Just overclock your cpu faggots
>>53785492
It's no surprise that the kind of retard who bought a 970 is the kind of retard who wouldn't understand IPC.
Stay poor.
>>53785542
>he thinks his new skymeme is faster than this
maximum kek
>>53785553
An i3 6100 could probably match your i5 at stock.
An i5 6500 would outperform it, and an i5 6600k would destroy it.
You would lose against an overclocked fx 8350. Just give up.
>>53785602
someone bought a skymeme didnt they
u mad brah
>>53785492
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
I want you to play very close attention to the clockspeed on the top of the list so you can understand why you're retarded and shut the fuck up.
>>53785492
Why must you 2500k owners be so loud?
>>53785492
No one here is 'falling' for it.
The only poster I've seen updating previously had Core2, lga1156 core ix or older AMD systems - which were due for an upgrade.
>>53785619
>he thinks that ovarclacking wont make it go faster
kek u a cuck bro
>>53785627
Its the sound of winning my furry little friend
no comments
just waiting for zen
>>53785613
>you mad bruh
Not really. I'm actually still pretty comfy on an i7 870, but there's no denying that skylake is a massive upgrade from sandy bridge or lynnfield.
There's no need to upgrade until your current pc isn't enough to handle what you need it for though, so I'm still fine for a little longer.
Skylake was one meme I didn't mind falling for, especially since the motherboard was free.
>>53785726
sandy bridge runs atomic bomberman way better than skymeme
>>53785739
go 5ghz+ or go home pajeeb
>>53785747
>implying the only thing that matters is giggahurts
>>53785761
>implying having high IPC matters when its running at 2mhz
>tfw z97 is "phased out" and not available locally and forced to buy skylelk
>>53785793
>feelsgoodman.png
>skymeme launches
>skymeme cant run a certain string of numbers which makes it crash
>intlel issues update
>said update kills overclocking on non-K cpu's because the jews are mad about imaginary stories
feels good to buy a cpu that actually works on release
Needed an upgrade, it's super comfy. I don't play vidya anyway.
>>53785830
That's why you buy AMD
>>53785846
AMD has had broken shit too.
It doesn't matter who you buy, never buy the first product of a generation.
This pretty much applies to everything actually.
>>53785492
>b-but m-muh electricity bills, m-muh 'nvironment!
>he fell for 3.5 meme
Just AMD up fag.
>>53785602
Nobody runs a 2500K at stock so everything you said was false.
A 6600K don't have the same performance as a 5.9GHz 2500K, and the 8350 needs to run at least 8GHz to be as fast as the 5.9GHz 2500K.
>3.5gb
Also it's not like people upgraded from a 2500k (i hope) but rather from outdated shit like some phenom II x4.
why do you need to keep justifying being a poorfag?
>>53785935
It do.
>>53785935
>mfw this post
>>53785542
>6700k barely beats the 4790k
>5820k wrecks the 6700k even in its terribly underclocked stock config
4790k or the 5820k is the way to go.
>>53786068
Spotted the AMD butthurt.
>>53786087
The 6700K beats the 4790K comfortably in gay men and thrashes Sandy Vag clock for clock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sx1kLGVAF0
The 5820K is the way to go if you don't only play gaymes like a child. Or not, since Broadwell-E and its much better memory controller will be out soon for the same price.
>>53786160
>5820K
That one is only 1% faster than an i3
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-5820K-vs-Intel-Core-i3-6320/2579vs3535
Overclocking is dangerous, just use the speeds that your PC provides
>>53786160
Notice how the GTA part have higher FPS?
Well that's because of DDR4, not the CPU only.
>>53786160
>The 6700K beats the 4790K
In your dreams maybe
https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Haswell-vs-Skylake-S-i7-4790K-vs-i7-6700K-641/
Also let me remind you that the 5820k easily overclocks over 4 ghz. You can easily match a 6700k's single core performance with such an overclock.
>>53786195
>multi core speed is %166 better
Do I need to say anything more?
>>53785793
Yeah what the fuck is going on with this shit. I was looking for an itx motherboard and all I found was trash h81 and low end h97. Only 1 local store has Z97 and it only has a Z97n gaming 5.
>>53786195
>unironically linking to some utterly meaningless synthetic benchmark shitfest site
Fuck off.
>>53786202
They're running baseline 2133MHz DDR4 with the 6700K in that test. They have another video showing how faster DDR4 increases performance even further.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Er_Fuz54U0Y
Retarded 2600K/4790K owners further BTFO.
>>53786275
>In your dreams maybe
I literally just linked video evidence of it, you stupid fucking cunt. Nobody cares about some shitty site you found that says otherwise with worthless unverified benchmarks. Link some video evidence of multiple gaymes running faster on a 4790K than a 6700K or get back in your box.
