This thread is about the appreciation of watches, as well as the micro-engineering and materials engineering that is required to make a fine watch.
Required viewing for newbies:
https://youtu.be/508-rmdY4jQ
Strap guide:
http://pastebin.com/SwRysprE
Previous thread:
>>53808088
So yay or nay?
I'm very into aviation. Always wanted to be a pilot but sadly I'm wasting my days away trying to get into pharm school.
Time for bed.
>>53832587
Unless you're actually going to use that watch as intended, no.
>>53832587
Why are you choosing this over a flieger? I've heard that historically pilots wouldn't use such a complicated looking watch. This style definitely has actually been used.
>>53832630
I'd like a chronograph and a date function at the very lesst since this is gonna be a daily wearer.
>>53832589
Good night southerner
>>53832653
http://www.cwcwatch.com/collections/chronograph/products/cwc-quartz-chronograph-watch
Pilot's chronograph with date from another brand with pilots chronograph heritage.
>>53832683
>Chronograph
>No tach
No thank you
This is my current daily
>>53832587
looks like shit bruh
>>53832714
Nice trash
>>53832630
What are the best cheap-ish flieger choices?
>>53832532
>>53832658
Thx pupper.
>>53832735
>>53832760
>Not liking column wheels
Nice shit taste
>>53832785
Sleep tight
>>53832798
>muh chink column wheel
Into the trash it goes. The entire thing is shit. Movement, dial, case and crowns are from the reject bin.
I dug up some old photos from when watchmakeranon fixed my watch. Here's what a proper decent quality quartz movement (Seiko 7546A) looks like, if anyone was curious. Bridge side disassembled.
>>53832798
I think you're just a homo dude
>>53832844
Care to back up your claims?
>>53832851
Bridge side assembled. Note the oversized coil, my watch is a normal casual watch but this same movement was apparently also used in some divers, I guess the bigass coil gives enough power to drive big heavy diver hands.
>>53832866
It's a watch company that makes shitty copies of swiss watches. You knew that when you bought it.
>>53833256
>Copies
>>53833349
You missed the point, anon. He chose a shitty looking Rolex copy from a brand that makes shitty copies instead of something good.
>>53833447
>Copy
>>53832532
>same generic watches get posted every thread
Where can I get a really bad looking fake Rolex to piss my snobbish family off with? They all have Rolexes and I've had some in the past when I was growing up but I think they're dumb and overrated.
>>53833756
Serious butthurt, anon.
>>53833856
I'm not butthurt. I have a trust fund from my grandparents and never need to work in my life. I can easily afford a real one but I want a bad fake to piss them off and "bring shame to the family".
>>53833756
How about you get a decent watch for your own enjoyment and stop being a fag?
>>53833890
You could get a bagelsport. I think that might be more amusing than just getting a fake.
>>53833890
Yeah, doesn't sound butthurt at all
>>53833890
then buy a fucking patek and out do them
>>53834087
Or better yet, get a seiko that's actually nicer than their rolexes. That'll really rustle their jimmies.
>>53835188
you need to add "dressy as fuck" or something similar
Amazon doesn't ship to my country. Where else can I order a watch from?
>>53835718
There are many options. And it's going to depend on which country you're actually in and what watch/brand you're trying to buy.
>>53835801
Middle east, Anne Klein
>>53835875
You may find Anne Klein wherever dogshit is sold near you.
Nordstrom can probably ship what you want internationally though.
>>53835188
You know what, I'm gonna buy it when I get some cash
It's guaranteed to be better than whatever dogshit is out there for 200 bucks.
>>53835875
Get out kike
>>53836559
Could also consider an SKX
>>53836575
ok
>>53835961
Thanks
>>53836705
>Trash movement
>Basically a meme watch
>2big4me
>>53836765
Skx includes the skx013
>>53836833
That's like buying an ecoboost mustang
I really don't see why you guys hate this watch so much?
>>53836858
>That's like buying an ecoboost mustang
Hurf
>I really don't see why you guys hate this watch so much?
Durf
>>53836833
skx013 with handwinding would be a perfect diver.
My father past away last week and I just found this watch. It says Japan Movt but isn't ticking, I assume it's battery is dead, how hard to change is it? Or should I take it to a jeweler?
