>20 microns
remind me why stereolithography is better?
>>53852064
it's also more consistent.
I mean seriously, look at the difference between an FFA print and an SLA print, then try to convince yourself it's totally the same thing.
>>53852077
this was printed at 50 and it's almost impossible to discern any irregularities. 50. this max thing supposedly can do 20 while the Forms can only do 25. i mean consisteny is important, with beds and hot feeds being improved so much since i last tried 3D it's hard for me to look at SLA as drastically superior.
>>53852077
i dunno man. this seems pretty consistent to me.
$1000
aren't stereolithography printers usually cheaper than all-mechanical?
>>53853037
Holy fuck, that's wonderful.
How much are these printers?
>>53855635
Only $1k?
Wow, seriously not bad. Might get my work to try picking one up sometime.
