>>53838121
Yeah, your fucking college course you're already in, faggot.

>>53838136
nope that's not it

>>53838168
Google.com

>>53838190
wtfaewavxczxf

>>53838121
Dr. Java
that's where you learn C# since C# and Java are the exact same thing except Java is faster ompiles on any OS not just wangblows "gaymin addition" Java is "open source" and literally the same thing as C#

>>53839035
> Java is open source
Arguably no longer true since Java 8. C# actually is open source now.

>>53839035
.NET is under MIT license and OpenJDK is under GPLv2 but Oracle still sue people for using it.

>>53838121
Stackoverflow.com

>>53839035
Java is too verbose. Exceptions are handled in a weird and intrusive way. Generics don't implement type safety in an easy way.
Oh, and java doesn't have basic stuff like default values for function parameters, or function pointers.

En plus, c# now compiles to (or is easier to) non-windows machines as well since the introduction of mono, dnx and asp5

The only thing java has going for itself, maven is in my experience better than nuget.

>>53840362
if they used openjdk they wouldn't be getting sued. Only reason google is being sued is because they used some proprietary library to compile android.

>>53838121
Just use the reference docs.

>>53841287
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3048818/oracle-seeks-93-billion-for-googles-use-of-java-in-android.html
Google is using OpenJDK right now.

>>53841279
Well, just create a method with another signature that has those 'default values'. Like 4 lines of code man.