>>53836975
quality shitpost
>>53836994
Unfortunately not a shitpost, I'm just a fucking autist
>>53832587
Is that the quartz SNA? They also make mechanical ones. SRP617 and SRP355. 4R movements too, you get winding and hacking.
already have a bunch of nato and trying to think of other strap options that would look good on this, have another one of these and an amphibia on the way
>>53837017
Apologies. I've never seen a quartz pocketwatch. Pull up the crown as far as it goes, the back might open up to show you the movement.
Maybe the SRP779 is not such a good idea after all...
Bought some denim today, decided to make a strap. Not sure how to get the end not to fray, but I think it turned out well. Probably gonna throw some glue on the end and let it dry hard. This is the only watch I have to show it off with, so shut the fuck up about non-bracelet/nylon/silicon on a diver.
what are some decent watches 100-200 that are 18mm? already have the absolute poorfag shit that goes on them
>>53837241
You put a layer of rubber/leather on the bottom, and fold it so the ends are tucked between the rubber/leather and the strap
>>53837331
I know that way, but it's pretty hard to fold it in on itself, especially when stitching by hand.
>>53837017
>quartz pocketwatch
>Geneva
>Japan movt
what the fuck? It would be pretty hilarious if that pocketwatch had a tiny little generic quartz movement wedged in there with an enormous spacer.
>>53837084
>>53837381
You'd be surprised, pretty sure you can still find old Molnija quartz-powered pocket watches.
But his seems to be chink made.
>>53837158
We told you so.
>>53837256
Vostok Amphibian with a 420 case, or some Seiko 5.
>>53837256
You're going to find 18mm on watches geared towards specifically feminine women. For sure Cartier has a lot, but it's going to be well over 200 bucks. Orient has some, maybe like a WI0141WD.
>>53837158
>That bezel alignment
Trash
>>53832780
Tisell if you want cheap - but not shit.
Parnis is you want cheap and don't care about it failing/falling apart.
>>53832630
>>53832780
>Wearing a fucking Nazi watch for hipster cred
>>53837449
i think he meant 18mm lug width watches
>>53837404
100-200
>>53832587
Having this won't turn you into a pilot. In fact i'd get a flieger instead.
Or a Rolex GMT Master II like a real Pan Am pilot
>>53837729
What's wrong with going below budget?
Anyhow, get one of the Amphibian special models like the 120SE and 420SE off Meranoms website, or vintage pieces.
>>53837404
Should I flip it and get the SKX007/009 instead?
>>53837803
already have a 710 amphibia and another komandirskie on the way, don't want mire vostok. Budget is 100-200, don't want to go under unless it's 80-90 something
>>53837777
Why won't you fuckers just let me live out my dreams fuck
>>53832532
i have been drooling over them
tell me what you think?
>1/4
i have been drooling over them
tell me what you think?
>2/4
i have been drooling over them
tell me what you think?
>3/4
>>53837857
more like nightmares
i have been drooling over them
tell me what you think?
>4/4
>>53837835
You could flip it for a SARB, and with the spare dosh you'd have half the funds needed for a SKX.
>>53837854
I still dont get why not go below 100. There isn't much else there but the Seiko 5 (models go from 50 to 80~) and the quality doesn't exactly drop
Otherwise go vintage.
>>53837864
>>53837887
>>53837904
>>53837926
>pic related
>>53837449
Meant lug width, don't want vostok or seiko 5 or any of the typical shit, trying to go for something 1-2 hundred that can be put on a NATO.
>>53837864
>>53837887
>>53837926
I swear if you faggots vindicate this faggy shit and not my pilot watch I'll be pissed.
>>53837956
vintage what? I am trying to go 18mm to share NATOs. I don't really understand why I would buy vintage watches sub 1,000 though if I am not going to service them, unless their quartz.
>>53837956
thanks for the replay...could you please in lighten me on the ones i should drool over.
>>53837962
you left one out does the mean what i think it means?
>>53837904
>>53837926
I like these two aesthetically, looks like a Seiko Spacewalk
>>53838002
I have many vintage commie watches under $50, and a bulova accutron and I did not service any of them, and they all run fine.
>>53837960
an 18mm nato fits on any lug width larger than 18mm.
>>53832870
The 7546 wasn't even Seiko's best effort. In terms of accuracy and refinement it was decidedly below stuff like the 0852. But it is still miles ahead of most modern movements. Jewels and quartz, a match made in heaven.
Re. the coil, this is something my watchmaker has commented on. He is also surprised at how big it is for a "dressy" watch, but he chalks that down more to older design rather than the need for more power, since I believe Seiko was still using mechanical movements in their divers into the 1980s since quartz was not quite strong enough.
