>2016
>still no player on Linux that can match Foobar2000 in terms of sheer quality and features.
Freetards will say they have the best software but they can't even get a good audio player going.
>>53842428
Audacious would like a word with you.
>>53842428
It's okay OP, you got proven wrong.
>>53842428
Just accept it and move on. :^)
foobar with wine
checkmate atheists
>>53842487
>>53842509
Looks like shit and your wallpaper is gay
>>53842487
Does that POS even rip CDs?
>>53842428
Foobar+foo_pod on Windows
Rhythmbox for my iPod's and cmus on Linux
Nothing compares to Foobar
>>53842428
>still people think fb2k is lightweight
>not having a copy of billy before the downloadlink was removed
>having to have a flashing gui to >listen to music
>not using billy on Linux through wine
http://www.sheepfriends.com/index-page=billy.html
http://www.mediafire.com/?4yim4yjtvo1
>>53842428
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cmus
>>53842545
I know it sucks you can't choose your bit depth, sample rate, EQ, lyric display, album art, channel mixer, stereo width and custom LADSPA plugins, but you're better off going to /b/ about it.
>>53842553
nice virus.
I use gmpc on Windows, foobar2000 is dreck
>>53842545
Is this about playing music or ripping CDs?
:^)
>current year
>not using Winamp
Shiggy
>>53842559
You didn't answer the question.
I personally prefer cmus in a drop down terminal.
I only interact with it when I want to add music to my queue, and the rest is through the media buttons / notifications
>>53842558
That looks like shit and has no features except muh wall of text, muh leet haxor console!
Boom by Foobar developer
Still dunno what y'all have against Rhythmbox. It's cozy and reliable.
>>53842582
You're going to reply with "that looks like shit" to every audio player posted in this thread, aren't you faggot?
>>53842575
Idk, I don't use it to rip CDs. I use a different program for that. I've never really used media players to do CD ripping like, ever.
I guess I can try real quick. Hold on.
>>53842563
>implying
>>53842573
That hasn't been good since 2007.
Why would I use that?
>>53842585
Doesn't have the audio effects, adjustments and plugins that Audacious has. I can't change stereo width, equalizer, bit depth, sample rate and channel mixing in Rhythmbox.
It does look good, though.
>>53842585
I can't customize it
>>53842572
Both. I rip my music with foobar and use it for burning music for others.
Audacious doesn't appear to do either.
Does it even support time-synced lyrics?
>>53842591
Yes, if you keep posting ugly players that are nothing but a wall of text and shit UI
>>53842545
>Foobar
>Rip CDs
Do you even 100% authentic RIP mate?
>>53842606
How do you get audacious to update itself when it doesn't have its own ppa? The webupd8 ppa breaks my Ubuntu install.
>>53842614
>Does it even support time-synced lyrics?
Real time? I don't know, I never use the lyric plugin. I just like the audio plugins and features. I don't really care about CD ripping or real time lyrics.
It does do lyrics, though. See: >>53842532
Also, Foobar's CD ripping quality is questionable. It sounds... lacking to me.
>>53842487
>>53842509
>>53842532
>>53842558
>>53842584
Absolutely disgusting. Are you fucking blind or what?
>>53842633
I'm using the default one shipped with Ubuntu 16.04.
>>53842623
Nope.
Install FreeBSD
>>53842509
>Unironically listening to that shit
>In <CURRENT YEAR>
Clementine.
>>53842643
Is this about audio quality and performance? Or about what you think looks 1337? Life must be exhausting for you.
>>53842646
It's not even close to the latest version, though
>>53842617
>implying fb2k doesn't look like shit too
>>53842658
Akira Yamaoka is great, so is NIN/Trent Reznor.
The other stuff is kind of plebby.
>>53842670
I haven't had any issues with it. My FLAC collection sounds pretty sweet if I use the one shipped with Xenial.
>>53842661
Clementine doesn't let you remove songs from iPod on Linux
>.trash
the answer is mpd, OP
I am making my own Gtk client. ncmpcpp is the only decent one right one.
>>53842509
Oh man, you'll be happy to know that 16.04 lets you move launcher to bottom, that unity + docky combo seems like such an overkill.
>>53842643
Enjoy your bloated GUI AIDS.
What honestly so good about foobar that music bee doesnt have?
>>53842695
Why not put controls up top? And if you wanna have them on bottom do give them some margin.
