376
IEC vs JEDEC standards for binary
1 gigabyte JEDEC = 1 gibibyte IEC
1gigabyte IEC = 1 gigabyte metric
gibibyte was coined in 1998, where gigabyte was used for far longer
it's partly habit
>>53865713
>giga = 10^30
>correctly
seek medical help
GB: SI
GiB: Powers of 2
>>53865376
Normies can't accept *iB vs. *B.
Gibibyte = Base 2 representation of 1,000,000,000 Bytes.
Gigabyte = Base 10 representation of 1,000,000,000 bytes.
Kilo, mega giga =
1,000
1,000,000
1,000,000,000
Kibi mibi gibi =
1,024
1,048,576
1,073,741,824
Daily reminder:
1 MB = 1000000 bytes
1 MB = 1048576 bytes
1 MB = 1024000 bytes
These are all used in different contexts.
>>53865750
Bytes and bits
>>53868187
Considering a byte consists of 8 bits and you're counting in binary, two of those contexts are strictly wrong.
>>53868187
>1 MB = 1024000 bytes
This is never right in any context
>>53868350
3.5" Floppy disks
>>53868310
>strictly wrong
I don't give a shit about your made-up concepts of right and wrong.
I'm saying people have used these exact definitions in casual interchange, marketing, or even programming contexts.
>>53868350
>too young to remember a good old 1.44 MB floppy