>>53838051
yeah but you don't want to look like james bond now, do you?
>>53837374
try hemming tape for temporary stick before stitch. That denim's only gonna unravel itself.
>>53838002
To start with, vintage slav watches like Poljot,Slava and Raketa. Will usually work without servicing for a good number of years. Vintage swiss pieces are another option. Most of them come with 18mm lugs, Soviet watches rarely come with anything but 18mm.
Maybe you could get a decent looking Poljot 3133 for slightly above the 200$ mark.
And not all vintage watches need to be serviced immediately.
>>53838009
see >>53838015 and >>53838054
>>53838009
It was a mistake
They're all disgusting
>>53838015
what kind of strap is that?
>>53838051
yes but that looks horrible
>>53838085
have enough russians already, not sold on vintage either but thanks anyway
>>53838079
I'm using heat bond double sided adhesive to hold it together.
>>53838128
Nylon with velcro and titanium clasp
>>53838054
Well yeah the watch it's in is just a regular Type II, the 0852 movement was used in KQs and I have one of those too. And the 7546 was actually used in some more low-end 100m "divers" like pic related, but I guess those hands are still pretty small.
>>53838072
I could think of worse things
>>53838144
That is the same thing.
>>53838149
Anywhere I can buy this?
>>53838316
I don't think so. Try lurking a bit maybe you get lucky.
The watch itself is already pretty rare.
>>53838331
damn. just after a strap with that texture and is a pull-through
>>53837864
I have the Timeless, it's good.
>>53837956
>You could flip it for a SARB, and with the spare dosh you'd have half the funds needed for a SKX.
I need something that's a little more durable since I work on the field.
>>53838748
So flip it for a SARB and an Amphibia.
I've used my Amphibia while breaking down walls,decorations and aging furniture in a hotel lobby whilst refurbishing it. Plus took it swimming later.
Had a few scratches on it, but i buffed them out later since it's an acrylic crystal.
>>53838667
No it's not.
>>53838986
Let me guess, it's because it has a quartz movement. Or maybe because it's not made by the Swiss. Maybe even because it has a modern design.
>>53839099
Because it's ugly as shit.
>>53839116
I wonder why I get constant complements then. Maybe it's because you have shit taste.
>>53839205
>normies compliment a shit looking watch
Color me shocked!
>>53839205
Because normies compliment you on a gaudy watch that looks like it was designed by a 5 year old?
You should know better then to post this shit in a WIS containment thread.
>>53839099
No, it's because it looks like a toy you'd get in a cereal box.
>>53832780
laco
>>53839240
>>53839276
>normies
You can't wear your Seiko 5 with your fedora, Eugene.
I'm in the need of something decent looking and reliable for less than 100€.
I'm considering the Casio MDV106 but I'm not sure if 48mm would be too big.
I'm happy with my F91W but I don't dig the massive poorfag look anymore
>>53839289
The difference is a seiko 5 just looks like a normal watch. Not some tryhard dogshit.
>>53838667
holy fucking ugly
>>53839313
Vostok famalamas
>>53839289
pic related.
>>53839313
one of the millions of seiko 5s
>>53839365
How do they keep time? Because if I see a 5 min gain in a month I'm going to get assblasted.
>>53839580
just get a cheap quartz piece of shit like the clown you are
>>53839608
Your asshole seems pretty tight today.
>>53839580
>assblasted
Depends on what Seiko 5 you land on.
My SNZG15 does +5 sec per day (which is on sale), and the other S5 i had does -9 sec per day. And the overall daily rates of it are anywhere from +40 to -35 secs per day.
>>53839580
>How do they keep time?
I don't know, why don't you try searching the internet.
How do I convince my friend not to buy any of this dogshit? He likes the green one in the bottom left corner in particular.
>>53840643
it's not worth the time/effort
>>53836559
Please buy it so i can add more shit to the dial :^)
>>53835575
Pic related, thought I'd add some memorable quotes.
post grails
Should I buy a Casio DW-290?
Is it really as good as a DW-5600?
>>53841091
>fake daytona
>>53841164
5600 looks a lot nicer famalam
>>53841297
Also more than twice the money famalam
>>53832587
just buy it if you like it, don't you have your own criteria? stop posting it in ever /wt/ not all your shit had to be aproved by autists from internet
before
>>53839667
I don't know, I supposed you had a slight clue of how the watch you recommended works.