>>53842698
I tried it. The Unity launcher looks bad - it's full length and the icons are not centered. if they fix it I'll stick to using the default launcher but until then, I'm using Docky.
>>53842686
Don't you think it's sad that you can't get the latest version of your audio player delivered to your Ubuntu installation?
>>53842708
>he fell for bloat meme
>>53842733
I've used 3.7.1 and the 3.6.2. There's not too much a difference to me in terms of sound quality and performance. There are a few GUI differences but that's about it (it went back to GTK 2, I guess).
If it's that big of a deal and I'm that upset/distraught over it, I'll just download it from the website myself like people do on other operating systems. PPAs are useful and if that doesn't work, I'll just compile.
In short, tons of options for me to use if I'm unhappy with the default package.
>>53842678
You can skin it to look presentable.
>>53842606
Hm, it does have some info plugins and such, but truly not much related to sound itself.. It does crossfade and replay gain but that's about it.
>>53842607
True, not much. Best it does is pick up the GTK3 theme nicely.
I guess it's pretty basic in the end, but its nice system integration and sorted out GUI do it for me.
>>53842717
It's still early alpha. The bottom bar should be the same as GNOME Music, pic related.
It won't have the shitty paradigm GNOME Music has though. More like Foobar, ncmpcpp or audacious. Library + "Now playing" playlist
>>53842695
good luck, cause we need a good one.
looking good so far, please don't overclutter the ui, and have good playlist management + album art
>>53842764
Yeah, I've always cared way more about what I can do to the actual sound. As long as it can read the generic metadata, I'm good.
But whatever player I use must be full-featured+ with sound and audio options. I don't really care about stuff like lyrics, artist info pages and things. It doesn't enhance the audio quality.
>>53842721
Aw, too bad. I doubt it'll be fixed since 16.10 will probably bring forth Unity 8. I'm really curious about that one, I wonder how customizable they'll make it.
>>53842772
Ah, nice. Good luck with it, I believe it has potential.
>>53842778
Tried Amarok?
>>53842794
I know! I really wanted that feature to look. Here, I'll screenshot it to show you.
>>53842835
Amarok doesn't have Stereo Enhancer, Sample Rate Converter, Crystalizer, Channel Mixer or LADSPA plugins.
>>53842836
Hm, might look better if you dropped icon size to about 32 and grab a different icon pack (numix circle?).. But yeah, it uses up entire width and can't be centered.. Oh, maybe you could make launcher's background fully transparent? Unity tweak might be able to do that..
Anything that can't do everything you see in pic rel and more is not a replacement for foobar
The thing I really wouldn't be able to do without anymore is everything related to foobar's tagging: it has a special syntax to format string fields from track tags for purposes like sorting, grouping and auto file structuring/naming, you can query tags in a way similar to sql, etc
>>53842886
Can't center it, unfortunately. I wish it could be because then I'd never touch a dock again.
>>53842847
Welp. Nevermind that then.
>no DeadBeef
>>53842895
Heh, depending on your dedication you could go and fix that in code... But that's a bit extreme. Docky can be pretty nice, if a bit redundant.
>>53842509
>pulse audio
And linux fags wonder why people dont take linux seriously
>>53842903
The Numix icon pack was still a good suggestion.
>>53842938
Honestly I'm probably going to switch to Gnome 3 or something. I really like Unity but it's got a few annoying bugs they haven't fixed in years (resizing the launcher to anything below 48 blurs the icons).
No.
>>53843134
#REKT
>>53843134
fuck off with your trash faggot OS
>>53843134
fuck you Ryan you macfag
>>53843134
>running music player through WINE
autism
>>53843154
>>53843165
Linux boys mad as usual, I see.
>>53843210
Winfags jelly I got posix at core, not as an addon hack job.
>>53843091
If that's something you like then sure, but get ready for NO features because they're axing just about everything but the basics. I used to be on Gnome, but moved to Cinnamon, just because it's actually useful.
>>53842758
for what I minimize it
>>53842573
Audacious is like Winamp. Same gui
SPEAK TO ME, THREAD! SPEAK TO ME!
have none of you fags heard of deadbeef?
>>53844259
Oh yeah, I used it a few years back. How is it these days? Also, isn't there an android version of that too?
>>53844259
that looks awful m8
I told you, paid shill. Leave. Do not come back.