>You can easily match a 6700k's single core performance with such an overclock
No you can't, you goddamn retard. The 6700K is at 4GHz out of the box and has better IPC, a concept which dumb gaymer trash like you has probably never come across. There is no scenario where a 5820K outperforms Skylake clock for clock in terms of single core performance, ever. You are fucking stupid.
/v/ is sure out in force in this thread.
>>53785842
Literally why own a computer if you're not going to use the higher end parts at their best? I bet you're the type of guy who wears a pocket watch and thinks he's steampunk.
>>53786752
>video evidence
Yeah anon, go back to /v/
>>53786752
>hurr muh clock for clock performance
Let me know when you reach the same clock speeds pajeet
GIGA
HURTZ
>>53786957
you mean an iphone, right?
2500k rep
>>53785542
>mfw skymeme has like more 5% IPC than sandy bridge
nice buyers remorse kid
>>53785492
Waiting for the 6770K days familiapie
>>53785492
>970
>>53788032
Nice try to attempt to change the topic though, skymeme user :^)
>was cheaper than a 290
Im sorry bro, but at the time it was the best for the money in this retarded country.
>>53788084
Where do you live friend
>>53788096
Ill give you a hint and say we have huge fucking taxes
>>53785935
2500k @5.9 GHz
At what temperature?
130 C*?
>>53788162
iirc 65-70 on load (Intel burn test/prime95) depending on time of year
>>53788150
UK? Canada? Denmark?
>>53788274
Denmark
Phenom II x4 is still the masterrace CPU
>>53788250
Really? I could only reliably oc my 2500k to 4.5
5.9 seems outlandish to me.
>>53786957
I'm use it for research (steady state optimization). I don't work with CUDA which is why I don't have a GPU.
>>53788284
even at 4.5 why would anyone "upgrade" to skymeme?
At best its only an upgrade if you were to OC the one to 4.5 too, any lower than that and it would just be a meh upgrade
Kinda like going from a 290 to a 290X - why bother
>>53788280
Ah shit.
Well I got 2 FX-8350's a few years back in a bundle :^)
Guess the world is filled with good/bad deals
>>53788319
Also I don't think you vidya playing manchildren need high end CPUs anyway. What kind of games do you actually play where you're even using an entire core?
>>53785492
>ASRock
kek poorfags
>>53788490
ASRock > Gigashite and Asus
Brand loyalty will just fuck you over matey
>>53785492
an underclocked like 2.5ghz 6600k beats your 5ghz oc lol
>>53785492
No pcie 3.0 support.
Other than that, Sandy Bridge master race
>>53788564
Keep dreaming Kappa EleGiggle
>>53788692
theres no graphic cards that saturates PCIe 2 yet anyway
And when there is skymeme will be shit regardless
I wish I had a housefire CPU. This irrelevant CPU doesn't keep me warm at night.
skylake at most has 5% more ipc than haswell
>>53788801
have the same one.. when will we have to upgrade bro?
>>53788884
Ice Lake? (I sure hope it's as cold as its name)
>>53788919
I live in warm climate, so its not a big problem for me. But the nights can get could..
>>53788791
980ti bottlenecks on pcie 2.0
>>53788395
Gamers generally need higher end CPUs because game developers are lazy and can't optimize shit. For example, if I had an i7-4770 or higher I could still be playing all newer games and the MMOs I like at max settings but currently I'm bottlenecked by my i5-4670.
If game developers knew how to fucking code and thread this wouldn't generally be an issue though
>>53789170
lol, no it doesent
>>53789305
That is not always true.
>>53789357
Yes, it does.
>skymeme
Ugh
>>53789796
>let me show you an ulrelated image of something random as proof
Even if that does show actual GPU utilization, your software can be a piece of crap regardless
source (reliable) or go home pajeet
also
>83c
lmfao
>>53786752
>>I literally just linked video evidence of it, you stupid fucking cunt.
>using a GPU bound program to benchmark the CPU
>thinking that gaymez are a good way to benchmark CPUs
I've heard that they miss you a lot at /v/
>>Nobody cares about some shitty site you found that says otherwise with worthless unverified benchmarks.
>thinking that well known workstation manufacturer is less trustworthy than some random youtube channel
There are other uses for a computer than your shitty gaymez you underage autist.
>waah you can't match the 6700k
The average OC of the 5820k is well over 4ghz. Hell, people are seeing an OC of 4.4ghz normal on a 5820k and you are still sperging over this.
>talking about IPC as if you know anything about it
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp%5B%5D=2565&cmp%5B%5D=2275
Topkek, the 6700k barely beats the 4790k at the same clock. What makes you think that a 4.4ghz 5820k won't beat the shit out of the 6700k.
Spamming tech-related terms won't make you seem knowledgeable on the topic, kid. Sorry the CPU you begged your mom for months to buy turned out to be a meme. Anyway go back to >>>/v/.