>>53841553
after
>>53841557
I do, and so do you.
>>53837241
Looks great!
Please reply to emails.
>>53841164
Are you on a mission which could prove to be impossible? If so yes.
>>53841562
Big improvement, not sure about the red triangle though.
>>53841562
Nice Boctok Proplof 5508 anon!
Why is this piece of shit so popular in /wt/?
>>53841164
>>53841779
GW-5000 is the only G you'll ever need
>>53841794
>>53841794
I was aiming more to the super kon tiki
>>53841091
That is the exact same bezel as the Speedmaster. Do they have a patent or something?
>>53842429
You should be asking why is it so popular in general.
And that would be the decent overall bang for you buck, looks good and is a great modding platform.
>>53841003
Your memes only make me more determined
Shit I just dropped my new rodina
Fug
>>53843016
Get a G-shock.
>>53842429
I just realized the dial face is blue instead of black.
>>53842521
If you want to spend an exorbitant amount for a watch that is practically equivalent to a 5600 just for g shock cred
>>53843016
A scratch wouldn't really make it uglier than it is. It might just give it some character.
>>53842719
meant to reply to >>53842357
Just ordered this.
>>53843661
Oh nice heres mine
>want to get a 5th gen Seiko Alpinist SARB017
>about to press the "order" button
>just out of curiosity, check the 6th gen
>realize I really like the look of the SARB057
What do?
>>53843814
Is the 057 a new model?
>>53842429
Isn't the SKX007/009 being discontinued? Maybe it's a good idea to buy one before they become hard to find.
>>53843946
Made a mistake, it's actually the 059. It's the latest Alpinist range, on the right on the picture, the one of the left released 10 year ago.
>>53843978
Good luck finding one.
>>53843989
Yeah that might just help me make this decision. It's only sold in Japan like the rest of the Alpinists, seems to be still produced, but impossible to find on the internet.
I'll go to Tokyo in a few months, could wait until then perhaps, buy a whole box and then sell them a fortune on ebay.
http://www.ablogtowatch.com/visit-stp-watch-movement-manufacture-fossil-group-answer-eta/
>>53844066
If it was still produced then it would be as common to get as the 017. I like it more as well, but i'm probably going to get a SARG009 with a bracelet to replace all the watches i've sold recently.
Though i don't think you'll have any luck on this one, but good luck famalamas and search for vintage King Seiko's while you're there.
>>53842429
Because with very little effort they can be awesome watches. I really hope the supply issues are because they are swapping the movement to a 4r36.
>>53842521
Yup the GW-56XX is all the G-Shock you'll ever need. It's also not the size of a dinner plate.
>>53844208
Meant to reply to >>53843245
>>53844154
It just seems to be less popular, and there are plenty Japan only models that remain relatively unknown. It's more recent than the previous gen of Alpinists to which the SARB017 belongs, and it wasn't a limited run. Everything points to it being a current production model.
Will investigate on nihon websites.
>>53844256
Well, the SARB017 does have a very interesting appeal to it.
And the more i look at it the more i think if i want the 017 or the SARG009 as the first watch i've paid more then 150$ for.
http://www.ablogtowatch.com/astronaut-mark-kelly-interview-watches-are-necessary-in-my-profession/
>>53844172
You can always get the Turtle reissue if you want the 4R36 movement.
>>53844570
True, I kinda prefer the case shape of the SKX though. The turtle looks a bit bloated.
>>53843661
you dun goofed
>>53845633
Cue the butthurt elitist fags who think they need to pay a fortune for a decent watch.
>>53845792
>decent watch
It's pretty shit, bud.
>>53845792
lol no, it´s just ugly as sin.
btw my most expensive watch cost me €100
>>53843814
what are the indicators for in the inner bezel?
also do you guys think the normal alpine(left in the pic) could be used with a suit? or it´s too spoty?
>>53846170
Definitely good for business casual. Really who cares though, I've been seen people wear formal suit with things like Casio Fishing Gear.
Would you /wt/?
>>53847709
That looks fucking ridiculous. Reminds of this Alpinist which looks pretty cool though, I think it fits this watch a lot better.