Microsoft, your continued FUD and lies on /g/ is pathetic and every time you post one of these pathetic threads, you prove yourself more and more desperate and incompetent.
Sadly, there's no point reporting you because you've paid off 4chan to allow you to post this shit, given that reporting your bullshit just gets ME banned. Lol. Talk about proof that 4chan is deep in your goddamn asshole, Microsoft.
Fuck you and fuck your bullshit, and everyone else on /g/, just fucking ignore this shit. I'd love for everyone to just ignore these shit threads and report them, so maybe 4chan will reconsider their fucking "deal" with Microsoft.
Also
>foobar
Daily reminder that the DLLs needed to make your precious "fubar" even halfway usable originally came from a SHADY AS FUCK RUSSIAN SITE.
Enjoy your botnet, Windows users. Oh wait, you're used to the botnet, aren't you?
Fucking morons.
>>53843413
Screw it, I just installed Xubuntu 15.10. Solved all of my issues and it's snappier.
>>53843134
Damn Foobar is ugly.
>>53844464
>Xubuntu 15.10
You fucked up.
>>53844479
I'm loving it. Come at me or explain yourself.
Or not. Fuck you.
>>53842569
Ctrl + - for a much less cluttered interface my friend
Foobar2000 is nice, but I genuinely prefer mpd+ncmpcpp
>>53844491
>not installing the 16.04 LTS beta which will roll up to final release in 18 days
>installing a distro with only 9 months of support
kek
>>53844464
XFCE is pretty cool. I used it on an older machine in the past. I just like how GTK3 looks in general so I went with Cinnamon, I'd prolly be on XFCE if they ported it over.
>>53844559
>using 2 programs to do the task of 1 program
I thought you Linux users hated bloat?
>>53844567
GTK 3 is ported over to Xfce.
>>53844561
There's an option to do an upgrade via software update. Not hard. I wouldn't recommend it on pure Ubuntu but it works fine with Xubuntu or Lubuntu.
>>53844561
16.04 won't be supported by custom ppas and such for a few weeks to months after release plus it's best to wait a bit so that they get any possible major bugs sorted out. Besides, apt is stable as fuck and upgrades distros rather nicely so who cares. Worst case scenario you gotta clear your ~/.config folders
Why is there someone that doesn't use clementine?
>>53844585
I'm guessing you think there's no single program to do both?
You are quite the genius.
>>53844599
>16.04 won't be supported by custom ppas and such for a few weeks to months after release
It works fine on all my custom ppas
>>53844601
>clementine?
bloat city
>>53844626
There's an issue with a "weak digest" warning that crops up during an update. Also, Spotify has issues. GZDoom is a royal bitch to get working as of now.
>>53844592
Well yes, GTK3 programs work, but XFCE itself isn't all GTK3 yet. It's only a partial port thus far afaik?
http://www.xfce.org/about/news/?post=1425081600
Or are you using something newer than 4.12?
>>53844585
>do one thing and do it well
>>53844279
works just fine, except it sorts by folders/filename when you add
>>53842887
>So much bloat
How is this allowed?
>>53844626
Possible, I didn't check all mine yet, I'm just speaking from experience with previous releases. I do have 16.04 installed in a virtual machine to see how it's coming along though, I'll prolly test them there. Or check build pages, either way.
>>53844658
I'm using 4.12. What feature of GTK 3 is not present in this release? All the themes work.
>>53844657
>There's an issue with a "weak digest" warning that crops up during an update.
That was fixed days ago. Launchpad needed to update to keep up with apt's new policy of upgrading the default security measures to sha512.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1556666
All custom ppas on Launchpad work fine now. If you have a custom ppa outside of launchpad you need to tell your maintainer to upgrade to apt's new policy.
>>53844710
Ubuntu 16.04 was still doing it today. Spotify was complaining along with Chrome (stable).
>>53844464
yeah xbunutu is the way to go. unity is cancer. xfce is the only acceptable option.
>>53844728
Then tell Spotify and Google to update their security policy.
>>53844728
Both Debian and Ubuntu are incorporating the new apt security measures so you have to tell those providers to update their repos to align with apt's new minimum security standard.
>>53844705
Huh. Guess I gotta try it out then. Thanks.
>>53844739
Google will probably do it on its own but there are no devs in the Spotify team working on Linux.
