Looking for bleeding edge distro that is not arch linux based
Its not just kernel to be uptodate, but other packages as well...
What are my options?
>>53847231
just run antergos in auto update mode
have fun with your bleeding edge :^)
OpenBSD
Gentoo, Funtoo, exherbo, Fedora rawhide.
>>53847231
What's wrong with Arch? Stupid nigger.
fedora if you don't mind non-rolling release
if the default kernel is a little too old for your tastes, then use the vanilla kernel repos for either mainline, mainline stable, stable-rc etc, should be about as up to date as arch is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel_Vanilla_Repositories
Install a BSD
>>53847231
void linux
>>53847260
>>53847249
>>53847260
i have issues with arch+pyqt5 and debuging outputs in editors
I just need to test it in another distro thats also bleeding edge
I tested already in xubuntu, opensuse and mint, and there were no issues.
want to test another bleeding edge distro before trying to report this to Arch or PyQt team
>>53847297
I can barely comprehend the amount of autism one has to have in order to make this.
>>53847297
outdated and gay, i can't find this package signing thing on the official ArchWiki, you must mad Arch is the best distro out there.
Fedora or opensuse tumbleweed
>>53847231
look into fedora bareback op
>>53847303
>want to test another bleeding edge distro before trying to report this to Arch or PyQt team
That's not how it works. If you don't know how to properly debug something, just report it and let someone who knows how to debug do it.
>>53847231
>Looking for bleeding edge distro that is not arch linux based
why
>>53847835
I am not debugging anything
theres difference between repoting
>this shit does not work
and
>this shit does not work on this specific distro, but these distros have no problem with it, including the latest version X.Y and including manually compiling ZXW software
>>53847296
isn't void still a bit wonky?
>>53847303
kaos, it's also rolling release and not arch based
rawhide or tumbleweed
>>53847912
And there's a difference between
>this shit doesn't work on Arch, but it works on Xubuntu!
and
>this shit doesn't work when built with libfoo 1.2.3 and linked with libbar 3.2.1 and compiled with --enable-baz
>>53848171
point being?
>>53848186
point being that he thinks if you can't give properly accurate info about exactly what is wrong then you shouldn't be reporting stuff, and that's just retarded
>>53847231
Ubuntu daily, Debian sid, maybe Gentoo.
>>53847439
> i can't find this package signing thing on the official ArchWiki
Maybe because it doesn't exist? That's the point of that picture.
>>53847231
Kali Linux Rolling Release
>>53848645
i was using Arch when package signing was introduced. I can't remember how many years ago that was, though.
>>53847259
These + opensuse tumbleweed and debian sid
>>53847231
fedora rawhide, ubuntu with a ton of ppas and pre-release repo enabled
you'll be better off with arch, tho
>>53848645
yeah the other anon is right, fuck yourself.
>>53847231
Sabayon.
Red star os
>>53847231
opensuse tumbleweed will be your choice! Trust me OP
>>53847231
openSUSE Tumbleweed
>>53848719
+1
Kali has everything you need.
>>53847974
>kaos
OP here
running it now
its damn fucking comfy so far