I am surprised how I have yet to see someone wearing a mechanical watch yet there is this whole market for entry-level mechanical movements. To be honest it kinda seems silly to me. I would think you would buy a mechanical watch out of admiration for the craft and because a nicely decorated mechanical movement is nice to look at. So it doesn't make much sense to me to buy an entry-level mechanical with a movement that has no finesse, barely any finishing and that is basically disposable. Quartz makes more sense for me there. The only downside really is the 1Hz second hand.
>>53847863
i like it
>>53847863
Newsflash: not everyone has enough disposable income to spend 2k+ on a watch.
I don't see anything wrong with say a Miyota 9015 or a Vostok.
>>53848061
>Newsflash: not everyone has enough disposable income to spend 2k+ on a watch.
But then they should just buy a quartz watch. A mechanical watch is purely a luxury item. So there is no rush to buy it. So save up and buy something nice.
>>53848109
Again you've completely failed to explain how to someone who finds the mechanics of a mechanical watch intriguing an entry level mechanical is not better than a quartz.
Guess my watch
>>53848845
Rolex milsub.
>>53848845
Seiko Monster.
>>53848881
you got it my man
>>53845792
My most expensive watch is a £115 Seiko SKX009. It looks good and is running an average of -5s per day.
That Invicta looks like it will be dogshit tier like all Invictas.
I don't judge others opinion but if I had to choose a watch for myself then:
No:
>>53832587
>>53832589
>>53832714
>>53832784
>>53833598
>>53836915
>>53837017
>>53837045
>>53837158
>>53837241
>>53837404
>>53837777
>>53837864
>>53837887
>>53837904
>>53837926
>>53838015
>>53838054
>>53838085
>>53838209
>>53838667
>>53840643
>>53841091
>>53841553
>>53841562
>>53842429
>>53842719
>>53843661
>>53843774
>>53843814
>>53844208
>>53847709
>>53847762
>>53848946
Maybe:
>>53832630
>>53833447
>>53844172
>>53832658
>>53849137
Two chinks, a modded SKX and a Tudor you can't afford.
Wonder what could be a yes.
>>53849137
>says he doesn't want one watch
>right after he says he actually wants that watch
>>53847709
>>53847762
>nigger/slavcore
Alpinist looks fantastic, nice WR also. r8
>>53849222
Checked.
I didn't want to put anything under a certain yes, but maybe if i'd look again then some no-s might be maybe and opposite. (Quick look review)
If there's something aesthetically wrong about a watch then it's a certain no.
>>53849367
Might have said no and maybe to same watch indeed - its a no then. (2nd guessing is bad)
>>53849427
You may be checkin em' but you're still hating on my Dugena.
>>53849137
>says no to a Black Bay
>says maybe to a modded SKX that looks Black Bay-esque
Come again my friend?
>>53840643
fanboys and die hard supporters of certain brand are the worst
brand loyalty in technology should die
>>53840643
>He likes the green one in the bottom left corner in particular.
I like it too
green is my favorite color
>>53849599
What does that have to do with his post
>>53849566
This.
>>53849705
I used to have one of those PO style bezel inserts. I found that it didn't fit well and was generally cheap feeling. So I swapped for the Tudor style one I have now.
>>53843661
I don't hate all Invictas like some people, they do have a couple decent models. That one doesn't look horrible, but it doesn't look that good, either.
>>53850808
Dr. Seikostain has a great selection of bezels for sale on Ebay, good quality bezels with adhesive included.
Hey, I am a lurker who recently bought a Vostok Amphibia and a bezel to mod it but the bezel is so large it doesn't allow the crown to fully screw down. Am I a moron or is there a trick to getting it to fit properly?
>>53851837
You're a moron for not doing your research and finding out that there are two types of these bezels for the different Amphibia cases. The 420 needs the other one.
>>53851911
FML.
>>53851911
Also thanks. I found the bezel I need and ordered it. Jesus... I can't believe I did that. It took 3 weeks to arrive :(
>>53852254
Who did you order it from?
>>53847762
Fucking gorgeous desu.
>>53851837
Strip the crown, it has shitty plating, maybe it would be enough, the crown itself as better grip but is unfinished
>>53832714
>>53837045
>>53837158
>>53837241
>>53837777
>>53843774
>>53844208
Bitch wrists everywhere...
Every time I come into one of these threads.
I swear.
Eat some fucking red meat.
Found a watch on ebay at a massive discount, 4 are available. I don't understand why they're so cheap should I buy them all? it's driving me crazy
>>53856678
Could be fake.