There was an article recently about how they lost their Linux person several months ago, thus no updates.
>>53844767
Use a Virtualbox. I'm using Numix right now and it's look fine.
The package in the repos I think that does it is gtk3-engines-xfce for *buntu/Mint distros.
>>53844767
A screenshot.
>>53842553
DO NOT DOWNLOAD
DELETS SYSTEM32
>>53844767
One more showing the package.
>>53844767
Crap. Screenshot didn't upload. Anyway, here's the package.
>>53844823
Cool. Apparently though you won't need it anymore soon:
"To prepare the future of Xfce with Gtk3, which no longer requires theme engines, we are stopping the development of our Gtk theme engine, and dropping our Gtk3 engine - theme makers, please update your themes to CSS if you want them to work on the next Xfce version."
>>53844877
Oh, sweet. I'm ready. This is going to be good. Did you get that from their blog?
>>53844897
Yeah, linked it here:
>>53844658
![[Femme] Space Battleship Yamato 2199 - 26 [BD 720p Hi444PP AAC][DD079183].mkv_snapshot_21.23_[2015.10.24_18.47.36].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/XzMNkDW.jpg "[Femme] Space Battleship Yamato 2199 - 26 [BD 720p Hi444PP AAC][DD079183].mkv_snapshot_21.23_[2015.10.24_18.47.36].jpg")
I think this is the thing that hurts most when I switched to Linux.
Honeyview? There's Mcomix, Ahoviewer, Ristretto, etc.
MPC-HC? mpv.
Emulators? Most are there.
Games? Not really missing them, GPU passthrough when needed.
Then there's foobar. I've tried mpd+ncmpcpppcpppcpppcpppcpp, Clementine, and deafbeef and there's always something missing. I'd like a searching function that isn't shit, audio converters, and a little customizeability.
>>53844940
wine + foobar if you need it that bad...
>>53844940
>Then there's foobar. I've tried mpd+ncmpcpppcpppcpppcpppcpp, Clementine, and deafbeef and there's always something missing. I'd like a searching function that isn't shit, audio converters, and a little customizeability.
I know that feel.
Linux is shit at audio players.
>>53844940
Did you try Audacious? It has great audio quality. There were pics of all the plugins and stuff to really squeeze out the best sound. I haven't found those in any of the other audio players on any OS.
>>53845073
:^)
>>53842690
>Still using an iPod and not a clip
Dude
>>53845115
A what?
only using one of the basic templates, it's works really well for me and spectrum as eye candy if you're not doing anything else than listening to music.
The only thing mpd is missing imo, is actual .cue support.
Even the maintainer of ncmpcpp can't seem to get .cue support working on his setup, so it'll be a long time coming.
>>53844356
>Enjoy your botnet
No, this was already proven to be BS. A regular configured foobar does not make a single call "home"
>>53845316
cue work just fine with mpd and cantata, try using a gui that isn't abandoned.
>>53842428
mpd + ncmpcpp
who the fuck looks at the music player?
>what is ncmpcpp
deadbeef is the closest i've found to lunix foobar
>>53842428
Foobar2K is starting to show its age. It's still at the top of its game but it's begging to be open sauced. Its lack of backwards compatibility and all those abandoned plugins left behind are going to kill it at some point.
>>53842545
>CDs
>2005+11
>>53842772
>Not using superior Lollypop
>>53842428
It's fucking annoying. I'm happy with everything about my Linux setup except the music player, which is my most used application by far. Having to use Banshee, VLC and puddletag to get the combined functionality I'd have from foobar, and even then it will never look as good as I had f2k set up in windows. Every single player on Linux either looks 15 years old or is missing proper file organization capabilities.
Having said all that, I could probably solve this by not being a GUI pleb
>>53846430
Use audacious instead
I used to like this interface despite how shitty the program is
>>53846086
Lollypop is not superior to mpd at all.
>Foobar
>Windows
>>53845285
>literally just staring at your music player for who knows how long
At least use milk drop and get high
What's so special about fb2k?
Also, can you explain why the developer keeps the code closed while giving it for free? What does he have to hide?
>>53844950
kek
>>53846635
You can customize MusicBee to look like the Zune interface
>>53842545
that would go against UNIX philosophy. Do one thing, and do it well. If you need to rip CDs, use another program.
