Ubisoft to start favoring AMD? http://www.overclock3d.net/a

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-04-01 01:21:41 Post No. 53797969
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 28083505585l[1].jpg (36 KB, 600x334) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:21:41 Post No. 53797969 [Report]

Ubisoft to start favoring AMD?

http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/watch_dogs_2_will_support_directx_12_and_be_amd_optimised/1

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:22:44 Post No.53797983
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:22:44 Post No.53797983 [Report]

>>53797969
Don't worry--as soon as NVIDIA outbids AMD (not hard to come up with over 20 dollars) then they will change their tune.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:28:20 Post No.53798058
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:28:20 Post No.53798058 [Report]

>>53797969
>>>/v/

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:31:11 Post No.53798097
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 01:31:11 Post No.53798097 [Report]

They've been doing this for awhile. X1 and PS4 both use AMD and Ubisoft's PC ports are complete ass.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 02:15:17 Post No.53798612
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 02:15:17 Post No.53798612 [Report]

>>53797969
>Watch dogs 2
Are they actually making that? Do they think people are going to fall for it again?
Alternatively: Why do people keep falling for Ubisoft marketing?

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 02:17:35 Post No.53798643
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 02:17:35 Post No.53798643 [Report]

>>53797983
this...
Say you're developing for AMD then Nvidia will come running with money. Best way to get their attention.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 02:17:47 Post No.53798648
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 02:17:47 Post No.53798648 [Report]

>>53797983
i bid 21 dollars

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:12:57 Post No.53800161
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:12:57 Post No.53800161 [Report]

>>53797969
Doesn't matter when their games are broken piles of shit
>inb4 gb2/vee/

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:13:54 Post No.53800172
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:13:54 Post No.53800172 [Report]

>>53797969
AMD supported them and vice versa until about 2012 then the switch happened.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:15:22 Post No.53800192
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:15:22 Post No.53800192 [Report]

>>53797969
Blame the consoles...

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:17:41 Post No.53800217
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:17:41 Post No.53800217 [Report]

>>53797969
I don't think they're being optimised for AMD gpu's, they're most likely implementing the open frameworks that AMD offers, so that they work on both AMD and nVidia.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:27:30 Post No.53800330
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:27:30 Post No.53800330 [Report]

>>53797969
No, it just means it will run well on any video card, unlike the first Watch Dogs that is so badly optmized not even a 980ti can maintain 60fps.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:33:58 Post No.53800417
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:33:58 Post No.53800417 [Report]

>>53797969
asynch bitch

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:35:03 Post No.53800440
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 04:35:03 Post No.53800440 [Report]

>>53797983
>Nvidia
>using a real implementation of DX12

nah

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 07:23:32 Post No.53802367
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 07:23:32 Post No.53802367 [Report]

>>53797969

April's Fool

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 07:39:51 Post No.53802504
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 07:39:51 Post No.53802504 [Report]

>>53797969
This is probably cause nvidia sucks with dx12 and vulkan.

>>

Anonymous 2016-04-01 08:19:08 Post No.53802884
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-04-01 08:19:08 Post No.53802884 [Report]

>>53802504
>vulkan
Citation
>dx12
it's the async compute