But what are you, a watch dealer? Could just buy one
>>53856469
Guy who made strap here. You must be blind, 'cause my wrist is fat as fuck.
How do you guys narrow down the watch you want? I've been looking at watches and there's always another style that pops up.
>>53856864
>>implying bitches can't be fat
>>53856880
I focus on reputable brands, value for money, and style/functionality in that order. Look at watches for long enough (try them on, too, if you can) and you'll find a few favorites that you keep coming back to. Also, knowing what measurements will for your wrist helps narrow the selection down.
>>53856898
>implying that's what he meant
>>53856841
Just bought one, they had a couple auctions that went for the same so I suppose it's what they are going for. I got real excited when I saw them for half of what they are listed for everywhere else.
>>53857046
Link?
>>53857072
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Brand-New-Glycine-Combat-6-Stainless-Steel-Automatic-Mens-Watch-3916-19AT-LB9B-/252339207046
>>53857095
I see why you jumped on it...
Wish there were more pics like of the open case back. Looks like the seller It's reputable and they have a 14-day return policy, so that's cool. Good luck!
Sarb033 or sumo sbdc033?
>>53832532
Black/blue or Pepsi?
>>53851793
I can't find him, do you have a link to one of his listings?
>>53856469
>bitch wrist
My wrist is 7.5" so that's hardly a bitch wrist buddy.
I'm the guy with the GW-M5610 BTW.
>>53857284
On that watch I would say black/blue aka Batman bezel.
>>53857284
Blue/green
>>53856880
Its been a rough process for me.
-First I figured out what I could comfortably spend (which also factors in the replaceability factor, yeah I could shell out 800+ but I would become parinoid about damaging or loosing it and hence wouldnt be able to enjoy it)
Second, the longest stage and one which is under a fair bit of change is figuring out your own tastes (ie do I want a buys watch or a minimalist one, bigger /smaller, bezel style ect) and whether quartz or mechanical
Third, where it gets more serious and where you have to ask questions rather than just lurk is determining issues of quality and value for money.
Final stage, actually getting the watch this is the stage Im currently in and because I was after a vintage watch one of the more difficult ones as it invovles a lot of waiting for items to appear on ebay as well as asking yourself how much does that particualar damage on it bother you
>>53849733
green is my favourite colour too but those hands make the watch even more horrible than it already is
>>53857284
Black/blue if you want it to be slightly more understated. Pepsi if you want a more sporty look.
>>53843814
I had the opportunity to see both side by side like on this pic. I guess it depends on what you're looking for: the 017 has a dressier look, and pretty much seems to come from another era, while the 059 looks more like an actual outdoors watch you wouldn't really mind to scratch. Also note the 017 has a unusual color palette which makes it look like shit on anything but leather, while the 059 allows for more variety.
They indeed appear quite different, but they're closer than you'd think. Both go for an outdoors/adventure look, except 017 is more Indiana Jones, while 059 is more Jason Bourne.
>>53846170
>what are the indicators for in the inner bezel?
Air to ground signals reminder, so you know how to communicate with a search plane or helicopter which may not be able to land on your position. Not a bad idea to keep a memo card in your pocket when going >>>/out/, so it's a good idea to have it on your watch as well.
>>53857284
To be honest, I prefer the Coca-Cola black/red.
>>53858002
*chubby, nearly hairless bitch wrist
Quick, post what you're wearing right now!
>>53858002
Well then compare your bitch wrist with a small watch: >>53844208
with pic related of an even bigger watch on a non-bitch wrist.
>>53860594
>>53860594
>>53860608
It's just the angle pal, here's a pic of my SKX that I just took. You'll see there is a fair amount of wrist after the lugs end.
I'm not bothered anyway as I prefer smaller watches to some 54mm monstrosity anyway.
>>53860471
Chubby? Maybe. Nearly hairless? Almost certainly. Bitch wrist? Negative.
>>53860594
>>53860594
Bono 2 Dong
>>53861686
>Bulova Accu•Swiss
An American manufacturer bought by a Japanese company producing swiss dogshit
>>53861770
Nice fake tudor, bro
>>53861849
A homage isn't a fake
>>53861805
>>53861849
Thanks, senpai.
It's a beautiful watch.
>>53861882
>>53861943
>>53861968
>>53862028
>>53862065
>>53861968
Looks alright with a decently decorated movement.
Strap looks like regular thick chinkshit though.
>>53862237
>decently decorated
Doesn't get much worse unless you get something damaged