>>53847622
yeah. that's why I have one program that plays mp3, one that plays flac, one that plays ogg, one that does ape, etc.
anything else would just be bloated
>>53847672
>ape
Why do people still use those meme containers/codecs?
>>53846744
this
>>53842532
>:^)
>>53842636
>Also, Foobar's CD ripping quality is questionable. It sounds... lacking to me.
It should be fine as long as it checks with AR, but it's based on old ass CDParanoia code
>>53845879
>deadbeef
this tbqh
>>53847243
The author is from that era when everything was acceptably freeware and open source wasn't even a meme yet, just an obscure agenda for obese wizards with beards.
Open sourcing the program itself is of limited usefulness anyway since it's dependent on that modular plugin architecture. It would be like open sourcing Windows but having just about every program available for it remain closed.
Still, it's the only closed source program I use on a regular basis that keeps me from ditching Windows altogether. Linuxtards need to step up their game instead of pretending what they have is better; denial is the Macfag game.
>>53846744
>>53844356
It's already usable out of the box, if you need niche features like SACD or DVD-A then you need a few plugins, if you need some old ass ricing from DeviantArt then you might need some shady plugins from fucknowswhere
Most plugins are FOSS though
>>53847854
the question is still remains
What's so special about fb2k?
>>53845906
It's already dying, everyone seems to not really care about the plethora of old ass plugins out there, people seem to be pretty fine with Spotify and GPM
The same goes for Rockbox, even Saratoga is using GPM nowadays
>>53847854
>Open sourcing the program itself is of limited usefulness anyway since it's dependent on that modular plugin architecture. It would be like open sourcing Windows but having just about every program available for it remain closed.
Android/linux also depends on proprietary modules for example, but is open-source.
>Still, it's the only closed source program I use on a regular basis that keeps me from ditching Windows altogether.
then fucking answer my question.
>What's so special about fb2k?
>>53847903
>>53847926
Lod'sa plugins to do all kinds of shit, if there's something doable by an audio player then there's some Foobar plugin for it
Especially for older, even deprecated and forgotten, shit
Like obscure audio codecs, like LA or Optimfrog
>>53842643
>muh aesthetics
end your life
>>53842537
this
>>53847538
Is musicbee still a bloated mess whose eq distorts like crazy?
>>53847975
So it's about some ultra-hipster codecs nobody cares about?
>>53842772
Am I not understanding what's going on here? Savane Ali Farka Toure appears many times including right under an album art of The Crystal Method's Legion of Boom.
>>53848006
it's about just werking
>>53848035
MPD just werks and isn't a tool of oppression.
What about moc? It's probably my favourite linux music player because of its' simplicity and the fact that it runs in the background
>>53848006
Not really, it also just works out of the box
You can do anything in it, from all kinds of DSP's to tagging/renaming/moving files, or checking the integrity of them, it's kind of retarded the amount of crap people can do with foobar
>>53848049
You don't have a tool to convert audio out of the box
Not that you should
>>53848056
What do you mean it runs in the background?
>>53848077
I mean it runs as a sort of daemon, to which you connect with using an ncurses interface, it's like a much simpler mpd that uses less resources
>>53848065
>You can do anything in it
That's what an OS is for.
>from all kinds of DSP's
That's what your sound system is for.
>tagging
That's what taggers are for (like easytag).
>renaming/moving
That's what file managers are for.
>or checking the integrity of them
That's what checksum tools are for (like sha512sum).
>it's kind of retarded the amount of crap people can do with foobar
Indeed, it's retarded.
For some reason, Windows users feel the need to have every fucking feature integrated into a single executable.
>You don't have a tool to convert audio out of the box
Huh? I do, it's called ffmpeg. Converts everything to everything else.
>>53848118
I see,didn't know that. Does it support music database or replay gain?
>>53844678
Aside from the 2 spectrum and waveform visualisers, where do you see bloat? The top one is a convenient seek bar and the volume level displays are useful to me
>>53848126
Exactly, still, a lot of standalone tools can't compete with Foobar+plugins at all, for converting audio there's only a script with comparable features in *nix nothing in Windows, the same happens with a lot of other tools, and some tools don't really exist outside of foobar, like DVD-A watermark removal
>That's what checksum tools are for (like sha512sum).
It's checks integrity with the md5's included in the files, and/or with the AR/CTDB database
Deadbeef has the same editing mode as foobar and I actually set my player up the same way as my old foobar setup. I don't feel the need to use foobar anymore at all...
>>53848141
Well the audio control interface uses alsa , jack or oss as a backend and it supports playlists + network streaming too. You can set quick dirs in the config file. Idk if it supports those since it's so simple, but multiple workarounds should work
>>53848189
>for converting audio there's only a script with comparable features in *nix nothing in Windows
Do you mean FFMpeg? FFMpeg is not a script and it is available for Windows, as well as graphical front-ends for it.
>like DVD-A watermark removal
>optical media
>It's checks integrity with the md5's included in the files, and/or with the AR/CTDB database
Do you mean CRC?
>>53848126
>For some reason, Windows users feel the need to have every fucking feature integrated into a single executable.
probably because they aren't committed to a retarded unix philosophy that some fat guy on usenet made up in 1980
>>53848288
If not for people like Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson or Rob Pike, computing wouldn't look like it looks now. A little respect, lil ducky.
>>53847854
If you really wanted to ditch Windows you could easily do that and run Foobar in Wine, afaik it works perfectly.
>>53844259
Any plugins for it?
Cmus is good enough for me.
>>53848343
If it hadn't been for people like them, computing might have been directed by lisp machines.
Unix is a cancer that smothered superior ideas in the cradle.
>>53848413
LISP was popular because a bunch of people thought AI is easy and we'll have human-intelligence machines in 10-20 years. Shit didn't work out so well.
You can still use lisp, no need to have special lisp machines, as computers are fast now. But a lot of AI is now done in new generation of languages, like Python.
>>53842553
>download temp offline
WHY? I loved this player when I used windows. Bloat free as fuck.
>>53848254
>Do you mean FFMpeg? FFMpeg is not a script and it is available for Windows, as well as graphical front-ends for it.
You won't get the same performance transcoding files as the Foobar audio converter does, though you can with caudec
>>53848254
>Do you mean CRC?
Some codecs have the option of adding a checksum to the files, FLAC and TAK can add md5's of the decoded audio, dunno' about other codecs
AccurateRip is a database of checksums for CD's, CTDB is more or less the same, AR is based in CRC's IIRC, no idea what CTDB does since it works like parity data
CUETools can verify this data, and a lot of media players/ripping software can verify with the AR database
>>53848452
https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html
>>53848499
I'm pretty sure Foobar uses ffmpeg/libavcodec as a back-end, so there's no difference in performance.
FLAC files can be verified with the flac tool.
>>53848527
There's difference in most multiprocessor systems, most codecs are slower running with their SMP implementations instead of running multiple instances
foobar doesn't use ffmpeg as a backend, it actually runs lame/oggenc/flac/etc, it's pretty much a front end for any command line encoder
>>53848562
Well, ffmpeg does the same.
You can run multiple instances just fine.
>>53845201
A Sansa Clip.
>>53848598
Yeah, using some script, not out of the box
>>53842428
Foobar is fucking shit though and has ridiculously bad default settings and looks, also the playlist handling is absolute fucking garbage. MusicBee is superior in every single way.
>>53848621
MusicBee is like JRiver trying to be Foobar, without any of the good things of either
>>53848614
How do you define OOTB?
You can do some thing like:
for i in *.flac; do lame $i ${i%.*}.mp3 &; done.
>>53848659
That's a bash script
You also need to add more stuff if you want replaygain/etc
>>53842758
>ugly reflections
>borders around every entry
>pink window decorations
>aliased to shit foobar logo in bottom right with zero space between it and the top and bottom of the bar it's been hastily thrown onto
looks like shit desu senpai kys
>>53848671
That's a one-liner.
But what's wrong with scripts?
>You also need to add more stuff if you want replaygain/etc
--replaygain-accurate
>>53848695
Now downsampling/dithering using SoX, it soon will get complicated, that's why caudec exists
Then add DSP's, like decent HRTF/Crossfeed, or convolution, you might not even find any sort of decent HRTF in *nix land, that's one of the reasons Foobar is still quite dominant
deadbeef, dumbfuck
deadbeef ^___^
i dont really need much in terms of music.
i just use clementine for music, internet radio and podcasts.
its serves me pretty well and is pretty lightweight about 20-90mb usage on windows 7
Anyone use foobar on a high DPI monitor?
What are some good high DPI themes?
